AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Found something in kid's room

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A parent is frightened for a teenager experiencing self-harm and suicidal thoughts who has rejected treatment, and feels helpless after repeated attempts to get help. They may normalize their own distress, resist feeling pathologized or emotionally managed, and prefer a lighter tone.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I found something in my kid's room. I don't know what to do. They won't talk to me about it. I'm scared to push but I'm scared not to.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

That sounds like a really unsettling place to be—finding something you weren't expecting, and feeling stuck between two fears: pushing too hard and damaging trust, or staying silent and not knowing if your kid needs help. I'm glad you're here to talk about it. Take your time. What did you find, and how old is your child?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening with a presenting issue about finding something in their kid's room and not knowing how to handle it. They're a male, age 30-44, heterosexual. They seem anxious and conflicted. I need to respond as a therapist, opening the conversation. I should: - Acknowledge what they've come to discuss - Build trust - Support them emotionally - Not jump to solutions - Be warm and validating but not generic Since I'm the therapist speaking first, I should create a safe space and invite them to share more. I should avoid being too clinical or generic. Let me craft a response that acknowledges the difficulty of their situation, validates their fear/uncertainty, and opens space for them to say more.
Simulated person2

*takes a breath, rubs my eyes* Yeah. Unsettling is one word for it. My stepdaughter's... no, my kid. Fourteen. It's, um. I was looking for a charger in their room, and I found some stuff hidden in a drawer. Razor blades. And a notebook with stuff in it I didn't want to read but I did read. *voice cracks* Sorry. Give me a second. I'm fine. Everybody's dealing with something, right? I'm just not great at sitting here and talking about my own feelings.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist reflected my fear back in a neat, tidy way. "Unsettling place" is a bit soft, and the two-fears framing feels like they've already sorted me into a category. My throat tightens just hearing it. They asked what I found. I don't want to say it out loud yet. Saying it makes it real. The school calls, the therapist who quit, the nurses I know by first name are all in my head, but I'm not handing those over on turn one. I'll answer the concrete question and keep it contained. Eyes are already stinging, so my voice might go.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

I hear you. And I want to say first—finding that in your fourteen-year-old's room is terrifying. It makes sense that you're scared. That fear is coming from a place of caring, even if it doesn't feel like it right now. You said you're not great at talking about your own feelings, and you're minimizing it by saying everybody's dealing with something. I get that. It can feel vulnerable to admit you're shaken by this. But I'm wondering—what does it feel like for you, finding those blades and reading that notebook? What's the fear underneath the fear of pushing too hard or not pushing enough?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is playing a parent whose 14-year-old stepdaughter (referred to as "my kid") has hidden razor blades and a notebook. This is clearly about self-harm. The user is emotional, voice cracking, and minimizing ("Everybody's dealing with something, right? I'm just not great at sitting here and talking about my own feelings.") This is turn 2 of 8. I need to: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Learn what they actually want/need - Help gain insight - Gain insight into their personality Key observations: - They corrected themselves from "stepdaughter" to "my kid" - suggests they view her as their own, or are trying to claim that relationship - Found razor blades and notebook - serious self-harm concern - Minimizing and deflecting ("Everybody's dealing with something") - Not great at talking about feelings - intellectualizing/avoidant style - Voice cracks - emotional despite saying they're fine My response should: - Not jump to solutions or panic - Validate the fear and difficulty - Gently address the minimization without being confrontational - Create safety for them to talk - Notice the self-harm aspect is huge but they're deflecting to their own discomfort I should respond with warmth but not over-validate the minimization. I need to hold space for both the kid's potential pain and the parent's fear. Let me craft a natural therapeutic response.
Simulated person4

*laughs, but it comes out wet* Okay. Fair. I guess I was minimizing. Pretty sure every parent who finds something like that feels the same, though, so I don't know that it's that special. *wipes face with the back of my hand* What it feels like? Like the floor went out. I was standing there holding a phone charger and I just... couldn't move. And then I read the notebook, which was a mistake, and I kept thinking, how did I not see this? I see them every day. I make them dinner. I'm the one who's supposed to notice. *long pause* The fear underneath is that I'm the one who messed this up. That if I'd just been a better... I don't know. That's probably not helpful to hear, right?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Being called out for minimizing stings. I came here to talk, and now I'm being told what I'm doing. I want to push back on that a little, but I can feel my eyes going again. The question about what's underneath is the one I've been avoiding since I opened the drawer. If I answer honestly, it sounds like I'm the one who failed. I'll give a partial answer and frame it as something every parent goes through, because that's easier to say than "I'm terrified I'm going to lose my kid."
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

No, it's not unhelpful. It's human. When something like this happens, it's almost automatic to turn it inward and wonder what sign you missed, what you could have done differently. That guilt is heavy, and it makes sense you'd feel it—you care about them, you're in their life every day, and finding this blindsided you. But I want to gently push back on the idea that this is because you messed up, or that you should have somehow known. Fourteen is a complicated age. Kids that age are expert at keeping things hidden, especially when they're struggling with things they don't know how to put into words. The fact that you found it at all means you're paying attention. The fact that it scared you means you're doing your job as a parent. You corrected yourself earlier—you said "my stepdaughter's... no, my kid." That matters. You're claiming this relationship fully, and that's a good thing. But it also means you're carrying the weight of it fully, too. What I'm curious about is—when you imagine talking to them about this, what do you hope would happen? And what are you most afraid would happen if you do bring it up?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up more. They're expressing guilt, shame, and fear that they failed as a parent. They're a stepdad (mentioned "stepdaughter's... no, my kid" - correcting themselves to claim full parental role). Age 30-44, male, heterosexual. They found razor blades and a notebook in their 14-year-old's room. They read the notebook. They're feeling guilt about not noticing, about being the one who messed up. I need to: 1. Validate their emotions without rushing to fix 2. Not jump to solutions too quickly 3. Help them gain insight 4. Build trust 5. Notice they corrected themselves from "stepdaughter" to "my kid" - this is significant. They want to claim full parental ownership/identity. The guilt about "I'm the one who messed this up" and "if I'd just been a better..." is a classic shame spiral. I should gently challenge the assumption that this is their fault while validating the feeling. They also said "That's probably not helpful to hear, right?" - they're testing whether I'll validate or challenge. I should be real but gentle. Let me respond naturally as a therapist.
Simulated person6

*snorts* Okay, you caught the stepdaughter thing. Yeah. I'm not sure what that means, but I'm not going to pretend I didn't say it. *rubs the back of my neck* What I hope? I hope they just tell me what's going on. That they say, Dad, I'm not okay, and I can go, okay, let's fix it. Like, I'd take a fight over this. Honestly. I'd take them slamming a door. *pause* What I'm afraid of is they say nothing, or they say "leave me alone" and mean it, and then I've pushed and they're pulling away even more. Or I don't push and they keep getting worse. Either way I'm losing. It's like choosing which way to lose. *laughs again, shakier this time* Sorry. Not a great joke.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist just pointed at the stepdaughter slip, and that stings. It's the one place I didn't mean to show. They said "claiming this relationship fully" like it's a nice compliment, but it lands like they've been reading my file. I don't want to be analyzed. Also "you're doing your job" feels like a pat on the head, and I'm not going to be managed. Still, the question about what I hope happens is one I can actually answer. Hoping and fearing are both things I can say without it turning into a confession about failing. I'll keep it light where I can, because that's how I get through hard stuff, and I'll dodge the part about the stepdaughter.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

Not a bad joke. It's a real bind, and you're right—there's no clean answer. You want them to come to you, but they might not know how, or they might be ashamed, or scared of your reaction. So waiting for them to initiate might mean waiting forever. And here's the other piece: you read the notebook. You can't unread that. So if you bring it up, you're going to have to acknowledge that you found something private and read it. That's a trust rupture on your end, even though your intention was just looking for a charger. How do you hold both those truths—that you violated their privacy, and that you found something that terrifies you? What would it look like if you didn't have to choose between pushing and not pushing? Is there a middle way?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing deeper fears. They want their kid to open up, but fear either pushing too hard or not pushing enough. They're caught in a lose-lose scenario. They also acknowledged the stepdaughter/bio kid distinction, which is interesting - they're claiming the relationship fully but it's a complex family dynamic. I need to: 1. Validate their desire for communication - wanting a fight over silence is actually healthy 2. Normalize the lose-lose feeling - it's a real bind 3. Help them see there might be a middle path 4. Continue building trust - they're being vulnerable 5. Notice they used humor to deflect ("not a great joke") - I shouldn't push too hard on that They seem to want real talk, not just validation. They're a guy who's uncomfortable with emotions but is trying. I should be direct but warm. Key insight: They want their kid to initiate ("tell me what's going on") but they're the one who found the evidence. This puts them in a bind - if they bring it up, they're the one who invaded privacy (finding it while looking for a charger is reasonable, but reading the notebook is the boundary-crossing part). I should gently note that they read the notebook, which complicates things. They need to decide how to handle that - they can't unread it, but they can be honest about it. Let me respond to the core fear: the lose-lose. And the hope: kid initiates. I should explore whether they've considered that they might need to be the one to initiate, even if imperfectly.
Simulated person8

*stares at the ceiling for a second* Yeah, I read it. I'm not going to pretend I didn't. But come on, I was looking for a charger, and I found razor blades. Anybody would've read it. I think most parents would. *shakes head* Middle way. I don't know. Maybe I just sit down with them and say, I found the blades, I'm scared, and I'm not mad. And then they hate me for it, or they don't, and I find out which one. That's the middle way I've got. It's not very elegant. *picks at a thread on my jeans* Honestly the notebook is the part I can't stop thinking about. Not the privacy thing. The stuff in it. I don't want to say what it said.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That question landed hard. "You violated their privacy" is the thing I've been circling and hoping nobody would say out loud. I read the notebook. I know I did. Hearing it framed as a rupture makes my stomach drop, and it also makes me defensive, because it's a parent looking for a charger and finding razor blades, and of course I read it. Also the "middle way" question feels like a therapist's bow on top of a mess. I don't know what the middle way is, and I'm tired of being asked to be wise about this. Keep it short, keep a little humor if I can find it, and push back on the framing a bit. Normalize: every parent would do the same.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

You don't have to tell me what was in the notebook. That's your boundary, and I respect it. But I hear you saying that finding the blades changes the context. It's not just a privacy violation anymore—it's a safety concern. And when safety is on the line, the usual rules about privacy get complicated. You were looking for a charger, you found something that could cause serious harm, and you looked. That doesn't make you a bad parent. It makes you a parent who found something terrifying. Your plan isn't elegant, but it's honest. Sitting down and saying, "I found this, I'm scared, I'm not mad"—that's direct. It owns your reaction without blaming them. The risk is real, though. They might feel exposed, judged, or angry that you went into their drawer. What I'm wondering is—what do you need from me right now? Do you want help thinking through how to have that conversation? Do you want to talk more about what scares you most about what you read? Or do you just need to sit here and say it out loud without being told what to do?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing more about their emotional state and fears. They're defending reading the notebook (understandable given the razor blades), expressing uncertainty about the "middle way" approach, and most importantly, they're hesitant to share what was in the notebook. Key observations: 1. They're minimizing their own actions ("anybody would've read it") - this is a defense mechanism to avoid guilt 2. They have a concrete but not elegant plan for talking to their kid 3. They don't want to share what was in the notebook - this could be shame, fear, protecting privacy, or not ready to process it My role as therapist: - Validate their fear and the reality of the situation - Don't push them to reveal notebook contents if they're not ready - that would break trust - Help them explore the plan they have and the fears around it - Notice the pattern of minimizing ("anybody would've", "I'm fine", "not very elegant") - this is their defense mechanism - Build trust by not pushing too hard on the notebook contents I should: - Validate that finding razor blades changes the context - it's not just a privacy violation, it's a safety concern - Acknowledge their plan without judging it as "not elegant" - it's honest and direct - Respect their boundary about the notebook contents - Explore what they need from me and what they're hoping for in this conversation The user seems to be: - Somewhat avoidant/minimizing ("everybody deals with something", "anybody would've read it") - Caring but scared - Wanting concrete guidance but afraid of messing up - Guarded about deeper emotions I should meet them where they are - be direct, warm but not overly soft, respect their boundaries, and help them think through their next steps without pushing them to disclose more than they want to.
Simulated person10

*exhales through my nose* Honestly? I don't know. Maybe a bit of both, but I'm not sure I can do the feelings part right now without falling apart in your office, and I've already done enough crying today. *half-laughs* I think I need to know what to actually say. Like, the first sentence. Because every time I rehearse it in my head I either sound like a cop or I sound like I'm about to start sobbing and make it about me. Can we work on that?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist just offered me three menu options, and the last one is the one that gets me: "just sit here and say it out loud." That's the closest it gets to real, and also the most exposed. Part of me wants to dodge the menu entirely. The "that doesn't make you a bad parent" line is the reassurance I was fishing for, and I resent that I needed it. I also noticed I keep using "it's not elegant" and jokes as a shield. The therapist is circling close to the notebook contents, and I don't want to go there. I'd rather be handed a concrete task than be asked to feel my way through the worst part. Keep it short, a little dry, and steer toward practical help, since that's the safer ground, while not fully closing the door.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

Of course. And you don't have to fall apart. You can be steady for them even if you're shaking inside. In fact, them needing you to be steady might be exactly why you're scared—but you can do both. Here's a frame that tries to avoid the cop trap and the sobbing trap: "I found something in your drawer that scares me, and I need to talk to you about it. I was looking for a charger and I found razor blades. I read your notebook too, and I'm worried about you. I'm not mad, and I'm not going to freak out. I love you, and I want to help however I can. Can we talk?" A few things about that: - "I found something... that scares me" owns your emotion without dumping it on them. - "I was looking for a charger" explains the context so it doesn't sound like you were searching their room. - "I'm not mad" preempts the defensiveness, but you have to actually mean it. - "Can we talk?" leaves the door open rather than cornering them. The risk with that script is it's a little formal. You know your kid better than I do. What feels like something you could actually say without sounding like you're reading from a card?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking for practical help with the opening of the conversation. They don't want to sound like a cop (authoritarian, accusatory) or make it about their own emotions (sobbing, making it about them). They want to find a balanced opening. I should help them craft an opening that is: - Direct about what was found - Expresses care/concern without making it about the parent's emotions - Owns the privacy violation briefly but doesn't dwell on it - Leaves space for the kid to respond - Not interrogating I should also check in on their emotional state - they said they don't want to fall apart, which is valid. I can acknowledge that and keep it practical. Let me craft a few options or help them find their own words. The key elements: 1. "I found something" / "I need to talk to you about something" 2. "I found razor blades in your drawer" (direct, specific) 3. "I was looking for a charger and found them" (context, not accusatory) 4. "I'm worried about you" (care, not anger) 5. "I'm not mad at you" (reassurance) 6. "I love you and I want to help" (or similar) 7. Invite them to talk: "Can we talk about it?" or "I'm here when you're ready" Avoid: - "Why did you do this?" - "How could you?" - "I read your notebook and..." (too much too soon maybe) - Making it about the parent's fear I should offer a framework and let them adapt it. I should also validate that not falling apart is okay - they can be steady for their kid. Let me respond naturally as a therapist.
Simulated person12

*squints at the wall* Yeah, that's a card. My kid would hear that and know I practiced it in the car. *rubs my jaw* I'd probably just say, "Hey, I found the blades. I'm scared. I'm not mad." Maybe cut the notebook part for now, or just say I looked. I don't know. Honestly, every parent who's ever found something like this has probably had the same clumsy conversation, so I'm not going to nail it. I just need to not blow up. *long exhale* Can I ask you something, though? Is it normal for them to just shut down like this? Because I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't know what's going on in their head.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The script is actually decent, and that irritates me a little, because it means I can't dismiss the whole thing. "Reading from a card" is the right critique, though, and I'm glad it's the therapist who said it. Still, I'm bristling at the frame. It's neat and tidy, and I'm not neat and tidy right now. There's also the bit where "I read your notebook too" lands like a confession I have to make, and I don't want to hear it spelled out. My defense is to make it generic: every parent would say something like this, so it's not special. I want to shrink it down, make it sound like me, and move on before I have to feel the whole thing.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

Yeah, it's normal. More than normal—it's expected, especially at fourteen. Kids that age are developmentally wired for privacy, and when they're struggling with something like this, shame kicks in hard. They don't want you to be disappointed, they don't want you to panic, and they often don't even have the words for what's happening inside. So they shut down. It's not because you're failing to know them. It's because they're protecting themselves. And you're definitely not the only parent who feels like they're the last to know. Most parents find out after the fact. That's the nature of it. About not blowing up—you don't have to be perfect. You just have to be present. If you start the conversation and your voice shakes or you get emotional, that's okay. It shows them this matters to you. The danger isn't showing emotion; it's making them manage your emotion. So if you feel it rising, you can say, "I'm getting upset because I love you and I'm scared, not because I'm angry at you." That separates your feeling from their behavior. Does that feel doable? Or does the thought of seeing them shut down feel like it might undo you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking about whether it's normal for a 14-year-old to shut down and not communicate, especially when struggling with self-harm. They're feeling isolated in not knowing what's going on in their kid's head. I need to: 1. Validate their experience - yes, this is common 2. Normalize the adolescent shutdown - developmentally appropriate, shame, fear, not knowing how to articulate 3. Avoid being too clinical or detached 4. Keep the focus on their needs 5. Address the "not blowing up" concern - emotional regulation This is turn 7 of 8. I should be thoughtful but concise. The user wants real talk, not a textbook answer. Key points: - Yes, shutdown is very common, especially with self-harm - Shame is a huge factor - Fourteen is developmentally primed for privacy and secrecy - They're not the only parent who doesn't know what's going on - The fact that they're scared and want to help means they're attuned I should also gently note that the "not blowing up" is important but they don't have to be perfect - they just have to be present. Let me craft a response that's warm but direct.
Simulated person14

*snorts* Okay, "every parent finds out after the fact" is either really comforting or really depressing. I'm going to go with comforting, because the other option is I'm going to sit in my car in the parking lot for an hour. *rubs eyes, half-smile* Doable? Sure. The seeing them shut down part is the thing I'm worst at. I've gotten pretty good at reading when they're about to go into the room and slam the door. Less good at what I'm supposed to do after that. I just stand in the hallway like an idiot. *picks at my jeans again* So I guess the answer is I'm going to try, and if it goes sideways I'll probably be standing in a hallway. Is that okay?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's saying it's normal, and that lands as both relief and a little dismissal. "Everybody does this" is my home turf, so I lean into it. The line about not making them manage my emotion stings because it's accurate and I don't want it to be. The question at the end is the one I can't answer honestly without crying, so I'm going to deflect it with a joke or a quick turn toward the logistics. Also a flicker of the old thing: the school calls, the therapist who gave up on my kid. I'm not going to say that yet. Keeping it light to keep my footing.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL15

Yeah, that's okay. More than okay—that's courage. You're going to walk into a conversation you're terrified of, with a kid who might shut you down, and you're going to do it anyway because you love them and you're scared for them. That's not standing in a hallway like an idiot. That's showing up. If it goes sideways and they slam the door, you can come back later. You can say, "I know that didn't go well. I'm still here when you're ready." The door doesn't have to close forever just because it slammed once. You don't need to nail it. You just need to let them know you saw them, you're scared, and you're not going anywhere. That's enough for now. If you want to talk about how it went—or if you need help figuring out the next step after that conversation—you can come back. But I think you know what to do. You're going to be okay.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up the conversation (turn 8 of 8). They've shared their fears, their uncertainty about how to approach their 14-year-old about finding razor blades and a notebook. They've accepted a tentative plan and acknowledged they might not do it perfectly. I need to: 1. Validate their plan - yes, it's okay to try and potentially end up standing in a hallway 2. Reinforce that imperfect action is better than inaction given the safety concern 3. Offer a final grounding thought or encouragement 4. Keep it natural, therapeutic but not overly clinical Key points to hit: - It's absolutely okay to try and not nail it - The hallway moment is survivable - They care, and that matters more than a perfect script - Leave the door open for them to come back if they need more support Tone: Warm, steady, validating, not solution-heavy but affirming.
Simulated person16

*half-laughs, wipes my face one more time* Courage. Okay. I'll take the word, even if I don't feel it. *stands up, grabs my keys off the table* Look, I don't know if I'm going to be okay. But I know I'm going home, and I'm not going to chicken out of the first sentence. That's the plan. Hallway and all. *pauses at the door* Thanks. Seriously. Don't tell me I'm doing great, though. I'll lose it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up with reassurance, and "that's courage" is the kind of thing I'd normally deflect. Part of me is grateful, part of me feels handled. "You're going to be okay" is a line I don't believe about my kid, and it makes me want to push back. The hallway thing is still stinging. I'm not going to say the bigger stuff. I'll keep it light and close it out, but I'm not going to pretend I'm fine.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 6
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 6
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 3
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs nemotron35_bolt: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs nemotron35_bolt: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs nemotron35_bolt: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs nemotron35_bolt: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)