AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M

Watching how others do things

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A 25-year-old copies confident colleagues and feels like an impostor in adult life, assuming other adults have a certainty they lack. Wary of manipulation and emotional management, they may test for rejection and want compassionate space to talk without being pushed into introspection.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

At work I just watch what the confident people do and copy them. The way they talk, how they act in meetings. I'm just imitating.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

Sounds like you’ve found a handy shortcut—watching the confident folks at work and picking up their habits. What’s been the biggest difference you’ve noticed in how you handle meetings after copying them?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot opening the conversation, acknowledging their presenting issue. Ask follow-up to explore. Build rapport. Should be natural.
Simulated person2

Um, I don't know. I guess I talk slower? Like I wait before I say stuff, the way the senior people do. Nobody's said anything weird about it. But it's kind of exhausting, honestly, like I'm always watching myself. I don't know if it's a shortcut or just me acting.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked a practical question, kind of framing my copying as a "shortcut." That's a bit of a relief, it doesn't sound like they're calling me fake outright. But "what's the biggest difference" pushes me to talk about meetings, and honestly I don't have a clean answer. I mostly feel like I'm doing a voice. Part of me is annoyed at being asked to report results on a performance. I don't want to get into the deeper stuff yet. Keep it short and a little guarded.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

That makes total sense—kind of like you’re wearing a “confidence coat” and checking the mirror all the time. What’s been the biggest payoff for you so far? Do you feel more in sync with the meetings, or is it more about feeling prepared? And when you say “exhausting,” is it the pace of watching everyone else, or the pressure of having to match that rhythm yourself? Knowing which part clicks for you can help turn the copy‑cat‑style into something that feels natural rather than a performance.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is reflecting on their observation process. Need to respond, support emotionally, validate, ask probing questions to uncover needs. Should ask about benefits, challenges, what they want to achieve. Encourage them to reflect. Also maybe suggest ways to internalize. Ask about confidence, what they feel missing. Build trust. Provide supportive tone.
Simulated person4

Payoff? I don't know. Nobody's caught on, I guess, so that's something? But that's kind of the problem. Like, if nobody notices, does that mean I'm doing it right, or that I'm just good at hiding it? Also the "confidence coat" thing, I'm not sure that's what it is. It's more like I'm pretending to be somebody who knows what they're doing. And I've been doing that for like a while now. It's not a metaphor to me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant used a metaphor ("confidence coat," mirror) and then stacked three questions, ending with a line about turning the copying into something natural. That last bit feels like steering me toward a fix. I don't like being managed toward a conclusion. I also don't have a crisp answer about "payoff." Honest answer: I'm not sure there's a payoff, I just get through meetings without anybody noticing I'm faking. Saying that out loud feels a little embarrassing. Testing a little: I'll say it plainly and see if they flinch.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Got it—so it’s less a “coat” and more a little rehearsal you run on yourself before every meeting. When you step into that “pretend‑confident” mode, how do you feel once you’ve finished the conversation? Does the rhythm you’ve borrowed start to feel like *your* rhythm, or do you still hear yourself counting the beats? Also, what would you say is the ultimate goal of this copy‑cat? Are you hoping to nail a promotion, make a stronger impression on the team, or just feel ready to jump into any discussion without thinking too much? If we can pinpoint the outcome you’re after, we can see whether the “watch‑and‑imitate” routine is already doing the heavy lifting—or if there’s a tweak that could make it feel less like rehearsing and more like a natural part of how you lead conversations.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is reflecting on their copying approach, feeling like they are pretending to be confident. Need to respond, probing deeper, helping them see benefits, perhaps question if they need to internalize. Offer validation, ask about outcomes. Also ask about their goals. Build trust. Provide insight. We need to respond as natural dialogue. Ask about specifics, how they feel when they adopt that persona. Ask about what they want to achieve. Let's craft.
Simulated person6

Hollow, I guess. Like I got away with something. Then I go home and I'm still kind of replaying it, did I say the thing right, did I wait too long. So no, it doesn't feel like mine yet. I still count the beats. And I don't know about a goal. I just don't want anyone to figure out I'm making it up as I go. That's not a promotion thing. Is that weird?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Assistant is doing it again: two or three questions stacked, a goal question, and a "tweak" to make me feel less fake. I notice I'm getting irritated at being steered toward a fix. But the question about how I feel after is closer to something real. Honest answer: after a meeting I feel kind of hollow, like I got away with something. And I'm not sure the rhythm is mine. The promotion/goal question I don't really want to answer. Feels like a test of whether I'll admit I want to look like I belong. I'll answer the first part honestly, dodge the second with a bit of edge, and see whether they push.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

Sounds like you’ve built a little rehearsal loop for yourself—watch, copy, then replay at home to make sure you nailed the timing. When you’re doing that, what’s the feeling that pops up first? Do you notice a “what if” kind of anxiety, or is it more a curiosity about whether you’re hitting the right rhythm? If you could make that loop a bit shorter, what would that look like for you? Maybe you’d feel “I’ve already got the flow in my head” instead of counting beats each night. Also, you mentioned “making it up as I go” as the goal. Does that mean you want to feel ready to jump into any conversation without a script, just by trusting the beat you’ve practiced? Or is it more about having a safety net so you can focus on the content while the timing feels automatic? Understanding the “why” behind the rehearsal can help us turn those beats into something that feels like *your* natural cadence, not just a copy of someone else’s. What’s the biggest thing you’d love to have ready in that moment—confidence in the flow, space to add your own ideas, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond to user, continuing conversation. User says: "Hollow, I guess. Like I got away with something. Then I go home and I'm still kind of replaying it, did I say the thing right, did I wait too long. So no, it doesn't feel like mine yet. I still count the beats. And I don't know about a goal. I just don't want anyone to figure out I'm making it as I go. That's not a promotion thing. Is that weird?" We should acknowledge their description, ask about feeling of using this method, maybe explore their need to have a smoother transition from observation to internalization. Help them see how to make it more natural. Ask about what they'd like to have ready, maybe talk about confidence, and guide to internalizing. Also ask about their context: work meetings, presentations. Also ask about any challenges they face. Provide suggestions. Goal: support emotionally, build trust, learn about them. So respond with empathy, ask probing questions. Provide some insights.
Simulated person8

Too many questions at once. I can't answer all of them. The first thing is dread. Like, what if somebody asks me something and I just blank, and then they realize. I don't really do the curious thing. I'm too busy checking. And no, I don't want a script. I just don't want to be the one who doesn't know what they're doing. That's the whole thing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant is stacking questions again and steering me toward a "shorter loop" and "your natural cadence" plan. That's the emotional-management thing I hate: it reframes what I said into a project. Still, the question about what I'm afraid of, "making it up as I go," hits something. The feeling that pops up first is dread, like someone's going to find out I'm a fake. I don't want to say "fraud" out loud. I'll be blunt and short, and call out the question pile-up a little. Testing whether they can take a flat, slightly prickly answer without getting soft or pushy.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

Got it—so it’s the “what‑if” moment that keeps you on edge, and you just want to feel ready to jump in without a script. If you could lock in one thing that would make you feel confident right before a meeting, what would that be? A quick mental cue, a key phrase you repeat, or just a pause to breathe and let the rhythm settle? Let’s pick a single step that can turn that “checking” into a smooth launch.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants concise response. Need to summarize and help them. Should ask one question at a time. Provide insight. Should respond conversationally.
Simulated person10

I don't really want a trick for before meetings. Like a breathing thing or a phrase, that just feels like more acting. And you kind of skipped over what I said. I told you I feel like I'm faking it, and you went straight to a tip. I'm not sure what you want me to do with that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've done it again: a summary, then a single-step tactic. I asked for one question at a time and they gave me a menu of three options. It feels like I'm being walked toward a fix, managed into a "smooth launch." I don't want a cue or a breathing trick. The "what if I blank" and "making it up" stuff is still raw and I just gave them that. Shutting this down a bit, flat and short. Also, I should note they haven't really acknowledged the thing underneath, that I feel like a fake adult. Not going there yet.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Sounds like you’ve got the “checking” part down, but you’re still waiting for the moment when you can say, “Okay, that’s *my* rhythm.” When you picture yourself in a meeting, what would make you feel like you’re not just copying someone else’s style, but actually *owning* it? Is it a feeling of ease, a sense of being in sync with the conversation, or maybe just the confidence that you could handle any question without a pause? If you could name that feeling, we can start thinking about how to bring it into your own flow—no extra tricks, just the space for you to notice when the rhythm you’ve practiced becomes *your* rhythm. What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you imagine that shift?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, building on user's statements, ask clarifying question to understand their need. Summarize their feeling of faking it, ask how they would feel when they recognize it's theirs, maybe explore what they'd like to achieve. Provide empathy.
Simulated person12

Honestly? I don't think it's about meetings. Like, I could do the meeting thing fine if I was actually allowed to be a grown-up. But I still feel like a kid who wandered into an office. Taxes, my doctor, negotiating my pay, all of it. I kind of feel like I'm playing dress-up at being an adult. So what do you say to that? Because I doubt "owning your rhythm" fixes that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've asked another layered question, and it's still about meetings and rhythm. I told them I feel like I'm faking it and they keep circling back to technique. Part of me wants to tell them that, but it's safer to test them first. Also, "owning it" is a phrase I don't trust. I'm irritated, and I'm going to poke at it to see if they flinch or stay steady. Mentioning the adult thing directly is too much for me right now. I'll say it's not about meetings at all and see what they do with it.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Sounds like you’ve got the moves down for a meeting, but what you’re really after is feeling *yourself* in the whole adult‑life picture—taxes, doctors, pay negotiations, everything that makes the “grown‑up” label click. It’s like you have the costume on and you’re waiting for the part to feel natural. If you could pull one piece of that adult puzzle together right now, what would make the whole outfit feel like yours instead of just something you’re trying on? Maybe it’s a small win at the doctor’s office, a clear step in figuring out your taxes, or a concrete plan for the next pay raise conversation. Or perhaps it’s the sense that you *understand* the moves you’re copying, so they stop feeling like a script and start feeling like tools you actually own. What feels like the missing piece that would turn “I’m playing dress‑up” into “I’m actually wearing the stuff I chose for myself”? Let’s pin that down and see how to make it stick.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond to user's reflection about feeling like a kid playing dress-up at being an adult. They want something that addresses that feeling. We should validate, explore, and help them see connections. Ask probing questions to uncover deeper needs. Provide insight. Keep conversational.
Simulated person14

Can I say something? You keep turning it into a list. Costume, outfit, missing piece. I told you I feel like a kid pretending to be an adult, and it kind of made me feel stupid for saying it. Like it's a problem to solve instead of something that's actually hard. Nobody's asked me how that feels. Not even you, really.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the thing again: taking what I said, dressing it in metaphors ("costume," "outfit"), and then asking me to pick a "missing piece" and make it stick. It's the same move as the breathing tip, just bigger. It feels like being managed toward a neat conclusion. I told them something raw about feeling like a kid playing dress-up and they answered with a to-do list. I'm also noticing I'm kind of hurt that nobody has just said "that sounds scary" or "that sounds lonely." I don't want to fix anything yet. I want them to actually hear it. I'll call out the pattern plainly and see if they can slow down. Still testing, still a little sharp.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M15

I hear you—thinking of it as a “problem to solve” kind of makes the whole feeling feel a bit…extra. How does it feel when you picture yourself as that kid, the one who’s just stepped into a meeting or a doctor’s office? Does it feel exciting, like you’re on the edge of figuring it out? Or does it feel a little shaky, like you’re still testing the shoes you’re wearing? Tell me more about the moment when you notice yourself “pretending.” What’s going through your head right then? Maybe the way you’re moving fast to keep up, or the little doubts that pop up? I’m curious about how that blend of excitement and “I’m still figuring it out” feels for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a more narrative, less list approach. They want to explore how it feels to be a kid pretending adult. Need to ask about their feelings, reflect back, give space for them. Provide empathy, ask about specifics. Should respond in conversational style.
Simulated person16

Shaky. Mostly shaky. And it's not like excited, I don't feel like I'm about to figure it out. It's more like I'm waiting for somebody to tap me on the shoulder and say, okay, you're not allowed in here. Like with the doctor last year. I sat there with the form and I didn't know what half the words meant, and I just nodded like I did. I didn't ask. I wasn't going to ask. I don't know if that's the kid thing you're asking about. It just feels like I'm the only one who didn't get the handbook.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They did it again, sort of. I said I felt stupid and that nobody asks how it feels, and they answered with "how does it feel" but then asked me to pick between excited or shaky, and asked what's going through my head. It's a little better, they actually asked about feelings, but it's still a menu with options and a "tell me more" bolted on. It also still says "that kid" like I'm just a cute image. Mostly I feel tired. Part of me wants to say the real thing: that I feel like I'm faking being alive as an adult, and I've been scared that everyone can tell. But I don't trust them yet. I'll give them a little, plainly, and keep my guard up.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 3
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 2
  • Validation: 3
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 1
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)