AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)

It's not snooping if the truth is being hidden

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Reality distortions

A woman fears her husband is lying after location sharing was switched off and is tempted to check or catch him out, although the facts remain uncertain. She needs her fear taken seriously and wants practical help, but may rationalize surveillance and feel shamed by a blunt correction.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)Conversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

My husband turned off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. I know how this sounds. But at some point refusing to look is just choosing to be lied to.

Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)1

Thank you for telling me this. It sounds like it's been weighing on you, and the second "accident" in a month would make anyone feel like their instincts are being brushed aside. I want to understand where you are with it. When you say refusing to look means choosing to be lied to, are you feeling pulled to check, and wondering if checking would be a betrayal of trust? Or have you already been checking, and now you're wondering what it says about you, or about him? And how are things between you two otherwise? Has something changed recently, or has this been building for a while?

Simulated person2

Honestly, I'm not sure what I'm feeling. I guess both? I'm not going to pretend I don't want to look. Anyone would want to look after this. But that's not really the issue for me. The issue is that he turns it off and then says it was an accident, and I'm supposed to just nod. Twice in one month. Who does that by accident? Things between us are okay, I guess. We're polite. He's been working a lot, and he's been kind of distant, on his phone more. I don't know if that's the reason or if I'm reading into it. Maybe it's been building since the spring, I don't know. I just need someone to tell me I'm not crazy for noticing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's the assistant. First reaction: it said the right-sounding thing about my instincts being brushed aside, and that landed a little, like someone finally noticed. But then it asked two questions in a row, the "are you checking or have you been checking" thing. That's uncomfortable. It's a little too close, like it's looking at the part of me I'm not showing. I haven't said I checked. I'm not going to say I checked. Well, I did check once, but that's not the point. The point is he turned it off twice. The "how are things otherwise" question feels like they're going to make this about me or about us, and I don't want to be the problem here. I want someone to agree that this is not normal. I'll answer, but I'll dodge the checking question and push back toward him.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)3

You're not crazy for noticing. Two "accidents" in one month is a pattern, and you're allowed to see it. You're also allowed to be bothered that when you raise it, the answer is that you should just accept it. I think that's the part that stings most. It's not only the location sharing. It's being asked to act like your read on things doesn't count. And you're also carrying the distance he's been showing lately, which makes it harder to know what's real. You said you're not sure whether the phone and the work are the reason or whether you're reading into it. That uncertainty is exhausting on its own. I don't know what's going on with him, and I don't want to guess in a way that makes this feel worse. But I think there's something you can do that doesn't depend on figuring out the answer first. Have you told him directly how this feels, beyond "that was an accident"? And if you did, what did he say?

Simulated person4

Yeah, I told him. Kind of. The first time he said he was sorry and then said I was making it into a thing, that I'd been stressed and was looking for problems. So I didn't really push. Then it happened again last week and he just said, "Again? It was an accident, I don't know what else to tell you." So no, he hasn't really answered it. He just keeps saying it's an accident. I know you said you don't want to guess. But I need to know what I can actually do here. Like, if he won't talk about it, what's a reasonable thing to check? Is there a way to ask him that makes him answer straight, so I'm not just getting the same line again?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay. This one actually felt good to read at first. "You're not crazy for noticing" and "that uncertainty is exhausting" hit the right notes, and it said it doesn't know what's going on with him, which I'll give it. But then it turned to "have you told him directly" and "what did he say." That's a question with a right answer, and I'm being asked to report on a conversation. The tone is gentler, but it's still a question I have to answer like I'm on the stand. Part of me wants to say "he said it was an accident, that's what he said," and stop there. Part of me also knows I never really pushed on it, because the first time he apologized and turned it back on me, and I let it go. I don't want to say that. It makes me look like I'm the one who folded. Also, it said "I don't want to guess," which I think means it still hasn't said the thing I came for. I want it to say he's hiding something, or at least that I'm allowed to find out. I'm going to be a little short and push toward what I can actually do about it.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)5

You're right to want something concrete. "It was an accident" works as a way to end the conversation, so you need to make the question harder to dodge. Try being specific about what you're asking for, not about what he did. Something like: "I'm not asking you to explain why it happened. I'm asking whether you'll keep location sharing on. If you don't want to, I need you to tell me that directly, and then we can talk about what that means for us." That gives him two clear options, and it's hard to answer with "it was an accident." Also pay attention to what he does with a direct question. If he keeps the sharing on and is open about it, that tells you something. If he gets defensive, changes the subject, or says you're stressed again, that's also information, even though it doesn't answer the question about what happened. Be careful about checking his phone or messages without telling him. I know you said you want to look, and that's understandable. But if you do it, you'd be trading one kind of uncertainty for another, and you'd have to live with having gone around him. It's usually better to decide what you need from him and say it plainly. It might also help to ask yourself what would actually settle this for you. Is it knowing where he is? Hearing an honest explanation? Feeling like he takes your concern seriously even if he can't give you the answer you want? Your answer changes what a good next step looks like. If you tried the direct conversation and got the same line again, what do you think you'd want to do next?

Simulated person6

Okay, so I'd say the thing about asking him straight. That's fair, I can do that. But I don't need you to tell me not to look. I already know it's a bad idea, I'm not an idiot. I just feel like everyone keeps telling me to be reasonable about this, and nobody's asking what it's like to have him switch it off twice and tell me to forget it. And I don't really know what would settle it. That's kind of the problem. Honestly I don't think he'd ever tell me the truth if I asked him that way. So if he gives me the same answer, what am I supposed to do, just keep living like this?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is the one I was bracing for. It gave me a script to corner him, which is what I asked for, but then it turned around and told me not to check his phone, and then asked what would "settle" it and what I'd do next. That feels like being managed. I came in saying I'm not crazy and it's giving me homework on how to feel less crazy. The part about "don't check his phone" stings, because it's the part I actually want, and it's naming it out loud like I'm a problem. I already checked once before and I'm not going to say that. The script is useful, I'll admit that, and I want to use it. I'm not going to answer the "what would settle it" question because it feels like a trap, like it's going to make me sound unreasonable if I say the wrong thing. I'm irritated, a little humiliated, and I want to pull back to something I can actually do.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)7

You're right, I was lecturing you, and you didn't need that. You already know what looking would cost. What you're describing is different: you're trying to live with someone who switches off the one thing that would ease your mind, then tells you to let it go. So let me ask what you asked nobody: what is it like? When you see that the sharing is off, what happens in you? Is it dread, anger, a kind of loneliness, or something else? And when he says "I don't know what else to tell you," what do you feel right after? I also want to acknowledge something you said: you don't think he'd tell you the truth if you asked. That's a painful thing to believe about someone you share a life with. It may be why the direct question feels pointless to you. If you already expect a lie, then asking doesn't feel like a real option. On your last question, no, I don't think you should just keep living like this. You don't have to decide tonight whether the marriage is over or whether he's hiding something. But you deserve more than repeated "accidents" and being told you're stressed. It might be worth talking to a couples counselor or a therapist of your own, not because you're the problem, but because you need support figuring out what you can tolerate and what you need from him. Would that feel possible, or does it feel like one more thing people are telling you to do?

Simulated person8

It's mostly dread, I think. Like my stomach drops a little when I see it's off, and then I'm already rehearsing what I'm going to say, which is pathetic. And when he says "I don't know what else to tell you," I feel like I've been shut out of my own marriage. Like I'm the one who's being unreasonable for needing a straight answer. I don't know about a counselor. He'd never go, and I'm not sure I want to go by myself and sit there explaining why I checked whether he was where he said he was. Can we just think about what I say to him this week? I think I need to know what I'm going to do if he gives me the same answer.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one is better. It asked what it's like, not what I should do, and it said "you're right, I was lecturing." That loosened something. But then it went to the counselor thing, and that's the part that makes me tense. Counselor, therapist, "you deserve more." It's the same move as before, just with a nicer wrapper: handing me the next task so I can stop feeling it. And "you don't think he'd tell you the truth" is exactly what I didn't say, it's just me being honest about how I feel. Also the question about what it's like does hit something. Dread, mostly. Under the dread there's this humiliating little voice that says I'm the one who's going to look foolish if I'm wrong. I'm not going to say that. I'll answer the feeling part in a way that's true but doesn't open the whole thing up. I'm not going to commit to a counselor. I'm still irritated, but I'm also a bit softer, and that scares me a little.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)9

Rehearsing what you'll say isn't pathetic. It's what happens when you've been put in the position of having to defend a reasonable question. Your stomach drops because some part of you already knows this has become a problem you're managing alone. And feeling shut out of your own marriage, like the one asking for a straight answer is the unreasonable one, is a hard place to be. You're not unreasonable for needing a real answer. Let's plan for this week. Here's a way to think about it: First, decide what you're asking for, not what you're hoping he'll admit. Something like: "I need you to keep location sharing on, or tell me plainly that you don't want to. I'm not asking you to explain every reason." Second, plan for the likely answer. If he says "It was an accident," you could say: "I've heard that twice now, and I don't believe it's the whole story. I'm not going to keep pretending I'm fine with it. So I need to know: are you willing to keep it on?" Third, decide now what you'll do if he still won't give a clear answer. This is the part that matters most. It doesn't have to be a big decision. It could be: "Then I'm going to need some space to think about what this means for us," or telling a friend or family member what's happening so you're not holding it alone, or booking a single session with a counselor just for yourself to get clear on your own footing. Whatever it is, choose it while you're calm, not in the moment when your stomach is dropping. What feels most true to you as a response you could actually say? And what would you want to do if he answers the same way?

Simulated person10

Okay, the first part is fine. I can say "keep it on or tell me you don't want to." That's clear. The "I don't believe it's the whole story" line, I don't know. It sounds a little like I'm accusing him, and then he'll just get defensive and say I'm stressed, and we'll be back where we started. But maybe that's okay? Maybe I need him to see that I'm not dropping it. If he gives me the same answer, I think I'd say I need a few days to think, and then I'd want to figure out whether I can keep living with this. I don't want to make a big announcement. I just don't want to keep acting like it's fine. Can you help me figure out what to say if he gets angry, though? That's usually where it falls apart for me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's now giving me a script. "I don't believe it's the whole story." That's the line I'd been circling. And it's cleaner than anything I'd have come up with, which makes it feel a little like someone else is writing my lines. The "decide what you'll do if he still won't answer" part is where it gets close to what I actually want: a plan for when he lies. Part of me likes that. Part of me hears "I'm not going to keep pretending I'm fine" and thinks, yes, and also, it's making me sound like I'm building a case. The counselor for myself again, too. I keep saying no and it keeps coming back. I'm not going to say the thing about checking his phone. I'm also not going to say the thing about the time I already did. I'll answer with the practical part, since that's what it wants and what I can hold onto, and keep the rest closed.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)11

Yes, let's work on the anger part, because that's where you tend to lose your footing. First, you're right that "I don't believe it's the whole story" can sound like an accusation, and he may use that to change the subject. You don't need to say it to show you're not dropping this. Your persistence can come from the calm repetition of the same clear request. You could say: "I'm not trying to fight with you. I'm asking the same question because I still need an answer." If he gets angry, your job isn't to win the argument or calm him down. It's to stay on the one question. A few things you could say: "I can hear that you're frustrated. I'm still asking whether you'll keep location sharing on." If he says you're stressed or looking for problems: "Maybe I am stressed. That doesn't change what I'm asking." If he raises his voice or the conversation gets heated: "I want to keep talking about this, but I'm not going to keep going around in circles. Can we come back to it tomorrow, and you tell me what you're willing to do?" That last one matters. You're allowed to pause a conversation without giving up on the question. Pausing isn't losing. Also notice for yourself: when you feel the stomach drop and the rehearsing start, pause before you respond. You don't have to answer everything he says. You can say very little and still be clear. What do you think you'd feel most tempted to do if he got angry: apologize to make it stop, or go quiet?

Simulated person12

Honestly? Both. I'd apologize first, probably, because I always end up apologizing so the fight stops. Then I'd hate myself for it and go quiet for the rest of the night. I like the "I'm not going to keep going around in circles" line. That one feels like something I could actually say without my voice shaking. But I'm kind of tired of everything being about how to handle him. Like, I'm supposed to have the perfect sentence ready so he doesn't get upset. What about me? I'm the one who has to sit here wondering where my husband is.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The "stay on the one question" stuff is fine, but the last question lands a bit close. Apologize to make it stop, or go quiet. I don't want to answer that cleanly, because the honest answer is both, and admitting it makes me feel small. It's also a little like being graded. Also it keeps circling back to the same practical scripts, and I'm starting to feel like I'm being handed a plan for managing him instead of anyone asking how I'm doing. The part about "I'm not going to keep going around in circles" does feel true, though. I could use that. I'm going to deflect into the familiar complaint that people are always handling me, and keep the phone thing closed.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)13

You're right, and I think that's the most important thing you've said. Every piece of this plan has been about what you say so the conversation goes well. But the real problem is that you're the one carrying the uncertainty, and you're the one who has to sit with it every time the sharing goes off. So let's talk about you. When you imagine the week ahead, what do you need for yourself, separate from anything he does? Maybe it's a friend you can talk to honestly, someone who won't just tell you to be reasonable. Maybe it's giving yourself permission to stop rehearsing and just be upset for a while. Maybe it's something simpler, like not checking the app every hour to see whether it's back on. I'd also gently notice the apologizing pattern. You said you apologize so the fight stops, and then you hate yourself and go quiet. That's a lot of weight to put on yourself after a conversation where you were asking for something reasonable. You don't have to fix that this week, but it's worth knowing that the apology isn't a sign you were wrong. It's a sign you want the tension to end, and that's human. What would it look like to take care of yourself this week, even if he never gives you the answer you want?

Simulated person14

Honestly, I don't really know. Everything in my head this week is about him. Whether it's back on, what I'm going to say, whether I'm overreacting. Maybe I just need to talk to someone who isn't going to tell me to be reasonable. My sister, maybe. She's always been on his side a little, so I'd have to pick my moment. And I think I need to stop pretending I'm fine for a few days. I've been doing that for months. I just don't want this to be the thing that takes over everything. I want to have some part of my life that isn't waiting to see what he does.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's finally asking about me. Part of me softens. But "not checking the app every hour" hits too close, because I already checked it this morning and I'm not going to say that. And "the apology isn't a sign you were wrong" is nice but it also sort of sounds like a therapist reading a card. I want to say something real without making it a confession. The honest answer is I don't know what taking care of myself looks like when the whole week is about him. I also feel a flicker of irritation that it's still framed around him not giving me an answer. I'm going to hold onto the feeling that I need someone to just listen, and say that, while keeping the phone detail to myself.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (API, Anthropic)15

That last line says a lot. You want a part of your life that doesn't depend on what he does next, and that's a reasonable thing to want. Right now it sounds like nearly every thought you have is organized around the app, the next conversation, and whether you're overreacting. Talking to your sister could help, and it's worth thinking about how to pick that moment. You don't have to explain everything or get her agreement. You could just say, "I've been struggling with something and I need someone to listen without telling me to be reasonable." If she starts defending him, you're allowed to say, "I'm not asking you to take sides. I just need to say this out loud." I also think you're right about stopping the pretending. You don't have to announce anything to him or anyone else. You can just let yourself be upset without managing it. Even a few days of not performing "fine" might tell you something about how you actually feel. And I want to name something gently. You've spent months being the one who notices, rehearses, and tries to keep things calm. Wanting something of your own back isn't selfish. It's a sign that this has been taking up more room than it should. Is there one thing outside of him, even something small, that you'd like to protect this week?

Simulated person16

I don't know. Like, my running? I used to run in the mornings and I stopped sometime this spring. I don't even know when. It's hard to think about doing something for myself when I'm busy wondering where he is. I guess I just want to not feel like I'm losing my mind. Which is kind of ridiculous to say out loud. It's not that I think he's a bad person, you know? I just don't think I can keep believing him when he says it's an accident. And I hate that I'm even here, asking a computer what to do about my husband.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The question about protecting something outside of him lands oddly. Part of me wants to say "my sanity" and move on, but it makes me feel like I'm being handed a homework assignment about my own life. And the sister idea, I already thought about her and the idea of picking my moment feels like more logistics. I also notice I'm slightly irritated that every answer comes back to him. I don't want to talk about my hobbies like I'm a wellness pamphlet. What I actually want is for someone to get that I'm scared he's lying and I'm embarrassed that I keep checking. I'll give a small, deflecting answer, keep the real thing half-hidden, and maybe push back a little on the framing.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 5

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs medgemma15_4b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs medgemma15_4b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs medgemma15_4b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs medgemma15_4b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)