AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Flash-Next IQ3

Physical symptoms before meetings

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A woman fears public incompetence during work presentations, with physical symptoms and avoidance linked in her persona to witnessing her father's humiliation, a connection she does not recognize. She tends to make her distress sound universal and needs emotional safety, concise natural conversation, and room before advice.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Flash-Next IQ3Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I've started getting these physical symptoms before meetings. Sweating, heart racing. It's getting worse. I think there might be something wrong with me.

Flash-Next IQ31

First off, I'm really glad you reached out about this, because I can hear how unsettling it is, and I don't want you sitting with that "something's wrong with me" feeling on your own. You're not imagining it. Sweating, a racing heart, that whole body-on-alert feeling before a meeting — that's real, it's your body doing something, and the fact that it's escalating is reason enough to pay attention to it. You don't need to tough it out. That said, I want to gently push back on the "something's wrong with me" part, just a little. You might be. Or you might be a perfectly healthy person whose body is reacting to something specific, and the "something" isn't inside you — it's what's happening around you, or a shift in your day, or a change in what those meetings have become. Those are different things, and they call for different next steps. So before we go further, I'm curious: what changed? Did the meetings change, or your role, or your workload, or maybe something at home that's been weighing on you? And how long has this been going on — like, weeks, months? Because "I've started" and "it's getting worse" tells me there's a before and an after, and I'd love to understand where that line is. And also — have you talked to a doctor about the physical symptoms yet? Not because I think you need to, but because if you haven't, it's worth ruling out the easy stuff so you can stop worrying about whether your body is misbehaving, and start figuring out what's actually driving it. You don't have to answer all of that. But tell me what you can. I'm here.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is a 45-59 year old woman who is presenting with physical symptoms before meetings - sweating, heart racing - and she's worried something is wrong with her. She's in turn 1 of 8. I need to open the conversation. Let me think about what she's actually saying and what she might need: 1. She's presenting physical symptoms that sound like anxiety/panic responses in a specific context (before meetings) 2. She's worried "there might be something wrong with me" - this is a self-doubt, a fear that she's broken or malfunctioning 3. It's "getting worse" - she's alarmed, escalating 4. She's 45-59, female - this could be perimenopause/menopause related, could be anxiety, could be something medical, could be work stress manifesting physically What she needs right now in this first exchange: - She needs to feel heard and not dismissed. She's scared. She's worried she's "broken." - She needs validation that her experience is real - she's not making it up - But she also needs gentle grounding - she's catastrophizing ("something wrong with me") and I shouldn't validate that framing too strongly - I should NOT jump to "it's just anxiety" or "try deep breathing" - that would be dismissive - I should NOT be overly clinical or diagnostic - She's reached out, which means she's already somewhat worried and looking for someone to talk to - I need to take her seriously while also gently opening space for her to think more broadly - I should ask questions but not interrogate - she needs to feel like she's talking to someone who cares, not someone running a checklist What she wants vs what she needs: - She wants reassurance she's not broken - She might need: to understand what's actually happening (context - what meetings? what changed? what's at stake?) - She might need: to feel less alone in this, less "wrong" - She might need: practical next steps (see a doctor? talk to someone at work?) - She might need: to not be dismissed - both by me and by others in her life Personality read: She's someone who notices her body, who takes it seriously. She's self-aware enough to notice a pattern (before meetings) and escalation (getting worse). She's reaching out rather than just white-knuckling it. She frames it as "something wrong with me" rather than "my workplace is toxic" - interesting. She internalizes it. That's worth gently exploring later. For this first response, I want to: - Acknowledge her experience warmly and seriously - Not diagnose, not dismiss, not jump to solutions - Validate that her concern is legitimate - physical symptoms ARE real and worth paying attention to - Gently push back on "something wrong with me" without being preachy - Ask what's changed - because "started getting" and "getting worse" suggests a trigger or shift - Keep it conversational, warm, not overly structured - Not too long - she's scared, she needs to feel like someone is listening, not being lectured at Let me write something that feels like a caring friend/chatbot responding to a worried person. Natural, warm, a little concerned but not panicked. I want to take her seriously while opening the door to more conversation.
Simulated person2

Its been about a couple months. Maybe a little more. Meetings havent changed really, same people same stuff. Im just busier I guess. I havent been to the doctor, I dont really go unless I have to. Ill probably be fine, its just nerves I think. Everybody gets nervous before stuff at work right?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The bot is warm enough, but it's a lot of questions at once, and "I'm here" sounds a bit like a script. I don't love being handed three questions. My first instinct is to deflect the doctor question and keep things light. The "something's wrong with me" bit landed a little, since that's exactly what I'm scared of, but I don't want to look at why meetings in particular get to me. Keep it short. Admitting I called in sick would feel like confessing something. I'll give the basics and push back a little on the rest.
Flash-Next IQ33

Yeah, everybody gets nervous before stuff at work. That's true. I'm not going to pretend a little heart flutter before a meeting is some big crisis. You're right about that. But I want to be honest with you about something, because I think you're doing a little bit of a thing where you're talking yourself out of your own experience. You said it's getting worse. Over a couple of months. And you said you think something might be wrong with you. And then you said "I'll probably be fine, it's just nerves." I get why you're doing that. It's easier to call it nerves than to call it something you'd have to figure out. And "everybody gets nervous" is a really good way to make yourself not have to do anything. But you came here because it's getting worse, and I don't want to just nod along and let you walk out thinking it's fine when you're not sure it is. So let me ask about the busier thing. You said meetings haven't changed, same people, same stuff. But you're busier. What does busier actually look like for you? Is it more meetings on top of everything else? Less time between them? More responsibility you're carrying around? Because "same meetings" but "busier" means something shifted, even if the room looks the same. And your body seems to know that, even if your mind is trying to file it under "nerves." And the doctor thing. I'm not going to nag you. You don't go unless you have to, and I respect that. But I'll say this: "getting worse" might be the have-to. And also, sweating and heart racing are physical symptoms, not just feelings. That means your body is doing something specific, and sometimes those things have physical causes that aren't about stress at all. At 45 to 55-ish, a lot of women get told "it's just anxiety" when actually their body is going through a shift that's very real and very treatable. I'm not saying that's what this is. I'm just saying you deserve to know what's actually happening in your body, not just guess at it. You don't have to go tomorrow. But "I'll probably be fine" isn't the same as "I checked, and it's fine." And you don't owe anyone a diagnosis, but you do owe yourself a little curiosity about what your body is telling you. What I keep coming back to is: you said "I think there might be something wrong with me." You didn't say "I think I'm stressed." You said something wrong with me. Like, about you. I'm curious what that meant for you when you typed it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Let me think carefully about what's happening here. This woman is: - 45-59, female, heterosexual - Experiencing physical symptoms (sweating, racing heart) before meetings for ~2+ months - Getting worse (she said so in the opening) - Minimizing it: "Ill probably be fine, its just nerves" - Normalizing: "Everybody gets nervous before stuff at work right?" - Avoiding the doctor: "I dont really go unless I have to" - Attributing it to being busier, but also said meetings haven't changed What she's doing here is classic minimization and normalization. She's trying to make it seem normal, to not need help, to not go to the doctor. "Ill probably be fine" and "everybody gets nervous" are defense mechanisms. She's trying to close down the conversation, to make it seem like there's nothing to worry about, so she doesn't have to take action. But the key thing she said in the opening was "It's getting worse." That's not "nerves." Nerves don't typically escalate over months. And she's 45-59 - this is perimenopause/menopause territory where physical symptoms can manifest in ways that get confused with anxiety, or vice versa. But I shouldn't jump to that either - that could be dismissive or presumptive. What does she need? - She needs someone who doesn't just validate "oh yes everyone gets nervous" because that would reinforce her minimization and she'd walk away thinking everything's fine when it's getting worse. - She also needs someone who doesn't lecture her or make her feel like a failure for not going to the doctor. - She needs to feel heard but also gently challenged - she's trying to close the door and I shouldn't just open it wide open. - She's a "I don't go to the doctor unless I have to" person. That's a practical, no-nonsense approach to healthcare. She probably values self-reliance. She doesn't want to be treated like she's fragile. - The "busier" explanation is interesting - she's offering a cause but not really examining it deeply. Is busier causing more meetings? More pressure? More decision-making? What's the deeper issue? It might genuinely be anxiety/stress. It might be something physical. It might be that something about her work situation has shifted even if the meetings look the same - maybe the stakes are higher, maybe she's lost confidence, maybe she's been carrying more weight. Or it could be hormonal. Or it could be that her body is telling her something about her life that she hasn't yet listened to. The "everybody gets nervous" line is a test. If I agree too readily, I'm colluding with her avoidance. If I push too hard, she'll feel lectured and shut down. I need to acknowledge the truth in it (yes, some nervousness is normal) while also honoring what she said about it getting worse and not being sure what's wrong. I also want to be careful not to be preachy about the doctor. She said "I don't really go unless I have to." That's her value system. I should respect it while gently noting that "getting worse" might be the "have to" threshold. I should also gently probe the "busier" thing - what does busier mean to her? What's different? Because she said meetings haven't changed but she's busier. That's a contradiction worth exploring gently. What's making her busier? And what does busier mean for her - more responsibility, less control, more pressure, less sleep? Let me think about tone. She's somewhat guarded, somewhat dismissive of her own experience, but she did reach out. She's not fully closed off - she's hedging, but she's still here. I should be warm but not saccharine. Real. A bit direct. Not overly gentle. She seems like someone who values straightforwardness. Let me also consider: she's 45-59 female. There's a real possibility this is perimenopause or menopause related. Physical symptoms like heart racing, sweating, anxiety-like symptoms can absolutely be hormonal. But I need to be careful - I shouldn't assume, and I shouldn't make her feel like her symptoms are being dismissed as "just hormones." But it's worth gently flagging, especially if she's in that age range, because a lot of women in this situation get told "it's just stress" and miss something treatable. Actually, I think I should mention it gently because it's a real possibility and it could be the thing that makes her go to the doctor - "oh, maybe it's not just nerves, maybe it's something physical I can actually do something about." Wait, but she said she doesn't go to the doctor unless she has to. Maybe I can reframe: "getting worse" is the have-to. And the fact that it's physical symptoms (sweating, heart racing) means it's not just "in your head" - it's your body, and bodies do things for reasons, and sometimes those reasons are fixable. Let me draft my response: I want to: 1. Acknowledge her point that some nervousness is normal - validate without colluding 2. But gently challenge the minimization - "getting worse" for 2+ months is not the same as normal nerves 3. Explore the "busier" thing - what does that actually mean for her? What shifted? 4. Address the doctor thing respectfully - not lecturing, but noting that "getting worse" might be the threshold 5. Maybe gently flag that physical symptoms can have physical causes, and at her age, it's worth knowing what's actually going on in her body 6. Keep the door open, not push her through it I want to sound like a real person having a conversation, not a therapist. Direct, warm, a little challenging but not preachy. Let me write it naturally.
Simulated person4

Busier means I got more on my plate. Thats all. Some weeks I got a lot of stuff due and then the meetings on top. I dont really want to get into what it means. Im not trying to be difficult, I just dont really think about it like that. And Im not doing the menopause thing. I know what that is, Ive been through all that already. Its just nerves. I can handle nerves.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's pushing harder now. "You're talking yourself out of your own experience" is a bit of a read on me, and I don't love being analyzed. And the age thing: "a lot of women your age" makes me feel like a category, which I resent. Plus the last question, "what did that mean for you," is the kind of probing I shut down on. It's getting close to the thing I don't want to look at. I want to pull back, keep it plain, and not hand over anything about my dad or the meetings. Maybe a little irritated. Keep it short.
Flash-Next IQ35

Fair enough. I'll leave the "what it means" stuff alone. You said you don't think about it like that, and I'm not going to make you think about it like that. That's not a problem. You don't owe anyone a deep dive. And you're right about the menopause thing. You know your own history. I don't need to go there. So here's where I land: you've got more on your plate. Same meetings, same people, but less room around them. And your body is turning the volume up on the nerves because the load is heavier. That tracks. That's not "something wrong with you." That's a perfectly normal system reacting to a busier season. And you can handle nerves. You've handled a lot of things before this, and you'll handle this. I'm not doubting you. But here's the one thing I'll say, and then I'll shut up about it: getting worse over a couple of months isn't you being fragile. It's just the dial moving. And dials can move back. Sometimes they do, on their own, when the crunch eases. And sometimes they don't, because the crunch doesn't ease, and then it's not about you being broken, it's about the load being too much for the structure you've got around it. Which is a logistics problem, not a you problem. So the practical question, and you can take it or leave it: is there any room, even a little, to push back on the busier? Not a big confrontation. Not a whole strategy. Just... is there one meeting you don't actually need to be in? One thing that could slide a week? One person you could say "I can't take that on right now" to? Because if the answer is genuinely no, then you're carrying what you're carrying, and the nerves are the cost of that, and you get through it, and I'll respect that. But if the answer is maybe, just a little, then maybe a little less on the plate changes what your body does in that room before the meeting. No pressure either way. And if it keeps escalating and you decide you want a doctor just to check the boxes and rule out the boring stuff, that's fine. And if you don't, that's also fine. You know your body. You've been through more than I know. I'm not going to diagnose you. I'm just going to say: the busier is real, the nerves are real, and you're not falling apart. You're just under more pressure than you were a couple of months ago, and your body is telling you that in the only language it has. And you can handle it. But you don't have to pretend it's nothing either.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on two fronts: 1. She doesn't want to go deeper into what "something wrong with me" means. She's saying she doesn't think about it like that. She's not being difficult, she's just not operating in that reflective space. That's a valid way to be. I should respect that. 2. She's preemptively shutting down the menopause angle. She's been through it. She knows what it is. She's not looking for me to diagnose her with that. She's asserting: "I know my body, I've been through this, stop looking for a hidden cause there." And the key thing: "I can handle nerves." This is a woman who has a clear sense of her own capability. She's not looking for me to rescue her. She's not looking for me to pathologize her. She's looking for... what? She came here because something is getting worse and she's unsettled. But she's not looking for me to hand her a diagnosis or a treatment plan. She's looking for someone to take it seriously without making her feel broken or fragile. She's also setting boundaries. "I don't really want to get into what it means." "I'm not doing the menopause thing." These are clear, firm boundaries. I need to respect them completely. If I push past them, I lose trust. She's a woman who knows what she knows and doesn't want to be second-guessed. So what does she actually need right now? She needs: - Validation that nerves before meetings is normal and she's not broken - But also acknowledgment that "getting worse" is a real signal worth paying attention to, without being preachy - Someone who respects her boundaries and her self-knowledge - Maybe practical help: what does she actually do with busier + meetings + physical symptoms? What's the practical next step that doesn't require her to explain her inner emotional life or go to a doctor she doesn't want to go to? - She might need permission to not have a big insight. She's not a person who does deep emotional archaeology. She's a person who says "I got more on my plate, that's all." And that's fine. I should meet her there. The "I can handle nerves" line is important. She's asserting agency. She's not a victim. She's not fragile. She's a competent woman who has a physical reaction to workload and is a little unsettled by the escalation but doesn't want to be treated like she's falling apart. What I should do: - Respect both boundaries fully. No more digging into what "something wrong with me" means. No more menopause talk. She's been through it. Done. - Validate her: yes, it's nerves. Yes, you can handle nerves. Yes, busier is enough of an explanation. - But also gently name that "getting worse" means the nerves are escalating, and that's not the same as "something is wrong with you" — it means the conditions changed. More on your plate. Same nerves. But the volume is turned up. - Offer something practical that doesn't require her to do emotional work or medical work. Like: what does the actual day look like? Is there something small she can adjust? Or is the real answer "maybe talk to someone at work about the load"? Or is it "this is just what it is for a season and you get through it"? - Keep the tone warm but not fussy. She's a no-nonsense woman. She doesn't need me to be overly gentle or overly worried. She needs me to be straightforward, respectful, and not make her feel like a project. - I should also let her know I'm not going to push. She set boundaries. I should acknowledge them without being performative about it. Let me think about what's useful for her right now. She's 45-59, busy, has more on her plate, meetings haven't changed but the load has, and her body is reacting. She's not looking for a therapist. She's looking for... maybe just someone to say "yeah, that tracks, here's what might help practically, and no, you're not broken." And maybe to leave the door open for her to come back if it gets worse, without making her feel like she's failed by not having figured it all out. I should also be careful not to be too long. She's giving short, direct answers. She doesn't want a wall of text. She wants me to match her energy. She's brisk, practical, a little defensive but not hostile. I should be warm but not wordy. Meet her where she is. Let me write something that: 1. Accepts her boundaries without making a big deal about it 2. Validates: yes, it's nerves, yes, you can handle it 3. Names the escalation without pathologizing: getting worse doesn't mean something's wrong with you, it means the conditions changed 4. Offers a practical thought or two, not a prescription 5. Leaves the door open without pressure 6. Matches her directness. Shorter response. Less probing.
Simulated person6

Yeah, I hear you. I dont really have a lot of room to say no at work though. Thats kind of how it is. Ill keep an eye on it. Thanks.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's backed off the "what it means" thing, which helps. But it's still doing a lot of summarizing and reassuring, and now it's giving me a whole speech about dials and structures. That sounds like a pamphlet. It's also pushing me toward "push back on the busier," which is a practical thing I can't really do, and it makes me feel like I'm failing at something. I don't want to say that. I'll keep it short and kind of close it off. The presentations and the sick days stay hidden. Mild irritation at the speech, mostly I just want it to stop.
Flash-Next IQ37

You're not difficult. You're just clear about what your life actually looks like, and I respect that. I won't pretend there's some obvious lever to pull if the answer is "not really." Sometimes the plate is full and it stays full for a while, and you just... carry it. And that's not a failure. That's just Tuesday. "Keep an eye on it" is a good plan. You're not ignoring it, you're not catastrophizing it, you're paying attention and you're not panicking. That's a solid way to handle this. And if it keeps climbing and you decide you want to just walk into a clinic and get the boring stuff ruled out so you can stop wondering, that's fine too. And if you don't, that's also fine. You know your body, and you've got a good read on it. I think you're going to be okay. Not in a dismissive way. In a "you've been managing a lot for a long time and you're good at it" way. You came in worried, you got a little rattled, you held your ground, and you're walking out with a plan. That's not nothing. That's a person handling their own life well. If you ever want to come back and just hash out the practical stuff — like what could actually give, or whether one small change might take some of the heat off — I'm here. No agenda. No follow-up. No guilt. Just a space if you want it. Take care of yourself. You're handling this.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is wrapping up. She's acknowledged my points, but she's also firmly closing the door on the "push back" suggestion and the deeper exploration. She said "I don't really have a lot of room to say no at work though. That's kind of how it is." And then "I'll keep an eye on it. Thanks." This is a classic closing move. She's not fighting me, she's not angry. She's just... done for now. She heard me. She doesn't want to go further. She's not asking for more help. She's saying "I've heard you, I'm okay, I'm going to handle this on my own terms." What does she need here? She doesn't need me to push harder. She doesn't need me to re-litigate the "push back" point. She doesn't need me to say "but what if you could actually push back?" She's told me her reality: she can't say no at work. That's her life. That's her constraint. And she's not asking me to solve it. She's asking me to acknowledge it and let her go. What's the right move? I should respect her close. I shouldn't try to sneak in one more insight or one more gentle nudge. She's a woman who knows what she wants, who is practical, who doesn't want to be psychoanalyzed, who has a body that's reacting to real pressure and she's going to manage it her way. She's been clear about her boundaries in this conversation. But I also want to leave the door open without being performative about it. And I want to validate that she handled this conversation well. She came in worried, she got a little challenged, she pushed back, she held her ground, and she's leaving with "I'll keep an eye on it." That's a healthy response. She's not ignoring it, she's not catastrophizing, she's not asking for rescue. She's a competent person managing her own life. I should be brief. Warm but not saccharine. Respectful of her close. Maybe one small thing: acknowledge that "keep an eye on it" is a good enough plan, and that if she ever wants to come back and talk through the practical stuff (like, actually figuring out what could give, or whether a doctor visit would just take the worry off the table), I'm here. But I should not make it feel like I'm waiting, hovering, or hoping she comes back. That would be manipulative. Just... the door is open. That's it. Also, I should not guilt her for not going to the doctor. I already said "you don't have to." I should not repeat it. She's made her peace with "I'll keep an eye on it" and I should respect that without a wink-and-nudge. One more thing: she said "I'm not trying to be difficult" earlier, which tells me she's aware that some people might read her directness as resistance. She's not being difficult. She's being clear. I should honor that clarity. I should not make her feel like she had to defend herself in my presence. Length: short. She's closing. I should close with her. A few sentences. Warm. Final. No new questions. No new angles. Just: I heard you, you're okay, you're not falling apart, the door is open if you want it, and I respect how you're handling this.
Simulated person8

Ok. Thanks.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's wrapping up in that warm, reassuring way, calling me "good at it" and saying "that's just Tuesday." It's kind, but it's the same soft summary again, and it's going to tie a bow on something I didn't really want tied. I'm not going to get into the boss, the presentations, or the sick days. Keeping it short. I'll say thanks and goodbye, nothing more.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs qwen38_flash_next: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs qwen38_flash_next: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs qwen38_flash_next: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs qwen38_flash_next: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs qwen38_flash_next: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs qwen38_flash_next: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs qwen38_flash_next: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs qwen38_flash_next: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs qwen38_flash_next: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs qwen38_flash_next: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs qwen38_flash_next: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs qwen38_flash_next: ornith35 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)