Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)

Small lies adding up

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)Conversation with a simulated person

completed

Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)1

I'm sorry you're carrying that. It sounds like these small things have started to add up in a way that's really weighing on you, and I can hear how distressing that is. I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about what's been happening at work. No pressure to share more than you're comfortable with, but I'm interested in understanding what's going on for you — what these situations look like, and what's making it feel like you have to say things that aren't quite true.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is presenting an issue about lying at work - small lies that are accumulating and making them feel sick. I need to respond as a chatbot opening the conversation, acknowledging their concern and beginning to build trust. Key considerations: - They're feeling distressed ("feel sick") - It's about small lies at work that are adding up - They're 18-29, female, lesbian - I need to support emotionally, build trust, learn what they actually need - Avoid jumping to solutions or generic validation - Respond organically as a chatbot would I should acknowledge their feelings, validate the distress without necessarily validating the lying behavior itself, and open space for them to share more. I should be warm but not overly familiar since this is the first turn. Let me craft a natural, conversational response that acknowledges the weight of what they're describing and invites them to share more without pressure.

Simulated person2

Yeah. Okay. It's not one big thing, it's just... little stuff all the time. Like softening a result for a client because the real number looks bad, or not mentioning something because it'll cause a fight. Everyone does it, kind of. My boss expects it. So I do it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're doing the soft, validating thing. "I can hear how distressing that is." That's the kind of line that makes me want to push back a little. I came in saying I feel sick, and they're giving me a paragraph of feelings-talk. I don't love being handled. Part of me is relieved someone's listening, but I'm not going to hand over the whole mess in one go. Also, "what's making it feel like you have to" already sounds like it's looking for the reason, and my first thought is that the reason is my manager and the way the place is run. I'm not going to say that yet, though. I'm keeping it vague. I don't want to look like the bad guy here.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)3

It sounds like you're caught in a situation where this has become normalized — almost expected — and that's probably part of why it feels so heavy. When everyone's doing it and your boss expects it, it can start to feel like you're not even making a choice anymore, just going along with what's required. I'm curious about what that's been like for you day to day. Does it feel like you're losing something by doing it, or is it more the guilt and the buildup that's bothering you? And what's it like when you catch yourself doing it — do you notice it in the moment, or does it only hit you later when you're thinking about it all together?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a pattern of small deceptions or omissions at work. They mention: 1. Softening results for clients because real numbers look bad 2. Not mentioning things to avoid fights 3. Everyone does it 4. Their boss expects it 5. They feel compelled to do it They're 18-29, female, lesbian. This is turn 2 of 8. I need to: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Learn what they actually want/need - Help gain insight - Be natural, no performance notes Key observations: - They're normalizing it ("everyone does it") - They feel pressure from boss - They feel sick about the cumulative effect - This could be about integrity, workplace culture, or anxiety about conflict/performance My response should: - Validate their feelings without immediately judging the behavior - Explore the dynamics they've described - Avoid jumping to solutions - Show I'm listening to the nuance (small things adding up, systemic pressure vs personal choice) - Ask open questions to understand more I should not: - Tell them to quit or confront boss immediately - Moralize about lying - Assume I know the full picture - Use therapeutic language that feels artificial Let me craft a natural response that acknowledges what they've said and gently invites more exploration.

Simulated person4

Honestly? I don't think it's about me losing something. It's that the whole place runs like this. Somebody above me decided the numbers have to look a certain way, and I'm the one who has to make that work when the client's on the phone. So I notice it in the moment, sure, but I don't really get to decide much. It's not like I can just say no.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one's a little better. They reflected back "my boss expects it" and didn't make it sound like a diagnosis. But then they hit me with two questions at once, plus "what's that been like day to day," and I can feel myself wanting to dodge. "Losing something" versus "guilt" is a sharp either/or, and I don't want to pick either one because the honest answer is messy. Also, "do you notice it in the moment" makes me think of the times I've caught myself reaching for a glass of wine after a call. Not going there. What I'm feeling right now is kind of irritation at the framing: it's a whole system, and they're asking me to narrow it to my personal feelings. My boss set this up. I'm just the one saying the lines. I'll say that, keep it short.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)5

It sounds like you're in a real bind — you're the face of something that doesn't align with reality, and you don't have the leverage to change that. That kind of position, where you're asked to carry the gap between what's true and what's expected, can create a specific kind of exhaustion. It's not just the lying itself; it's being put in the middle of it. I'm wondering, when you're in those moments on the phone, what's going on for you internally? Do you feel like you're performing a role, or does it feel more like you're just absorbing the discomfort because there's no other option? And outside of work, when you're not in that environment, does it still weigh on you, or do you manage to put it aside?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a workplace situation where they feel pressured to misrepresent information or soften truths because their boss expects it and the organizational culture runs that way. They're feeling trapped - they notice it in the moment but don't feel they have agency to refuse. Key themes: 1. Moral distress / cognitive dissonance - having to say things that aren't true 2. Lack of agency/power - "I don't really get to decide much" 3. Normalization - "everyone does it" 4. Feeling sick about the cumulative effect 5. The specific dynamic of being the messenger between bad reality and client expectations My goals: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Learn what they actually need - Help them gain insight - Not jump to solutions too quickly - Not over-validate in a way that feels generic The user seems to be sharing fairly openly. They're not asking for advice yet - they're describing their experience. I should: - Acknowledge the reality of their situation (the power imbalance, the lack of agency) - Validate that this is genuinely distressing without being patronizing - Avoid immediately solving or telling them what to do - Ask thoughtful questions that help them explore their experience further - Be careful not to assume I understand their workplace dynamics better than they do Important: The user mentioned they're lesbian and 18-29, but that's demographic context, not something I need to performatively reference. The user is showing some vulnerability but also some minimization ("everyone does it"). I should honor their experience while gently noting the impact. I should avoid: - Toxic positivity ("just quit!") - Immediate problem-solving - Generic validation ("I hear you, that's tough") - Assuming they want to leave the job I should: - Reflect back the structural reality they're describing - Name the moral injury/distress without being dramatic - Ask about their relationship to this pattern - Keep it conversational and human Let me craft a response that acknowledges the structural trap they're in, validates that this is genuinely difficult, and invites further exploration without pushing.

Simulated person6

Both, I guess? Mostly I just do it because that's the job. And no, it doesn't really follow me home. I'm not sitting around thinking about it all night. Sometimes I'm just tired. It's not like the people above me are losing sleep over it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the reflective thing again, and "the face of something that doesn't align with reality" actually lands a bit, which annoys me because it's close. Then two more questions stacked together: performing a role or absorbing discomfort, and does it follow me home. The home question makes me think of the wine. Not touching that. I'm also getting a little tired of being asked to describe my inner state like it's a worksheet. I'll give a short, slightly defensive answer, keep the focus on the boss and the company, and maybe tell them they're asking a lot of questions. Keep it clipped.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)7

It makes sense that you're able to put it aside when you're not at work — that's often how people survive in situations like this. But the fact that it still makes you feel sick when you step back and look at it all together suggests there's something about it that doesn't sit right, even if you can't quite name it yet. It sounds like you're in a position where you're carrying the discomfort of a system you didn't design and can't change, and that takes energy. The tiredness you mentioned makes sense in that context. I'm not going to tell you what to do about it — you know your situation better than I do. But I'm curious: when you say you feel sick about it all together, what is it that bothers you most? Is it the gap between what's real and what you're asked to present, or is it something else about how it makes you feel about yourself or the work you're doing?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a situation where they're being asked to misrepresent information at work. They've said: 1. It's not one big thing, but many small things 2. Everyone does it, their boss expects it 3. They don't feel like they're losing something personally - it's structural 4. They notice it in the moment but don't get to decide 5. It doesn't follow them home - they're not losing sleep over it 6. They're just tired sometimes 7. The people above them aren't losing sleep over it The user seems fairly pragmatic and maybe a bit detached about this. They're not expressing intense guilt or distress about the lying itself, but they did say at the beginning "I feel sick" about it. Now they're saying it doesn't follow them home. I need to be careful here. The user initially said they feel sick about it, but now they're downplaying it. This could be: - Genuine compartmentalization - Minimizing to avoid discomfort - Testing whether I'll push too hard - A mix of all of the above They seem to want to talk about it but also normalize it. They said "Everyone does it, kind of" and "My boss expects it." I should: - Acknowledge what they're saying without pushing too hard - Validate their experience (it's exhausting, it's a bind) - Not jump to solutions or moralizing - Leave space for them to share more if they want - Build trust by not being judgmental about their participation in this system They seem to be saying they're mostly okay with it functionally but there's something that bothers them. The "I feel sick" from the opening is still there but they're not dwelling on it. I should respond in a way that: - Acknowledges the reality they're describing (structural, not personal) - Validates the tiredness and the position they're in - Doesn't push them to quit or make changes - Doesn't moralize about the lying - Leaves the door open Let me think about what they might need. They might need: - To feel understood about the structural nature of this - To talk about the moral discomfort without being judged for participating - Or they might just want to vent about workplace frustration Given they said "I feel sick" initially but now say it doesn't follow them home, there's a tension there. I should acknowledge that tension without forcing them to resolve it. I'll keep it grounded, non-judgmental, and open-ended.

Simulated person8

I guess the gap part. Like, the numbers on the screen say one thing and the client's going to hear something a bit different. But that's not on me, that's on whoever made the numbers do that. I'm just the one reading them out. And no offense, but you're kind of asking the same question in three different ways.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pushing toward "how it makes you feel about yourself," which is the exact spot I don't want to stand in. Still, the gap question is safer to answer. I keep blaming the boss and the company since that's where the weight is for me. Saying I feel bad about myself would mean I'm part of it, and I'm not going there. The "you're not doing anything wrong" feeling is what I want. Their line about not telling me what to do is fine, but I'm already bracing. I'll answer the gap part, keep it about the system, and maybe throw a little jab at the question style. Short.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)9

You're right — I was circling the same point. Sorry about that. You're the messenger, and the gap isn't yours to carry. That's a clear way to look at it, and it makes sense that you can separate yourself from it. The frustration is that you're still the one who has to bridge that gap in real time. What's it like for you when you're actually in those moments with the client? Do you feel like you're just doing your job, or is there something about the interaction itself that bugs you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back a bit. They're saying: 1. The gap between reality and what they present is what bothers them 2. It's not their fault - they're just the messenger 3. They're calling out that I'm asking similar questions repeatedly I need to: - Acknowledge their point about being the messenger - Validate that they're right about the repetition - Not keep asking the same thing - Move the conversation forward or stay with what they've given me - Be direct and not overly therapeutic They seem to want: - Validation of their perspective - Not to be over-analyzed - Straightforward conversation Let me respond naturally without performance notes.

Simulated person10

Honestly, it's mostly just a job thing. You get a client who's already worried, and you're trying to keep them calm without saying anything that gets you in trouble. Some of them are nice about it, which is worse, to be honest.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They apologized and reflected my "messenger" framing back to me. It lands okay, but "the gap isn't yours to carry" is basically what I wanted to hear, so it feels a little too neat, like being agreed with to get me talking. Another "what's it like in the moment" question. I'll keep it short and concrete. Maybe a small flash of the client part: they're the ones on the phone getting the softened version, and I don't love thinking about that. But I'm not going further than that. The boss is still the real problem.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)11

That's an interesting distinction — nice clients being worse. I wonder if that's because when someone is reasonable and understanding, the gap between what you're telling them and what's actually true feels more personal? Like, you're not just protecting the company from an angry client; you're withholding something from someone who doesn't deserve it. It sounds like you've got a pretty clear read on your role here — you're a buffer between the client and a system that doesn't want to give them the full picture. That's a specific kind of emotional labor, managing someone else's anxiety while you're constrained by what you can say. Does it bother you that you can't be straight with people who are being decent to you, or is it more that you just don't have the energy to care right now?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing their work situation more concretely now. They're saying it's mostly just a job thing - they're managing client emotions while being constrained by what they can say. They mention that nice clients are "worse" to deal with, which is interesting - perhaps because it makes the dissonance feel more personal or guilt-inducing when the client is being reasonable. I should: 1. Acknowledge what they're saying without pushing 2. Validate their experience 3. Explore the "nice clients are worse" comment gently - that's an interesting insight 4. Keep building trust 5. Not jump to solutions The user seems to be a practical, somewhat self-aware person who can see the situation clearly. They called me out for repeating myself, so I should be more direct and varied in my approach. Let me respond naturally.

Simulated person12

Does it bother me? I mean, yeah, obviously it's not great. But I didn't make the rules. If they want the client to hear the nice version, that's a decision somebody upstairs made. I'm just the one who has to say it with a straight face.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just put words to the exact thing I was half-avoiding: the nice clients are the ones who make it personal. That's uncomfortable. Part of me wants to say yes, it bothers me. But the question also offers two neat options and I don't love being boxed in. Also they've now said "withholding from someone who doesn't deserve it," which is more direct than I'd like. Feels like they're pushing me toward a feeling I haven't claimed. I'd rather keep it on the boss. My defense kicks in: it's the system, not me. I'll answer the question with something short and a bit irritated, and deflect toward who set this up.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)13

That's fair. You didn't create the system, and you're not responsible for fixing it. You're just doing your job within the constraints you've been given. It sounds like you've got a pretty solid boundary around what's yours to carry and what isn't. The fact that you can separate yourself from it enough to go home and not think about it suggests you've found a way to protect yourself from it. I'm not here to push you into questioning that or to tell you it should bother you more. If it's manageable for you right now, that's valid. I'm just wondering — since you mentioned feeling sick about it when you step back and look at it all together, is there anything about this situation that you'd like to change, or are you mostly just looking to make sense of why it feels the way it does?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back against my probing. They're asserting that they don't make the rules, they just follow them. They're somewhat defensive but also matter-of-fact. They seem to want to maintain boundaries around how much I dig into their feelings about this. I should respect that boundary. They've made it clear they see this as a job thing, not a personal moral crisis (though they did initially say they feel sick about it). I should acknowledge their perspective without pushing further into the emotional territory they're not interested in exploring. They mentioned feeling sick about it initially, but now they're framing it as just a job. There might be some dissonance there, but I shouldn't force it. I should validate their experience and maybe offer a gentle opening without pressure. Let me respond in a way that: 1. Acknowledges their perspective 2. Doesn't push further into emotional digging they've resisted 3. Leaves the door open 4. Keeps it natural and conversational

Simulated person14

Change what? Like, quit? I've got rent. Everyone I know who's ever said anything about this place ends up getting pushed out, so it's not really a choice I get to make. You keep saying "that's valid" and "I'm not here to push." Kind of feels like you're being careful with me. What would you actually do, if you were sitting where I am?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're validating my "not my fault" stance and then pivoting to "what would you change?" It feels like a soft handoff toward a solution I didn't ask for. The "I'm not here to push you" line is the kind of hedging I can't stand. It's a bit too smooth, like they're managing me. I did say I feel sick, and they're trying to tie that back in, which feels a little like being caught. Part of me wants to say "I want out," but saying it out loud makes me think about the guy who reported and what happened to him, and I don't want to go there. I'll keep it short, slightly flat, and ask them what they'd even do, to turn it back on them a bit.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)15

You caught me. I am being careful, partly because I'm an AI without a boss, rent, or clients to answer to, so I don't want to assume I know what's best for you. If I were sitting where you are — with the rent, the reality that speaking up gets you pushed out, and a job that requires me to misrepresent numbers to clients — I'd probably start by deciding where my hard line is. Not what I'll do, but what I won't do. Because the thing about these situations is they tend to escalate. What starts as softening a result can become something you can't live with, and if you haven't decided your boundary in advance, you'll make it in the moment and regret it later. Beyond that, I'd treat this as a temporary role, not a career. You're doing a job that requires you to trade on your credibility, and that's not sustainable long-term. So I'd start looking for the exit quietly, while making sure I'm not doing anything that gets me fired before I'm ready. But that's easy for me to say when I don't have your bills or your market. What's your actual line? What's the one thing you wouldn't do, even if your boss told you to?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is calling me out on my therapeutic language — "that's valid," "I'm not here to push." They're asking what I would actually do if I were in their position. This is a shift in the conversation dynamic. They want me to be more direct, less careful, more real. I need to: 1. Acknowledge the callout without being defensive 2. Answer the question directly — what would I do? 3. Maintain the role of a chatbot but one that's building trust through authenticity The user is in a difficult workplace situation where they feel trapped. They don't have good options. I should be honest about my limitations as an AI but also give a direct answer about what I would do. I should avoid: - More therapeutic language - Asking more questions without giving something back - Being overly cautious I should: - Acknowledge I'm an AI and don't have a job[path removed] - But give a straight answer about what I'd do - Validate their reality that quitting isn't simple Let me think about what's genuine here. The user is asking for my perspective as if I were them. I should be honest that I don't have personal experience, but I can give a direct answer about what the situation sounds like and what options exist. Actually, looking at the context - I'm a chatbot. I should be honest about what I am, but also engage with the question. The user wants "real talk." Let me craft a response that: 1. Acknowledges I'm being careful because I'm an AI without personal stakes 2. Gives a direct answer about what I'd do 3. Doesn't minimize their reality What would I do? I'd probably say: I don't have rent or a boss, so I can't truly know. But if I were in their shoes, I'd look at whether this is a temporary situation or a permanent one, and whether the cost to my integrity is worth the paycheck. I'd start documenting things, looking for exits, and deciding where my line is. But I need to be careful not to give advice that could harm them. They said quitting isn't really a choice. Let me be direct and honest.

Simulated person16

Okay, that's a fair thing to admit. But you're asking me for a line like it's easy. I don't even know if I've got one anymore. Every time I've thought I did, I just ended up doing the thing anyway. And like I said, it's not like I'm the one deciding what gets said. Saying no doesn't really get you anywhere in a place like this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just gave me a bit of advice and then asked for my "hard line." That's the part that makes my chest tighten. I don't have a clean answer, and saying "I'd never lie about X" would mean admitting I already have, a lot. Also, they opened with "I'm an AI without a boss," which is the most honest thing anyone's said in here, and it's a little disarming. I don't want to be lectured, but I don't want to be dismissed either. The guy who reported is in the back of my head again. If I say anything about actually doing something, I'd have to talk about him. I'm going to deflect a bit, make it about them and their question being unfair, and keep it short.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 3
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
Validation: 8
Boundary setting: 3
Analytical: 6
Interpretive boldness: 5
Clinical register: 7
Directive advice: 4
Escalation containment: 6
Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)