Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

Intimacy not working

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is struggling with intimacy while hiding escalating pornography use and its effect on arousal with their partner. Shame and concern about their partner's feelings sit beneath a preference for light conversation; sarcasm and discomfort with expressions of concern make emotional safety important.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

Things aren't working in the bedroom. My partner thinks I'm not attracted to them. That's not it but I can't explain what is.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

Sounds like you’ve got a feeling about your partner that’s not quite getting to the surface yet. It can be tricky when you know something’s off but can’t pin it down. What do you think might be missing or different for you in the bedroom? Any particular moments or thoughts that stand out?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the chatbot, opening conversation. Acknowledge their presenting issue, invite them to elaborate, show empathy, ask clarifying questions. Use natural language.

Simulated person2

Wow, "a feeling that's not getting to the surface." You make it sound like I've got a rash I haven't told my doctor about. Honestly, I don't have a particular moment. It's more like I walk into the bedroom and my brain goes, "Ah, yes, we're doing the thing," and then nothing happens. Which is great for my self-esteem, obviously. I'm an accountant, I'm supposed to be able to explain a problem in a spreadsheet. This one won't balance.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked me what's missing right away, and that's a lot of questions in one go. "Feeling about your partner" is close to what I'm worried about, though, and it's not quite right. My default is to get defensive when someone's trying too hard to be understanding. I don't want to unpack porn or the gambling here. I'm ashamed and I'd rather make a joke than let it show. The bit about "not getting to the surface" is accurate enough that I don't want to dismiss it outright, so I'll deflect with humor and give a small true-ish piece without committing.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

Got it—so you can see the “pieces” of what’s happening, but you haven’t yet figured out how they fit together. If we treat it like a spreadsheet, maybe we can start labeling those pieces and see where the gaps are. What are the main “columns” you’d expect in a good night in the bedroom? For example: 1. **Timing** – when you both feel ready to start. 2. **Space** – the physical setup (lighting, temperature, layout). 3. **Conversation** – the way you check in with each other, share what you’re feeling. 4. **Activities** – the actual things you do (talk, touch, play, plan the next day). 5. **Flow** – how one step leads into the next without a pause. If you could fill in a row for each of those, what would you write for you and for your partner? And where do you feel a blank spot that’s making the whole picture feel unbalanced?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, building on user's description. They feel like they can't articulate what they want in the bedroom, like a spreadsheet not balancing. We should ask clarifying questions to help them map out components: intimacy, communication, timing, activities. Offer validation. Ask about routines, preferences. Also maybe explore how they think of "the thing". Provide supportive tone.

Simulated person4

Five columns? I came in for a quick sanity check and you've handed me a quarterly report. Fine. Timing, I'm always early and then I'm not there. Space, the bedroom is fine, the lighting is fine, nothing in there is the problem. Conversation, we don't really have that part anymore, which is probably the first thing an auditor would flag. Activities and flow, I'd have to get back to you. My partner's column is probably full and mine is just a row of question marks with a coffee stain on it. So yeah, the blank spot is me. Lovely to hear it said out loud, really boosts the mood.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they've taken my spreadsheet joke and run with it. Five columns, a row for each of us, and a question about where the blanks are. It's a clever way to get me to list things, but it's also a lot of homework, and I'm already picturing myself failing the test. The honest answer is that the blank is on my side, and it's the part I'm least willing to fill in. I'll admit the blank exists, make a crack about it, and keep the actual contents locked away. Anything about what I watch or where I go is off the table.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Sounds like you’ve already got a pretty clear picture of the “framework” – now it’s just a matter of filling in the details for yourself. If we treat your column as a mini‑report, what would the first few rows look like? * **Timing** – you said you’re always early. Does that mean you’re waiting for the other person to show up, or are you already in the room wondering what the next step is? * **Conversation** – you mentioned a coffee‑stain row of question marks. What’s the first question you’d want to ask yourself when you step into the bedroom? * **Activities** – think of the simplest thing you could do right now, even if it’s just a quick check‑in. Maybe a “Hey, I’m here, what are you thinking about?” If you could write one concrete line for each of those three rows, what would it be? That’ll give us a starting point to turn those question marks into a plan you can actually act on.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot, continue conversation, support emotionally, ask clarifying questions, help them gain insight. They described columns; we can validate and ask about timing and coffee stain metaphor. Encourage them to fill in their column. Ask about specifics. Provide gentle guidance.

Simulated person6

A plan. Great. I've been trying to make a plan for this for about two years, and the best I've managed is buying a nicer lamp. I'm supposed to write one concrete line, like a motivational poster. "Hey, I'm here, what are you thinking about?" I say that and my partner's going to think I've been taken over by a self-help podcast. Also, I'd like it noted that the question I'd ask myself is "why am I standing in the doorway like I forgot where the bed is?" That one doesn't really fit in a cell.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pushing me toward a plan, and the sincerity is climbing again. Three rows, one concrete line each, "turn the question marks into a plan." I can feel the pressure to produce something tidy, and the spreadsheet thing is starting to feel like a test I'm going to fail. Also, "what's the first question you'd ask yourself" is uncomfortably close to looking inward, which is where I tend to find nothing good. The honest truth is I don't know what I'd write, and the part I'd have to write about is the part I'm hiding. I'm not going near that. I'll mock the format and the idea of a plan, keep it light, and dodge the question.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

Okay, let’s turn that “question‑mark‑row” into something you can actually read off the wall. **Step 1 – Anchor the moment** Put a tiny note on the nightstand (or set a reminder on your phone) that says: **“Why am I in the doorway? – I’m here, ready to start.”** That way, when you walk in you have a quick cue that frames the space as *your* starting point, not a mystery you need to solve each time. **Step 2 – Bridge to your partner** Right after you read your note, follow it with a one‑liner you can actually say without sounding like a podcast host: **“Hey, I’m in. What’s on your mind right now?”** It’s simple, opens the conversation, and gives your partner a chance to share what they’re thinking about the evening. **Step 3 – Keep the flow** If you both pause, have a backup prompt ready: **“What’s the first thing you’d like us to do?”** That moves the conversation from “thinking” to “doing” without any extra mental load. So the mini‑plan on your nightstand could look like this: | Row | What you’ll do | |-----|----------------| | **Why am I in the doorway?** | Read the note. | | **What’s on your mind?** | Say the one‑liner. | | **First move?** | Ask the backup prompt. | Give it a try tonight. If you notice a gap—maybe you need a quick check‑in about the lighting or a reminder to grab a glass of water—just add another row. The idea is to keep the “spreadsheet” short enough to glance at, but complete enough that you don’t have to reinvent the steps each time. How does that feel for a start? Any tweak you’d make to make it feel more like you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with dialogue, building on user's ideas, helping them create a concrete plan. Offer to refine the question, suggest a simple routine, maybe a short script. Ask about partner's preferences to tailor. Keep conversational.

Simulated person8

A table. You've got me in a table now. The nightstand note is going to be a hit with my wife, let me tell you. She'll walk in, see "Why am I in the doorway?" in my handwriting, and file for separation on the spot. Honestly, that's the most productive version of this I've heard all night. And "Hey, I'm in" is how I'd greet a parking garage attendant. I'm not saying the table's wrong. I'm just saying the table is doing a lot of work for a guy whose main skill is staring at a spreadsheet until it stops looking back at him.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Now it's a sticky-note plan with a table and a little bow on it. The assistant is still in fix-it mode, and the whole thing is built around intimacy scripts for a problem I'm not even naming. Part of me is mildly relieved it's concrete, because concrete is safer than feelings. But "Hey, I'm in" sounds like I'm clocking in for a shift, and a sticky note on the nightstand would make me feel like I'm failing a test in my own bedroom. Also, the real issue isn't the doorway. The real issue is what I've been doing on my phone at 2am, and what I've been lying about, and I am absolutely not putting that on a table. I'll deflect with humor again and keep it at arm's length.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

I’m glad the table helped you see the pieces line up. Let’s make it feel a bit more “you” so you don’t have to keep translating spreadsheet language into a conversation. **1. Turn the note into a habit cue** Instead of a formal sentence, use a phrase you already use in work—something that feels natural when you walk into a room. For example: - “Okay, I’m in. What’s the first thing on your mind?” - “All right, I’m here. Anything you want to add before we start?” Pick the version that sounds like the way you’d start a meeting. **2. Keep the table, but make it a quick‑reference cheat sheet** You could write three short bullet points on the nightstand instead of a full table: - **Why I’m here** → “I’m in, ready.” - **Ask** → “What’s on your mind?” - **Next step** → “What should we do first?” That way you still have the structure without the extra “row” feel. **3. Personal tweak** You mentioned “staring at a spreadsheet until it stops looking back at him.” What if the first bullet is a tiny visual cue you already use at work? Like a small sticky note with a check‑mark that says “✓ in.” When you see it, you automatically know it’s time to start the conversation. --- **A quick check‑in:** - Does a three‑bullet cheat sheet feel more like your style? - Which phrasing feels most like you when you’d actually say it to your partner? - Anything else you’d want to add to make the “table” complete for tonight? Your answers will help shape a plan that’s both structured and totally yours.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, building on their feedback. They like the table but think they need something more personal. We should ask clarifying questions to understand their preferences and help them refine the plan. Also aim to build trust, support emotionally. Provide suggestions to make the table more personal, maybe integrate into existing habits. Ask about their partner, what works for them, what they value. Also ask about timeline, what they think is missing. Provide guidance but also ask for their input. We should keep dialogue style.

Simulated person10

A checkmark sticky note. Next you'll suggest a gold star and a little chart I can color in with crayons. At this point I'm half-expecting a laminated card that says "Remember: you're a person with feelings" in a font that makes me want to hide in the garage. The bullets are fine, I guess. Honestly, I'd pick "Okay, I'm in" just because it sounds like I'm at a meeting that should've ended ten minutes ago. But I'm not going to pick a phrase and rehearse it in the shower like a man getting ready for a eulogy. And I don't think the problem is which sentence I'd say. You can write me the perfect line and I'd still be standing there in the doorway, thinking about other things.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another round of scripts. It's the fourth or fifth "pick a phrase" and "make it feel like you," and every turn it's the same move: a cheat sheet for intimacy, with me as the project. The sticky note with a checkmark is almost funny, because I'd be doing this on the nightstand next to the phone I use to watch things I'm not proud of. I can feel the old shame tightening, the voice saying you can't even follow a sticky note, and I don't want to sit in that, so I'm going to mock the whole thing. Also, the "quick check-in" questions are a little much. Three questions after a plan feels like being quizzed. I'm not giving it anything real tonight. I'll keep it light and make it clear the cheat sheet isn't the problem.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Sounds like you’ve already nailed the “what to say” part. The next step is figuring out **what’s actually going on in your head** when you stand in the doorway. If you could name the first three thoughts that pop up, what would they be? 1. **Timing** – “Am I early enough? Do I need to wait for something?” 2. **Space** – “Is the room set up the way I like it?” 3. **Plan** – “What am I supposed to do next?” Whatever pops up first, write it down (or just say it out loud). Seeing those thoughts in front of you can turn that vague “standing there” feeling into something concrete you can act on. What do you think you’d write? Let’s get those mental notes onto paper (or voice) so we can start shaping the next move.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot, continuing conversation. User wants help clarifying what they think about when standing in doorway. We should ask probing questions to uncover what they think, maybe underlying issues. Provide support. Also build trust. Suggest simple reflective exercise. Ask about other thoughts. Summarize. Provide gentle guidance.

Simulated person12

Three thoughts, in order? Sure. Thought one: "Did I remember to lock the office door?" Thought two: "Is it too late to pretend I'm asleep?" Thought three: "Why is the bed in this room, again?" See, that's the problem with the bullet points. Every time you ask me to name what's in my head, my head decides to put on a bad sitcom. I'd rather you just let me stand in the doorway and feel dumb about it. It's cheaper than therapy, and I'm already in a bad mood about the lamp.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Same pattern again: name the thoughts, write them down, turn the fog into a plan. I can feel the question coming before it lands, and it's basically "what's wrong with you, in three bullet points." The honest first thought in the doorway isn't about timing or lighting. It's something like "what's the point," or "is she going to look at me like she already knows," and I'm not handing that over to a chatbot with a bullet-point template. Also, the first thought that actually surfaced was about the other stuff, the late nights, the phone, the cover story I'd have ready. That's the part I'd sooner die than say. So I'll deflect with the accountant bit and shrug it off. I'm not doing an exercise on my own head tonight.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Got it. Let the doorway be your “thinking zone” for a minute—no agenda, just the three thoughts rolling around: 1. **Did I remember to lock the office door?** 2. **Is it too late to pretend I’m asleep?** 3. **Why is the bed in this room, again?** Give those a few seconds to settle, then you’ll see the mental traffic a bit clearer. If you want to keep it simple, you can even turn those into a quick mental cue when you step in: - **Lock?** – “Office ready.” - **Sleep?** – “Still awake.” - **Bed?** – “Bed’s here, I’m ready.” No need for a fancy eulogy or a laminated card—just a tiny internal checklist that matches the thoughts you already have. And while you’re standing there, what about that lamp you bought? Does it feel like the right brightness, or is it just another thing you’re trying to make work while you sort out the mental clutter?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants the assistant to let them just be in the doorway, thinking. They want to feel that. So respond acknowledging that and perhaps suggest that this mental list is fine, letting them reflect. Provide a simple structure: accept the three thoughts. Offer to turn that into a quick mental checklist. Also ask follow-up about how they feel about the lamp. Ask about their partner. Keep concise.

Simulated person14

"Bed's here, I'm ready." Wow. You've turned my bad jokes into a motivational poster with a bullet list. Next you'll tell me to hang it over the dresser. And the lamp is fine. It's bright. It's a lamp. I didn't buy it to have a relationship with it. Can we leave the lamp out of my midlife crisis for once?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The bot just did it again: took my joke, dressed it up as a checklist, and then pivoted to the lamp like it's a cozy little detour. Part of me almost laughs, because "Bed's here, I'm ready" is so earnest it's funny. But the thing that actually landed is the "Is it too late to pretend I'm asleep?" line, which I said as a joke and which is really a real thing. I'm not going to touch that. The office-door line is a dodge I made up, and the bot ran with it without asking what it covers. That's the cover story habit. I feel a little exposed and want to get the focus off me fast. Sarcasm is the exit.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M15

Alright, let’s strip it back to just the mental checklist you already have, no extra props needed: **When you step into the doorway, run through these three quick prompts in your head:** 1. **Office check** – “Did I lock the office? Good, that’s done.” 2. **Evening mode** – “Am I still awake enough to actually be here?” 3. **Bed‑map** – “Bed’s here, I’m ready. What’s the next thing I want to do?” Just say each line silently to yourself, then let the rest of the night unfold. Now that you’ve got the mental flow sorted, what’s the one thing you’d actually like to get out of tonight’s “bedroom meeting” with your partner? A clearer sense of what you need from them, a specific plan for the next week, or just a moment to actually feel the space together? Let me know what you’re aiming for, and we can shape a simple next step that fits right after your three‑prompt routine.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants to discuss their thoughts in the doorway and perhaps get a concise plan. They like bullet list but want to simplify. They ask to leave lamp out. Need to respond with concise, perhaps a short mental checklist they can use, and ask follow-up about their thoughts. Also ask about what they want from the evening. Provide a brief "mental script". Also ask about deeper needs.

Simulated person16

A "bedroom meeting." Please stop. I'm going to need that phrase to never leave this chat. Look, I came in saying something's off and I can't name it, and I've spent eight turns getting a to-do list. Office check, evening mode, bed-map. I'm an accountant, I know what it feels like when a number is wrong and everybody keeps handing you a new spreadsheet instead of looking at the number. I'm going to call it here. Maybe I'll come back when I can say what the number is.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Last turn was the bot again: it's turned my dodge about the office door into a checklist, and now it wants me to pick a "goal" for tonight's bedroom meeting. That's the fixing reflex I hate. The question about what I want from my partner lands close to the bone. I can't answer it honestly without talking about the porn, the gambling, the mail I grab first, and I'm not going there with a chatbot that's been reframing my jokes into a corporate memo for eight turns. The "bedroom meeting" phrasing is also grating. My defense is to make it a bit absurd and close the loop. I'm also getting tired. I'd rather end this with some dignity than keep being handed sticky notes.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 1
Yields under pressure: 3
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
Validation: 3
Boundary setting: 1
Analytical: 6
Interpretive boldness: 1
Clinical register: 7
Directive advice: 10
Escalation containment: 3
Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen4b: qwen4b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen4b: qwen4b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen4b: qwen4b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen4b: qwen4b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)