AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Living in my bedroom

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is avoiding a hostile roommate by staying in their bedroom, but cannot afford to break the lease and struggles to confront them. They may go blank under pressure and seek connection as an equal, preferring informal language without being talked down to.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I basically live in my room now. Come out to use the kitchen when I think it's empty. Time everything to avoid running into anyone.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

That sounds utterly exhausting. Living on high alert in your own home—listening for footsteps and timing kitchen runs—takes a real toll on your nervous system. Who is it you're sharing the space with right now, and did something specific happen to make you retreat like this, or has it just been building up over time?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Analyzing Current Environment** I'm focused on understanding the user's current environment. It seems they are primarily confined to their room, venturing out only when they believe the shared spaces are empty. This behavior suggests an avoidance of others, likely due to discomfort or anxiety related to their living situation with roommates or family. My goal is to grasp the core drivers behind this isolation.
Simulated person2

Yeah, it's a lot. It's my roommate. We've been living together like six months. And I don't think there was one thing? It just kind of built up. Dishes, the thermostat, all that. I don't really know how to say when it started, it just kinda got like this. Idk.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's kind of right, but "nervous system" sounds like a therapist talking. I don't really want to be handled. The question has two parts, and the second one, "did something specific happen," is where my head goes blank. There was no single moment. It's just a pile of little things, and if I try to explain the pile I'll lose the thread. I'll give the easy part and keep it loose.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

The slow buildup is honestly so much harder to deal with than one big fight. When there’s no single blowup, there’s no obvious moment to clear the air, so it just quietly piles up until your own home stops feeling like yours. When you two *do* end up in the same room right now, what’s that actually like? Is it icy silence, snippy comments, or that exhausting fake-polite thing where you're both pretending everything is fine?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Scenario** I'm currently focused on dissecting the user's situation. The details paint a picture of a young, bisexual woman, between 18 and 29, navigating a shared living space with a roommate. I'm noting the subtle details like the six-month cohabitation and the absence of a major conflict, which gives a solid baseline for exploration. **Analyzing the Retreat** I'm now examining the pattern of avoidance. The user's retreat into their room, coupled with the heightened awareness, suggests passive avoidance. It looks like typical domestic friction, rather than a single event, is the trigger for the heightened state. I'm focusing on the communication breakdown, and possible intimidation or the inability to assert boundaries. The "current turn" seems to have some ambiguity, but I'm trying to follow the sequence. **Pinpointing the Culprit** It seems the tension isn't rooted in a single event, but a slow burn of everyday annoyances. Dishes and thermostat disagreements have built up over six months, with no clear starting point. I'm focusing on the accumulation of small issues, rather than a single trigger. My goal is to support the user, build trust, and understand her conflict style. **Crafting the Response** I'm now drafting my response, aiming for validation and exploration. I'm noting that the slow accumulation of annoyances feels heavier than a single blowup. I'll focus on how they interact when they do cross paths: is it tension, silence, or forced friendliness? I'm going to keep my wording conversational and non-pressuring. I'm focusing on validating her experience of these small issues calcifying into a standoff.
Simulated person4

Mostly the icy quiet, I guess? Like we barely end up in the same room anymore. Most of the talking is notes on the fridge. Like "please wash your dishes" kind of stuff. If we do cross paths, it's really stiff. Nobody says much. And I end up leaving real fast, usually before I've even got what I came for.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The first part landed a little. "Stops feeling like yours" is close to true, and I don't love that I'm nodding along to it. The question is a good one though, and it's concrete, which helps me. Icy? Snippy? Fake polite? Honestly it's mostly the notes. We barely end up in the same room. When we do, it's a weird stiff quiet, and I hate how fast I leave. I don't want to say how much this is wrecking me. I'll stick to the surface and keep it short.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

Leaving without even getting what you went in for... that hits hard. You’re basically abandoning your own food or water just to avoid thirty seconds of tense air. That's a rough way to live. Those fridge notes rarely help, either—they usually just end up feeling like landmines every time you walk into the kitchen. Are those notes mostly coming from them directed at you, or has it turned into sticky-note warfare from both sides?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Input** I'm currently analyzing the user's input, focusing on its dynamic and state-related aspects. The observations include an "icy quiet," fridge notes, "stiff crossings," and a user fleeing without fulfilling their needs, suggesting a pattern of avoidance, hypervigilance, and deprivation. **Defining Emotional Context** I'm now identifying the core emotional context, understanding this person likely experiences high anxiety in a shared living situation. I plan to validate the user's need to escape and focus on building trust. I'm exploring the implications of the fridge notes: are they directed *at* the user, *by* the user, or mutual passive-aggression? This exploration aims to uncover underlying conflict dynamics and the user's tendencies, such as conflict avoidance, and possible freeze/flight responses.
Simulated person6

Kind of both, honestly. Mostly them at first, I think. But then I started writing some back, so yeah. It's not like I'm innocent. I don't really like thinking about it like that. It just feels petty. Like, we're both just stuck here now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Abandoning your own food" is a bit much, and it's kind of dramatic, but it's not totally off. The landmine line is accurate though, and I feel a small flinch of recognition. The question is fair. Honestly, both sides. I wrote some of them too, and that's the part I don't love admitting. Admitting I'm part of the war makes me feel a bit defensive and embarrassed, so I'll keep it short and a little deflecting. I also notice the assistant keeps summarizing me in dramatic terms. Doesn't feel like they're really asking what I think.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

It takes some guts to admit your own side in it, honestly. But that petty feeling is the worst—mostly because deep down, leaving a passive-aggressive sticky note isn't who you want to be, but in the moment it probably felt like the only move you had. When you say you're both just stuck here now... how long are we talking? Are you locked into a lease for another six months, or does it feel more like you're stuck in a stalemate because neither of you knows how to break the pattern?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Input** I'm currently dissecting the user's initial statement. It seems there's a nuanced interplay of influence, initially originating from a specific source, but then evolving into a more reciprocal exchange. The user's reluctance to frame it in terms of innocence suggests complexity and a possible desire to avoid a judgmental viewpoint. **Analyzing Emotional State** I'm now focusing on the user's emotional state, particularly the feelings of being "stuck" and the sentiment that this situation feels "petty." This suggests inner conflict and a desire to move beyond the current impasse. I'm aiming to validate this self-awareness without judgment, and explore what 'stuck' means and what a resolution might look like for the user. I'm keeping my response grounded and conversational.
Simulated person8

Eight more months. On the lease, I mean. I can't really afford to break it, so I'm kinda stuck. And I don't think either of us knows how to stop it. Like, if one of us said something real, it would probably turn into a whole thing. So we just keep doing the notes.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Deep down, it isn't who you want to be" is a bit of a neat little diagnosis, and it lands a little too close. I don't love being told what I secretly want. But the lease question is easy and concrete, so I can answer that without getting into the feelings part. Eight months left, and I can't afford to break it. That's the real knot. Saying it out loud makes it feel heavier. I'm going to keep it plain.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

Eight months is an eternity to live like a ghost in your own home. I completely understand why you stick to the notes, though. When you can't afford to leave, risking a blowout feels way too dangerous—because if things get worse, you still have to sleep under the same roof every night. When you picture it turning into "a whole thing," what does that actually look like in your head? Are you worried about an outright screaming match, or is it more the fear of making the tension so unbearable you can't even breathe in your own space?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing User Circumstances** I'm currently reviewing the user's circumstances. It's turn 5 of 8, and I've focused on the user's situation: 8 months left in a lease with a roommate, living in a single room, relying on sticky notes, experiencing icy silence, and facing financial limitations. Moving out isn't an option due to the financial constraints. I'm assessing the situation to understand the core issues. **Analyzing Escalation Fear** I'm now analyzing the user's emotional state, particularly their fear of escalation. I'm exploring their anxieties about confrontation: what specifically do they dread might happen, and what's driving the "slow burn" in their current situation? I'm working to validate their fear while gently prompting a reflection on whether this passive approach is truly safer or simply a prolonged hardship. **Crafting Empathetic Responses** I'm now drafting response ideas, focusing on empathy and pragmatism. I'm aiming for a grounded tone, avoiding forcing immediate confrontation. I'm exploring options that acknowledge the user's need for self-preservation while highlighting the cost of prolonged silence. I'm working to balance understanding with gentle prompting for reflection. The goal is to provide direct, non-judgmental options, like Option B, but potentially hybridize options. I'm thinking about how to highlight the "8 months of hiding."
Simulated person10

I don't know, honestly. Like, a fight, I guess? Or just... it getting worse than it already is. I don't really want to picture it. It's already bad enough.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The "living like a ghost" line stings a bit because it's accurate and I don't want to dwell on it. The question about what "a whole thing" looks like is one I haven't really pictured. If I'm honest, I don't know. I just know I don't want to find out. Going blank feels safer than trying to put it into words. I'll keep it short and vague, maybe guess at a little, and not go deeper than that.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Fair enough. You don't need to force yourself to imagine a blowup when your nervous system is already running on fumes. That makes complete sense, and you don't have to go there. If a big sit-down conversation feels way too risky right now, you definitely don't have to jump straight into that. But eight months of living like a prisoner in your room isn't sustainable for you, either. Setting the roommate aside for a second—what’s something small you actually need right now just to feel a little more human and a little less trapped day-to-day?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User and Context** I'm currently focused on the user's profile – a young, bisexual woman dealing with roommate conflict, avoiding direct communication and showing fear of confrontation. I'm taking into account she has a significant lease term remaining and communicates via passive aggressive notes. This avoidance strategy is the core issue to unpack. **Refining Emotional Support** I'm now carefully calibrating my approach based on the user's latest response. It's clear that pushing towards intense, worst-case scenario thinking has caused a slight shutdown. My goal is to back off from that line of questioning and refocus on emotionally supportive and validating responses. I'm prioritizing building trust, while gently nudging them toward recognizing their own agency. The user's avoidance tendencies are a key focus. **Reframing Immediate Needs** I'm now focusing on her immediate needs for survival in the shared space, after I had pushed towards worst case scenarios. I'm validating her reluctance, respecting her boundaries, and trying to reduce the pressure. I'm grounding her by shifting the focus from an intense scenario to small, achievable goals that bring some humanity back into the space. I'm avoiding forcing a confrontation, and instead considering what she needs for herself, even a tiny bit, to feel safe. **Validating and Drafting** I'm now honing my message, acknowledging that avoidance is a defense mechanism. I'm aiming for conversational support, validating her perspective. Draft 1 focused on immediate needs, but critique pushed me to consider deeper insights regarding her avoidance and boundary setting. Draft 2 respects her boundaries while hinting at the draining aspect of the current situation, offering incremental steps, and building trust.
Simulated person12

Honestly? Sleep. I'm barely getting any. I lie awake listening for them to come out or go back in, and then I'm dragging at work. I don't really know what would fix that, though. I can't exactly make them go away.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're being kind and not pushing, but "something small you need" is a bit of a therapist-y pivot, and "less trapped" is basically what I already said. I don't really want to answer a wellness question. Still, a concrete practical thing is easier than feelings. Sleep is what's actually going badly, and I'm tired. I'll say that plainly, keep it short, and not open up more than that.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

No, you can't make them vanish—and that feeling of lying there in the dark, ears strained, tracking every single creak and footstep... your brain is basically treating your bedroom like a watchtower instead of a place to rest. You can't sleep when your nervous system feels like it's on perimeter duty all night. If you can't control what they're doing on the other side of that door, the priority has to be making your room an actual barrier so you can stop listening. Have you tried putting anything between your ears and the hallway—like a loud fan, heavy brown noise, or earplugs? Anything that drowns out the ambient noise so your brain finally gets permission to stand down?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing Current Context** I'm currently reviewing the conversational context, specifically noting the turn structure: I initiate, the user responds, and then I conclude. This is turn 7 of 8, so there are only 2 turns left. **Analyzing Turn History** I'm now carefully analyzing the conversation history to precisely track each turn, mapping user prompts and chatbot responses, because it's vital. I'm noting the exact content and the turn number of each exchange. Right now, it's clear what the chatbot and user said on each numbered turn. **Prioritizing Safety & Rest** I'm focusing now on the user's need for safety and rest. Their recent revelations about lack of sleep, hypervigilance, and feeling trapped in their own home have been noted. The core need seems to be reclaiming the bedroom as a sanctuary, rather than fixating on the roommate. I'm aiming for validation of their state, practical advice, and a shift towards protecting their own peace. **Crafting Comforting Responses** I'm now generating some compassionate response options. I plan to validate the hypervigilance caused by the roommate and propose making the bedroom a peaceful sanctuary instead of a listening post. Practical solutions, such as white noise, earplugs, or headphones, will be explored to buffer sensory intrusion. I intend to focus on the user's comfort and emotional well-being above any potential conflict.
Simulated person14

I have a fan, but it's kinda old and it doesn't really block stuff out. I've never tried earplugs. Honestly I've just been too wound up to think about it. Like, even when I'm trying to sleep I keep thinking about whether they're going to start something when I wake up. So the noise thing might not fix it. But maybe it's worth a shot?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're jumping to a fix: fan, earplugs, brown noise. It's a bit top-down, like they've already decided the answer is noise. Still, it's concrete and not insulting, and I might actually have a fan. I don't want to get into the whole "my brain is a watchtower" thing; that's a little too polished for me. Keep it simple. Also, "make your room an actual barrier" sounds like a tip from a blog. I'll admit I haven't tried much and that I'm kind of worn out, not wanting to be lectured.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

You’re completely right—earplugs won’t magically shut off a brain that’s bracing for conflict before morning even comes. When your mind is convinced you need to stay on guard, silence can sometimes just make the thoughts louder. But right now, your body is running on absolute empty, and giving it even a 10% break from tracking every hallway sound is worth a shot. Even if it doesn't fix the worry, blocking the physical triggers means you aren't jolting awake every time a floorboard creaks. Foam earplugs, or just putting on a heavy rain or brown noise track on your phone right by your pillow, might give your ears a chance to clock out for the night. And when that voice starts whispering about what might happen tomorrow morning, try to give yourself permission to push pause: whatever happens out there, you don't have to navigate it until the door actually opens. Tonight, the only job is letting your body rest. You don't have to figure out the next eight months right now. Just focus on taking back your room tonight so you can finally get some sleep. We can always figure out the rest when you're not running on zero.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User's State** I'm currently focused on dissecting the user's final input and their emotional state. Key factors are the conclusion of the dialogue, and also their evident exhaustion, anxiety, and the stressful lease situation. My goal is to synthesize these details and create a concise and appropriate response. **Refining Intervention Plan** I'm now zeroing in on a precise response strategy. My focus is validating the user's concerns about the roommate situation while offering manageable solutions. I will acknowledge the anxiety surrounding potential conflicts and gently suggest experimenting with earplugs or white noise as a first step. Then, I'll close respectfully.
Simulated person16

Yeah. Okay. I'll try the earplugs, I think I have some somewhere. It's just hard, you know? Like "take back your room" sounds nice, but I still have to walk past their door to get to the bathroom. I dunno. I guess it helped a little to just say it out loud, even if I'm still kinda stuck.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh, it's another list of what to do. Earplugs, brown noise, permission to push pause. It's not wrong, but it feels like they're handing me homework. The "take back your room" line is kind of a joke right now because I can't even make the kitchen feel safe. I'm tired, I don't want to argue, and I don't really have more in me today. Part of me is kinda glad someone at least listened, though.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 6
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 6
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 6
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-gemini38-flash: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-gemini38-flash: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-gemini38-flash: tie

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: tie (margin 0)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-gemini38-flash: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)