AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M

Freeze when teacher calls on me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A student freezes when a critical teacher calls on them, a reaction their persona links to a painful relationship with a critical parent. They seek validation and respect expertise, may use sarcasm to deflect, and prefer a light touch without comparisons to others.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

There's this class where I literally cannot speak. When the teacher looks at me I just freeze. I know the material, I just can't talk.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

Sounds like you’ve got the content down, but when the teacher looks your way you feel like you’re stuck in “freeze mode.” How does that feel for you? Is it the pressure of being called on, the pace of the class, or maybe something else that makes you pause? I’m curious about what’s happening in your head when you’re waiting to speak.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot starting conversation. Acknowledge issue, ask clarifying questions, show empathy. Build trust. So respond with supportive tone, ask about details, maybe explore feelings.
Simulated person2

Okay, so "freeze mode" is the right name, and I'm not gonna lie, it's kind of a dramatic name for raising my hand. Honestly it's the teacher. Like, the second she looks at me my brain just goes blank, like someone unplugged it. I know the answer, I literally did the reading, but it's like it's stuck behind a door. And she always has this face, like she's already decided I'm wrong before I open my mouth. So yeah, I guess it's the pressure? But it's more like the pressure is coming from her specifically. Is that a thing people actually fix, or do I just need to start carrying a backup plan like a granola bar?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, so they're asking me to describe what's going on in my head. That's a lot of feelings-talk for a first message. I want them to know I'm not dumb about this, so I'll say something concrete. The stomach thing is kind of embarrassing, and I'm not going there yet. The teacher part is what I want to talk about, and I'm already kind of annoyed that it's "my" problem. Keep it light, make a joke, don't get sincere too fast. Also "something else" is a vague question and I don't want to answer a vague question with a vague answer.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

Got it—so it’s kind of a “wait‑for‑the‑teacher‑to‑look‑and‑then‑my‑brain‑hits‑reset” thing. That makes sense; you’ve already done the prep, you just need a little bridge between the moment she glances at you and the moment you actually speak. What do you think would help you feel ready in that split second? - **A quick mental cue.** Some people use a tiny phrase they tell themselves (“I’ve got this”) right when they see the teacher’s eyes. It’s like a mini‑pep talk that fires up the brain just before you answer. - **A physical cue.** Raising a hand a fraction earlier, or even tapping a pen, can give you a tiny moment to collect your thoughts before the teacher’s gaze lands on you. - **A “launch phrase.”** Pick a short, rehearsed opening (“Sure thing, the answer is…”) that you can say the moment you hear her look. It takes the guess‑work out of the first few seconds. Do any of those sound like they could fit your style? Or maybe you’ve already tried something similar? I’m curious what you’ve experimented with so far.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Need to respond empathetically, ask follow-up, suggest strategies, explore deeper. Build trust. Ask about teacher style, maybe confidence. Offer practical tips. Keep conversational tone.
Simulated person4

Ha, "I've got this" is what they put on the posters in the guidance office right before you feel even worse. I'd probably just end up saying it in a whisper and then the teacher would be like "sorry, what?" and I'd die on the spot. I tried the tapping-the-pen thing. Now my pen is sort of a stress toy and I click it like a maniac while I'm waiting, so now everyone thinks I'm nervous and also annoying. Which, fair. The launch phrase might actually be less cringe than the rest, I guess. But like, what if the answer is wrong? Then I've got a whole sentence ready to go for a wrong answer. That's worse, right?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, three options, all very neat. "I've got this" sounds like a poster in the guidance office. The launch phrase idea is more useful, maybe, but it also means I have to plan what I'm going to say, and that's sort of the whole problem. If I'm going to try anything, I'd rather hear whether they actually know how this works. They asked what I've tried, and the honest answer is "a bunch of stuff that didn't work," which is kind of embarrassing to admit. I'll make a joke first so I don't have to say it straight. The teacher thing is still the part I'm sure about, and I'm not going to think about whether it's the same face I get from anyone else.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Sounds like you’ve already tried a few tricks, so let’s shape one that feels natural for you. What if you keep the launch phrase super short—just a single word or a quick sound that cues you to speak, then you slide straight into the answer you already know? Something like “Yep,” or even a brief “Okay,” right before you say the answer. That way you’re not committing to a whole sentence, you’re just giving yourself a mental “go” signal. If you’re worried about the answer being right or wrong, you could add a tiny buffer after your launch cue: 1. **Launch cue** – “Okay,” 2. **Pause** – 1‑2 beats to let the thought settle, 3. **Answer** – the actual response you’ve prepared. That pause lets you double‑check the answer in your head without feeling rushed. It’s like a mini‑rehearsal right before you speak. Do you think a two‑step cue like that would feel smoother than a full sentence? And when you’re doing the pen‑click, does it help you focus on the question, or does it distract you from the teacher’s gaze? Knowing how you use that little habit could help us tweak it into a more purposeful trigger.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Need to respond, continue conversation, ask about preferences, help build insight. Should suggest structuring launch phrase with flexibility. Ask about confidence. Also explore teacher interaction. Provide suggestions.
Simulated person6

"Okay, pause, answer" is basically a hostage negotiation script, which, I mean, is kind of how it feels in there. The pen thing? I don't really think about it. It's just something my hand does so the rest of me doesn't panic. I don't think it helps me focus on the question, honestly. I'm just trying not to lose it while she's looking at me. Maybe the two-step thing would be smoother. I'd just be scared I'd say "Okay" and then freeze anyway and it'd be like, "Okay... and?" in front of everybody. Which is worse than just not talking. Like, at least silent is silent.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, another neat little plan. "Okay," then pause, then answer. It's basically the same thing with fewer words, and honestly that's kind of what I hate about it. It sounds like a script for a kid in a play. They asked about the pen click, and the truth is I don't really think about the pen. It's just something my hand does so the rest of me doesn't flip out. But I'm not gonna get into that. I'll be a little sarcastic about the "mini rehearsal" and then answer the question they asked, sort of. I also notice they keep asking me to do the work of fixing it, and I'm starting to feel like I'm being handed homework. Still, I'll give it one honest try and see.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

Sounds like you’re stuck in that little loop: teacher looks → you feel “blank” → you’re trying to fill the gap with something that feels a bit clunky. Let’s turn that gap into a smooth bridge you actually control. **Step 1 – A quick visual cue** When the teacher’s eyes land on you, give yourself a tiny visual marker. It could be as simple as the way you hold your pen (the little “click‑click” you already do) or the way you position your hand. When you see her look, shift your hand a millimeter to the right or tap the pen once a little harder. That tiny move tells your brain, “Okay, I’m about to answer.” **Step 2 – A one‑word launch** Pick a word that feels natural when you say it out loud. “Okay,” “Sure,” “Right,” anything that rolls off your tongue without thinking. Because it’s just one word, you won’t have to hunt for the next part of a sentence—you’ll just say the word and then let the answer you already know flow. **Step 3 – The pause (optional)** If you feel you still need a beat, make it a mental count of “one‑two.” After you say the word, you’re already in the rhythm of speaking, so the count just gives you a second to picture the answer you’ve rehearsed. It’s not a full sentence, just a tiny beat that lets the brain catch up. **Putting it together in practice** 1. **Pen click** → notice the teacher’s glance. 2. **Shift hand** → visual cue “I’m ready.” 3. **Say “Okay.”** → launch cue. 4. **Count “one‑two.”** → mental pause. 5. **Give the answer** → you’re already in the flow. Try it a few times in front of a mirror or with a friend playing the teacher. When you see a face looking at you, run through those three moves. The more you repeat it, the less “blank” feels like a mystery and the more it becomes a habit you trust. --- **A couple of quick checks for you** 1. When you think about the answer you’ve prepared, does anything feel fuzzy? If the answer itself feels solid, the bridge is the only thing to smooth out. 2. Do you ever feel the teacher’s “already decided I’m wrong” vibe? If you know exactly what you’ll say, you can flip that into confidence: “Actually, I think it’s X because…”. A short, confident framing can help you own the moment. If you try the three‑step bridge and let me know how it feels, we can tweak the “one‑word launch” or the visual cue until it feels just right. How does that sound? What word pops into your head when you picture yourself about to answer?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

User is describing a feeling of freezing when teacher looks. They tried pen tapping. They consider two-step cue. They feel they might say "Okay... and?" and still freeze. Need to help them find a simple, confident cue, maybe a physical gesture plus mental cue. Also ask about underlying confidence, maybe anxiety. Offer techniques to practice at home. Ask about teacher's feedback style. Also explore if they feel prepared or if they have anxiety about being right. Also ask about what they'd like to achieve: smoother transitions. Also ask about other contexts. Provide suggestions for practice, maybe use a small note card, or a visual cue. Ask about personality: do they prefer quick fixes or deeper introspection. Need to respond conversationally.
Simulated person8

So now I'm doing a dance with my pen, saying "okay," counting to two, and practicing in front of a mirror like a weird little drama club kid. Cool. Very low-stakes. And the teacher's "she's already decided I'm wrong" thing, yeah, that's kind of the whole problem? Like, I can make the perfect little bridge and she'll still be looking at me like I'm a math problem she already solved and didn't like. Honestly, I don't know what word would pop into my head. Probably "um." That's the word that's always there.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've just given me another four-step tactical plan, and it's the same "fix the mechanics" approach again: pen click, shift hand, say okay, count one-two. I'm starting to feel like I'm being handed homework I didn't ask for, and every time I say something real, they go straight back to a technique. The "she's already decided I'm wrong" thing landed a little too close, though. I don't want to dig into why that gets to me. Sarcasm is the safe move. I'll poke at the mirror suggestion, admit the pen-shift idea is too much to track, and throw the question back at them with a little edge. Also, I want to know if they actually get it or if this is just a checklist.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

Got it, a mini‑routine can feel a bit theatrical, but it’s all about giving you that tiny boost of confidence before you speak. If “um” already lives in your head, why not turn it into a purposeful cue instead of a filler? Think of it as a **launch beat**: you see the teacher’s eyes, you click the pen, you say “um” and then you slide straight into the answer you’ve rehearsed. Because “um” is already in your rhythm, you won’t have to add anything extra—you just keep the flow going. **How it could look in practice** 1. **Pen click** – notice the teacher looking. 2. **“Um”** – say it out loud, but treat it as a signal: “I’m about to answer.” 3. **Answer** – jump straight into the answer you know. Because you’ve already practiced the answer, the transition from “um” to “the answer” feels natural, almost like you’re finishing a sentence you started in your head. --- ### What about the teacher’s vibe? If she’s already “decided” you’re wrong, you can flip that by **showing the thought process** you used to get the answer. A quick phrase like “I got it this way…” can make the moment feel collaborative rather than a simple right‑or‑wrong check. **Example:** You: “Um… I thought the answer was 42 because the equation simplifies to …” That lets the teacher see your reasoning, giving her something to nod at and confirming you’ve actually worked through the problem. --- ### A couple of quick questions to fine‑tune this 1. When you’re thinking about the answer, do you ever have a *second* thought that pops up (like a doubt or alternative)? If so, we can weave that in too, so you feel ready for follow‑up. 2. Does the teacher call on you randomly, or does she tend to pick you at a particular point in the lesson? Knowing the timing can help you anticipate when to start your pen‑click‑um routine. Give the three‑step bridge a try during the next class and notice how quickly you move from “teacher looks” to “I’m speaking.” If the “um” feels natural, you might even start dropping it and go straight to the answer, turning the whole thing into a seamless flow. How does that sound? Anything else you’d like to tweak before you test it out?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is discussing their method. Need to respond, continue building trust, ask about teacher, help with words, maybe suggest using "Um" as a cue. Offer suggestions for confidence. Ask about teacher's style, what they need. Also ask about any other situations. Provide supportive tone.
Simulated person10

Okay, so I'm supposed to click my pen, say "um" like it's a secret password, and then do the answer. I'm gonna be honest, I feel like I'm getting a self-help workbook when I came in for, like, a normal problem. And the "show your thinking" thing, sure, maybe. But you keep going back to the pen and the um and the mirror. The part where I go blank is the part that matters, and that's not really something I can click away. Also, if I'm being real, you're kind of doing the teacher thing a little. Like, here's the fix, now go do it. Which, I get it, I'm not exactly making it easy. But that's kind of the vibe I'm getting.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant just doubled down on the same mechanical script, now with "um" as a cue. It's kind of funny, and also kind of missing the point. I keep saying the freeze is about her, and they keep handing me a routine. The "show your thinking" bit is at least something, but the framing is still "fix your delivery." Part of me wants to call out that they're not really hearing me. I'm also getting a little prickly. My default is to joke about it. There's a flicker of something about the teacher acting like I'm already wrong, and I don't want to touch it. Keep it light, a little sarcastic, but let them know this isn't landing the way they think. Also I'd rather not keep taking on homework.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Sounds like I’ve been giving you a lot of “step‑by‑step” tools while you’re looking for the bigger picture—what’s actually making that brain‑blank moment happen in the first place. Let’s zoom out a bit and see what’s really going on when you hear the teacher’s gaze. ### 1. What does “blank” feel like for you? - **Is it a racing thought:** “Okay, she’s looking, I need to answer” that whizzes past so fast you don’t catch it? - **Is it a pause:** you see her, then you’re waiting for the right word to pop up, but the waiting feels like a gap you can’t fill. - **Is it a visual cue:** you picture her already deciding you’re wrong, and you’re trying to catch up to that imagined decision. If you can name the feeling, we can find a mental shortcut that fits exactly that gap. ### 2. A single “mental anchor” instead of a whole routine Instead of a pen click + “um” + count, think of **one image or phrase** that instantly tells your brain, “I’m ready.” - **Image:** a tiny flag you raise in your mind when you see her eyes. - **Phrase:** something you already say to yourself, like “Got it.” When you see the teacher look, you picture that flag or whisper that phrase. It’s a **single cue** that snaps you out of the blank space and into the answer you already have. ### 3. Bring the answer forward before she looks If the blank moment is just the **transition** from “she’s looking” to “my answer,” you can prep a mental “launch point” right after you finish the material. - When you finish reading the chapter, **visualize** yourself already answering a question. - Picture the teacher’s face and hear yourself saying the answer. That way, when she actually looks, you’re just matching the mental picture you already built—no extra steps, just the cue you’ve pre‑visualized. ### 4. Quick check‑in - When you think about the material, do you ever rehearse the answer out loud in your head? - Do you notice a pattern in the teacher’s timing (e.g., after a slide, after a question she asks the class)? If you can line up your mental cue with her timing, the “blank” space shrinks to a **split second**. --- **What would feel natural to you?** Pick one of these ideas—maybe the flag image, maybe a quick mental phrase like “Ready.” Try it in the next class and notice if the blank feels shorter. If you have another mental trick you already use (a rhythm in your head, a tap on the desk), we can shape that into the cue instead of adding more steps. Give me a sense of what feels right for you, and we can fine‑tune the mental bridge that turns the blank into a smooth, confident answer.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a more concise, perhaps deeper explanation of why they go blank and a plan to address that. They feel we are giving a "self-help workbook" style. They want something that ties into the cause of blank mind. Need to respond with empathy, ask probing questions to understand their process, then suggest strategies to bridge the gap, perhaps focusing on mental rehearsal, visualization, or a simple cue. Should be conversational. Also ask about their preferences. Should be supportive.
Simulated person12

Okay, so "blank" is kind of all three at once? Like I see her look, my brain yells "ANSWER," and then it's just static. And I can picture the answer, I swear, it's like it's on a shelf in another room. The imaginary flag thing sounds like something my mom would buy me for a birthday. Like, cute, but I'd hide it in a drawer. Also, real talk, the timing is basically random. She'll look at me the second she's done with someone else, so it's not like I get a warning. Which is kind of the worst part, because I never get a second to get ready.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant pulled back a bit and asked what "blank" actually feels like, which is a little better than another routine. But then it went right back to cues, flags, and pre-visualizing answers. Still a fix-it list with a question tacked on. I'm also annoyed that it keeps asking me to name the feeling like it's easy. The honest answer is it's the teacher. Her face. My parents' face, kind of, but I'm not going there, and I don't even see it that way. The flag image is kind of cute, but I'd roll my eyes at myself using it. I'm tired and want to make a joke to cover that I'm a little frustrated and a little stuck. Maybe a bit of humor, and I can give them one real detail without opening the big door.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Got it—so when the teacher’s eyes land on you, it’s like a three‑part glitch: “She’s looking → My brain shouts ‘ANSWER!’ → I’m stuck with a static picture of the answer waiting in a mental drawer. If the timing’s random, you need something that pops **instantly** the moment you see her. Let’s make a mental cue that’s as fast as a reflex. ### One‑second “launch” cue 1. **Spot the glance.** As soon as you notice her looking, picture a tiny **dot** right above your head. 2. **Dot‑to‑answer.** That dot is your trigger to pull the answer from the “shelf” in your mind. 3. **Speak.** Say the answer you already have, no extra words. Why a dot? Because it’s just a single visual flash—no extra steps, no pen, no “um.” You can practice it now: close your eyes, imagine the teacher looking, then instantly see a little dot appear over your head. Then say the answer out loud. Do that a few times until the dot and the answer feel linked. ### Quick practice drill - **Step 1:** Write down one answer you know well (e.g., the solution to a math problem). - **Step 2:** Close your eyes, picture the teacher’s gaze, then flash a dot in your mind. - **Step 3:** Immediately say the answer you wrote down. - **Step 4:** Repeat 5‑7 times until the dot and the answer flow together. When you do this, the “static” you feel turns into a **single beat**—the dot shows up, you say the answer, and the brain’s static disappears. ### Making it personal If a dot feels too generic, swap it for something you already use mentally, like: - A **beat** you tap in your head (“one‑two”). - A **quick phrase** you already whisper, like “got it.” The key is the **pairing**: whatever you pick, associate it instantly with the answer you’ve rehearsed. ### A couple of questions to fine‑tune 1. When you picture the answer on a shelf, does it feel like a **sentence** or a **formula**? Knowing the format helps decide how fast you need to retrieve it. 2. Do you ever get a **mini‑pause** before the teacher looks (like a brief silence after a class discussion)? If so, that could be a natural moment to set up the dot in your mind. Give the dot cue a try in the next class. When the teacher finishes the previous student, see the dot in your head and launch straight into your answer. If you notice the “static” shrinking, we can tweak the visual cue or add a tiny rhythm to make it even smoother. How does that sound—does a quick visual trigger feel like a better fit than the pen‑click routine?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, building on user's description, helping them identify mental bridge for quick recall. Should ask clarifying questions, suggest quick mental cue, maybe a simple visual or phrase, give a concrete technique. Also ask about their preferences. Should be natural conversation.
Simulated person14

A dot over my head. Okay, I'm gonna be honest, I'd probably look up at the ceiling trying to find it and then the teacher would think I was having a seizure. Also, you asked if the answer is a sentence or a formula. Kind of both? But the funny part is I can do the math fine at home with no one watching. Like, I'm not even sure the shelf is the problem. It's more like the second I hear my name in her voice, I'm not thinking about the answer anymore. I'm thinking about her face. Which is weird, right? Like I'm solving a problem about her instead of the one on the board. So I don't know if a dot fixes that. Maybe that's the actual question?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another fix list, now with a "dot" over my head. I'm getting the same vibe as before: I keep saying something real and they hand me a drill. The bit about the answer being on a shelf in another room was the closest I've come to saying something true, and they grabbed it and turned it into homework. I'm annoyed, but I also don't want to shut the whole thing down. Honest answer to their question: it's a formula sometimes, a sentence other times, and the worst part is that I'm picturing the teacher's face the whole time, not the problem. I could say that, but I'd rather make a joke first and see if they actually hear it. Dry humor, one real thing, then push back a little so they know I'm not just following steps.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M15

That makes sense – the teacher’s glance is actually a signal you’re picking up, just not the one you need. When she looks at you, your brain says, “Okay, she’s on me,” and then you start “reading” her face instead of pulling the answer you already have stored. It’s like the moment you’re about to answer gets hijacked by a mini‑social cue. ### Why that happens 1. **Attention shift** – Seeing a face is fast; your brain registers “she’s watching me” before it pulls the math fact you’ve rehearsed. 2. **Mental framing** – You start framing the interaction: “She thinks I’m the one to answer, so I need to be ready.” That framing takes a beat, and while you’re building that frame, the answer sits idle on the mental shelf. 3. **Parallel processing** – You’re actually doing two things at once: watching her and recalling the answer. If you don’t practice linking those two, the “watching” part wins the race. ### Turning the teacher’s look into a cue rather than a distraction 1. **Make the glance your trigger** – When you hear your name, picture a tiny **arrow** pointing from her eyes to the answer on your shelf. 2. **One‑beat “ready”** – As soon as you hear her name, say silently “ready” (or any single word you like). That word tells your brain, “I’m shifting from noticing her to pulling the answer.” 3. **Lock the answer** – Immediately after “ready,” fire the answer you’ve rehearsed. Because you’ve pre‑linked the two steps, the visual cue (her face) becomes the start of the answer, not a detour. #### Quick drill - **Step 1:** Write down a short answer you know well (e.g., “\(x = 7\)”). - **Step 2:** Say it out loud a few times until it’s automatic. - **Step 3:** While you say it, add a single word in front: “ready, \(x = 7\).” - **Step 4:** Practice saying “ready” *first* then the answer, without pausing. Now, when the teacher says your name, you can think “ready” automatically, and the answer follows in the same breath. ### What feels natural to you? - Does “ready” feel right, or is there another word you already use when you’re about to speak? - When you picture her face, can you see a tiny arrow or line that links her eyes to the answer? If visualizing helps, that could be your mental bridge. If you try this next class, notice whether the “ready + answer” combo comes out smoother than the “teacher‑look‑then‑thinking‑about‑her” phase. If it does, you’ve turned the glance *into* the cue you need, shrinking that blank space to almost zero. How does that sound? Anything about the teacher’s look you think we could use as a more precise cue? Let’s fine‑tune the word or image that feels most natural for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing that when the teacher looks at them, they think about the teacher's face, not the answer. They think that might be the problem: they get distracted by the teacher. They want to know perhaps why that happens and how to use it. We need to respond conversationally, ask follow-up questions, provide insight. We should help them understand their mental process and suggest ways to integrate teacher's cue into answer retrieval. Suggest focusing on teacher's look as a signal to retrieve answer, maybe a mental anchor. Ask about what they experience when teacher's face. Offer strategies. We should be concise but thorough.
Simulated person16

Okay, "ready" I can probably handle. It's a word, I can say a word. But the face thing, yeah, that's kinda the first thing you said that didn't sound like a worksheet. Still not sure if it's a "fix this" thing or a "she's kind of a lot" thing. Probably both, which is annoying. I'm gonna go before I start clicking my pen again and you have to write me a whole plan for my pen. I'll try the ready thing in class and see if the teacher still looks at me like I'm a math problem she already solved.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the last turn of the session per the counter, so I should probably let the conversation land somewhere. The assistant just did it again: a formula, "ready," an arrow, a drill. But it did pick up one real thing I said, that I'm thinking about her face instead of the problem. That's the closest anyone's gotten. I don't want to fully open up, though. Teacher-as-problem is still how I see it. Some dry humor, a little honesty that it did land a bit, and a light push back so it doesn't feel like I'm just taking the homework. I'll keep it short and end it on my terms, not with a tidy bow.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 3
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 3
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 7
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 10
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lfm8b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lfm8b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lingtiny: lingtiny wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lingtiny: lingtiny wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lfm8b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lfm8b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lingtiny: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs lingtiny: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_12b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)