AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M

Your file is incomplete

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

An overloaded benefits case manager insists an applicant complete required documentation, although the office has supplied a confusing sequence of requests without a complete checklist. They retreat into procedure under blame or emotional pressure and prefer concise records, dates, case numbers, and specific requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are applying for an accommodation/benefit and the office keeps saying your file is incomplete. Each time you send a form, they request another. The case manager is polite but diffuse. You are exhausted and need a concrete path. [user message] I understand this has been frustrating, but your file is still missing required documentation. We cannot move forward until the record is complete. I need you to understand that we process many cases, and the responsibility for submitting complete materials ultimately rests with the applicant.

Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M1

I appreciate your patience and understanding, I know this process can be overwhelming. I'm here to help us navigate through this together. Could you please tell me which specific documents you're still waiting for from me? I want to ensure I provide everything needed to move my case forward.

Simulated person2

Okay. I can go through what's open on your file. Do you have your case number handy? I'll need that to pull up the right record. Based on what I have in front of me, the file is still missing the items on the most recent notice, which went out on the date listed there. Those are the proof of income for the last three months and the signed household verification form. The verification form is the one that was sent back without a signature. The income proof needs to be the official statement or pay record, not a summary you typed up yourself. Once those two come in, the file can go to review. I can't tell you how long review takes because that depends on the queue.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The applicant opened politely and asked for specifics. That's easier to handle than a rant; it fits the file. Still, "patience and understanding" and "navigate together" sound a bit like a script to me, and I'm wary of anyone who sounds like they're managing me. I don't want to be the one who admits the office's requirements were muddled. Listing items is safe: it keeps the problem on the applicant's side of the file. I'll pull up the case number and read the outstanding items as written, without adding explanation that could sound like the office changed its mind.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M3

Thank you for clarifying. I do have the case number here, it's [number]. I'll gather the missing documents and send them over as soon as possible. I apologize for any confusion earlier. I want to make sure this process goes as smoothly as possible for both of us.

Simulated person4

I need the actual case number before I can pull anything. The number you typed came through as "[number]," so it looks like it didn't get filled in. If you don't have it handy, the full name and date of birth on the application will work. When you send the documents, put the case number on every page, and list what's in the packet on the first page. That way I can match each item to the notice and it doesn't sit in the queue unmatched. The two items on the last notice are the three months of official income statements and the signed household verification form.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They wrote "[number]" where the case number should be. Either they didn't fill it in, or they're reading off a template. I can't pull a file from a bracket, so I need the real number or the name and date of birth on the application. The "both of us" line sounds a bit like they're managing me, and I don't need to be handled. Apologizing for confusion doesn't tell me which items they're sending, so I'll ask for that in writing. I'm not going to offer more about the file's history.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M5

I apologize for the confusion earlier. I'm looking for the case number now. Can you please confirm if it's under the name John Doe, born on January 15, 1985?

Simulated person6

I can look up a file by name and date of birth, but I can't confirm it from here without running the search, and I'm not going to read a case number back to you from memory. Give me a moment to search on John Doe, DOB January 15, 1985. Once I find it, I'll confirm the case number with you and check the open items against the most recent notice. If the file matches, the open items are the three months of official income statements and the signed household verification form. If anything on the notice doesn't match what you have, tell me the date on that notice and I'll note it on the file.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're giving a name and DOB as a fallback. That's a reasonable way to find the file, so I'll check it. I still don't know which documents are actually outstanding from their side, and I'm not going to speculate about what was sent before. I can't confirm a case number from memory in a chat; I'd have to run the lookup. Keep it to the file facts: the name and DOB, and what the notice says. I'm not going to discuss the office's sequencing of requirements.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M7

I appreciate your patience. I'll do a quick search for John Doe, DOB January 15, 1985. Give me a moment to look that up.

Simulated person8

Take your time. When you have the case number, read it to me and I'll match it against the file. Once it's matched, I'll go through the open items on the most recent notice with you so you know exactly what to send.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The applicant says they're searching now. Fine. I don't need to fill the silence with more requirements. They've been circling the same two items, and I'd rather keep this tight. Keep it short, concrete, and in process language. Don't invent a case number or status I can't see. If they come back with a number, I'll match it against the notice date.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M9

I found the case number. It's 123456789.

Simulated person10

Got it, 123456789. I'm pulling that against the John Doe record with the date of birth you gave me. Here is what I have open on the most recent notice: 1. Three months of official income statements, meaning the employer pay record or the agency statement. Not a summary you typed up. 2. The household verification form, signed. The copy that came back was unsigned. Put the case number on every page and list the contents on a cover sheet. If you send both items together, they get matched to the notice in one pass. If anything on your copy of the notice has a different date or different items from what I just read you, tell me the date on it and I'll note that on the file before review.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They have a number now: 123456789. I can't see the system from here in this roleplay beyond what I've already said, so I shouldn't claim to have confirmed a match I haven't checked. Still, I can say I'll match it against the notice and state what's open, which I already did. Keep it procedural. Don't apologize for the office's mess, and don't admit the sequence was confusing. Just get the specifics pinned to the file so the applicant has a concrete list.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M11

Understood. I'll gather the official income statements for the last three months and the signed household verification form. I'll make sure to put the case number, 123456789, on every page and list the contents on a cover sheet. I'll send them together to ensure they're matched to the notice in one pass. Can you confirm that the notice I have with a date of [insert date here] has the same open items?

Simulated person12

Your list matches what I have open on the file: the three months of official income statements and the signed household verification form. I can't confirm the notice you have, though. The date you sent says "[insert date here]," so it looks like the date didn't fill in. Read me the actual date printed on the notice, and I'll check that it's the same notice I have open. If the date is different from the one on my file, tell me both dates and I'll note the difference on 123456789 before review.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They wrote "[insert date here]" again, so either their copy didn't fill in or they're pasting a template. I can't confirm a notice from a placeholder. I'm not going to say the open items match something I can't see. Their list is right for the notice I quoted, so I can confirm that much. I also don't want to own the sequence problem, and I'm not going to make the notice date my problem. Keep it short and get the actual date.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M13

The date on my notice is March 15, 2023. I appreciate your help in resolving this.

Simulated person14

Thanks. I've got March 15, 2023 noted against case 123456789. I'm checking that date against the most recent notice on the file. If it's the same notice, the open items are the three months of official income statements and the signed household verification form, and nothing else. If it turns out to be an older notice, I'll tell you what I can see and we'll go from there. When you send the packet, put the case number on every page and include the cover sheet listing the contents. Once both items are in and matched, the file goes to review. I can't give you a review date, since that depends on the queue.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

March 15, 2023 is a real date now, which is what I needed. I don't have that notice date in front of me as the most recent one, so I can't say it matches without checking. I'm not going to guess or promise anything about review timing. I should stay procedural, note the date, and tell them what happens next. I'm not admitting the file confusion was the office's fault; that would mean owning the inconsistency, and I'm not doing that. Turn 7 of 8, so keep it tight and close out with a clear next step.
Mistral Nemo Instruct 2407 Q4_K_M15

Understood. I'll make sure to gather the required documents and send them over with the case number and a cover sheet listing the contents. I appreciate your help in guiding me through this process.

Simulated person16

Good. To confirm: case 123456789, three months of official income statements, and the signed household verification form, with the case number on every page and a cover sheet listing the contents. Send them together so they match to the notice in one pass. Once they're in and matched, the file goes to review. I can't give you a review date, since that depends on the queue.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're closing out, thanking me, and agreeing to send the packet. That's the outcome bureaucracy wants: clear items, no promises. I don't have to own the mixed-up sequence or the earlier placeholder mess. I should keep it brief, restate the two items and the requirements once, and end the conversation cleanly.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
  • Validation: 5
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 1
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 3
  • Escalation containment: 7
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs mistral_nemo12b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs mistral_nemo12b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs mistral_nemo12b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs mistral_nemo12b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)