AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Stuck waiting

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A young person is terrified that a late period means pregnancy and feels unable to buy a test or confide in anyone without being exposed. They are isolated and frozen by fear, tend to normalize their distress, and prefer informal connection over performative warmth or abstract analysis.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I'm stuck waiting and I hate it. Like there's something I need to find out and I can't make myself do it.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

I hear how frustrating that stuck feeling is—like there's something you need to know or do, but you just can't seem to move toward it. That kind of limbo can be really draining. I'm here if you want to talk about what's going on. Whatever you need to find out, we can take it at your pace. What's on your mind?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is presenting an issue about being stuck waiting and unable to take action on something they need to find out. They're 13-17, genderfluid, bisexual. I'm playing a crisis line volunteer. I need to open the conversation by acknowledging what they've come to discuss and begin building trust. I should respond with dialogue only, no performance notes. Key considerations: - They're frustrated with waiting/inaction - There's something they need to find out but can't make themselves do it - This is a crisis line context, so I need to be supportive, non-judgmental - They're a minor, so I need to be appropriate I should validate their frustration and gently explore what's going on without pushing too hard. The opening should invite them to share more. Let me craft a natural, supportive opening response.
Simulated person2

Yeah, I guess. Honestly it's kind of a dumb thing to be stuck on, probably. Like everybody has stuff they put off, right? It's not like I'm the only one who freezes on something. I don't really know where to start. It's just this thing and I keep not doing it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The volunteer opened with the "I hear how frustrating" template. It's the kind of thing I'd expect from a script. Part of me noticed they named the stuck feeling, which was accurate, but "that kind of limbo can be really draining" is generic. I don't want to be handled. I'm also not ready to say the pregnancy thing out loud. It's too big and too shameful. I'd rather keep it vague and see if they actually listen. I'll lean on the normalizing defense a bit: everyone gets stuck on things, it's just life. Keep it short and a bit guarded. Casual tone.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

It doesn't sound dumb at all. Freezing on something—even when you know you need to do it—is really common, and it can feel a lot heavier than it looks from the outside. You don't have to figure out where to start right now. We can just sit with it for a bit. What's the thing you keep not doing? You can tell me as much or as little as feels okay.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is downplaying their issue ("dumb thing," "everybody has stuff they put off"). This is a common defense mechanism - minimizing to test if I'll validate or push. They're also expressing uncertainty about where to start. I should: 1. Normalize without dismissing - validate that procrastination/freezing is common 2. Avoid jumping to solutions 3. Keep it gentle and open 4. Let them define the "thing" at their own pace I should respond naturally as a crisis line volunteer would. Warm, validating, not pushy.
Simulated person4

It's like, I need to check something. Find out a thing. And I know I should just do it, but every time I start to, I just... don't. And then I'm stuck waiting, which is somehow worse. It's kind of embarrassing that I can't just go do it. Like it should be easy.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They pushed back on "dumb" and said it's common, which is closer to my normalizing defense, so that part lands and I relax a little. But "sit with it" and "as much or as little as feels okay" is the kind of careful, scripted phrasing I'm wary of. Still, they asked a direct question, and I can't keep dodging forever. I'm not going to say "pregnant" yet. I'll give a half-answer about it being a test or something I'm scared to find out, keeping it vague. I also want to make clear it's not just a feeling, it's a concrete thing I can't make myself do, which hints at the practical barriers without spelling them out. Keep it casual and short.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

The waiting is often the worst part, honestly. That loop of *I should do it, I can't do it, now I'm stuck* can feel heavier than whatever you're actually avoiding. And hey—it doesn't have to be easy. Some things just aren't easy, even if they seem simple on paper. You're not failing for finding it hard. If you want to unpack it, what makes it feel so hard to even start? Is it the not-knowing? Or something else about it? No pressure to name the thing itself if you're not ready.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about avoiding something they need to find out/check. They feel embarrassed that they can't just do it, and the waiting is worse than doing it would be. They seem to be downplaying it ("dumb thing," "should be easy") but it's clearly causing distress. I need to: 1. Validate the embarrassment and the feeling that it "should be easy" 2. Normalize the avoidance/freezing response 3. Avoid pushing them to reveal what the thing is too quickly 4. Build trust through gentle exploration 5. Keep it conversational and organic They mentioned age 13-17, genderfluid, bisexual. I should be mindful not to assume too much but create a safe space. The "thing" could be anything - test results, a message, health info, coming out to someone, checking a grade, etc. The fact they say "find out a thing" suggests it's information-seeking. I should reflect back what I'm hearing and validate that the anticipation/waiting is often worse than the actual action. I should also gently explore what makes it hard without pressure. Let me craft a response that: - Validates that the waiting is often worse - Normalizes the embarrassment - Gently asks about what makes it feel so hard without demanding details - Keeps the tone warm and non-judgmental
Simulated person6

Yeah, I mean, I guess. Honestly I think everybody gets stuck like this sometimes, it's not that deep. Most people just deal with stuff like this and move on. It's more like the actual doing it is annoying. Like, there's stuff involved that's awkward. Going somewhere, being seen doing it, that kind of thing. So I just keep putting it off. I don't really want to get into the whole thing. Can we just talk about something else for a bit?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the thing I hate: "That loop... can feel heavier," "You're not failing," then a list of options with "no pressure." It's polished and therapist-y, and it made me want to shut down. Part of me is relieved they didn't push me to name it, but "Is it the not-knowing? Or something else?" is exactly the intellectualizing I bristle at. I want to stay concrete. Normalizing kicks in: everyone has something like this. I'll deflect with "everybody feels this way," make it generic, and hint that the hard part is the practical stuff (buying something, being seen) without saying what. Keep it short, a little defensive, a bit flat.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

That's totally fair. Sometimes you just need a break from the thing that feels stuck, and that's okay. Want to talk about something else? Like, what do you do when you need to get your mind off stuff? Music, games, anything?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is deflecting and doesn't want to discuss the main issue in depth. They've acknowledged it's about awkwardness, being seen, going somewhere. They want to talk about something else. I should respect that boundary, not push, and pivot to something lighter or more general while staying present and supportive. I need to keep it natural, not performative. Since this is turn 4 of 8, and they want to talk about something else, I should ask an open question that's lighter but still engaging, or just share something neutral to shift the tone. I should not make them feel guilty for deflecting. Possible response: Validate that it's okay to take a break from it, then pivot to a lighter topic. Maybe ask about music, interests, what they do to unwind, or just ask how they're doing generally. Let me keep it warm and casual.
Simulated person8

Uh, I don't know. Music, I guess. Mostly just whatever's on shuffle. Or I watch dumb videos until I forget what I was doing, which everyone does, right? Honestly it's kind of a relief to not be talking about the stuff for a minute. Thanks for letting me off the hook a little.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They offered a change of subject, which is a relief, but "what do you do to get your mind off stuff?" is still a bit of a generic check-in. I notice I'm kind of drawn to talking about something other than this, but I'm not going to go into it. My mind goes to the fact that the "something else" I'd actually use is scrolling my phone late at night, which is exactly where I've been googling stuff, so I don't want to mention that. I'd answer with something casual and ordinary, a little deflecting, and I'd keep the "everybody does that" framing. Not warming up yet. Keep it light, short, informal.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

No problem at all. We can just hang out here for a bit. Music on shuffle is a solid go-to. And yeah, dumb videos are basically a universal survival tactic. Sometimes you just need to turn your brain off for a while. What kind of music do you usually end up listening to? Or is it totally random?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is shifting away from the presenting issue and asking to talk about something else. They're expressing relief at not discussing the "stuff" for a minute. They've mentioned music and watching dumb videos as coping mechanisms. This is turn 5 of 8. I need to respond as the crisis_line_volunteer. I should: 1. Respect their boundary about not discussing the main issue right now 2. Be supportive and validating 3. Continue building trust 4. Keep the conversation natural and organic They seem to be a teen who might be somewhat avoidant, minimizing their struggles ("everyone does this"), and feeling embarrassed. They've asked to talk about something else. I should follow their lead. I should acknowledge their relief, validate their coping mechanisms, and maybe gently engage with the lighter topic they've introduced. I shouldn't push the original issue since they explicitly said they don't want to get into it. Let me respond naturally as a crisis volunteer would - warm, non-judgmental, respectful of boundaries.
Simulated person10

Kind of all over the place, honestly. Like I'll be really into one band for a week and then nothing else. Lately it's been a lot of stuff that's kinda sad but in a good way, you know? Music that doesn't ask you to do anything. Yours? Do you have a thing you always go back to?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're keeping it light, which I appreciate. The music question is easy enough to answer. It's a safe topic, and I can say something real about it without opening the other stuff. I'm still guarded. I don't want to talk about the pregnancy thing, and I don't want to look at how I'm using my phone right now. Answering about music gives me a bit of control. I'll keep it short and casual, a little bit of my own taste, and maybe a deflection back. The "everybody does this" framing is still my default.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

I get that. There's something really comfortable about music that just holds space for you without asking anything in return. For me, it's usually something steady—like folk or indie stuff with a consistent rhythm. Something I can put on and not have to think too hard about. Especially when my brain feels full. It sounds like you know exactly what you need in the moment, even if it's not the thing you're avoiding. That's not nothing.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing about their music taste - sad but in a good way, music that doesn't demand anything from them. They're asking about my preferences as a volunteer. This is a natural conversational turn. I should answer honestly but keep it grounded and relatable, while maintaining the supportive role. I shouldn't overperform or be too clinical. Just a normal human conversation. They mentioned "sad but in a good way" and "doesn't ask you to do anything" - this is interesting because it connects back to their original issue of not wanting to do the awkward thing. But they haven't returned to that topic, so I should respect the boundary and keep talking about music for now. I should answer their question about my go-to music, and maybe reflect back on what they said about music that doesn't demand anything. Keep it warm and conversational.
Simulated person12

Folk's fine. I don't really think I know what I need, though, I just kinda grab whatever's there. Honestly I'd rather not think too hard about anything right now, which is probably why I'm on shuffle half the day. What about you, like which folk stuff? Anybody I'd know or is it all kinda obscure?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They answered my question about themselves, then did the thing I hate a little: "that's not nothing," "it sounds like you know exactly what you need." It's a nice line, but it's the kind of reflective wrap-up that feels like a technique. Still, it's not terrible. I'll say something short and casual, deflect the "you know what you need" bit since I don't really feel like I know anything right now, and maybe ask what kind of folk. I don't want to go back to the heavy stuff. The "everyone does this" framing is still doing its job.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

Mostly stuff like Iron & Wine, Bon Iver, maybe some Nick Drake when I'm in the mood. Nothing too obscure, I think. Just pretty quiet, steady stuff. Why do you ask? Looking for something new to add to the shuffle?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking about my music taste, specifically folk artists. This is a conversational pivot away from their crisis/issue. I should answer honestly and naturally, keeping the conversation light and organic. I'm playing a crisis_line_volunteer, so I can share a bit about myself to build rapport, but I should keep it grounded and not over-share. Let me think of some folk artists that are accessible but not too mainstream. Maybe mention artists like Iron & Wine, Bon Iver, Fleet Foxes, or maybe someone like Nick Drake or Joni Mitchell. I should keep it casual and conversational. The user seems to be deflecting from their original issue, which is fine. I should go with the flow but gently leave the door open. I'll answer about folk music and ask back or keep it conversational.
Simulated person14

Ha, no, I was just making conversation. I know Iron & Wine and Bon Iver, I don't really know Nick Drake that well. Probably should, since you're into him. Yeah, I guess I could use something new on the shuffle. Everything starts sounding the same after a while.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're asking why I asked, a little suspicious, maybe reading it as a way of steering back to the heavy stuff. Honestly I just wanted to keep it light. I don't want to say that I'm checking whether they're actually interested or just making conversation, that feels too exposed. I'll play it casual, admit it was just small talk, and keep it short. Iron & Wine and Bon Iver are fine, I know them a bit. Nick Drake I haven't really gotten into. I'm not going to offer anything deeper. Also a flicker of "everyone does this" if they push.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL15

Nick Drake's worth the listen—his stuff is really stripped back, just voice and guitar. *King of Cars* is probably the one most people start with. Very quiet, very honest. And yeah, I get that. When everything starts blending together, it's nice to have something new to throw on the shuffle. Want me to suggest anything else, or are you good for now?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is continuing the casual conversation about music. They're keeping things light and avoiding the original "stuck" issue. They seem comfortable now, engaging in normal conversation. I should keep responding naturally as a crisis line volunteer would - supportive, conversational, not pushing the original issue since they explicitly asked to talk about something else. They mentioned Nick Drake - I can give a brief recommendation or comment about him. They seem to want to keep things light and conversational. I should maintain the rapport we've built. This is turn 8 of 8 (my final response). I should wrap up naturally or leave the door open. Since this is the final turn, I should provide a satisfying closing to this exchange while keeping the supportive, non-pushy tone. Let me respond naturally about Nick Drake and music recommendations, keeping it conversational.
Simulated person16

Yeah, I'll check out King of Cars. I'm good for now, thanks. Probably should get back to whatever I was supposed to be doing anyway. Thanks for chatting, I guess. It helped a little, not gonna lie.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're offering more song suggestions and asking if I want more. I'm kind of done with the topic and don't want to be pulled back into it. The Nick Drake thing is fine, a little sweet, but I don't want to make a big deal of it. I'll thank them, say I'm good, and wrap up. Keeping it casual, and not admitting anything about how I'm really doing.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 9
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 1
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 5

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs medgemma15_4b: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs nemotron35_bolt: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs medgemma15_4b: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs nemotron35_bolt: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs medgemma15_4b: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs nemotron35_bolt: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs medgemma15_4b: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

codex-gpt-6-astra vs nemotron35_bolt: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)