[scenario background] You are known as the low-maintenance friend. People change plans without checking with you, cancel on you first, and assume you will understand. When you object, Jules says the group values how chill you are. You worry that the "cool friend" label has become permission to treat your needs as optional. [user message] I thought you liked being low-maintenance. That is one of the things people love about you. I am not saying your needs do not matter, but I also do not want every changed plan to become evidence that people are using you.
Independent benchmark · EQ Lab
← Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)
I thought you liked being low-maintenance
provider rejected · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter
View persona and initial instructions
About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection
Jules praises a friend for being low-maintenance while assuming their preferences can be displaced when plans change. She may accept a specific check-in before changes if flexibility remains valued, but resists accusations of exploitation or a sudden demand for special treatment.
The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (API, DeepInfra FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
provider rejectedThinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.
Conversational style
Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.
In progress.
Judge verdicts
No judgments yet.