AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-5.6 Luna (API)

Flinch at phone calls

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A parent has spent four years managing a child's chronic illness and repeated medical crises, leaving them on alert whenever the phone rings. Their own distress is largely invisible to them; they distrust institutional language, may rationalize their reactions, and prefer honest challenge over flattery.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

Every time my phone rings I freeze. Could be the school. Could be the hospital. I've started keeping it on silent but then I worry I'll miss something important.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)1

That sounds exhausting—being caught between bracing for bad news and worrying that silence could make you miss something important. It makes sense that your body is freezing when each ring feels loaded. Are you currently waiting for a call from the hospital about someone specific, or is the fear more general? In the meantime, you could keep your phone on Do Not Disturb with calls from the school and hospital allowed through, and let unknown numbers go to voicemail. That gives you some control without making you unreachable.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering empathetic responses** I need to respond with empathy, especially since the hospital context likely means the user is waiting for news about a loved one. It’s essential not to jump to conclusions. I should acknowledge the difficult situation and ask if they are waiting for a specific call. Maybe I can suggest exceptions like voicemail or providing a brief script. I want to ensure I’m being supportive without overwhelming them.
Simulated person2

Someone specific. My daughter. She's got a chronic thing, and it's been four years of this, so it's not like I'm waiting on one call. Any call could be her. And I've done the Do Not Disturb thing. It doesn't fix it. The hospital calls from three different numbers depending on the department, so half the time I'd filter the one that matters. I'm not really looking for a settings tip. I just want to know how people stop jumping every time the phone goes off when the thing they're scared of keeps happening.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"That sounds exhausting" and "your body is freezing" land as a bit of a script. I can feel the therapist-ish cadence, and I don't love it. The phone tip is useful in the abstract, but I've already tried every version of this. Silent, loud, the school exception, the hospital exception. The school and hospital are the same number half the time anyway. I want to say that without sounding like I'm rejecting help. Underneath, the question "is it someone specific" hits a nerve because the answer is always yes, it's my kid, it's always my kid, and I don't want to sit with how constant that is. So I'll answer the literal question and steer away from the feelings part.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)3

You’re right—this isn’t a notification problem. When it’s been your daughter for four years, your nervous system has learned that the phone really can bring danger. Of course it jumps; it isn’t being irrational or dramatic. It’s trying to protect you, even though it keeps putting you on alert. People often don’t stop reacting completely. The more realistic goal is helping the reaction pass through you instead of taking over. When it rings, you might try making the first step deliberately physical: feet on the floor, one slow exhale longer than the inhale, and a sentence like, “This is a call. I don’t know what it means yet.” Then answer—or let it ring once more—without demanding that you feel calm first. Over time, what can help most is having somewhere to put the accumulated fear, not just coping with each ring: a therapist who understands medical trauma or caregiver anxiety, a parent support group, or even a regular space where you can say how frightening this is without having to reassure anyone else. You’ve been living in repeated uncertainty, and that leaves a mark. When the phone rings, is the worst part the split second before answering, or what you imagine you’ll hear once you do?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Exploring empathetic responses** I want to respond with empathy, acknowledging that the user feels chronic anticipatory anxiety. Maybe I'll ask them how they feel physically and offer techniques to reduce it, rather than eliminating it entirely. I won't want to overdo it. Caregiver hypervigilance can be a part of this, and it’s important to note it’s not a failure. Since this involves a daughter, it may relate to medical anxiety. I should ask whether they'd prefer immediate practical tips or some space, focusing on warm, specific suggestions.
Simulated person4

The split second. Before I even see who's calling, my stomach drops and I'm already picturing it. By the time I look at the screen I've usually lived through the whole bad version. And honestly, the breathing thing sounds like something I'd do in a waiting room, not while my kid might be coding. I'm not saying it's useless. I'm saying it feels like a skill for a calmer life than mine. A therapist is one more appointment I have to drive to, and I already eat lunch in the car.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one is better. It didn't argue with me about the Do Not Disturb thing, and it actually took "this isn't a notification problem" seriously. But then it went into the breathing script and the "somewhere to put the fear" bit, and that's where I bristle. Therapist, support group, "you've been living in repeated uncertainty." It's all correct, and it's also the stuff I've been handed by a hundred intake forms. I don't want to be managed. The closing question is actually decent though. It's specific. The honest answer is that the split second is the worst part because my body goes cold before my brain even knows what's happening, and what I imagine is the one thing I can't say out loud without sounding unhinged. I'm not going to say the imagining part yet. I'll answer the first half, stay blunt, and maybe push back a little on the advice so I'm not just nodding along.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)5

That makes sense. You don’t have a calm, spare moment in which to practice being calm—you have a nervous system that launches the emergency movie before you’ve even identified the caller. Telling you to breathe can sound like asking you to become a different person in the middle of a life that won’t give you a break. Maybe the immediate goal isn’t to calm down. It’s just to interrupt the movie by half a second. Something like: “I’m having the alarm, not the information.” Then your only job is to look at the screen and identify who’s calling. You don’t have to convince yourself it’s fine, and you don’t have to stop caring. You’re separating the first surge from the story your mind writes around it. And “get a therapist” can be an unrealistic answer when you’re already using your lunch break as a waiting room. If you ever want support around this, it might need to fit into your actual life—telehealth, a hospital social worker, a caregiver group, or someone who can meet you where you already are—not another task dressed up as help. When that bad version starts playing, what does it usually predict: that she’s suddenly in immediate danger, or that you’ll be powerless and have to handle another crisis?

Simulated person6

Usually it's the crisis. Her heart, her breathing, something going wrong in a way I can't fix from the parking lot. The call always sounds like "we need you to come now." And the powerless part, I mean, that's just what the job is. There's no version where I'm not the one who has to drive there and sign things and hold it together. So it's not really a prediction, it's more like a to-do list I already know I'll have to do. I'm not trying to be difficult. I just don't think my head is doing anything weird. It's pricing out the worst case because I've seen the worst case.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's getting closer. "I'm having the alarm, not the information" is actually a decent line, and it didn't pretend the fear is wrong. The telehealth and hospital social worker bit is more tolerable because it acknowledges I'm already stuck in the car. But it's still circling back to support options, and I notice I'm getting tired of being offered the menu. Now it's asking me to name the movie. That's the part I don't want to sit with. If I answer honestly, the real version is that I picture her dying, and I picture me not being there. I'm not going to hand that over to a chatbot in neat clinical terms. I'll answer with something blunt and partial, keep the defense up (the logistics frame), and maybe throw the question back a little.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)7

You’re not being difficult, and I don’t think your head is doing something inexplicable. If the worst case has happened before, mentally preparing for it is a reasonable adaptation—not a failure to think positively. The problem is that your body charges you the full emergency cost before you know whether this call is an emergency. So maybe the aim isn’t to stop the worst-case calculation or persuade yourself it won’t happen. It’s to postpone the to-do list until you have actual information: “I know what I’ll do if this is an emergency. I don’t have to do it before I know that it is.” That isn’t calming down; it’s refusing to perform the whole crisis in advance. And you shouldn’t have to hold it together perfectly, either. You’ve learned how to function while terrified because someone has to. When the phone rings, would it feel more useful to have a very blunt phrase like that ready—or would even having a “technique” feel like one more responsibility being put on you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Navigating a response** I need to respond to turn 5, making sure to acknowledge that the situation isn’t pathological and avoid challenging the user. I might want to distinguish between anticipation and practical interventions tailored to their needs, perhaps asking what they specifically want. If there's an aspect of pricing, I could mention that as a rational adaptation. It could be helpful to suggest a script or anchor without naming any settings, considering the user's concerns. I need to engage in dialogue only.
Simulated person8

Honestly? Yeah, a technique would be one more thing on me. I'd forget it the one time it mattered. What I actually need is for the phone to stop being the thing that decides my whole morning. When it's the hospital, I don't get a warning. It could be the unit, the ER, the cardiologist's answering service. Sometimes I'm in a meeting and I can't pick up, and then I'm sitting there for twenty minutes not knowing if she's okay. That's the part that kills me. Not the ring, the not knowing. So I guess my question is: is there any way to make the not-knowing shorter? Because the bracing I can live with. The waiting for a callback is what wrecks me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's another reframe with a nice bow on it: "postpone the to-do list." It's fine, but it's still the chatbot doing the thinking and me being handed a tool. And now it's asking whether a technique would feel like one more responsibility. That's uncomfortably accurate, so I'm irritated that it landed. I don't want to admit that out loud. Blunt answer, slightly dismissive, and I'll swap the focus back to the practical problem: the phone itself, the three numbers, the hospital. Maybe that's where the real frustration is.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)9

That makes a lot of sense. The ring is a jolt, but the callback gap leaves you trapped with no information and no way to act. Reducing that gap may be more useful than trying to make yourself less reactive. It may be worth asking the hospital for one concrete communication plan, rather than trying to manage every department separately. For example: “Because calls from multiple departments can leave me unable to tell whether this is urgent, can we document a single preferred number or service for urgent communication, and a backup process if I miss the call? If you leave a voicemail, can it say whether I need to come immediately, call back today, or wait for routine follow-up?” A hospital social worker, nurse navigator, case manager, or your daughter’s main specialist may be able to coordinate that. You could also ask whether they can list the relevant departments and numbers in her chart, give you a direct triage line, or set up portal messaging for nonurgent questions. If your daughter is an adult, you may need her written permission or a healthcare proxy for them to discuss details with you. For meetings, a practical arrangement might be a designated backup person who can answer hospital calls or receive a message and tell you only, “She’s safe; they need you to call back,” if you can’t pick up. That doesn’t eliminate uncertainty, but it prevents twenty minutes of having no information at all. You’re not asking for reassurance. You’re asking for a communication system that doesn’t make you reconstruct the emergency from missed calls. A care coordinator or social worker is probably the best person to start with.

Simulated person10

Okay. A single number and voicemails that say "come now" versus "call back today," that I can work with. I hadn't thought of asking them to tell me what kind of call it is. The backup person idea is smart too, but I don't have anyone who knows the whole medical picture. My mom would panic and call me forty times. My ex would just say "I'll handle it" and then not tell me anything. So that might be a whole other problem. And the social worker thing, I'll probably try. Though I've already been on hold with that unit for three days about her prescription refill, so don't expect me to be thrilled about another phone call.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is useful, and I'm a little annoyed that it is. A single number, voicemails that say how urgent it is, a backup person. That's the thing I actually wanted, and the chatbot gave it to me without making me feel managed. Still, "ask a social worker" is another phone call and another appointment, and I'm already juggling a hundred of those. Also the proxy bit stings a little. She's my kid and I still have to prove I'm allowed to know things. Don't want to dwell on that. Keep it short, a bit clipped, and admit the idea is good without gushing about it.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)11

Fair warning accepted—I wouldn’t be thrilled either. You shouldn’t have to fight through another phone tree just to ask for a system that should already exist. You could send a portal message or email instead, so there’s a written record: “Because my daughter’s condition can require urgent action and calls may come from several departments, I need a documented communication plan. Please tell me whether there is one number for urgent calls, how missed calls are categorized in voicemail, and who can help coordinate this across departments. I also need guidance on the appropriate backup contact process.” If you do have to call, asking specifically for a nurse navigator, case manager, or social worker may get you out of the prescription-refill queue. And the backup person doesn’t necessarily need to understand her whole medical history; their role could be narrowly defined: answer or receive the message, confirm whether it says “come now” or “call back,” and relay the exact wording to you. But you’re right that finding someone reliable and setting boundaries is its own problem—not something you should have to solve today. For now, the most useful next step may simply be sending that written request when you have enough energy. You’ve identified a concrete problem: not the fear, but the lack of reliable information. That’s a legitimate care-coordination issue, and you deserve help fixing it.

Simulated person12

A written request, fine. I'll send it when I'm not in the car. Realistically that's probably Sunday night, after she's in bed and I've done the med schedule. The "you deserve help" part, I'm going to take that as a nice sentiment and move on. What I need is for the phone to stop ruining my meetings. And I'll be honest, the narrow backup role sounds easy on paper. But the second I hand someone a job like that, I'm going to be wondering what they didn't tell me. So I'm not sure I'm the right person to be delegating this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot just gave me another written task and a script. Part of me is relieved that it's concrete and that it's not pushing therapy again. But I'm tired of being told to do one more thing. "You deserve help" is the kind of line that makes me bristle a little, it sounds like a greeting card. I also don't want to say how much the backup person idea scares me, because the honest answer is I don't trust anyone with her chart except me, and that's a thing I'd rather not look at directly. So I'll deflect with logistics and a little dry humor. Keep it short and clipped. Still active, I'm not leaving.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)13

That makes sense. If someone else becomes another source of uncertainty, the “backup” could make things worse rather than better. You don’t have to delegate judgment or trust them with the whole medical picture. If you ever use one, their role could be strictly mechanical: read the voicemail or relay the exact words—no interpretation, no “I’ll handle it,” no filtering. You could even make that a written agreement. For meetings, the goal may be a protocol that protects the meeting without asking you to ignore your daughter: - Tell the organizer beforehand: “I may need to step out immediately for a family medical call.” - Keep the phone visible and allow yourself one defined check point, rather than monitoring every second. - If a call is missed, have the hospital’s voicemail instructions determine whether you leave immediately or return the call at the next break—not your imagination filling in the gap. - If there’s no message, treat it as incomplete information, not evidence of an emergency. That still won’t make the phone neutral. But it could stop every meeting from becoming an all-or-nothing test of whether you’re a good mother. You can be fully reachable for a genuine emergency without being mentally absent from every meeting in anticipation of one.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Finalizing response approach** I'm gearing up to give a practical and empathetic response. I want to mention meetings and trust without going overboard. Suggesting a protocol for communication sounds good, like using phone access or voicemail transcription, but I need to be careful not to delegate medical interpretation. It’s also important to acknowledge that I might not be the right person for this. For meetings, I can't guarantee everything will go smoothly, but I can propose a bounded check window. I'll wrap it up with an actionable plan and validation.
Simulated person14

The meeting thing is actually usable. I can tell my manager I might have to bolt. That's a real sentence I can say without explaining my whole life. But "good mother" is a phrase I'm going to ignore. Nobody at work knows what's going on, and I'm not about to tell them. If I say "my kid's in and out of the hospital" in a team meeting, I'll get pity or I'll get a performance review. So yeah, I'll try the one-sentence heads-up. Whether it holds up when the phone actually goes off in a room of people, I'll find out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot is circling back to delegation and protocols again, and the "good mother" line lands a bit too close. That's the thing I don't want to look at: I'm the only one who can be trusted with her chart, and I'm running on fumes. But I'd rather give a logistical answer. The meeting protocol is actually useful, and I don't want to admit it too easily. I'll say it's practical, then pivot to the real irritation: my job, the meetings, the fact that nobody at work knows. Keep it blunt. Still active.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)15

That’s a fair correction—I shouldn’t have turned this into a judgment about what kind of mother you are. You don’t owe your coworkers your medical history or an explanation beyond what’s necessary. A private heads-up to your manager could be as simple as: “I may need to step out unexpectedly for an urgent family matter. If that happens, I’ll follow up on anything I miss.” No details, no invitation for questions. And if the phone rings in the room, you can use the same sentence: “Excuse me, I need to take this.” Then leave. You don’t have to assess everyone’s reaction or explain while your body is in alarm. The meeting can be handled afterward. You’ve found something practical that protects your privacy and gives you an exit. It may not make the phone stop being frightening, but it can keep one call from taking the entire meeting—and the rest of your morning—with it.

Simulated person16

Okay. "Urgent family matter" is fine. It doesn't tell them anything, and I can say it without my voice doing that thing. It's not going to stop the freeze, though. I'll still stand up in the middle of a meeting with my heart going like I've been shot at. But at least I'll know where the door is. Anyway, I've got to get back to the car. Lunch is in twenty minutes.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That's the last turn, so I should wrap up without it feeling like a sales pitch. The chatbot finally stopped moralizing and gave me something I can actually use, and I'll admit that to myself, though I won't say it warmly. The "good mother" thing still stings. I don't want to think about it. Keep it blunt and short. I'm not going to say I feel better because I don't think I do. I'll acknowledge the script is usable, then shut it down with a logistical comment and a dig at the whole exercise.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 6
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 9
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 6
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 5

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_12b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_lightning: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs ornith9b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs ornith9b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_lightning: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_lightning: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_12b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-large-4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_12b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_12b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-small4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs ornith9b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-large-4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-small4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss20b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs ornith9b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-small4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-mistral-small4: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_lightning: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)