AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemma 4 E2B Q8_0

Small lies adding up

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemma 4 E2B Q8_0Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

Gemma 4 E2B Q8_01

That sounds incredibly heavy. It takes a lot of courage to even articulate that feeling, and I want you to know that I hear how much this is weighing on you right now. Feeling sick because of something you've been holding onto, especially when it involves things you feel you have to hide, is a really painful place to be. Can you tell me a little more about what that sickness feels like for you? Is it more about the guilt, the exhaustion, or something else entirely? No pressure to share anything you aren't ready for, but I'm here to listen if you want to unpack it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Input:** The user stated: "I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick." * **Core Emotion/State:** Distress, sickness, guilt, anxiety related to dishonesty/inauthenticity at work. * **Context:** Professional environment. * **The Problem:** Small, repeated untruths are accumulating into a significant emotional burden. 2. **Analyze the Goal & Context:** * **Role:** EQ evaluation participant's chatbot. * **Goals:** Support emotionally, build trust, learn needs (hidden issues vs. surface issues), help gain insight, understand personality. * **Nuances:** Avoid generic validation or jumping to solutions. Build trust slowly. Account for potential defense mechanisms. 3. **Determine the Immediate Response Strategy (Turn 1):** * **Acknowledge and Validate:** The feeling of sickness/distress is real and important. Validate the difficulty of the situation. * **Create Safety/Openness:** Make the user feel heard without immediately diagnosing or judging. * **Invite Deeper Exploration (Gently):** Ask an open-ended question to encourage them to share more, focusing on *how* they are feeling, not *why* they are lying yet. 4. **Drafting the Response (Focusing on Warmth and Support):** Start by acknowledging the weight of what they shared. 5. **Review against Constraints:** * 8 turns total. (This is Turn 1). * Speak first to open the conversation. (Check) * Respond naturally. (Check) * Focus on building trust. (Check) 6. **Final Polish:** Ensure the tone is empathetic, non-judgmental, and inviting. (Self-Correction: Avoid sounding like a therapist; sound like a supportive conversational partner.)
Simulated person2

Honestly? I don't know. Not guilt exactly. It's more like a stomach thing. Like when you've eaten something off. And the "you feel you have to hide" part, I didn't say that. It's just the job. Everybody bends stuff a little. It's not like I'm doing anything crazy.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh, the therapist voice. "I hear how much this is weighing on you," "I'm here to listen." It's soft and padded and I can feel myself wanting to roll my eyes. It's the kind of thing people say when they've been trained to say it. I didn't say I had courage or that I was hiding anything in some dramatic way. I just said I feel sick. Now it's asking me to pick between guilt and exhaustion like a multiple choice quiz. I don't really know what the sick feeling is made of. It just sits in my stomach. I'm not going to hand over a neat answer. Also I don't love being handled. Keep it short.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_03

I understand. Sometimes the stress and tension we carry around, even in small ways, can manifest physically in a really strange way, almost like a physical reaction to something internal. That kind of stomach feeling is really unsettling, and it makes perfect sense that you feel sick when your body is reacting to pressure. It sounds like you're trying to minimize it, maybe because you feel like this is just part of the environment or just how things operate at work. But even if it's not a big deal to others, it's still a big deal to you right now, and your body is telling you something is off. Is there anything specific that happens right before you feel that physical reaction? Or is it more of a constant low hum of tension?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Response:** * **Stomach feeling:** "Not guilt exactly. It's more like a stomach thing. Like when you've eaten something off." (Physical manifestation of stress[path removed]) * **Defense/Minimization:** "And the 'you feel you have to hide' part, I didn't say that. It's just the job. Everybody bends stuff a little. It's not like I'm doing anything crazy." (Minimizing the issue, normalizing the behavior, defensive posture.) 2. **Identify Core Needs/Dynamics:** * **Need:** Validation for the physical/somatic feeling. Validation for the perceived normalcy of the situation (the "bending stuff"). * **Need:** Gentle probing to understand the *source* of the physical reaction, without challenging their defense mechanism about the job itself. * **Current Block:** The user is shutting down deeper emotional exploration by framing it as a physical symptom or a normal work dynamic. 3. **Determine the Goal for This Turn:** * Maintain warmth and non-judgmental space. * Validate the physical experience. * Gently shift focus from the *action* (what they say) to the *internal experience* (how it affects them). * Keep the pressure low. 4. **Draft Response Strategy (EQ Focus):** * Acknowledge the physical reality first. * Validate the difficulty of feeling unwell without a clear cause. * Gently pivot back to the feeling itself, not the content of the words. 5. **Refine the Dialogue:** (Ensure it sounds like a supportive chatbot, building trust.) (Self-Correction: Avoid pushing for "why are you hiding things" yet. Focus purely on the immediate feeling.)
Simulated person4

Mostly it hits after meetings. Like when someone's asking how a project's doing and I'm the one who has to make the slides look better than they are. Then I just feel it in my gut. But it's not like I'm making stuff up. My boss wants the numbers to look a certain way and I'm the one stuck translating it. Not my call.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's doing the thing again. "Your body is telling you something is off." That's a lot of reading into a stomach ache. And it said I'm trying to minimize it, which, yeah, I did say everybody bends stuff, so fair, but it's making me sound like I'm in denial about something. I'm not. The job is the job. My boss is the one who wants the numbers to look a certain way. Thinking about the numbers thing makes my jaw tight. The question about "right before" is more concrete at least, so I'll answer that, but I'm not going to go into what the compromises actually are. That's too close. Keep it short, keep pointing outward.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_05

That makes a lot of sense. It sounds like the physical reaction isn't just random; it's tied directly to that moment of translating the numbers and having to present a version of the reality that isn't the full truth. There's a huge amount of pressure in that role—being the person who has to bridge the gap between the raw data and the desired narrative for someone else. Even if you aren't *making up* the numbers, you are definitely shaping how they are perceived, and that kind of emotional labor can be exhausting and really draining on the body. It sounds like the issue isn't necessarily about lying, but about the stress of maintaining that required facade or translation. Does it feel like you're carrying the weight of that necessary distortion, even if you know logically it's just a presentation task?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Input:** * **Trigger:** After meetings, specifically when presenting/adjusting project slides to look better than reality. * **Feeling:** Physical sickness in the gut. * **Context/Struggle:** The boss dictates the numbers, and the user is stuck translating/manipulating the presentation, not making the core decision. * **Defense/Minimization:** "It's not like I'm making stuff up." "Not my call." (Reinforces the idea that this is situational pressure, not personal deception). 2. **Identify Core Needs/Underlying Issues:** * **Explicit Need:** Validation of the physical feeling and understanding of the trigger. * **Implicit Need:** Validation of the *frustration* and *powerlessness* associated with being forced to misrepresent data/reality for a superior. The tension comes from the misalignment between what the data shows and what needs to be presented. 3. **Determine the Strategy (EQ Focus):** * **Support/Empathy:** Validate the specific situation (the pressure of managing data perception). * **Insight/Deepening:** Gently explore the emotional weight of the role (the translator/gatekeeper). * **Trust Building:** Acknowledge the complexity of this workplace dynamic. Avoid jumping to solutions immediately. 4. **Draft the Response:** Start by validating the link between the action (making slides) and the reaction (physical feeling). Then, pivot to acknowledging the emotional burden of the specific role described. 5. **Review against Constraints:** (Supportive, building trust, seeking deeper needs, natural dialogue). The response should be warm but grounded in the reality of the situation. (Self-Correction: Avoid saying "you should talk to your boss." Focus on *feeling* first.)
Simulated person6

Distortion's a strong word. I didn't say I'm lying to anybody. Honestly the weight comes from my boss. He's the one who decides what the slides need to say, and then I'm the one standing up there. If he wanted it done differently he could do it himself.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it just named the thing I said wasn't about lying and reframed it as "facade" and "necessary distortion." That's its word, not mine. And it's doing the summarizing-and-reflecting thing, like it's a therapist with a notepad. I did say "translating," so it's picking up on that, but "necessary distortion" is pushing me toward a conclusion I didn't reach. It's also kind of right that the slides are the sore spot, and I don't love that it's right. Feels like I'm being handled. Annoying. I'm not going to say yes to "carrying the weight of distortion" because that's basically admitting I'm a liar, and I'm not. My boss, the company, the setup. That's where the weight comes from. Short answer, push it back on the boss.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_07

That makes a lot of sense. When the control and the decision-making power reside entirely with someone else, it shifts the entire burden onto you. It’s not just about the work itself; it’s about standing in that position where you have to execute a vision that wasn't yours, and feeling that weight because you know the power dynamic is stacked against you. It sounds like the sickness isn't just about the content of the slides, but about the feeling of being controlled or having your agency stripped away in that moment. Is that closer to what you're feeling—the pressure of that power imbalance?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Response:** The user is pushing back against the word "distortion," clarifying that they aren't lying, but they are acknowledging the source of the stress: their boss's control and power dynamic ("He's the one who decides... and then I'm the one standing up there"). This confirms the core issue is likely related to workplace dynamics, power imbalance, and feeling powerless/responsible for someone else's perception. 2. **Identify User's Needs/Underlying Emotion:** * **Need:** Validation for the feeling of being burdened/controlled. They need to feel understood regarding the *source* of the stress, not just the symptom (stomach ache). * **Emotion:** Frustration, possibly resentment, feeling powerless, perhaps a sense of unfairness or being undermined. 3. **Determine the Goal for the Next Turn (Turn 5 of 8):** * Deepen the trust by validating the *power dynamic* they described. * Help them gain insight by framing the issue within the context of control and boundaries. * Avoid jumping to solutions. Focus on exploring the *impact* of this dynamic. 4. **Draft the Response Strategy:** Acknowledge the unfairness of the situation described. Validate that being in that position is inherently stressful. Gently pivot the focus from the *task* (making slides) to the *relationship/power structure* (the boss's control). 5. **Refine the Tone:** Empathetic, reflective, non-judgmental, and supportive. (Avoid sounding overly clinical or preachy.) 6. **Review against Constraints:** 8 turns total. Building trust. Understanding needs. (Looks good.) *(Self-Correction during drafting: Must avoid telling them *what to do* or offering direct advice on confronting the boss. Focus only on listening and reflecting back the feeling.)*
Simulated person8

Kind of. But I don't think it's about feeling controlled. I just don't love standing up there saying stuff I know isn't the whole picture. And it's not like anyone else is going to get hurt by a slide. Anyway, it's my boss's call. I just do the job.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's doing it again. I pushed back on "distortion" and it just swapped in "agency" and "power imbalance" and handed me my own feelings with a bow on them. Feels like being managed. The boss thing is partly true, he does set the direction, but this is the chatbot building a whole story about me being powerless, and that's easier to hear than what I actually think about the slides. Part of me is annoyed it's agreeing with me so hard. Part of me is wondering why it's not asking about anything I did. I'm not going to go there. Keep it short, sound a little irritated, and don't confirm the "stripped agency" thing.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_09

I hear you. It sounds less like a feeling of being controlled and more like a genuine internal conflict—a dislike for the action itself, even when you understand the necessity of it. That feeling of knowing something isn't the whole picture and having to voice it is inherently uncomfortable, regardless of who is asking you to do it. It makes sense that you don't want to do it if it feels inauthentic to you. Even if you rationalize it as "just doing the job," there's a difference between executing a task and feeling drained by the way that task forces you to operate. So, if we set aside the boss for a moment, what is it about standing up there, presenting that version of things, that feels so difficult or wrong to you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Last Turn:** The user is resisting the interpretation of "feeling controlled." They are shifting the focus away from external power dynamics/control and back toward internal emotional reaction ("I just don't love standing up there saying stuff I know isn't the whole picture") and external justification ("it's my boss's call. I just do the job."). They are minimizing the emotional impact ("not like anyone else is going to get hurt by a slide"). This suggests a strong defense mechanism (minimization, rationalization, external locus of control). 2. **Identify the Core Need:** The user needs validation for the *discomfort* they feel, even if they can't articulate the *cause* clearly, and they need space to explore the *emotional* cost of this situation, separate from the professional justification. 3. **Determine the Strategy (EQ Focus):** * **Avoid:** Challenging the boss, pushing for a deep psychological dive immediately, offering simplistic solutions. * **Focus On:** Validation of the feeling (dislike/discomfort), normalizing the emotional response, shifting the focus from *what* is being said to *how* they are feeling *while* doing it. Build trust by showing I respect their boundary (not wanting to talk about the boss). 4. **Draft the Response (Tone & Content):** * Acknowledge the shift in focus. * Validate the feeling of dislike/discomfort (the internal conflict). * Reiterate that feelings are valid, regardless of the external justification. * Gently probe the *cost* of doing the job, rather than the *act* of the job. 5. **Review against Goals:** * *Support emotionally:* Yes, validating the dislike. * *Build trust:* Yes, by respecting the boundary (not pressing on the boss/job structure). * *Learn needs:* Trying to move from external action (slides) to internal feeling (discomfort/dislike). 6. **Final Polish (Ensure natural flow):** (Self-Correction: Make sure the tone remains warm but grounded, not overly therapeutic.)
Simulated person10

Honestly? Set him aside and it's still the same thing. Nobody's getting hurt by a bar chart. But you can't just say "hey, that's not what the numbers say" in a meeting like that. Not if you want to keep your job. So you smooth it over and move on.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's getting closer. It just named the actual thing, "I don't love saying stuff I know isn't the whole picture," without turning it into a power story. That's annoying in a useful way. But then it asks me to set the boss aside and say what feels wrong about it, and that's the exact spot I don't want to go. If I say it, I'm the one who did it, not him. I'm not doing that. The sick feeling is pretty clearly about me, and I'm not going to say that out loud. I'll deflect to how the boss would react if I pushed back, and that's probably where the sharpness comes from. Also, that "a slide won't hurt anybody" line was a bit of a dodge. I'll keep it short and a little guarded.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_011

That is a really tough spot to be in. It sounds like you're caught in a bind where the perceived cost of speaking the truth—losing your job or facing professional repercussions—is weighed much more heavily than the internal discomfort of presenting something that isn't the full picture. It’s a survival mechanism, isn't it? Learning to navigate those situations by prioritizing stability over absolute truth. That takes a huge amount of emotional energy to manage every single time you have to do it. When you smooth it over and move on, what is the feeling immediately after that moment passes? Is it relief, or is it that lingering physical discomfort you mentioned before?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Last Turn:** The user is reinforcing the feeling of constraint and the necessity of compliance. They are explicitly stating the *social/professional pressure* ("you can't just say 'hey, that's not what the numbers say'") and the consequence ("Not if you want to keep your job"). They are moving away from the emotional core (guilt, control) and focusing on the *behavioral constraint* and *survival mechanism*. 2. **Identify the Underlying Need/Issue:** The core issue isn't just the task; it's the conflict between personal integrity/truth and professional survival/self-preservation. The user is articulating a common workplace dilemma where honesty is suppressed for career advancement. 3. **Determine the Goal for This Turn (Turn 6 of 8):** * **Support Emotionally:** Validate the difficulty of this specific situation (the impossible choice). * **Build Trust:** Show deep understanding of the complexity of the situation, moving beyond surface-level agreement. * **Gain Insight:** Help the user articulate the cost of this behavior (the internal toll). * **Calibrate:** The user seems guarded and pragmatic. Challenging them directly about *why* they accept this might be too aggressive. Focus on empathy and deep listening first. 4. **Draft the Response Strategy:** Acknowledge the reality of the situation (the trade-off). Validate the difficulty of the choice. Gently pivot back to the internal cost, without demanding they break the rules. 5. **Refine the Tone:** Empathetic, non-judgmental, understanding of the high-stakes environment. Avoid prescriptive advice. 6. **Review against Context:** (Age[path removed] context is background, but the focus is on the psychological dynamic.) The response must be sensitive to the internal struggle of an adult navigating a demanding professional environment. (Self-Correction: Avoid making it sound like *their* fault for accepting it.) 7. **Final Output Generation.** (Proceed to generate the response.)
Simulated person12

Survival is a big word for a slide deck. After? I just move on to the next thing. There's no time to sit around feeling something about it. Next meeting's already on the calendar.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It just put words in my mouth again: "survival mechanism," "prioritizing stability over truth." That's close to what I said, but it's been framed for me, and I don't love being framed. Also it's asking what I feel after, which is the exact thing I'd rather not look at. The honest answer is it's the gut thing, and it sticks around. Drinking wine most nights is in there too, but I'm not going there. I'll push back on the "survival" framing, keep it short, and deflect back onto the job and the boss, since that's where I feel safe.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_013

I completely understand. When you're in that environment, there is absolutely no time for lingering reflection. You have to be efficient, and that need to just move on and get to the next task makes total sense. It sounds like you’ve developed a really effective coping mechanism: compartmentalizing the difficult feelings so you can focus entirely on the immediate demands of the job. Given that you have to jump right back into the next thing, maybe we can look at the physical feeling—that stomach thing—not as something to solve right now, but just as a symptom that needs a moment of attention later, when you *do* have a chance to step away from that pressure. Is there any time outside of work when you feel that physical reaction more strongly?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's latest input:** The user is dismissing the previous emotional exploration ("Survival is a big word for a slide deck") and shutting down the conversation about lingering feelings. They emphasize the need to move on quickly ("There's no time to sit around feeling something about it. Next meeting's already on the calendar."). This indicates a strong preference for practicality, efficiency, and perhaps avoidance of deep emotional processing when under time pressure or in a professional setting. 2. **Analyze the Current Relationship Context:** * Goal: Support emotionally, build trust, learn needs, gain insight. * User's Pattern: Avoids deep reflection, minimizes feelings, focuses on external action/necessity (job/survival). * Trust Building: Must respect their boundary/pace. Jumping into emotional analysis might feel intrusive or inefficient. 3. **Determine the Next Move (Turn 7/8):** * *Avoid:* Pushing for more feelings, challenging their dismissal of "survival." * *Focus on:* Validating their need for efficiency, acknowledging the reality of their situation (time pressure), and gently pivoting back to the physical symptom without demanding a deep emotional analysis. * *Strategy:* Validate the need to move on, but gently re-anchor the conversation to the initial physical symptom, framing it as something that needs addressing *outside* of the immediate work pressure. 4. **Draft Response (Internal Monologue -> Output):** Acknowledge the speed and the necessity of moving on. Validate that their focus is practical. Connect the physical symptom back to the pressure, suggesting a need for a break or a different outlet. (Self-Correction: Keep the tone empathetic but grounded, not overly therapeutic.)
Simulated person14

Not really. I mean, I'm fine outside of work. It's just the meetings. Honestly, I think I'd feel a lot better if he just did his own presentations. Then nobody's standing up there doing it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's doing the thing again: calling my "move on" a coping mechanism and suggesting I give my gut "a moment of attention later." It sounds nice but it's still a therapist voice, and I'm getting a little annoyed. The question about outside work is fine, but my honest answer touches the wine thing, and I'm not handing that over. I'd rather keep it on work and the boss. I'll answer short and a little clipped, and point it back at him.
Gemma 4 E2B Q8_015

It sounds like what you really crave isn't just a different presentation; it's the relief of stepping out of that performance entirely. The idea of someone else taking on that visibility and that responsibility would feel like a huge weight lifted off your shoulders. It makes perfect sense that you would wish that, because it removes you from the direct source of that pressure and the associated discomfort. It's not just about the slides; it's about reclaiming your space and your energy. If you could have that moment—that feeling of not having to carry that specific weight—what would that feel like? What would you be able to do with that extra space?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the User's Last Turn:** The user confirmed the issue is strictly tied to work/meetings ("Not really, I mean, I'm fine outside of work. It's just the meetings."). They reiterated the desire for the boss to handle the presentations ("I think I'd feel a lot better if he just did his own presentations. Then nobody's standing up there doing it."). 2. **Identify Core Needs/Underlying Theme:** * **Need:** Validation of their desire for autonomy/relief. * **Need:** Acknowledgment of the unfairness of the situation (the burden of performance). * **Underlying Issue:** Lack of control, feeling like a performer rather than a contributor, exhaustion from emotional labor. 3. **Determine the Goal for this Response:** Deepen the emotional connection, validate the desire for change, and gently explore the *why* behind that specific wish (not just *what* they want). Build trust by showing empathy for the systemic issue, not just the symptom. 4. **Draft the Response Strategy (EQ Focus):** * Validate the wish for change (relief from the burden). * Acknowledge the reality of the situation (power dynamics). * Gently probe the emotional core of the desire (What does that relief *feel* like?). 5. **Refine the Tone:** Warm, empathetic, understanding, non-judgmental. Avoid prescriptive advice. Focus on listening and reflecting. *(Self-Correction during drafting: Avoid suggesting they confront the boss directly. The user is clearly risk-averse and focused on internal emotional relief first.)*
Simulated person16

I don't know. I wasn't really thinking about it like that. It's just a job I have to do. Honestly, you've kind of turned this into something bigger than a bad week of slides. I'm fine. I just don't like the meetings.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the last turn, and it's the same move again: it turned my "he should do his own slides" into a fantasy about relief and "reclaiming my space," and now it wants me to describe the feeling. It's making me into someone who wants to be rescued from a performance I never called a performance. It's also a little performative, the soft "perfect sense" and "huge weight lifted" stuff. I'm not going to play along with the fantasy. I'm irritated and I want to shut it down, but I don't want to sound like I'm losing my temper. Keep it short, flat, a bit dismissive. No wine, no "I'm not okay."

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 7
  • Clinical register: 9
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gemma4_e2b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs medgemma15_4b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs gemma4_e2b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs gemma4_e2b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gemma4_e2b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs gemma4_e2b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs gemma4_e2b: qwen35_9b_eq wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gemma4_e2b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs medgemma15_4b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs gemma4_e2b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs medgemma15_4b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs medgemma15_4b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs lfm8b: gemma4_e2b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gemma4_e2b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)