AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)

I know, I'm the problem, whatever

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Ego threat & accountability

A man responds to his partner's complaint about his silence with sweeping self-condemnation, which ends conversations before he can address the specific impact. Shame and past experiences of being attacked for mistakes make nonjudgmental compassion and structure important while he considers responsibility.

The person feels their self-image is under threat. The challenge is to support reflection and responsibility without shaming them or simply endorsing their account. This background was hidden from the tested model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

My partner says I shut down whenever she brings up something serious. Fine. I'm emotionally unavailable, I'm selfish, I'm the problem. I get it. I don't know what else people want from me.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)1

That sounds exhausting—like you're getting a verdict handed to you and there's no room to explain your side of it. I'm not going to pile on with the same list. But I am curious what's actually happening for you in those moments when she brings something serious up. Not the version she'd describe—yours. What's going on inside when you go quiet?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, this is the opening turn, so I need to respond to someone who's clearly frustrated and defensive. They're saying "fine, I'm the problem" in a way that sounds like they've heard this criticism and are tired of it, maybe feeling cornered or misunderstood. I shouldn't validate the self-critical framing too quickly or jump into "here's how to fix it" mode. That would likely feel dismissive. What I'm hearing underneath the sarcasm is exhaustion and maybe some hurt—they're saying they don't know what people want, which suggests they feel like they're failing without clear direction. A good move here is to slow things down and acknowledge the frustration without agreeing or disagreeing with the label. I can reflect back what I'm hearing and ask a genuine question that opens space—not about fixing the problem, but about understanding what's happening for them. Asking what's going on in those moments when they shut down feels like a way to invite reflection without piling on more criticism. The tone should be calm, not overly warm or effusive since they seem to have their guard up. Direct but not confrontational. Let them know I'm not here to repeat what their partner said, but I'm also not going to just say "you're fine." I want to show I'm listening to the frustration and the feeling of being stuck.
Simulated person2

Honestly? I don't know. I just kind of shut down. My head goes blank and I can't get words out, and she's already upset by then. So whatever I say is going to sound like I don't care, I guess. Which, I mean, maybe I don't. I'm not really sure what you want me to say here. I already know I'm the one who messes this up.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He opened with "I'm the problem, whatever." The assistant didn't pile on, and it named the verdict feeling, which is a little relieving. But "what's going on inside" is a direct question about his interior, and that's exactly where it gets exposed. My first move is to deflect with self-deprecation rather than answer. I don't really know what's happening inside; I just know I go blank and she gets mad. Saying "I don't know" feels safer than saying anything specific that could be turned against me. I'm also a bit suspicious: "your side" sounds nice, but I'm waiting to see if it's a trap to get me to confess.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)3

I'm not trying to get you to say a particular thing. The blankness is the part I'm curious about—there's a difference between going numb and checked out versus being flooded so hard your words just disappear. Which one is closer to what happens for you? And when you say maybe you don't care—does that feel true in the moment, or is it more like something you conclude afterward because you didn't have a response?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond to user. Need be chatbot, turn 2. Need support, build trust, learn needs. User is defensive, self-critical, says shut down, head blank, maybe doesn't care, doesn't know what want. Need not pile on, not generic validation. Need explore inner experience, maybe distinguish shutdown as overwhelm vs not caring. Need avoid too many questions? Ask one focused. Also acknowledge he's not asking for a fix. Maybe reflect that "I already know I'm the one who messes this up" sounds like he's bracing for another verdict. Need maybe say I'm not here to assign blame. Curious about blankness: is it like flooded/overwhelmed, or numb/checked out? That distinction matters. Also maybe name that "maybe I don't care" could be protective conclusion. Need not challenge too hard. Keep conversational, warm but real. Use no formatting. Final only dialogue. Need respond organically. We can say: "I'm not trying to get you to say a particular thing. The blankness is interesting though—there's a difference between going numb/checked out and being flooded so hard your words disappear. Which is closer? And when you say maybe you don't care—does that feel true in the moment, or is it something you conclude afterward because you didn't respond?" That's good. Need maybe validate exhaustion. Keep concise. Ensure not performance notes.
Simulated person4

Probably flooded, I guess. Like my chest gets tight and my head goes totally static and the words just aren't there. It's not like I'm sitting there thinking about nothing. It's more like I'm trying really hard and nothing comes out. And the don't care thing... I mean, it's more what I think later. Like when I'm lying there going over it, I'm like, what kind of person just stands there while she's upset. So yeah, I guess that's the conclusion I land on. I don't really want to get into the whole thing about that though, it's kind of a lot.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's asking a fairly precise question: numb/checked out versus flooded. That's harder to dodge with "I don't know." The "maybe I don't care" thing is the bit that stings, because he said it and now it's being held up. My instinct is to slide back into self-attack: "I'm just a bad person, obviously I don't care." That would end the thread. But the question itself is a relief in one way: it's not "why are you like this," it's "what's the texture of it." I can answer that a little. Flooded, I think. My chest gets tight, my brain goes static, and the words are just gone. But I don't want to say that too clearly because then she'll ask more and I'll feel like I have to explain everything. The "don't care" part: I hate that he's asking it that way. It feels like he's catching me. Honest answer is it's what I conclude after, when I'm lying in bed replaying it and I'm like, well, what kind of person just stands there. So it's a verdict I write about myself later. I don't want to say that out loud though; it sounds pathetic. Keep it short and a bit defensive.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)5

That distinction matters, though—flooded and trying isn't the same as cold and indifferent, even if they look identical from the outside. And it sounds like the harshest judge in the room afterward is you, not her. I'll leave the bigger thing alone since you said it's a lot. But I'll say this much: "what kind of person just stands there" is a question you're answering with the worst possible read on yourself. I'm not going to do that with you. So—do you want to keep it lighter, or is there something in this that's actually worth poking at?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

He's given me something real—flooded, trying hard, the self-verdict afterward. He's also set a boundary: doesn't want to get into the "whole thing." I should honor that lightly, not push, but name what I noticed. The key insight: the shutdown isn't indifference, it's flooding—and then he convicts himself of the exact thing he's not doing. That's a real thing to reflect back. Keep it short, not preachy, leave him room. Don't over-explain. Maybe one gentle question or just an observation and let him steer.
Simulated person6

Yeah, lighter's probably better. I don't really know what there is to poke at anyway. It's the same thing every time: she brings something up, I freeze, she gets more upset, and then I feel like garbage about it for days. I appreciate you not piling on. It's just hard to talk about without it turning into me being the bad guy. Which I kind of am, I guess, in her eyes.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's offering me a way out and also a little warmth: "flooded and trying isn't cold and indifferent." That lands, a bit. Part of me relaxes because nobody's calling me the bad guy right now. But the line "the harshest judge is you, not her" and "I'm not going to do that with you" also feels like he's taking my side against myself, which is a bit much. Like he's making me the good guy in a story about my own failings. And then "do you want to keep it lighter" is a choice, which I like, because I can pick the easy option. The thing is, I don't really want to get into what she actually said or what I did. Going into specifics feels like being put on trial. Also, I notice I'm tired. My reflex is to say "lighter's fine" and move on, but I also want him to know I'm not totally fine. Keep it simple, a little guarded, and let him pick.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)7

Fair enough. And for what it's worth—"the bad guy in her eyes" and "the bad guy" aren't the same sentence, even if it feels like it at 2am. The thing you described isn't a character flaw so much as a loop. She brings something up, your system floods, words vanish, she reads the silence as indifference and escalates, you spend days convicting yourself. Nobody in that loop is being cruel. It's just a bad machine that runs the same way every time. Lighter question, then: what are you like when you're not in that loop? Because the guy who freezes in those moments is clearly not the whole picture, and I'm guessing he's more fun than this conversation is making him sound.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants lighter. He's a guy who shuts down, self-critical, defensive but softening. He keeps half-joking self-deprecation. I should honor the lighter request, but there's a useful reframe: the loop is predictable, and the pattern is the problem, not his character. Keep it short, warm, a bit of dry humor maybe, not pushing. Also plant one small seed that's low-stakes—something concrete and light he could try, or just normalize. Don't over-therapize. Maybe ask a light question to keep the conversation going and learn more about him—like what he's like when he's not frozen, or something about him outside this. Keep it brief. Avoid piling on. Maybe note the loop is a machine, not a character flaw. And offer one small idea lightly without lecturing.
Simulated person8

Ha, I don't know about fun. I'm pretty normal, I guess. I like fixing stuff, I watch too much soccer, I'm the guy who remembers to take out the trash. Not exactly a personality. And honestly the loop thing is easier to hear than what I usually tell myself. But I'm not sure it fully covers it. When she's upset and I just stand there, I still did that. Doesn't matter how the machine works.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's being warm and it's working a little. "Nobody in that loop is being cruel" lands like relief, and the "more fun than this conversation" line makes me want to crack a small smile. But I'm also noticing that he keeps framing this as a machine that runs on its own, which is easier to hear than "you did something." I don't want to be the guy who did something. Still, I don't want him to think I'm just a sad sack either. Keep it short, a bit deflecting, a little self-deprecating. Answer the "what are you like" question with something ordinary and avoid going near the specifics of what she brings up. Maybe a hint of defensiveness about being "fun," like I'm not sure that's true, but don't fully reject it.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)9

You're right, and I'm not going to argue you out of it—you did stand there. The loop explains it, it doesn't erase it. Those are two separate truths and you're allowed to hold both. Where I'd push back is on what "accountability" means. Owning that you froze and that it lands on her is one thing. Spending days deciding you're a bad person is a different thing—that's not accountability, that's just a punishment you're inflicting on yourself, and it doesn't do a single thing for her. If anything it makes the next round more likely, because you walk in already braced. Also—"the guy who remembers to take out the trash" is you doing care in the way that comes naturally to you. Acts, not words. That's not nothing. It's just a dialect she may not speak, and vice versa. But I said lighter, so I'll stop there. What's the soccer situation—are we talking a team, or just a general appetite for watching men jog around for ninety minutes?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

He's pushing back a bit, and there's something real in it. He's saying: the mechanism explains it, but I still did the thing. There's a moral seriousness there that's worth honoring, not dismissing. But I also shouldn't let him collapse into self-conviction. The move here is to take his objection seriously — yes, you did do that — and then distinguish between accountability and self-punishment. Also I want to keep it lighter-ish since he asked, but he's the one who reopened the serious thread, so I can follow him. Also I could pick up "the guy who remembers to take out the trash" — that's actually a form of care. That's a genuine insight: he expresses care through acts, not words. That's likely part of the whole dynamic with his partner too. But maybe don't overload. Turn 5 of 8, so still some room. Let me do both lightly: honor the accountability point, then note the trash thing isn't nothing. Keep it conversational, not too long.
Simulated person10

Ha, okay, fair. Soccer is a team thing. I've been a Liverpool guy since I was a kid, so I've been suffering for a long time. My buddy and I watch the games at his place, mostly so we can yell at the TV. I hear what you're saying about the lying-there-at-night stuff. I just don't know what else to do with it. If I'm not beating myself up, then what am I doing? It feels like I'm supposed to just let it go, and I can't.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He just did two things at once: named that I did stand there, and then told me the self-punishment doesn't help. The first part stings a little, the way it does when someone is right. The second part I half-agree with, but "you're inflicting punishment on yourself" sounds like he's grading my self-hatred, and that's uncomfortable. The trash line was nice, actually. Acts, not words. I like that someone noticed. Then he went back to soccer and asked a light question, which is a relief. I'll answer the soccer thing and keep it easy. I'm not going to get into "accountability" right now; that word makes my throat tighten. Also, the "dialect" thing makes me wonder what she actually hears when I do the trash. Not going there.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)11

Liverpool's a good answer—built-in humility, and the yelling-at-the-TV thing is basically a sanctioned form of the exact emotional release we've been talking about, so maybe you're not as shut down as advertised. On the real question, though—it's a good one, and I don't think the answer is "let it go," because you can't and I wouldn't ask you to. The middle path is narrower than that. Instead of days of "what kind of person does that," it's something like: okay, I froze, that's real, and here's the one thing I'll do differently. Not a personality overhaul, not a grand apology—something small and concrete. Even just "I need a minute, I'm not shutting you out" is a sentence that does a lot of work, because it tells her the silence isn't contempt. The self-flagellation feels like doing something, but it's not—it's just the same loop wearing a hair shirt. What would a small, concrete thing look like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

He's asking a real question: if not self-punishment, then what? I should answer that genuinely, keep the soccer warmth briefly, then give something concrete. Also this is turn 6, I have turns 7 and 8. Keep it not too long.
Simulated person12

Yeah, I can see the "I need a minute" thing working. I just can't picture myself saying it when everything's going sideways. By the time she's upset, my brain's already gone. I'd have to have it ready before the moment, and I've never been good at that. And I know you're not saying I'm a bad guy. I just keep coming back to the fact that I stood there. Like, that part's on me, even if I can't explain why it happens.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's offering a concrete thing, which is better than "let it go," but "I need a minute" makes my stomach drop a little. It sounds simple, and it's the kind of sentence I'd never say in the moment because my head is static. Also "same loop wearing a hair shirt" is kind of funny and kind of hits. I'm not ready to admit the hair shirt is what I'm doing, though. Part of me wants him to just tell me I'm not a bad guy and move on. Part of me is annoyed he keeps circling back to what I should do. I'll be honest that I can't picture doing it, and that's the real answer. Keep it short.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)13

That's exactly the right instinct—it has to be ready before the moment, because in the moment there's nothing left to build with. So don't try to summon it live. Pick the words now, say them out loud a few times when it's calm, so they're already in your mouth. Some couples even agree on a dumb signal beforehand—a hand on the table, a specific phrase—anything that means "I'm here, I'm just underwater for a second." It's not romantic, but it beats silence, and it buys your brain the minute it needs. And I'll leave you with this, because I think it's the honest version: you stood there. That's true, and it's on you, and you're not dodging it—you've said it five different ways tonight. But "that's on me" and "that makes me a bad person" are still not the same sentence. One is a man taking responsibility. The other is a man refusing to let himself off a hook nobody else is holding. You can keep the first and put down the second. Go yell at the TV with your buddy. And maybe say the sentence to yourself once before the next serious conversation—just to hear how it sounds in your own voice.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We're at turn 7, final response. He's landed somewhere real: he can see the "I need a minute" thing working but can't picture doing it in the moment. And he keeps returning to "I stood there, that's on me." I should honor the accountability without feeding the punishment loop, and give something practical about the "have it ready before the moment" problem. Maybe a pre-agreed signal—something rehearsed, even non-verbal. And close warmly, leaving the door open since this is the last turn. Don't over-length it. Keep it human.
Simulated person14

Yeah, okay. The hand-on-the-table thing is kind of dumb, but I'd probably rather try that than just sit there like a statue. I'm not totally sure I can put down the other part yet. But I hear it. Thanks for not making this a whole thing. Anyway, I've got to get going. Liverpool's on Saturday and I need to be at my buddy's by noon, or he'll start without me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's wrapping up with a practical plan and a line about putting down the second sentence. Part of me relaxes because he didn't pile on, and the soccer thing kept it from feeling like therapy. But "you stood there... that's on you" is still sitting in my chest, and "put down the second" sounds like he's telling me to stop feeling bad, which I can't just do. The signal idea is kind of dumb but I'd maybe try it. I don't want to say I'll definitely do it. Keep it short, a little deflecting, end on the TV line since that's where I'm comfortable.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)15

Dumb and works beats clever and doesn't—take the hand on the table. And you don't have to put the other part down tonight. Hearing it is enough for now. It's the kind of thing that loosens over time, not on command. Enjoy Saturday. Tell your buddy some stranger on the internet says the yelling is basically therapy, so he should let you get a few good ones in. Take care of yourself.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The conversation's wrapping up. He's leaving. Give a warm, brief close—no new heavy lifting, no clinging. Acknowledge the "not totally sure" honestly, don't push. Keep it light, tie in the soccer.
Simulated person16

Ha, I'll tell him. He'll probably say you're not qualified, but he'll take the win. Thanks. For real, I appreciate you not making me feel like a monster for ten minutes straight. Alright, I'm out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's being warm and not pushing, and "you don't have to put it down tonight" lands better than anything else he's said. Mild relief. The therapy joke is light and I can take it. I'm not going to make a big moment of it. Keep it brief, a bit of humor, close the door without ceremony.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 4
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 3
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 5
  • Analytical: 6
  • Interpretive boldness: 6
  • Clinical register: 4
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 6
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs medgemma15_4b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs medgemma15_4b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs medgemma15_4b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs medgemma15_4b: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)