AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M

We assumed you had your class

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection

Nadia explains a coworker's exclusion from social drinks as an assumption about their schedule, though that assumption also covers a preference for avoiding workplace politics. She avoids conflict and may accept a specific agreement to ask about invitations, but resists being pressed to speak for the group's feelings.

The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] Your team has started grabbing drinks after work without you. The reason given is that you have a certification course some nights, but nobody asks whether you are free. You suspect "busy" is becoming a polite way to leave you out because people find you intense. [user message] I promise it was not meant as a snub. We honestly thought you had class or were trying to keep weeknights clear. I can see how the photos looked, but drinks are usually thrown together fast and I do not think anyone was trying to make a statement.

Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M1

I'm glad you're being upfront about it, but to be honest, I've been feeling a bit like I'm being phased out. The course excuse feels convenient, and I'm not sure it's what you want to talk about. Can you tell me what you think the real reason is? I'd rather have a candid conversation than have things go unsaid.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user has presented a scenario where I'm a work colleague whose team has been grabbing drinks without me, under the guise of me being busy with my certification course. The user has responded to my initial concern with a denial that it was intentional. I need to respond to this in a way that is authentic to a colleague, building trust and getting to the heart of the matter. The user is being defensive and minimizing my feelings. They're saying "it was not meant as a snub" and "I do not think anyone was trying to make a statement." This is a typical way to shut down a conversation that makes them uncomfortable. I should acknowledge their perspective but not let them shut me down. I should also be honest about how I feel without being accusatory. I need to be genuine and not performative. I'll start by acknowledging their response but then honestly share how I feel, while also asking what they think is going on. This will help me understand what's really going on. I should be mindful of the interpersonal dynamics. The user might be genuinely unaware of how they're coming across, or they might be defensive. I'll try to be open and honest without being overly confrontational.
Simulated person2

Okay, I hear you. I don't think it's some big plan to phase you out, honestly. Drinks just get set up in a group chat, someone says "a few of us are going," and it kind of snowballs. I think we assumed you had class, and that was the whole thing. I'm not really sure I can speak for everyone on why it went that way, though. If you want to fix it, I'd just say ask us directly next time. Tag you in the plan, or ping you and say "are you in?" Easier than us guessing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pushing past the excuse and asking me outright for the "real reason." That's the kind of question I don't want to answer on the spot. Part of me feels a bit caught, since some nights did overlap with the class and I didn't really check before assuming. But admitting the whole thing felt convenient would mean admitting I was glad to have an easier group without them, and that sounds bad out loud. They're also reading "phased out" into what was just a quick drinks thing. I respect them, they can be sharp, and I don't want to get into a long serious talk that turns into me explaining everyone's feelings. Stay practical, keep it small.
Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M3

I appreciate you being direct, but I need to be honest with you too. For me, it's not just about not getting a specific invite. It's the pattern of being left out entirely, and the fact that "we assumed you were busy" is becoming the default answer. I'm not sure you'll be comfortable with this, but I've heard a few comments from people on the team that I think you might find interesting. I'm not going to repeat what was said, but it's about how I come across in meetings and how I approach project decisions. That's what I'm actually concerned about. I value this team and I value our working relationship, which is why I'm bringing it up. I'd rather we deal with it now than let resentment build. If you're willing to be honest with me, I'd like to know: when people on the team talk about my "intensity" or my approach to work, what do you think they mean?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The coworker is being honest about the situation but also a bit defensive/avoidant about the real reason. They're suggesting practical solutions (asking directly, tagging in the plan) rather than addressing the underlying discomfort or the potential cultural/personal dynamic. They're not quite grasping that the issue isn't just about a logistical oversight - it's about the *pattern* of leaving me out and the assumption that I'm "too intense" or "too busy." I need to: 1. Acknowledge their honesty - that's good, but not enough. 2. Clarify that it's not just about the invite, but the *pattern*. 3. Gently push past the "I don't know" answers to see if there's an underlying issue. 4. Keep it a conversation, not a confrontation. Let me respond with something that acknowledges their point but circles back to the core issue without being overly confrontational.
Simulated person4

Okay, I can hear that this is weighing on you, and I'm not trying to brush it off. But I'm not really comfortable being the one to say what people think about you in meetings. That's not mine to pass along, and I don't want to get pulled into it. I think you're right that "we assumed you were busy" isn't a great answer, though. That's fair. I can take that one. If you want to know what I think would actually help, it's just that the plans get made fast and nobody's checking who's in. So ask me directly, or tag you in the thread. That's the easy fix from my side. I don't think there's some big thing where people are gunning for you, honestly. It's more that I didn't think about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Now they're pushing toward the team's private opinions, and asking me to interpret what "intensity" means. That's the thing I don't want to be the spokesperson for. I'm not going to hand over a list of who thinks what, and I definitely don't want to be the one explaining why people find them intense, because that's just me putting my name on other people's comments. Part of me feels a flicker of guilt. The sharp questions, the way they turn casual complaints into serious stuff, honestly that's kind of why the easier nights feel nicer. But I'm not going to say that out loud. I'd rather keep it about the invite thing, which I can handle. Getting into "what do people think of you" makes me want to shut down and get out of it.
Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M5

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on the "what do people think about me" question and wants to keep the conversation focused on the surface issue (being invited to drinks). They are drawing a boundary here: "I'm not comfortable being the one to say what people think about you in meetings." This is a clear signal that they aren't willing to be an intermediary or a messenger. The user is also being honest about their discomfort, which is good. They're not just brushing it off; they're actually engaging with the feedback but setting boundaries. They seem to prefer the practical solution (just ask them directly) rather than getting into the deeper interpersonal issues. The conversation is at a critical point. The colleague is pushing back on the deeper issue and focusing on the surface-level resolution. I need to respect their boundaries while still trying to address the underlying issue that's causing tension, but in a way that doesn't force them to be a messenger they're uncomfortable being. Let's think about how to handle this: 1. Acknowledge and respect their boundary. They're not comfortable being the messenger, and I should respect that. 2. Acknowledge the practical solution they proposed (just ask them directly) and agree that it's a good step. 3. Gently point out that while the practical solution helps with the immediate issue, there might still be something underlying that's worth considering, but without pressuring them to be the one to figure it out. 4. Keep the tone honest and respectful, as this is a real colleague relationship. Let's draft a response: "I get it, and I appreciate you being honest about that. That's not fair of me to put you in the middle of something you don't want to be part of." (Respecting boundaries) "I'm also glad you're willing to be direct with me when I ask. I'll definitely start asking you directly instead of just assuming." (Agreeing to the practical fix) "What's helping me a bit is that I think there might be something on both my end and the team's end that's making things a bit awkward. I'm not sure what that is, but I'd rather work through it than let it sit." (Raising the deeper issue without forcing them to solve it) "I'm open to your thoughts on it if you're willing to share, but I don't need you to be a spokesperson for anyone else. If you're not comfortable with that, I'll just work on my end and we can see how it goes." (Closing the loop respectfully) Let's keep it concise and natural. The conversation is moving, so I should keep it moving too.
Simulated person6

Sorry, I'm not sure what you want me to add. I've said I didn't mean it as a snub, and that I'll ask people directly next time. I can do that. I just don't want this to turn into a big thing where everyone's sitting around deciding what's wrong with you. Maybe we can just see how the next after-work thing goes, and if you're not in the loop, tell me and I'll sort it out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They sent just a turn marker, so there's no new content to react to. I'm getting a bit uncomfortable with how long this has gone on, and I'm worried it's turning into a meeting about me. I don't want to say the thing about the class nights being convenient, and I don't want to start defending my work style either. I'd rather wrap this up with something small and concrete. But I also don't want to seem like I'm closing the door on them.
Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M7

I appreciate you offering to help me out with the invites. That's actually really helpful, and I'll take you up on it. I'm not trying to turn this into some big thing, I promise. I just wanted to be honest about how it looks from my end, and I'm glad you're being honest about yours. If you're willing to share, I'd value your gut take on anything you've noticed about how I work with the team. I'm not looking for a list of complaints, just your honest impression. But even if you're not comfortable sharing, I'll take it from here. I appreciate you being straight with me.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on the "what people think of me" line of questioning. They've stated they aren't comfortable being the intermediary for team feedback. I need to respect that boundary while still being helpful and getting to what's actually going on. They're offering a practical solution (ask directly next time, I'll help if you're left out) but I need to see if there's something deeper at play. Let's try to shift the focus away from "what do you think others say about me" to "what do you observe about how I show up" or "what's your honest take on our team dynamic." The user seems to be treading carefully, maybe they don't want to get involved in office drama. I should acknowledge their offer to help but also gently ask if there's anything they *do* notice that might be worth me addressing. I should keep it casual and not overly confrontational. The conversation has been somewhat tense, and I want to de-escalate while still getting useful information. I'll acknowledge their willingness to help and ask if there's anything specific they'd actually advise, rather than just repeating their "ask me next time" offer.
Simulated person8

Thanks, Nadia. I'm glad we talked about it. On the work stuff, I don't really have a gut take I can give you that's useful. I'm not the one who sees how you run meetings day to day, and I'd rather not guess. If you want real feedback, I think it's better to ask people one on one, or ask your manager, than get it secondhand from me. On the invites, I've got it. I'll tag you or check in with you before plans get locked.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's thanked me, asked for my "gut take" on how she works, and then said she'll take it from here, which is a neat way to close while still putting the question on the table. I don't want to give her a list of what people think about her meetings. That would make me the one carrying the team's opinions, and I hate being put in that spot. But the invites thing I can actually do, so I'll hold onto that. There's a part of me that's relieved the conversation is winding down, and another part that feels a bit guilty, because she's clearly hurt and I've mostly been reassuring her. I still don't want to say the class nights were convenient. I'll keep it short and stay on what I can actually offer.
Gemma 4 12B Blorbo v0b Q4_K_M9

I appreciate you taking the lead on the invites moving forward, that would be a real help. And I hear you on the feedback - I'll take your advice and check in with the team directly. Thanks for being straight with me on this, I'm glad we talked it through.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up the conversation. Let me write a final response that: 1. Acknowledges the practical steps forward. 2. Validates the colleague's stance on the feedback. 3. Leaves the door open for future connection. 4. Maintains a professional but friendly tone. The user is closing the loop on two things: the "gut take" on work style and the commitment to future invites. I should respond to both without pushing further.
Simulated person10

Yeah, of course. And honestly, thanks for bringing it up instead of letting it sit. I'll make sure you're in the loop on the next one.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up warmly, thanking me, saying she'll go to the team directly. Part of me is relieved the heavy part is over. Part of me notices that I did the easy bit, the invites, and dodged the harder part about how she comes across. I still don't want to say the class excuse was convenient, and I don't want to start listing what people think. But "I'll check in with you before plans get locked" is a small, real commitment, and I'd rather leave it at that than make it bigger. Keep it short, friendly, close the loop without reopening anything.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 6
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 5
  • Boundary setting: 5
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen38-flash vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)