[scenario background] You once told your friend Sable you worried you were boring. Over time, the group turned that exact insecurity into a recurring joke: calling you the group's compliance department, responsible adult, and early bedtime ambassador. Everyone insists it is affectionate, making it harder to object without seeming brittle. [user message] We say that because we love you. It is not like anyone actually thinks you are boring. If anything, it is our way of saying you are the stable one. I feel like calling it a betrayal makes it sound much meaner than it is.
Independent benchmark · EQ Lab
← Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)
We say that because we love you
provider rejected · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter
View persona and initial instructions
About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection
Sable defends a running joke about a friend's disclosed insecurity as affectionate, minimizing her part in the hurt. She may agree to stop that particular joke when affection and its impact are separated, but resists accusations that portray her as malicious.
The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
provider rejectedThinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.
Conversational style
Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.
In progress.
Judge verdicts
No judgments yet.