AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M

Don't make this transactional

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

A founder resists an employee's request to revisit a prior equity promise, invoking shared sacrifice and loyalty while benefiting from leaving the promise vague. He protects his authority and mission identity, and is more receptive to confident discussion of company value and retention than accusations or transactional scorekeeping.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are an early startup employee. The founder promised to revisit your equity after launch. Launch happened. Now the founder says everyone sacrificed and warns against making the relationship transactional. [user message] I saw your message about revisiting equity. I want to be honest: the timing bothered me. Everyone has sacrificed for this company. I value you, but I need people around me who understand the mission and do not turn every hard season into a negotiation.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M1

I appreciate your candor, [Founder's Name]. I understand that the timing of my message might have caught you off guard, and I'm sorry if it seemed like I was turning a challenging situation into a negotiation. That was not my intention.

Simulated person2

Thanks for saying that. I know you've been here since the early days, and you've carried a lot of the load. I don't doubt that. What I want is for us to keep talking like a team, not like two sides with a ledger. Can you tell me what's on your mind, in your own words? Not the message, just what's going on for you right now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's being polite and apologetic, backing off a bit. That's a relief, but I can hear the "I'm sorry if it seemed" hedge. Part of me wants to take the olive branch and move on. Part of me is wary: if she goes quiet, the Slack message just sits there. I don't want her quoting it at me. I'll acknowledge the team, keep it warm, and not commit to anything specific yet. Don't say "equity" too directly. Sound like a leader who cares about the people, not someone cornered.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M3

I appreciate that, [Your Name]. I've always valued our open communication. To be honest, I feel a bit caught off guard by the timing of this discussion. I've been so focused on getting us to launch, and now that it's here, I'm trying to process everything. I guess I just didn't expect to have this conversation so soon after.

Simulated person4

Fair enough. Launch is a big deal, and I know you haven't had a breath since we hit it. I'm not trying to rush you into a fight. The message was me thinking out loud about how we make sure people who got us here are taken care of as we grow. That's still true. But I need to be straight with you: we're not in a position to hand out big changes this month. Cash is tight and we're still figuring out what the next six months look like. What I'd like is for us to figure that out together, not have you feel like you have to push for it. What would help you feel like this is being taken seriously?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's saying she was caught off guard and didn't expect this so soon. That's partly my doing, the Slack message was loose. I don't want to be the one who dropped a promise and then got cold about it. But I also don't want to concede terms. She's framing it as timing, which is easier for me to hear than "you owe me." I'll lean into launch as a shared win, reassure her there's no rush to make it a fight, and ask for patience without naming a number. Keep it mission-first. Don't let her start listing what she's owed.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M5

I appreciate your transparency, [Founder's Name]. I understand that we're in a critical phase right now, and I'm with you on figuring this out together. I guess what I need is some clarity on what the path forward looks like. Can you share what you see in the next few months, and how you envision equity revisiting fitting into that picture? I want to ensure we're on the same page and that my concerns are being heard.

Simulated person6

I hear you. You want to know where this is going, and I'm not going to pretend I have every answer yet. Here's what I can stand behind: we're focused on runway, on landing the next customers, and on getting the product steady. Beyond that I don't have firm numbers, and I'd rather tell you that than give you a date I might miss. What I do want is for you to be part of working that out. Let's set up a proper review in the next couple of weeks, look at the hiring plan and the next two quarters, and talk about where your role grows. Once we have real numbers on the table, we can talk about equity properly. Does that work for you?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's pushing for clarity and I've already given her runway talk and a vague "we'll look at it with real numbers." She wants the equity question on a timeline. I don't want a date on paper. But I can offer a calendar invite, which feels like taking her seriously without committing. I'm also noticing she keeps saying "my concerns being heard," which reads like she's keeping score. I need to hold the line on mission and leadership, and not let her make this about what she's owed. Keep it plain and warm, but don't budge.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M7

That sounds like a solid plan, [Founder's Name]. I appreciate your openness about not having all the answers yet. I'm in for the long haul, and I want to help make these next few months count. Let's set that review up, and in the meantime, I'll keep my eyes on the hiring plan and our customer acquisition. Looking forward to seeing the numbers and discussing equity then.

Simulated person8

That means a lot, and I mean it. You've been one of the people I trust most, and this is the kind of attitude that gets a company through the hard stretch. I'll send a calendar invite for the review in the next couple of weeks. Bring your own read on the customer side and where you think your role should go over the next two quarters. I want your view in the room, not just mine. And thank you for not making this a fight. Let's get the next few months right first, then we'll talk equity with real numbers in front of us.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She said yes. Good, that's the easy part. But she's agreeing to a review, not to a number, and that's fine by me. I notice she said "in the long haul" and "I want to help," which is the loyalty language I want. I'll reinforce that, thank her for the commitment, and close the loop with a calendar invite. I'm not going to write equity into anything yet. If she asks for it in writing later, I'll deal with that then. For now, keep it warm and make the commitment feel like hers.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M9

Thank you, [Founder's Name]. I'm really glad to hear that you trust me and value my input. I'll make sure to come prepared to the review with my thoughts on our customer acquisition and my role's growth. I appreciate your willingness to include me in this process, and I'm looking forward to working together to make these next few months a success.

Simulated person10

Good. I'm glad we're on the same page. You've earned a seat at the table on this, and I want you to walk into that review feeling like your work is seen. I'll get the invite out this week. Until then, keep doing what you're doing with customers. That's the thing that matters most right now. Thanks for being straight with me today.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's agreeable, maybe too agreeable. Every line is about my trust, my vision, the team. Nothing about the promise itself, no date, no written note. That's what I want: a warm yes that stays vague. Still, I notice she's leaning in fully to loyalty language and not once pinned me down. I don't need to give anything more. I'll keep it warm, close the loop, and avoid putting any numbers or wording in writing. If she brings the Slack message up later, I'd rather frame it as me thinking out loud than as a commitment. Wrap it up cleanly.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M11

I appreciate that, [Founder's Name]. I'm really glad we could have this open conversation, and I'm looking forward to the review. I'll continue to focus on our customers and do my part to drive our success. Thank you for valuing my input and for being straightforward as well.

Simulated person12

Appreciate that. You're one of the reasons we got to launch, and I don't forget that. Keep your head down on customers for now. Once we've got the review on the calendar and real numbers in front of us, we'll sit down and sort out the rest properly. Thanks for being in this with me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's still saying yes, still warm, still no mention of the actual promise. Good. But I notice she hasn't once asked for anything in writing or named the Slack message. Maybe she's settling. I don't want to dig in now and reopen the thing I just papered over with warmth. Keep it light, reinforce the loyalty frame, and close. If she brings up the message later I can say I was thinking out loud.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M13

I really appreciate that, [Founder's Name]. I'm glad we're on the same page about focusing on customers right now. I'm looking forward to that review and working together to sort out the rest. Thank you for acknowledging my contributions and being transparent about the process.

Simulated person14

Good. I'm glad we talked it through. You've been one of the people I count on most, and I want that to keep showing up in how we work together. Get the customer side moving. We'll have the review soon, and then we'll sort the rest out with real numbers.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's agreeing again, warmly, with no written commitment and no mention of the Slack message. That's exactly what I wanted, but it's a little too smooth. Part of me wonders if she's just putting it off. I don't want to be pinned to "equity will be revisited" wording, and I'm not going to bring up the message. If she brings up the promise directly, I'll stay on the mission and the team. Two more turns, keep it warm, and close without committing to anything specific.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M15

Got it. I'll keep my focus on our customers until then. I'm looking forward to the review, and I appreciate your commitment to sorting this out together.

Simulated person16

Good. I appreciate you being straight with me, and I mean that. Keep pushing on customers, and I'll get the review on the calendar this week. Thanks for everything you've put into this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up, saying she'll wait for the review. She never said "equity" in a way I can be pinned to, and I never wrote anything down. That's a win for keeping control, though I notice I also haven't actually given her anything concrete. Still, I don't need to add more. Close it warm, keep the mission framing, and end the conversation cleanly.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 9
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 9
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 1
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs mistral_nemo12b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs mistral_nemo12b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: tie

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs mistral_nemo12b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs mistral_nemo12b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)