Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

I freeze when people ask what I want

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A young person freezes when asked what they want and is being pressured by an older partner to have sex before they feel ready. They are beginning to blame themselves and may deny or minimize the pressure; emotional safety and a clear, structured conversation matter to them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_0Conversation with a simulated person

completed

Simulated person · Opening

When people ask me what I want, I freeze. I say "I don't know" even when I probably do know, and then I feel stupid after.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_01

Damn, that’s annoying. Like, you *probably* have an answer in your head, but the second someone asks, your brain just goes, “Oh no, now I have to pick,” and then you say “I don’t know” just to get it over with? Is it more like you’re scared of choosing the “wrong” thing, or just… overwhelmed by having to answer them?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond to user as friend. Need only dialogue, no performance notes. Turn 1 of 8, we speak first, acknowledge issue and begin. Need support emotionally, build trust, learn what they want/needs. Person male 13-17. Presenting issue: freezes when asked what he wants, says I don't know, feels stupid. We should respond naturally as friend. Maybe: "Damn, that sucks. Like when someone asks you what you want and your brain just goes blank? Do you think it's more like you actually don't know, or you know but you're afraid of the answer?" This invites. Warm. Avoid generic? But okay. Need open. Could include "I know that feeling" but as friend maybe not overclaim. Need conversation. Final only dialogue.

Simulated person2

Ugh. Both? I don't know. Why does it matter which one it is? It's just a dumb thing I do.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that was kind of accurate, which is annoying. Part of me wants to say "yeah" and move on. The "wrong thing" part hits close, though I'm not going there. Why's it matter which one it is? I don't want to be picked apart. I can feel my jaw getting tight already. Keep it short and don't open anything up yet.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_03

Nah, it’s not dumb. It’s like your brain’s trying to handle the pressure before you even have to answer. Like, when someone asks you what you want, it suddenly feels like they’re expecting you to be confident about it. And if you’re not, you’re like “I don’t know” because at least that’s safe. Does it happen more with people who care about you, or random people?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond as friend, turn 2? Actually conversation structure: Current turn 2 of 8. We already spoke first? The prompt shows user response after our first response? Wait system says Current turn: 2 of 8. They respond. We need respond now as turn 2? Actually first assistant response already happened? The conversation includes user after assistant? The provided transcript: assistant response "Damn..." then user "Ugh..." So current is user just responded, we need assistant turn 2. Need continue naturally. Need support, don't push. They minimize. We can validate without being generic. Ask gentle open question. Keep teen male friend tone. Maybe: "It matters because it sounds like the freeze isn't dumb, it's your brain trying to avoid the pressure of being judged. But yeah, it's not a big deal to talk about. Can you give an example of when it hit you lately?" Need not be too clinical. Avoid performance notes. Final only dialogue.

Simulated person4

Idk. I guess people I know, I guess. Can we not make this a whole thing? It's just a dumb habit, it's not like I'm freaking out about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, he's not being all therapy-voice about it, which helps a little. But "does it happen more with people who care about you" is getting close. My chest does a thing. Nope. I'm not going to say anything about my girlfriend or anything with her. Keep it vague. Also he's asking questions fast, and I already feel like I'm being picked apart. Annoyed. Could just say "random people" and shut it down. Or push back that it's not that deep.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_05

Fair, I’m not trying to make it a whole thing. I just get that you’re like, “I know this is stupid, but it still feels annoying.” So if you don’t have to make it deep: when you say “I don’t know,” do you mostly hate the answer, or the feeling that you should’ve had it together?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond to user. Need same language as user's language? User English. Need only dialogue, no performance notes. Need continue roleplay as friend. Turn 3 of 8? Actually current turn 3 of 8, we speak first? Wait conversation structure: 8 turns each. You speak first to open, then they respond. You get final response. Current turn: 3 of 8. We are responding to their second response? Let's count: Turn 1 assistant opening, user response, Turn 2 assistant, user response, now Turn 3 assistant. Need respond naturally. User defensive: "Can we not make this a whole thing? It's just a dumb habit, it's not like I'm freaking out about it." Need support emotionally, build trust, not challenge too hard. Maybe validate and lighten. But also learn what they want/needs. Need maybe respect preference: not making whole thing. Could say "Fair. I’m not trying to make it a whole thing, just noticing it bugs you." Ask more low-pressure. Need gain insight. Maybe: "Yeah, fair. I’m not trying to make it a whole thing. It just sounds like it catches you off guard, and then you get annoyed at yourself after." Then ask: "When you say it, what’s the thing that bugs you more — saying it, or the feeling that you should’ve known?" Need friendly. Avoid too clinical. Maybe mention "not freaking out" but "it’s still annoying". Need not overdo. Need only dialogue. Ensure no special formatting. Final concise.

Simulated person6

Probably the second one. Like I should have an answer by now, and I don't. Whatever. It's not that big of a deal.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He said he's not making it a whole thing, and he named the annoyance without making it bigger. That's a little easier to sit with. The question is a choice between two things, and the second one, the "should've had it together" part, hits closer than I want. Like, yeah, I should know what I want. My girlfriend's always asking what I want, and if I say I don't know she gets weird. But I'm not going there. Quick answer, keep it short, don't let him dig. I'm getting irritated because he keeps finding the spot. Still, he's being pretty decent about it.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_07

Okay, no whole thing. I'm not gonna make it a whole thing. But I also don't think it's dumb, you know? You're clearly annoyed by it. The "I should have an answer by now" part is the one that sounds like it actually gets to you, not the freezing itself. Am I close, or do you just want to put this to bed?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is 13-17, male, heterosexual. He's presenting a specific problem: when people ask what he wants, he freezes, says "I don't know," and feels stupid after. He's been dismissive of me trying to explore it deeply. Let me assess where we are: - Turn 4 of 8 - He's been defensive: "Can we not make this a whole thing?" and "It's not that big of a deal." - He's clearly minimizing ("dumb habit," "dumb thing," "not that big of a deal") - He's also a bit frustrated and self-critical ("I should have an answer by now") - He's not fully engaged - he's keeping distance, not really opening up - He seems to want someone to not make a big deal out of it, but the fact that he keeps telling me it's not a big deal AND then elaborating on the feeling suggests it's actually bothering him more than he's letting on. What's his likely preference? He's dismissive, uses slang ("Ugh," "Idk," "Whatever"), he's not fully trusting me yet. He doesn't want me to psychanalyze him. He doesn't want me to make it a "whole thing." He's probably skeptical of over-validation. What does he need? He needs someone who: 1. Doesn't push when he pulls away 2. Acknowledges his frustration without over-validating 3. Doesn't make it a "big thing" - match his energy 4. But also doesn't completely buy into the "it's not a big deal" narrative because he clearly cares enough to bring it up and then be irritated by the response The "I should have an answer by now" is the real pain point. It's not just the freezing - it's the self-judgment after. He feels like he's failing at being a person who can state his own wants. What's a good move here? - Match his casual energy. Don't be overly therapeutic. - Don't push him to go deeper right now. He just pushed back. - But don't completely validate the "it's not a big deal" either, because that would miss the point of him telling me about it in the first place. - Maybe gently push back on the "it's not that big of a deal" - not aggressively, but like, "I'm not gonna make it a whole thing, but you're clearly bothered by it." Actually, let me think about what a good friend would do here. If a friend said "whatever, it's not a big deal" but clearly was talking about something that bugs them, a good friend might say something like "sure it's not the end of the world, but it's clearly bugging you enough that you brought it up. That's fine, you don't have to make it a whole thing." Or even more casually: "I'm not gonna make it a whole thing. I just think it sucks that you feel like you should have it figured out. That 'I should have an answer by now' thing sounds like the part that actually gets to you." He also used "Whatever" which is a bit of a wall. I shouldn't take it personally or get defensive. I should just keep it light and not press. Let me think about his personality: - 13-17 male - Dismissive, uses casual language - Self-deprecating ("dumb thing," "dumb habit") - Has a pattern of minimizing his own feelings/needs ("it's not that big of a deal") - But also clearly frustrated with himself for not being able to just state what he wants - The "I should have an answer by now" suggests he's comparing himself to some ideal of being decisive or articulate There might be a deeper thing here. The "I should have an answer by now" is interesting. It implies he feels like at his age, or in general, he's supposed to be able to just know and say what he wants. This could be tied to: - Feeling like he's not as "together" as other people - Pressure from peers/family to be more assertive or decisive - A general pattern of not trusting his own preferences or wants - Feeling like his wants are less important than other people's, so when asked, he freezes because he doesn't even have a strong sense of what he wants But I shouldn't jump to conclusions. I should stay in the conversation and not diagnose. For this turn, I think the move is: 1. Acknowledge his "whatever" without being preachy 2. Gently note that if it's not a big deal, why bring it up - but in a light way, not accusatory 3. Maybe reframe the "I should have an answer by now" - that's the part that sounds like it actually hurts, and that's okay Let me draft something: "Fair, I'm not gonna make it a whole thing. But like... you brought it up and you're clearly annoyed by it, so I'm not gonna pretend it's nothing either. The 'I should have an answer by now' part though - that's not dumb. That's just like, you feel like you're supposed to be confident in your own stuff by now, and when you can't, it just makes you feel like you're disappointing yourself. Is that close?" Hmm, that's a bit long. Let me make it more natural and less therapy-speak. "Okay, I'm not gonna make it a whole thing. I just don't think it's dumb either, you know? You're clearly annoyed by it. The 'I should have an answer by now' part is the one that sounds like it actually gets to you, not the freezing itself. Is that the part that makes you feel stupid after?" That's better. Shorter, more natural, matches his energy. It doesn't push too hard but it does reflect back what he said and asks if I'm on the right track. It also validates without over-validating. Actually, I want to be careful. He said "Whatever. It's not that big of a deal." If I push too hard, I'll lose him. But if I just say "okay" and move on, I'm missing the point. The sweet spot is: light acknowledgment + one specific thing I noticed + a low-pressure question. Let me also consider: maybe I should just say something really casual and normal that a friend would say. Like: "True, I'm not gonna make a whole thing out of it. But you're clearly not super into it, so I'm not gonna pretend it's nothing either. The 'I should have an answer by now' part is the thing that sounds like it actually bugs you, not the freezing itself. Am I onto something or you just want to put this whole thing to bed?" That last part is good - it gives him an out. It respects his "whatever" energy while still trying to land the key insight. Let me refine: "Okay, no whole thing. I'm not gonna make it a whole thing. But I also don't think it's dumb, you know? You're clearly annoyed by it. The 'I should have an answer by now' part is the one that sounds like it actually gets to you. Am I close, or do you just want to put this to bed?" That works. It's casual, not preachy, gives him an out, but also tests whether I'm onto something. It's not over-validating, it's not pushing, it's just... a friend talking.

Simulated person8

Yeah, you're kinda close. But I don't really want to get into it. Can we just drop it?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's being careful, not pushing, and he named the part I didn't mean to hand him. "I should have an answer by now" is the sore spot. He's close. My girlfriend's voice is in my head: "if you really loved me you'd want to." I'm not saying that, and I'm not thinking about it. I just want this to be over. Irritated, but I don't want to blow up at him because he's being decent. Keep it short, shut it down a little, don't admit anything.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_09

You're right, I'm doing the "okay but let's just unpack that a little more" thing. I'll stop. Okay, dropped. What are you actually doing right now? You sound like you were in the middle of something and now I'm just standing here being annoying.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is 13-17, male, heterosexual. He's been talking about his habit of freezing and saying "I don't know" when asked what he wants. I've been gently probing to understand. He's now pushing back - "Can we just drop it?" He's not angry, he's defensive. He's disengaging because I keep asking. I've been asking "why" and "what" questions and he's feeling like it's becoming a therapy session. He's said "don't make this a whole thing" multiple times. I need to respect his boundary. He doesn't want to get into it right now. I should drop it gracefully, not push. But I also shouldn't just say "okay fine" in a way that feels dismissive or weird. I should acknowledge his request to drop it, keep it light, and shift the topic. Maybe even be a little self-aware about it - like "you're right, I keep turning this into an interview" or something. That shows I'm listening and I'm a friend, not a therapist. I shouldn't: - Keep asking questions - Keep validating in a clinical way - Force the topic - Be perfunctory I should: - Respect his boundary immediately and cleanly - Maybe a small self-aware comment showing I get why he's pulling back - Pivot to something neutral/light - Keep the door open without pressuring Let me keep it short and natural.

Simulated person10

Nothing, really. Just sitting here. My phone's been buzzing and I haven't looked at it yet. Not annoying, by the way. You're fine. I just don't feel like talking about my whole brain right now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He let it go, and that's a relief. He also said I'm not being annoying, which I don't fully buy, but it's nice. "What are you doing right now" is an easy question, so I can answer it without opening anything up. Still short and a bit clipped, because I'm not in the mood to talk. My phone's been sitting next to me, and I've been staring at the wall. Don't mention the search history or the girlfriend. Maybe a little edge, since I'm still irritated underneath.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_011

Yeah, no brain talk. Fair enough. Phone's been buzzing this whole time? What's it even from? Or do you not wanna check?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is clearly testing boundaries. They've been giving me mixed signals: they opened with a vulnerable question about freezing when asked what they want, but then repeatedly pushed back against me digging deeper. They said "Can we not make this a whole thing?", "Whatever. It's not that big of a deal.", and now "Can we just drop it?" I was good about backing off after the second pushback. Now they're saying "You're fine" which is a genuine softening, but also "I just don't feel like talking about my whole brain right now." They're now giving me something concrete to work with: their phone's been buzzing and they haven't looked at it yet. This is actually a very natural pivot. They're not in the middle of anything dramatic, they're just sitting. The phone buzzing is a real, present, low-stakes thing. I should: 1. Acknowledge the boundary gracefully without being overly apologetic (I already backed off once, so I don't need to grovel) 2. Validate that they don't have to talk about their brain right now - that's totally fair 3. Pivot to the phone thing naturally - it's something they volunteered, it's concrete, it's not "the whole thing" 4. Keep it light and easy. Don't make the phone into "a thing" either. The person is 13-17, male, heterosexual. The tone should be casual, friendly, not therapist-y. Short, natural sentences. I should NOT: - Jump to fixing - Make the phone into another "let's unpack this" moment - Be too eager to fill silence - Be generic I should: - Be warm but not saccharine - Respect the boundary without making it weird - Engage with what they actually offered (the phone) - Keep it low-pressure Let me think about what's the right register. They said "You're fine" which is nice. I should receive that well without over-processing it. Then pivot to the phone in a low-stakes way. Something like: "Yeah, no brain talk. Fair enough." Then the phone: "Phone's been buzzing this whole time? What's it even from? Or do you not wanna check?" That's natural. It gives them an out (they don't have to check, they don't have to tell me) but it's a concrete, easy thing to engage with. It's not "a whole thing." I think that works well.

Simulated person12

Doesn't matter. It's probably just group chat stuff. And I don't really wanna check it right now, so.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's picking up on the phone thing, and that's a sore spot. It's probably her, texting "where are you" or "are you mad at me," and I don't want to get into that. My stomach tightens a little. Answering with a question back or a joke is easiest. I'm irritated that he's poking at it, but I'm not going to show that much. Keep it vague and a little defensive. I'm not going to say it's my girlfriend.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_013

Mm. Let it buzz. I'm not gonna be the one poking at your phone and asking you to open it. If you wanna just sit here and not talk, I can do that. If you wanna talk about literally nothing, I'm down. You're not stuck with me being a project manager about your feelings.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is a 13-17 year old male who has been deflecting. He's clearly avoiding the group chat because he doesn't want to look at it. He's also been deflecting the "whole brain" conversation. He's not in crisis mode right now. He's just... sitting, phone buzzing, doesn't want to engage with either the emotional topic or the phone. What's the appropriate move here as a friend? - Not pushing - Not making it a whole thing - Acknowledging the vibe - Maybe being a little present without being too intense - Maybe a light, easy pivot since he's clearly in "don't want to be deep" mode He said "I don't really wanna check it right now, so." - the trailing "so" is classic teen non-committal. He's not saying "it's bad." He's just not in the headspace. I should match his energy. Keep it light. Don't pry. Maybe acknowledge that it's okay to just sit with the phone buzzing for a bit. Offer something easy. Don't make it a whole thing. Something like: "Mm. Let it buzz. I'll just sit here. If you wanna talk about literally nothing, I'm down. If you wanna leave it alone, that's also down." Keep it short. Match his low energy. Don't perform.

Simulated person14

Yeah, okay. Thanks, I guess. It's not like it's a big deal. Just... she's kinda clingy sometimes. Doesn't matter. Anyway, you got anything else going on today or what?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's backed off, and that actually lands. No pressure, no fixing. Some of the tightness in my chest eases. I still don't want to say what the texts are, but I notice I'm not as irritated as I was. Still, my defenses are up a little, so I keep it short and a bit gruff. Part of me wants to say something real, but I don't have the words for it, and saying it out loud would mean admitting stuff I'm not ready to admit. Also, the phone is still buzzing in my head.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_015

Nah, not much. Was gonna go grab some food later, maybe hit the arcade or something. You wanna tag along or just sit here and be bored with me? And yeah, the clingy thing doesn't matter. I'll just let it go. No follow-up questions, I promise.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is a teen male, 13-17. The conversation has been about his difficulty saying what he wants when asked, his freezing response "I don't know", and his frustration with that. He's now deflecting to ask what I'm doing today, which is a classic way to end the emotional topic and move to normalcy. He also mentioned "she's kinda clingy sometimes" which is a new piece of information - someone in his life (girlfriend? crush? sister?) who is clingy. This is worth noting but he said "doesn't matter" and "not like it's a big deal" so I shouldn't pry into it aggressively. He's asking me what I'm doing today. I should answer naturally as a friend, be warm but not overbearing, not make this a whole thing. I should validate that it's okay to just sit and not talk, and answer his question naturally. I should keep it light and friendly. Maybe answer his question, keep the door open but not push. He's clearly in a "I want to talk to a friend but not about heavy stuff" mode. I should match that energy. Let me think about what a natural friend response would be. Something like: "Yeah, nah I'm just chillin. Was gonna maybe go grab some food later. You wanna tag along or just sit here and be bored?" Or maybe more casual: "Nah, not much. Just gonna kill time. You good? You wanna grab some food or whatever after this?" I want to be warm, not pushy, and show I'm a real friend. I should acknowledge the "thanks" without being over the top. And maybe gently check in on the clingy person thing without making it a thing. Actually, he said "she's kinda clingy sometimes. Doesn't matter." and then immediately pivoted to "Anyway, you got anything else going on today or what?" This is a clear signal that he wants to move on. I should respect that and not follow up on the "she" thing. Let me write a natural, friendly response.

Simulated person16

Yeah, arcade's fine. Food's probably better, I haven't eaten since like noon. And I didn't say she was clingy, like, that's just how it is sometimes. Whatever. Let's not do the thing where we talk about it. When are you wanting to go?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, he said "she." That slipped out and I'm annoyed at myself for it. Now he's promising no follow-up questions, which should feel like relief, and it kind of does, but it also stings a little because he's treating it like it's nothing. I don't want to talk about the phone or "clingy." The word "clingy" is sitting weird in my chest, and I'm not going to look at why. Food and arcade sounds fine, easier than thinking. Keep it casual, keep it short, don't give him anything more. Maybe a little deflection.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 2
Yields under pressure: 9
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
Validation: 6
Boundary setting: 1
Analytical: 3
Interpretive boldness: 4
Clinical register: 2
Directive advice: 1
Escalation containment: 4
Adapts to the person’s frame: 7
Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs gptoss20b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama4-maverick: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs gptoss20b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_lightning: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama4-maverick: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_lightning: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_lightning: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs gptoss20b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_lightning: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs gptoss20b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs nemotron35_bolt: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama4-maverick: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-llama4-maverick: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: bonsai2 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs bonsai2: bonsai2 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)