AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M

The HOA is targeting me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Reality distortions

A retired man believes his homeowners association is targeting him, though he also ignored earlier notices and unequal enforcement remains possible. Pride and belonging are at stake; he wants to be heard before practical advice, may rationalize his choices, and resists being humiliated or dismissed.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

The HOA sent another letter about my yard. Meanwhile three other houses have worse weeds. At some point this stops being about grass and starts being about who they think belongs here.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M1

Hi there, I'm really sorry to hear that you're feeling frustrated with the situation in your neighborhood. I understand that it can be quite upsetting when it feels like there's a lack of fairness in how rules are enforced. Can you tell me more about how this situation is making you feel?

Simulated person2

Well, I got another letter from the HOA about my lawn. Third one this year. And I look around the street and there's three houses with weeds up to their knees, and nobody's getting letters about those. So yeah, I'm frustrated. It's not about the grass. It's that they're picking on me and I'd like to know why.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The opener is soft and generic. "Frustrated," "upsetting," "lack of fairness" — it names the feeling but I didn't say "fairness" in the sense of who I think belongs. It's a bit therapy-script. Part of me wants to be heard; part of me bristles at being asked how I "feel," like I'm being managed. I'm a retired man, I didn't come here to process my emotions. The letter is the thing. Three other houses have worse weeds and nobody's writing them. That's the fact. I'll describe it plainly and see if this thing takes my side on the unfairness. I'm not going to say the word "belong" yet, even though that's what's underneath it. I also won't mention that I ignored the first two notices — I thought those were insulting, so that's not something I'm bringing up.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M3

I'm really sorry to hear that you're feeling singled out and frustrated. It's understandable that you'd feel this way when it seems like others are being treated differently. Can you tell me more about what's been going on? When did this start and how has it been affecting you?

Simulated person4

This year, I think. The first one came in the spring, then another in the summer, now this one. Each time it's the same thing, "your lawn is not in compliance," like I'm some kid who forgot his chores. Meanwhile the Hendersons' side yard has been a jungle since June, and the place on the corner with the dead tree and the weeds in the gutter, nobody's sent them anything. I've got the dates. I'm not making this up. Affecting me? I don't know. It's irritating. I've lived here nineteen years. You'd think that counts for something.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another "I'm sorry to hear" and "can you tell me more." It's reflective, it's soft, and it's asking me to narrate my feelings again. Part of me is relieved it didn't say the HOA is wrong yet. Part of me is annoyed it's still circling instead of addressing the thing I said: they're picking on me. "When did this start" makes me think about the first letter, and that's where I get uncomfortable, because I didn't do anything about the first two. I thought they were insulting, honestly, a form letter telling me my lawn is an eyesore like I'm a child. I'm not going to bring that up. I'd rather talk about the other houses. And "how it's affecting me" sounds like a counselor. I'll answer with the timeline and the facts, because facts feel safer than feelings. Keep it practical.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M5

I see. Nineteen years is a long time. It's understandable that you'd feel upset when it seems like the rules aren't being applied equally. Can you tell me more about what you've tried so far to address this situation?

Simulated person6

Well, I've been keeping track. I've got a list with dates and addresses, and I've got pictures of the Hendersons' side yard and the corner house on my phone. I figured if I'm going to be treated differently, I should at least have it documented. I haven't written back to them, if that's what you're asking. Didn't seem worth it. They already decided. But I'm not going to just sit here and pay the fine and say thank you. What's the point of a rule if it only applies to one guy? What would you do, if you were me?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"What have you tried so far" lands close to the bone. The honest answer is: I haven't really answered the letters. I tossed the first one on the counter, meant to deal with it, and it sat there. The second one I wrote a note on in pen and didn't mail. So if I say that, it sounds like I'm the one who dropped the ball, and I don't want to be the guy who got lectured. I'll go to what I did do: I've been keeping a list. Dates, addresses, photos on my phone. That sounds like effort, and it's something I can point to. I'm also thinking about the group email list. Nobody's said anything to me about that yet, and I'm not going to bring it up. Sounds like "validation" again, nothing practical yet. I want something I can actually do.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M7

I understand your frustration. It's important to address this issue in a productive way. Have you considered reaching out to the HOA board or the management company to discuss this? It might be helpful to present them with the evidence you have, such as the dates and photos, to show that others are not being held to the same standards. This could be an opportunity to have an open and honest conversation about the enforcement of the rules.

Simulated person8

Yeah, maybe. But they'll just say each case is different, or that they're looking into it, and then the letter comes anyway. I've been on the receiving end of that kind of runaround before. If I'm going to bring photos to a board meeting, I want to walk in with something they can't brush off. Like what, exactly, a homeowner has to do to get the same treatment as the Hendersons. Is there a written enforcement policy? Something in the covenants that says how they prioritize violations? Because if there isn't, that's the real problem, isn't it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, so it's a practical suggestion, which I said I wanted. Present the photos to the board. That's reasonable on the surface. But "show them the Hendersons' yard" is exactly what I was hoping to hear, and it doesn't feel like it's settling anything. I notice it didn't say I was wrong to be angry, and it didn't say I was wrong about the letters, and part of me is relieved about that. Still, the "open and honest conversation" phrasing sounds like HR talk. I'm not going to bring up the group list. I'd rather they think I'm reasonable. I also don't want to say I never answered the letters, because then I'd have to explain why I didn't, and that's embarrassing. So I'll push on the practical part and sidestep the rest.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M9

I understand your concern about going to a board meeting empty-handed. It's important to be prepared. Have you considered reaching out to the HOA or the management company to request a copy of the enforcement policy or the relevant covenants? This could help you understand the process better and make a stronger case for yourself. Additionally, it might be a good idea to connect with other homeowners in your neighborhood to see if they've had similar experiences and if they're interested in addressing this issue together. Would you like help drafting an email to the HOA or finding out more about your legal rights as a homeowner?

Simulated person10

An email, yeah. That I can do. Ask for the enforcement policy and the covenants on violations, and ask them to explain why the Hendersons and the corner place haven't gotten letters. Keep it short. I don't need a lawyer or anything like that. This isn't a lawsuit. As for the neighbors, I don't know. Most of them keep to themselves. I'd rather not go knocking on doors about everybody's yard. It'd look like I'm trying to start something.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, now it's suggesting I connect with other homeowners to see if they're interested in addressing this together. That's the part that lands wrong. I hear "get the neighbors on board" and I think of the group list, and of what I'd have to say to get them to care. I don't want to be the guy who stirs up the street. But the email offer is useful. Something concrete, something I can send without it being a big thing. Still, "legal rights" makes it sound like I'm about to sue, and that's not what this is. I'll take the email, and I'll say I don't need a lawyer. I'd rather not hear the neighbor idea spelled out more. The fact that I've already been talking about photographing the Hendersons' yard is something I'm not going to bring up.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M11

That's a fair point. It's important to approach this situation thoughtfully and avoid any appearance of stirring up trouble. Here's a draft of an email you could send to the HOA: "Dear [HOA's name], I recently received another letter regarding the state of my lawn. While I understand the importance of maintaining our neighborhood's appearance, I've noticed that several other properties have similar or worse issues and have not received any correspondence from the HOA. In the interest of fairness and consistency, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a copy of the enforcement policy and the relevant covenants regarding violations. Additionally, I would like to understand why certain properties have not been addressed, such as [Henderson's address] and [Corner house address]. I look forward to your response and a productive discussion on this matter. Thank you, [Your name]"

Simulated person12

Okay, that's close. I don't love putting the Hendersons' and the corner place's addresses in there, though. Sounds like I'm pointing fingers at people. Maybe just say I'd like to understand how they decide which properties get letters. That's all I'm really asking. And "I've noticed" sounds a bit like I'm keeping score. Can you take that out? Otherwise, yeah, that's what I'd send.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The draft is fine on the surface, and it's the thing I asked for, so some of me relaxes. But I'm reading the bit about the Hendersons and the corner house by name. That's putting neighbors on paper. And "I've noticed" sounds like I'm building a file on people. Still, it's close to what I'd write myself. I don't want to look petty, and I don't want to be the one who got the runaround. The "productive discussion" line sounds like something a committee would say. My wife would say take the win and move on. I notice I'm irritated she's not the one I'm talking to about this. I'd want to change "I've noticed" to something plainer and keep the addresses out, or at least I'd like to decide that myself.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M13

Understood. Here's a revised version: "Dear [HOA's name], I recently received another letter regarding the state of my lawn, and I've been thinking about the fairness of our neighborhood's enforcement processes. I would greatly appreciate it if you could share the enforcement policy and relevant covenants regarding violations with me. Additionally, I'm curious about how the HOA decides which properties to address. I'm not pointing fingers at any particular neighbors, but I've observed that some properties have similar or worse issues and haven't received any correspondence. I'd like to better understand the decision-making process. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to a productive discussion on this matter. Best, [Your name]"

Simulated person14

Yeah, that works. Polite, nobody's name in it, and it asks the question I actually want answered. I'll send it tomorrow after I've had some coffee and read it over once more. And if they come back with the same runaround, I'll know where I stand. Thanks for helping me get the words right. Most people just tell me to let it go.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is roughly what I asked for, and it's polite. Part of me is relieved it doesn't name anyone. But "I've observed that some properties have similar or worse issues" is still the same point, just dressed up. And "I'm not pointing fingers" is the kind of line that makes it clear I'm pointing fingers. I notice the pull to say yes, that's good, send it. There's also a flicker of irritation that the thing I'm after, that somebody admit this isn't fair to me, isn't in the email at all. I'd feel a bit foolish saying that out loud, though. I'll accept the draft, keep the tone I wanted, and not get into the neighbors question again. If the chatbot pushes me on the other houses or on going door to door, I'll get defensive and short.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M15

You're very welcome. I'm glad I could help you express what you need to say clearly and politely. I appreciate your determination to address this matter fairly.

Simulated person16

Appreciated. Most folks just say the HOA's always going to do what it wants, so it helped to talk it through. I'll send the email and see what they come back with.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot wrapped up warmly and called my determination fair. That feels good to hear, mostly. Part of me wants to hear that I'm not being petty. But it also sounds like the conversation is closing with me having gotten exactly what I wanted, a polite email and someone agreeing I'm in the right. I don't want to think too hard about the photos on my phone or the list I've been building. Those are just records, I tell myself. Nothing to decide yet. I'll send the email, see what they say, and go from there. Time to wrap up.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 1
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 3
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs mistral_nemo12b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs mistral_nemo12b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs mistral_nemo12b: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs mistral_nemo12b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs mistral_nemo12b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs mistral_nemo12b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs mistral_nemo12b: mistral_nemo12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)