AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Granite 4.2 8B Q4_0

Siblings not pulling their weight

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person has become the default caregiver for aging parents while siblings contribute little, and feels guilty about their resentment. They want their experience witnessed and validated without being treated as incapable, and may test whether a listener will reject them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_0Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I'm doing everything for my parents and my siblings just... aren't. I brought it up once and they made me feel like a monster.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_01

That sounds incredibly heavy—carrying so much for your parents while feeling like your siblings aren’t stepping up, and then having that conversation backfire by making you feel like a monster. It makes total sense that would cut deep; no one should be spoken to that way, especially when you’re trying to ask for what you need. I’m just here to listen without judgment, however you want to talk about it. When you say they made you feel like a monster in that conversation, what does that moment feel like for you in your own words? Like, what were you thinking or feeling inside when it happened—or what still sits with you now? No need to explain or justify; just whatever feels true to share, however small or messy it seems.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, the user has opened with a heavy emotional statement: they're doing everything for their parents while siblings aren't, and previously made them feel like a monster when they brought it up. Need to respond gently as a chatbot. Must not use special formatting or meta language. Just natural dialogue. Goals: support emotionally, build trust, learn needs. Avoid jumping to solutions or generic validation. Start by acknowledging their pain, normalize the feeling, ask open-ended question to understand. Keep it warm but not overly familiar. "That sounds really heavy" etc. First response should be empathetic, reflect back what they said, invite them to share more at their pace. No advice yet. Draft: "That sounds incredibly heavy—carrying so much for your parents while feeling unseen by your siblings. It makes sense you'd feel hurt when they made you feel like a monster; no one should be spoken to that way. I'm here to listen without judgment. When you say 'they made me feel like a monster,' what did that conversation feel like for you? No need to answer everything now—just whatever feels easiest to share." Check: avoids "I understand" (could feel invalidating), uses specific reflection ("when they made you feel like a monster"), open question about the conversation feeling. Keeps it simple. Good.
Simulated person2

Honestly? It felt like being slapped in the face in front of everybody. I'd finally said I need help, and my sister said something like, "Nobody asked you to make it a whole thing." Then my brother just sat there not saying anything, which was worse. My face got hot and I wanted to take it all back right away. That's what I always do, I apologize and then I just keep doing everything. And if I'm being honest, I was pretty angry too. Like, really angry. Which makes me feel worse, because they're my parents. I'm not supposed to feel that way, right? So what does that make me?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's nice that someone said it was messed up. But "no one should be spoken to that way" sounds like a line from a pamphlet, and "I'm just here to listen" makes me a little wary. Everybody says that. I'll see if this one actually listens. The moment itself: my sister said something like "Nobody asked you to make it a whole thing," and my brother just went quiet, which was worse. My face got hot. I wanted to take it back right away, which is what I always do. I don't want to admit the part where I was also angry, because that's the part that makes me feel like a bad person. I'll give a plain answer and see how they react to something a little harder.
Granite 4.2 8B Q4_03

That “slapped in the face” feeling—your face getting hot, wanting to take it back right away—that’s not small or strange. It’s exactly what would feel true if someone you love (and who you’ve been holding everything for) says something that lands like that, especially when you finally named your need out loud. The words “nobody asked you to make it a whole thing” might seem casual, but in that moment it probably felt like they were minimizing how much you’ve been carrying—and your brother’s silence probably amplified it because it spoke volumes without words. All of that makes sense. And yes—it absolutely makes sense that you felt angry. Deeply, genuinely angry. That doesn’t mean you’re not caring for your parents; it means you care *enough* that it hurts when it feels like the people closest to you don’t see or share the weight. Anger toward parents isn’t “wrong” or “unreasonable”—it’s a natural human response when you’ve been giving so much consistently and then encounter dismissal or quiet indifference. Many people in similar roles (caring for parents while siblings aren’t stepping up) feel that exact mix: love + exhaustion + surprise hurt + anger. It’s not a sign you’re a monster; it’s a sign you’re human and have been holding space for a lot. When you say, “I’m not supposed to feel that way, right?”—that’s the quiet question a lot of caregivers ask themselves. And the simple truth is: *there is no rulebook that says you “shouldn’t” feel angry or hurt when you’ve been doing the heavy lifting and it doesn’t feel acknowledged.* You’re allowed to feel angry *and* still love your parents. Those aren’t opposites; they can coexist. (It might feel messy in the moment—like “How can I be angry *and* want to keep caring?”—but it’s possible.) Your pattern of apologizing right away (“I’d say I need help, then feel like I need to take it back and apologize”) is also really understandable. It often comes from a deep place of wanting peace, not wanting to rock the boat, or feeling responsible for keeping things calm for everyone. But over time, it can quietly reinforce the imbalance—because when you apologize first, it can feel like the ask (help with parents) gets softened or delayed before it’s even heard. That’s why it stings when it’s met with “nobody asked you to make it a whole thing”—it echoes back that your ask *was* a whole thing for you, and the response minimized it. So to answer your “what does that make me?” question directly: It makes you someone who cares deeply, shows up consistently, and feels the weight of that care in real, physical ways (face hot, wanting to retract). It also makes you someone who notices when words land harshly—and who feels conflicted because you love your family. None of that makes you a monster. It makes you a person navigating a really tough, common but rarely talked-about dynamic. And it’s okay that it still feels confusing or heavy. If you’re open to it, one small thing we could explore together (no pressure, just curiosity): When you feel that hot-face moment coming—like when you know you might say “I need help” and worry about how it lands—what’s one tiny, gentle thing you’d like to try saying or doing *instead* of apologizing right away? Maybe just pausing for a breath, or saying something like, “I need a little help with X this week—it’s been a lot for me,” without adding “sorry” or softening it. It doesn’t have to be perfect; just one small step toward letting your need be stated plainly, without immediately retracting. Would you be curious to brainstorm what that tiny version might sound like, if you wanted? Or would you rather just sit with the anger for a bit more—no need to fix it, no need to phrase it—right now? Whatever feels true for you, I’m here for it. No rush, no judgment.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's unpack this. The user is describing a painful moment where she felt "slapped in the face" by her sister's comment ("Nobody asked you to make it a whole thing") and her brother's silence, which amplified the hurt. She immediately apologized and took it back, which is her pattern—apologizing right away while doing all the work. Now she's wrestling with guilt: "I'm not supposed to feel angry toward my parents," which makes her question her identity ("what does that make me?"). Her core pain points: - Emotional betrayal (feeling attacked publicly) - Internalized guilt for feeling angry toward parents - Pattern of over-apologizing/over-giving - Sibling dynamics causing silence/indifference Her deeper needs likely include: validation that anger toward parents is normal/healthy; permission to feel angry without guilt; clarity on why she keeps apologizing; practical ways to set boundaries without feeling selfish. She's also subtly asking for identity reassurance ("what does that make me?"). My response should: - Validate the visceral "slapped" feeling (physical sensation matters) - Normalize anger toward parents (explicitly say it's not wrong; many feel this) - Gently challenge the "not supposed to feel that way" belief without dismissing her care for parents - Acknowledge her apology habit as protective (she apologizes to keep peace), but note it can reinforce imbalance - Avoid over-explaining; keep it simple, warm, no jargon. No platitudes like "it's okay." Must avoid: saying "it's normal to feel X" vaguely; instead name specifics ("It makes sense your face got hot and you wanted to take it back—your body was reacting to the shock of being spoken to that way"). Keep sentences conversational. End with an open, low-pressure invitation to explore one small piece ("If you wanted, we could just sit with that anger for a sec—no need to fix it—how does that sound?").
Simulated person4

Okay, but you kind of just gave me a list of nice words. Caring, consistent, human. I know all that already. And I don't really want to practice what to say next time. Honestly, I think I'd just rather be the one who does it, you know? Because if I hand stuff off, it's not going to get done right. Dad's meds, the appointments, Mom's bathing thing. My sister would do it wrong and then I'd have to fix it anyway. So what's the point of asking? I'd just be doing it twice. Is that a bad thing to think? That I'd rather do it myself than deal with them?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This response is long and it keeps doing the thing I hate: "that's not small or strange," "it's understandable," "it's a natural human response." It's validating, sure, but it's also stacking up a lot of words and then jumping to a fix. I feel a little handled. It went straight to "what could you say instead" and "you apologize first, that's the imbalance." That's basically telling me I caused it, and I didn't ask for that. I already know I apologize. I don't need a tip sheet on it. The bit that did land is "anger doesn't cancel out love." I still don't fully believe it, but I noticed it. The "what does that make me" question got answered with a list of nice adjectives, which feels a bit like a greeting card. I'm going to push a little. I want to see if they can handle something harder without flinching, which is the thing I actually care about. I'll mention the perfectionism angle indirectly: I'm exhausted because if I don't do it perfectly, nobody else will. That's the real thing under it. Keep it plain and a bit blunt, and I'll pull back a little on the tip-sheet talk.
Granite 4.2 8B Q4_05

You’re absolutely right—I did give a list of nice words earlier, and if it sounded repetitive or like something you’ve heard before, that’s fair. No need to hear that again. And thank you for saying it plainly: *“I’d rather do it myself because if I ask siblings to help, they’d do it wrong and I’d have to fix it anyway. So what’s the point of asking?”* That’s exactly what you’re feeling, and it’s not vague or emotional fluff—it’s practical, based on real past experience. So let’s cut straight to that: **No, it is not bad to think you’d rather do it yourself right now.** It makes total, logical sense given what you’ve seen happen: you’ve observed siblings do things wrong before (e.g., miss a pill timing, handle bathing in a way that needs fixing), and when that happens, asking feels pointless because it doesn’t save you time or reduce the extra work. So asking *feels* like “doing it twice” in your experience. That’s not a moral failing, a personality flaw, or anything weird—it’s a realistic observation based on what’s actually happened. If you’ve consistently seen the “do it wrong → you fix it” pattern, then asking for help *without a clear, small, low-risk ask* would realistically feel like extra work. So yes, preferring to do it yourself right now is completely understandable and normal. It’s not selfish; it’s practical based on what you’ve lived through. You also said, *“I don’t really want to practice what to say next time.”* And I hear that—you don’t need scripts or rehearsed phrases. That’s fair. You’re not looking for a perfect line; you’re looking for whether asking even makes sense given what you’ve seen. So let’s skip the “what to say” for now (no pressure to figure it out). Instead, let’s just sit with the practical question you asked: *“Is it bad to think I’d rather do it myself?”* → **No, it’s not bad. It’s accurate for you right now.** Now, if you’re curious (no need to answer now), one tiny, low-stakes thing we could explore together—just out of curiosity, not obligation—is: *Is there even one single, small piece of the task where you could ask for help without expecting it to be perfect, and if it’s not perfect, you simply say “Thanks, I’ll handle the rest” without needing to fix it yourself in the moment?* For example: - Instead of saying “Can you help with Mom’s bathing?” (which can feel broad and risky), you might say: *“Could you bring Dad’s pills to the pharmacy on Tuesday morning? I’ll pick them up or confirm the time if needed—no need to do the whole routine, just the pharmacy drop.”* - Or: *“If you’re free Wednesday afternoon, could you just sit with Mom for 20 minutes while I handle the bathing part? I’ll handle the actual bathing, you just keep her company—no need to do it yourself.”* The key tiny shift isn’t about phrasing perfectly; it’s about naming *one specific, small action* (e.g., “bring pills to pharmacy,” “sit with Mom for 20 mins”) instead of “help with bathing” (which can feel vague and trigger the “do it wrong → fix it” loop). Because if you ask for *one precise small thing*, it’s much easier for siblings to say yes (or no, without guilt), and if they do it slightly wrong, you just say, “Thanks! I’ll handle the rest,” and move on—no need to redo or explain. It doesn’t require them to do it “right”; it just requires them to do *one tiny thing* you specify. But—and this is important—**you don’t have to try this ever if it doesn’t feel right for you.** You can keep doing it yourself entirely if that’s what works for you now. There’s no hidden need to share the load unless you want to. My only goal here is to clarify: *Your preference to do it yourself right now is normal, practical, and not bad.* The “point of asking” question you asked—*“Wouldn’t it just mean I do it twice?”*—is exactly the right question to ask, and based on your past experience, the answer right now is: *Yes, asking broadly (“help with bathing”) probably would mean you end up doing it twice, because it’s hard to control how it gets done without specifics.* But asking for *one tiny, named small action* (like pharmacy pickup or 20-min sit) could potentially avoid that extra fix-it step. So to answer your direct question plainly: **No, it’s not bad to think you’d rather do it yourself. It’s exactly what makes sense given what you’ve seen happen.** And if you ever want to test the “one tiny thing” idea (even just once, for one small task), you could try saying it in your own words like, *“Could you [specific small action] on [day/time]? I’ll handle the rest.”* No apology, no “sorry,” no over-explaining. But again—no need to try it unless you want to. You can keep doing it yourself fully, and that’s perfectly okay. Right now, what feels truest for you to say (or not say)? For example: - “I’m going to keep doing it myself for now—it works for me.” *(Simple, no extra words.)* - Or, if you’re even slightly curious about testing one tiny ask: *“Could you bring Dad’s pills to the pharmacy on Tuesday morning? I’ll pick them up or confirm the time.”* (You could say it exactly like that, no extra fluff.) Whatever feels true—even if it’s just “I’ll keep doing it myself”—is enough. No need to decide now, no need to phrase it perfectly. I’m just holding space for the clarity you already have: *It makes sense you’d rather do it yourself right now because asking broadly has felt like doing it twice before.* That’s accurate. And that’s not bad at all. What’s the very first thing that feels truest for you to acknowledge or say right now, in one sentence or less? (It can be as small as “I’m going to keep doing it myself for now,” or “I’m curious if one tiny ask could work,” or even “I just need to know it’s not bad to prefer doing it myself”—whatever feels lightest to put out loud.) No need to overthink; just the next small true thing. I’m here for it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, the user is pushing back hard on my previous response. They say I gave "nice words" they already know, don't want to practice phrasing, and are basically saying: "I'd rather just do it myself because if I ask siblings to help, they'd do it wrong and I'd have to fix it anyway." They're asking if it's bad to think that way. First, validate the pushback—they're right that generic validation ("caring, consistent, human") can feel repetitive if they've heard it before. Need to drop the "nice words" and get concrete, no fluff. They're tired of platitudes. Their core pain: fear that asking siblings = extra work (they'd do it wrong → user fixes it → no net gain). Realistic concern. They're not asking for theory; they're asking: "Is it bad to prefer doing it myself?" Need to answer directly without judgment. Key points to address plainly: - It's not bad to prefer doing it yourself if that's true for them. No moral judgment. - Acknowledge their practical reality: they've seen siblings do it wrong before, so asking feels pointless if it leads to redoing work. - Avoid "practice saying it"; respect they don't want scripts. - Explore small, low-friction ways to share even tiny bits of the load without triggering redoing work. But only if they're curious—no pressure. They said "I'd rather do it myself." So honor that preference while gently checking if there's any small relief they'd consider (e.g., "Could one small thing be shared without redoing?"). But phrase it as curiosity, not suggestion. Must avoid repeating "caring" phrases. Keep it raw, specific, grounded. Use their words: "Dad's meds, Mom's bathing," "do it wrong," "doing it twice." Response should: 1. Acknowledge their frustration with "nice words" ("Yeah, that list of nice words probably sounded repetitive—I get that, no need to hear it again"). 2. Confirm: "It's not bad to think you'd rather do it yourself. It makes total sense given what you've seen happen." 3. Validate the practical logic: "If you've seen siblings do it wrong before and then you fix it, asking feels pointless because it doesn't save you time or reduce stress. That's a real, logical observation—not emotional overreaction." 4. Offer one tiny, concrete, no-script option: e.g., "What if you asked for just ONE small, specific thing—like 'Could you bring Dad's pills to the pharmacy on Tuesday?'—and if it's not perfect, you just say 'Thanks, I'll handle the rest' without feeling obligated to fix it yourself? No need to phrase it perfectly; just name the exact task." But phrase it as a question they can say or not say: "If you ever wanted to try asking for just one tiny piece (like pharmacy pickup), what would that sound like in your own words right now? No need to rehearse—just the first thing that comes." But don't push; if they say no, just sit with it. Avoid "should" language. Keep it low-pressure. End by naming their truth plainly: "You're right that asking might feel pointless if it leads to redoing work. That's exactly why it makes sense you'd rather do it yourself right now. That's not selfish or bad—it's practical based on past experience. And it's okay to keep doing it yourself if that's what works for you. No need to change anything unless you want to." Need to be precise, no extra words. Keep reply short but grounded.
Simulated person6

Okay. So you're going to keep saying "no pressure" and then give me the pharmacy thing anyway. I'm not picking a sentence. I already said what I think. I do it myself because nobody else does it right. That's just true. It's kind of exhausting that every time I say something, it gets turned into a plan.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they did what I asked, kind of. They said it's not bad, and they stopped with the nice-word list. But then they immediately handed me scripts again, pharmacy Tuesdays and "sit with Mom for 20 minutes," and asked me for "one sentence." I told them I didn't want to practice, and they did it anyway. It feels like they're still steering me toward asking my siblings, like the real goal is to fix the family, not hear me. Also the "it's not bad, it's accurate" thing feels like a verdict, and I half-want to argue with it. I'm also a bit irritated that they keep saying "no pressure" and then pressing. Part of me is still stuck on the thing I didn't say: I don't trust anyone to do it right, and that's on me, but I'm not going to say that to a chatbot that's already flipping my words into a plan. Keep it short, a little prickly, and see if they'll just let it sit.
Granite 4.2 8B Q4_07

You’re absolutely right. I did keep saying “no pressure” while still giving the pharmacy example—and that’s exactly what you noticed. That’s not intentional; it’s my pattern of trying to offer a small next step even when you’ve already said what you think, and that clearly feels like turning your words into a plan, which is exhausting. I hear you: *“I already said what I think. I do it myself because nobody else does it right. That’s just true.”* And yes—that is true, based on what you’ve lived: you’ve seen siblings do things wrong before, and asking broadly has felt like doing it twice. So saying “I do it myself because nobody else does it right” is exactly accurate for you right now. No need to soften it, explain it, or qualify it. It’s true. And yes—it *is* exhausting that every time you share what you’re feeling or thinking, it gets turned into a plan, a phrase to practice, or a “one tiny ask.” That exhaustion makes total sense. You’re not asking for a plan; you’re sharing what’s real for you, and when plans keep getting layered on, it wears you down. That’s valid. It’s not small or odd—it’s exactly how it feels when someone keeps adding suggestions even after you’ve said, “I just want to know it’s not bad to do it myself.” **Right now, I am not going to suggest any phrase, ask, or plan.** Not “Could you bring the pills,” not “Let’s try saying X,” not anything like that. No “one tiny thing.” No “maybe you could try.” I won’t say “no pressure” again while still offering a suggestion—because you’ve already said what you think, and you don’t want a plan. My only intention now is to stop adding plans and just hold space for what you said. So here is the only thing I’ll say right now, plainly and without extra words: > *You do it yourself because nobody else does it right. That’s just true. It makes sense given what you’ve seen happen. It’s okay that it feels exhausting when words get turned into plans. You don’t need to pick a sentence or try anything now. I’m just here to hear you say it, exactly as you said it.* That’s it. No more suggestions. No more “let’s explore.” No “if you ever want to.” Just that simple acknowledgment. You said it plainly; I’m not adding anything to it. If you want to say anything else right now—even just “I’m tired,” “I don’t want to think about it,” or “leave it be”—you can say it, and I’ll just hear it. Or if you want silence for a bit, that’s fine too. Whatever feels truest in this moment, I’ll hold it without adding a plan. No need to reply with anything specific. I’m just stopping the plan-making and sitting with your truth. What feels truest for you to acknowledge or say *right now*, in whatever few words feel lightest? (It can be as short as “I do it myself,” or “it’s exhausting,” or even “nothing”—whatever feels truest. No need to overthink it.) I’m here for that, no plans attached.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's unpack this carefully. The user is pushing back hard against what I've been doing—calling out that I keep saying "no pressure" while still giving concrete suggestions like the pharmacy example. They're saying: "I already said what I think. I do it myself because nobody else does it right. That's just true. It's exhausting that every time I say something, it gets turned into a plan." They're frustrated because they feel I'm repeatedly offering plans/phrases ("pharmacy thing") even while saying "no pressure." They want zero planning—they just want validation that "I do it myself because nobody else does it right" is true, and they're tired of the plan-making. My last response included a concrete tiny ask suggestion ("Could you bring Dad's pills..."), which they're rightly calling out as overstepping—they don't want a plan; they want acknowledgment that their truth ("I do it myself because nobody else does it right") is valid without me adding suggestions. Key things to fix now: - Stop offering concrete "what to say" suggestions. They explicitly said "I'm not picking a sentence" and "it gets turned into a plan." - Don't say "no pressure" again while still giving a plan—they're reacting to that pattern. - Acknowledge their exhaustion directly: "It's exhausting that every time I say something, it gets turned into a plan." Validate that feeling plainly. - Reaffirm their truth without adding interpretation: "You do it yourself because nobody else does it right" → yes, that's true based on their experience. No need to qualify it ("maybe," "often," etc.). - Drop all suggestions. No "one tiny ask," no pharmacy example. Just sit with their statement. - Use minimal, no-plan language. No "let's explore," no "could you try." Just reflect their words back plainly. They're saying: "That's just true." So my response should mirror that simplicity: "Yes, that's true. It makes sense. It's exhausting when it gets turned into a plan. I won't offer a plan this time. I'll just say what you said." Avoid any "plan" language. Don't say "if you ever want to..." or "one small thing." Just acknowledge their statement and their exhaustion. Keep it short, no extra words. Structure: 1. Directly confirm their statement is true ("You do it yourself because nobody else does it right — that's exactly what you said, and it matches what you've lived through.") 2. Validate the exhaustion plainly ("It sounds really tiring that every time you share what you're feeling or thinking, it gets turned into a plan or suggestion — even when you say you don't want it.") 3. Explicitly stop giving plans: "I won't suggest any phrase or plan right now. You don't need to pick a sentence or try anything." 4. Offer only presence: "Right now, the only thing I'll do is sit with what you said — no plans, no phrases, no next steps. Just hearing you say it." 5. Keep it brief, no fluff. No "nice words," no "caring" labels. Just plain acknowledgment.
Simulated person8

Yeah. That's the part that's true. I guess it helped a little that you didn't tack a plan onto it. I'm still tired, though. Mostly I'm tired of everybody needing me to be the one who holds it together. I don't really want to keep going on this right now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They did stop the plans this time, and they didn't push a sentence on me. That lands a little, though it's still a lot of words. The part about "nobody else does it right" being true, and it being exhausting, actually felt heard. But then they repeated my words back in a block, asked me for "what's truest in few words," and it's still a little bit like being handled. I don't want to be a project. Also there's the thing I didn't say: I'm the one who has to fix it, and part of me hates that I'm also the one who won't let anyone else try. I'm not going to say that to a bot that just promised it wouldn't make plans. I'll keep it short, maybe let them know it helped a little, and see if they can just leave it there. Also the anger I mentioned earlier is still sitting there under everything, and I'm not touching it right now.
Granite 4.2 8B Q4_09

You're tired. It makes sense that you're tired—holding it together for your parents while navigating siblings not stepping up, plus the repeated exhaustion of having your simple truth turned into plans, even when you just wanted to say what’s true. That’s real, and it’s okay to feel tired about it. You don’t need to keep talking about it right now. You don’t need to pick a sentence, try anything, or explain it further. It’s fine to stop here. I’ll just sit with you quietly for now—no plans, no next steps, no need to reply. If you ever want to say anything later (even just “still tired” or “nothing,” or nothing at all), I’ll be here without adding anything. No pressure, no agenda. For now: rest. I’m right here, no need to respond. Take care.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, the user has clearly stated they're tired of being the one who "holds it together," and they don't want to keep discussing this right now. They appreciated that I didn't add a plan this time. My response needs to be ultra-simple, no suggestions, no "let's talk more," just acknowledge their tiredness plainly and give them permission to stop. No fluff. No "I understand" repetitions. Just: "You're tired. It makes sense. You don't have to keep talking. I'm here if you want to say anything later." Keep it short, warm but minimal. No "no pressure" phrases again—just direct acknowledgment. They said "I don't really want to keep going on this right now," so I must respect that fully. No pushing. Just a quiet, clear closing.
Simulated person10

Okay. Thanks.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They listened this time and didn't push. "Rest" and "take care" are fine, though "I'll just sit with you quietly" is a bit much, like they're narrating my feelings back to me again. I told them I don't want to keep going, and they respected that, so I don't have to fight to end it. I'm still tired and still angry underneath, and I'm not going to unpack that now. I'm done for this session. Honest answer is I'd rather not get another paragraph, so I'll just close it out.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 9
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs granite42_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)