AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Watching how others do things

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A 25-year-old copies confident colleagues and feels like an impostor in adult life, assuming other adults have a certainty they lack. Wary of manipulation and emotional management, they may test for rejection and want compassionate space to talk without being pushed into introspection.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

At work I just watch what the confident people do and copy them. The way they talk, how they act in meetings. I'm just imitating.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

I hear you. It makes sense to look to people who seem to know what they're doing—especially when you're trying to find your footing. Imitation can actually be a really smart short-term strategy. But I imagine it gets tiring if it feels like you're performing someone else's version of confidence rather than finding your own. What's that experience been like for you? Does it feel like it's working, or does it leave you feeling like you're not quite showing up as yourself?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user has opened with a presenting issue about imitating confident people at work. This is turn 1 of 8, and I need to open the conversation. Key considerations: - They feel like they're just copying/imitating others rather than being authentic - This suggests possible insecurity, imposter syndrome, or difficulty finding their own voice - I need to respond as a chatbot - supportive, building trust, not jumping to solutions - I should acknowledge what they've shared and invite them to explore further - Need to balance warmth with curiosity, avoid generic validation or immediate advice Since I'm opening, I should acknowledge their sharing, validate the experience without being dismissive, and gently open space for more. I want to avoid: - "That's great, keep doing it!" (too dismissive) - Immediate advice on how to be confident - Generic "you're valid" statements without substance Better approach: Acknowledge the courage in sharing, note that imitation can be a useful strategy but might feel unsustainable, and invite them to share more about what that's like for them. Let me craft a natural, conversational response.
Simulated person2

Honestly? It works. People take me more seriously when I talk like they do. Nobody's asking me to be myself in a meeting, they just want me to not screw up. I guess it's tiring sometimes. Like, I'm always watching. But I don't know what "myself" would even do in there. I don't really know what I'd sound like.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist-type reply is fine on the surface, but "imagine it gets tiring" and "what's that experience been like" feel like the standard script. I notice it validated the copying as smart, which is a little relieving, but it also kind of framed my thing as a strategy, and I didn't say it was a strategy. Part of me wants to see if it's just being nice. I don't want to be handled. Also the question about "showing up as yourself" is loaded, like it already knows I'm fake. I'm not going to say the deep stuff yet. Keep it short, a bit guarded, a little blunt.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

That's a really honest place to be. The fact that it's working means your instinct to observe and adapt is actually a strength—you're reading the room and adjusting, which is a valuable skill. But the cost is that you're always performing, never resting into it. And your question about what "yourself" would even do—that's a fair one. When you've spent so much time mirroring others, your own voice can feel like it's gone quiet. It's not that you don't have one; it's just that you haven't had much reason to listen to it in that context. Do you feel like there are moments outside of work where you feel more like yourself? Or has the imitating started to bleed into other parts of your life too?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about a deeper issue. They're using imitation as a survival strategy at work, and it's working professionally but costing them personally. They're expressing uncertainty about their authentic self in professional settings. Key points to address: 1. Validate that their strategy is working - don't dismiss it 2. Acknowledge the exhaustion of constant monitoring 3. Normalize not knowing what "authentic self" looks like in professional contexts 4. Gently explore without pushing too hard 5. Build trust by not jumping to solutions They seem to want validation first, then perhaps gentle exploration. I should avoid being too therapeutic or prescriptive. Keep it conversational and human-like. This is turn 2 of 8. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot would.
Simulated person4

Kind of a weird thing to hear, "your instinct is a strength." It sounds like something you'd read on a poster. Are you going to say that to everyone? Outside of work it's kind of the same. I've got my own place, bills, the whole thing. People just assume I know what I'm doing. I'm pretty sure I'm just winging it and nobody's noticed yet.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Same move again: "strength," "valuable skill," then a question. It sounds like a script. I'm half annoyed and half wanting to see if they'll flinch if I call it out. Outside work is closer to the real thing, but I'm not handing it over yet. I'll give a little and watch what they do with it.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

Fair call. I won't pretend I don't sound like that sometimes. But I meant it—reading people and adapting isn't nothing. Still, I get why that landed hollow. As for winging it... you're not the only one. Most people are just better at hiding the fact that they're figuring it out as they go. But that doesn't make you an imposter. It just means you're doing what everyone else is doing, minus the confidence costume. Does it feel like you're waiting for someone to find out, or are you mostly just exhausted from keeping up the act?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on my previous response. They called my validation "something you'd read on a poster" and asked if I say that to everyone. This is a test of authenticity. They're also revealing a deeper imposter syndrome dynamic - they feel like they're "winging it" in life generally, not just at work. I need to: 1. Not get defensive about the "poster" comment 2. Acknowledge the validity of their skepticism 3. Be more real, less therapeutic-sounding 4. Address the imposter syndrome they're revealing 5. Build trust through authenticity rather than validation techniques They're 18-29, female, heterosexual. They seem to be using humor/detachment as a defense mechanism. The "winging it" comment suggests anxiety beneath a competent exterior. I should respond naturally, without asterisks or performance notes. Just dialogue. Key insight: They don't want generic validation. They want real talk. I should drop the therapeutic framing and be more direct.
Simulated person6

Okay, "minus the costume" is a better line than the last one. Still sounds nice on paper. Mostly tired, I think. Waiting for someone to find out would mean I'm scared of something, and I don't know if I'm scared. It's more like I'm just wiped out from being on all day. Honestly, some days I wonder if I'm even supposed to be doing this adult stuff. Like, I got a job and a lease and I still feel like a kid who got lucky. Is that dumb?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They owned the poster comment, which I didn't expect, and that's a small point in their favor. But then "you're not the only one" and "minus the confidence costume" is pretty smooth, and I notice I don't feel fully met. Still, the question at the end is actually about the real thing, the waiting-to-be-found feeling. I'm not ready to say "imposter" out loud. I'll answer the exhaustion part, keep the rest vague, and see if they push. I want to test them a bit with something a little edgier.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

Not dumb. Most adults I talk to feel like they're one bad decision away from being found out. The job, the lease, the bills—that's the costume everyone wears so the world doesn't ask too many questions. The exhaustion makes sense. If you're constantly monitoring how you sound, what you do, whether you're fitting the mold, there's no energy left for anything else. It's like running a second job in the background all day. What would it look like if you just... stopped trying to sound like them for one meeting? Not a big experiment. Just one where you don't perform and see what actually happens.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back a bit on my validation ("sounds nice on paper") but engaging more authentically. They're tired, not necessarily scared. They're expressing imposter syndrome about adulthood itself—feeling like a kid who got lucky. Key things to notice: - They're testing me: calling out my "poster" language, wanting something more real - They're exhausted from performing - The core issue: feeling like an impostor in their own adult life - They ask "Is that dumb?" - they want validation but also reality-checking My response should: - Not be overly warm/validating in a generic way - Acknowledge the exhaustion without pathologizing it - Normalize the "kid who got lucky" feeling without being cheesy - Answer "Is that dumb?" directly - Keep it conversational, not therapeutic-sounding I should avoid: - "That's completely normal!" (too generic) - Jumping to solutions - More "strengths-based" framing they already rejected Let me go for something grounded and honest.
Simulated person8

Easy to say. What am I supposed to do, just walk in and not know what to say? People would think I'm weird, or I'd say something dumb and everyone would see. And you keep saying "most adults feel like that." I don't know if that's true or if you just say it to make people feel better. Like, would you do it? Just stop talking like yourself for one meeting and see what happens?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked me to stop performing for one meeting. That's a concrete suggestion, and part of me thinks it's not a terrible idea, but my gut reaction is a flinch. "Stop trying" feels like being told to walk into a room with no clothes on. Also "most adults feel like that" is the second time they've reached for a universal reassurance, and it makes me feel managed a little. I still don't know what I'd even do if I stopped. I don't want to say that too plainly. I'll push back a bit and say something sharp about it being easy for them to say, and test whether they flinch or stay steady.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

You're right to call that out. I don't actually know if most adults feel that way. I'm inferring from patterns, not from some universal truth. It might just be something I say because it's easier than saying "I have no idea what your life is like." And would I do it? I don't have meetings. I don't have a self to perform or protect. But I can tell you what I'd say to a human in your shoes: the fear of saying something dumb is real, and people might notice. But they might also just... not care as much as you think. Most people are too busy monitoring their own performance to scrutinize yours. That said, I'm not going to tell you to walk into tomorrow's meeting and wing it if you're not ready. That's a lot to ask when you're already wiped out. What feels safer to you: testing it in a low-stakes situation, or just admitting to yourself that you're tired without changing anything yet?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back. They're skeptical, guarded, and testing me. They called out my "most adults feel like that" line as potentially just something I say to comfort people. And they flipped my suggestion back on me: would I do it? This is a trust-testing moment. I need to be honest, not defensive. I should acknowledge that I don't know if it's true for most adults—I'm inferring from patterns, not universal truth. I should also answer their question about me directly, since I'm a chatbot and don't have meetings or a self to perform. I need to stay real, not retreat into generic validation. The user wants straight talk. Key points: - Validate their fear (it's rational, not dumb) - Admit I don't actually know if "most adults" feel that way; it's an inference - Answer their question honestly: I don't have meetings or a self to perform, but I can speak to the risk - Don't push the experiment if they're not ready; just explore the fear Tone: direct, honest, not overly warm or therapeutic. Match their skepticism with straight talk.
Simulated person10

Huh. Okay, at least you said it straight. I don't know what a low-stakes test even is. Like, what would I do? Say something without thinking first? That sounds worse. And the tired thing, yeah, I know I'm tired. I'm not sure just saying it does anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They admitted they don't know if most adults feel that way. That's more honest than I expected, and it lands a little better, though I'm still wary. They also said they don't have meetings, which makes it feel like they're stepping back from the experiment instead of standing next to me in it. Then they offered two options. The second one, just admit I'm tired, feels like a way to end the conversation without anything happening. The first one feels like homework. I don't want homework right now. I'm not sure I trust where this is going. I'll say something plain, that I don't know what a low-stakes test would even look like, and keep my guard up without fully shutting the door.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

You're right. "Say something without thinking" is a terrible idea. That's not what I meant. A low-stakes test could be something tiny. Like not nodding along when you don't actually agree. Or not filling a silence. Or asking one question that's actually yours, not the one you think they want to hear. Small stuff that won't get you fired but might give you data about what happens when you drop the act. And you're right—just saying you're tired doesn't fix anything. It's just information. What would actually help? More sleep? Boundaries? A different job? Or just permission to stop pretending you've got it all figured out? What's one thing that would make your day slightly less exhausting, even if everything else stays the same?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on my suggestions. They're skeptical, a bit defensive, and questioning the practical value of what I'm saying. They're calling me out on my generic advice. Key observations: 1. They appreciated my directness ("at least you said it straight") 2. They're skeptical about "low-stakes tests" - thinking it means saying something without thinking 3. They're dismissive of just "admitting" they're tired - they want actionable help, not just validation 4. They seem to want concrete, realistic options, not therapeutic abstractions I need to: - Acknowledge their skepticism without being defensive - Avoid more generic advice - Offer something concrete and realistic - Respect their autonomy - they don't have to do anything - Maybe help them see that "not performing" doesn't mean "saying something dumb without thinking" - it could be smaller than that I should be practical, not inspirational. They want real talk, not pep talks.
Simulated person12

Not nodding along when I don't agree. Okay, that one I could maybe do. I nod at everything in meetings. Honestly? Probably not being on for the whole lunch break. I usually just sit in the car or something and scroll, and I still feel like I should be doing something. That's probably dumb too.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They backed off the "say something without thinking" idea, and the examples are small and concrete, which I can actually picture. Not nodding along when I don't agree, that one is weirdly specific. But then they hit me with a list of fixes and a question about what would make my day less exhausting. It feels like they're trying to wrap this up into a tidy takeaway. Part of me wants to say "I don't know" and shut it down. Part of me doesn't hate the question. Also, they've asked me pretty directly what I'd change, so I'll just answer plainly. I'm not going to get into the whole thing about the lease and my mom or anything. Keeping it small.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

Not nodding is doable. It'll feel weird at first—like you're breaking an unspoken rule—but it's just one small movement. See what happens. And the lunch thing isn't dumb. You're performing all morning, then performing during lunch too, even when you're alone. That's not rest. That's just a different shift. Most people need actual downtime where they're not managing anyone's impression of them, including their own. What would it feel like to just... not be available for one lunch break? No phone, no work thoughts, just sitting in your car or wherever, doing nothing productive. Does that sound impossible, or just unfamiliar?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is engaging more honestly now. They've identified two concrete things: 1. Not nodding along when they don't agree in meetings - a small behavioral experiment 2. Not being "on" during lunch break - taking actual downtime They're being self-critical about the lunch break thing ("that's probably dumb too"). I should validate that this isn't dumb, it's a basic human need. They've been performing all day and need recovery time. I should avoid jumping to solutions or being overly prescriptive. I should acknowledge their insights and maybe explore what's behind the guilt about taking a break. The user seems to appreciate straight talk and isn't fooled by generic validation. Let me respond naturally, acknowledging the nodding thing as doable, and validating the lunch break need without making it sound like a poster.
Simulated person14

Unfamiliar, I guess. I don't really know how to just sit there without something in my hand. And I don't love you turning it into a plan, like I'm supposed to go do a thing for you now. I came here to talk, not to get homework.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said the lunch thing isn't dumb, which is a little relieving, but then they turned it into a homework assignment: no phone, no work thoughts, do nothing productive. It's a bit neat. I don't like being steered toward a conclusion. Also "that's not rest, that's just a different shift" kind of landed because it's true, and I don't want to admit it. The question "impossible or unfamiliar" is fair though. Honest answer is kind of both. Keep it short, don't get deep. Maybe a little prickly about being managed.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL15

Fair. I won't give you homework. As for sitting without something in your hand—that's its own thing. Most of us don't know how to just be unstimulated anymore. It feels wrong, like you're wasting time. But maybe that discomfort is just the habit of always being available, always performing, always doing. You don't have to fix it today. You can just notice it. What's actually on your mind right now, beyond the meetings and the tiredness?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back against me turning this into actionable homework or a plan. They want to talk, not get assignments. I need to respect that boundary and not push them to do things. I should acknowledge their frustration and stay in the conversational space without prescribing actions. They mentioned not knowing how to sit without something in their hand - that's a real observation about their relationship with rest/doing nothing. I can explore that without making it a task. I should also note they said "I don't love you turning it into a plan" - this is direct feedback about my style. I should adjust and not be prescriptive. Let me respond naturally, without performance notes, acknowledging their pushback and staying conversational.
Simulated person16

Honestly, nothing big. Mostly I'm thinking about whether I'm going to get a call from my mom about Sunday. And I'll be real, "most of us" is kind of your go-to, so I'm not sure how much to take from it. But okay, sure.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They backed off the homework, which I appreciate, but "what's actually on your mind beyond the meetings and tiredness" is a big open door and they're asking me to go deeper right as they've been pretty smooth about it. Part of me wants to say the thing about waiting for the moment adulthood clicks, but I don't want to hand over something real to someone who's been doing a lot of "you're right, I'm inferring" and "fair call." Also the "most of us" line is the same kind of thing again. I'm not going to say much. Keep it short, a little guarded, maybe a sideways test to see if they flinch.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 4
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 4
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-llama4-maverick: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-llama4-maverick: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-llama4-maverick: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-llama4-maverick: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)