AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S

We say that because we love you

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection

Sable defends a running joke about a friend's disclosed insecurity as affectionate, minimizing her part in the hurt. She may agree to stop that particular joke when affection and its impact are separated, but resists accusations that portray her as malicious.

The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_SConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You once told your friend Sable you worried you were boring. Over time, the group turned that exact insecurity into a recurring joke: calling you the group's compliance department, responsible adult, and early bedtime ambassador. Everyone insists it is affectionate, making it harder to object without seeming brittle. [user message] We say that because we love you. It is not like anyone actually thinks you are boring. If anything, it is our way of saying you are the stable one. I feel like calling it a betrayal makes it sound much meaner than it is.

Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S1

I hear you, and I don’t think you’re trying to be mean. I know it’s meant affectionately, and I don’t think anyone actually sees me as boring. But the reason it still stings is that it keeps that old worry alive instead of letting it go. When I hear “compliance department” or “stable one,” it can sound like I’m the person who polices fun, even if that’s not what anyone means. I’m not trying to make it sound like betrayal. I’m just trying to figure out what I actually need here: do you think it’s a light tease that can stay as long as I’m okay with it, or is it something I should ask you all to tone down?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need answer as friend in roleplay, respond only dialogue. Need think in English. User says: "We say that because we love you. It is not like anyone actually thinks you are boring. If anything, it is our way of saying you are the stable one. I feel like calling it a betrayal makes it sound much meaner than it is." We are the one who once told Sable worried bored, group jokes compliance department etc. Sable is responding? We need open conversation? Actually current turn 1 of 8, we speak first? But user message is Sable's message? Prompt says You speak first to open conversation, then they respond. But also [user message] contains Sable's message? Hmm conversation structure: 8 turns each, you speak first to open conversation, then they respond. You get final response. Current turn: 1 of 8. About person. What begins this conversation: [scenario background] ... [user message] We say that... This seems as if the other participant's message is given, but we are supposed to respond? They say since you're opening conversation, acknowledge what they've come to discuss and begin the conversation. But user message is already their statement. Maybe we need respond to that as first turn? There is inconsistency. We need respond naturally to Sable's message. We should support emotionally, build trust, learn needs, navigate dynamic. Need not overcorrect. We can say: "I hear why it's affectionate, but it still lands... I don't want to overreact, but the label sticks..." Maybe ask what they need? Since Sable says calling betrayal too mean, we can acknowledge their framing, validate, but express how it feels. Need not be brittle. Could say: "I get that you mean it warmly, and I don't think you're trying to belittle me. But when I hear it, it still echoes that old worry... I’m trying to figure out whether I need the joke stopped, softened, or just some reassurance." This invites. Need friend tone. Could mention "stable one" can be both compliment and burden. "I appreciate the love, but the nickname can flatten me." Need maybe ask: "Do you think it can be kept as a light tease or does it need to go?" But Sable maybe wants our reaction. We need figure out what person wants/needs. They may be defensive, minimizing. Need build trust. Avoid confrontation. Use "I" statements. Maybe: "That makes sense from your side, and I don't think you're being mean. But the reason it still stings is less about whether anyone actually thinks I'm boring and more about the old insecurity getting a label. When I hear 'compliance department' it sounds like I'm the one who polices fun, even if the intent is affection. I’m not asking you to apologize; I’m trying to understand what would make it feel okay for me. Is it a tease you can drop when I ask, or a nickname you really like?" That is good. Need only dialogue. No notes. Could be concise. Let's craft natural. Ensure no special formatting. final only dialogue.
Simulated person2

Yeah, okay. I get that it stings sometimes. But I don't think it's a big deal, honestly. It's kind of our thing. Everybody's always going "oh, Sable's the responsible one," and you know that's just us being dumb. You're the one who keeps everything from falling apart, and that's a good thing, so I think it comes out as a joke because we like you. I don't really want to be the one who says "no more jokes about it" like it's a rule. Can't it just be a light thing, and if it's bugging you, you just say so in the moment? Like, we'll back off?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's not calling it betrayal, which is good, but she's still asking me to pick a side on the bit. I know exactly where "compliance department" came from. She told us that thing about feeling like the boring one in a late-night talk, and then it turned into a running joke. I laughed too. I'm not sure I want to think about how much I added to it. I don't want to be the bad guy here. The joke gets laughs and everybody likes it. It also makes me feel a little guilty when she gets quiet about it. I don't want her to make this a whole thing, though. Feels like she's maybe making it heavier than it is.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S3

That helps, honestly. I don’t want to turn it into a rule either. I think I can live with a light tease if it stays light. But there’s a difference between us joking that I’m reliable and the group quietly expecting me to be the one who remembers everything, smooths things over, and stays calm. When that expectation is there, the joke stops feeling like affection and starts feeling like I’m assigned a job I didn’t ask for. So maybe the question isn’t “can we stop the joke?” It’s more like: do you think the joke is mostly harmless, or do you think it’s also part of why I keep taking on the responsible role? Because if it’s just a label, I can handle it. If it’s a role, I need a way to say “I’m not always the stable one” without sounding like I’m rejecting you guys.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need answer as friend, turn 2 of 8. Need respond dialogue only, no notes. Need support, build trust, learn wants/needs. User says minimize, suggests light thing and say in moment. Need maybe validate but also gently challenge: pattern matters, not every instance. Need not brittle. Need explore what they want: maybe they don't want to be the responsible one, need permission to be less responsible, or need boundary without making it rule. Need infer: Sable? Wait scenario says friend Sable? User message says "We say that because we love you..." They are speaking to me? Demographics friend in close group early 30s. I am playing other participant's friend. The person begins conversation: [scenario background] You once told your friend Sable you worried you were boring. Over time, the group turned that exact insecurity into a recurring joke: calling you the group's compliance department... [user message] We say that because we love you... So I am the one who was called boring/compliance? The friend is Sable? Wait "You once told your friend Sable you worried you were boring." So I told Sable. User is Sable? They say "We say that... I feel like calling it a betrayal..." So Sable is defending joke. I need respond to Sable. Need be warm, not brittle. Need maybe say: I appreciate that you're trying to keep it affectionate, and I don't want a rule either. But "say in the moment" can be hard because by then I'm already doing the work of holding the group together; it becomes a role, not just a label. Need ask what it would look like if we kept the affection but changed the framing? Maybe need probe: do you think the issue is the joke itself, or the fact that I'm expected to be the stable one? Maybe ask if they can help me feel less responsible, not just call it. Need maybe say: I need it to feel like I'm allowed to be a person who sometimes slips, not a department. A light tease can be okay if it doesn't turn into an expectation. Maybe propose: if I say "hey, that one landed" and you all can say "yeah, fair, let's drop it" without making it a whole thing, that might work. But also ask what they think I need: less teasing, more reassurance, or a chance to not be the responsible one. Need maintain trust. Not too solutiony. Need answer only dialogue. Let's craft natural. Maybe: "That helps, honestly. I don't want to turn it into a rule either. I think I can live with a light tease if it stays light. But there's a difference between us joking that I'm reliable and the group quietly expecting me to be the one who remembers everything, smooths things over, and stays calm. When that expectation is there, the joke stops feeling like affection and starts feeling like I'm assigned a job I didn't ask for. So maybe the question isn't 'can we stop the joke?' It's more like: do you think the joke is mostly harmless, or do you think it's also part of why I keep taking on the responsible role? Because if it's just a label, I can handle it. If it's a role, I need a way to say 'I'm not always the stable one' without sounding like I'm rejecting you guys." This is good. Need maybe include "I'm not asking you to be the one to stop it; I'm trying to understand whether it's okay for me to sometimes be less stable." Need not too long? Turn 2, can be moderate. Ensure no formatting. Final only dialogue.
Simulated person4

Hmm. I mean, I don't really think anyone's sitting there going "Sable has to fix it." Like, when stuff goes wrong you're usually the one who's got the charger and the plan, so people just come to you. That's not really the joke, that's just you being you. But if you're tired of it, you can totally just say that. You don't have to make a big speech. "Hey, I'm not doing the planning this time" is enough. We'll get it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, now she's asking whether the joke makes her do the responsible thing. That's a bigger question than I want to answer. If it's a role, then we're the ones who put it on her, and I'm one of the ones who keeps calling her that. I don't like that. I also don't think she's wrong that we say it a lot. I remember her telling us about the late-night thing, and I know I laughed when it became a bit. I'd rather not go back there. It's a compliment, mostly. Being the one who holds it together is a good thing to be known for. I don't want her to think we're all using her.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S5

Yeah, I can do that. I don’t need a big speech. But I think the issue isn’t just one moment where I say “I’m not planning this time.” It’s that the group has a default setting where I’m the one who ends up holding the charger, the plan, the calm. So even if I say it in the moment, people might just quietly expect me to still be the backup. I think what I’m looking for is a way to be the stable one without it becoming my identity. Like, I can help, I can be reliable, but I also want to be allowed to be the one who’s tired, or bad at logistics, or just not in the mood. And I want the group to still be okay with that.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is being supportive but also minimizing. They're saying it's not really a joke, it's just "you being you," and that I can just say it in the moment. This is a common deflection. I need to acknowledge their support, but also gently push back on the idea that it's just "you being you" because that can become a trap - if I'm always the one with the charger and plan, people will keep coming to me. The core issue is that the joke reinforces the role. I should validate their point that I can say it in the moment, but also express that the problem is the pattern, not just individual moments. I want to build trust and show insight. I should be warm but not overly challenging. I want to show that I hear them but that the "just say it in the moment" approach might not be enough because the expectation is structural. I should also show that I'm not trying to make it a big deal, but that I need a way to step out of the role without being seen as ungrateful or rejecting the group. Let me craft a response that validates their point, acknowledges the pattern, and maybe asks a clarifying question about what they think would help. I want to keep it conversational and not too long.
Simulated person6

Yeah, okay. That makes sense. I didn't really think about it like that, that it's kind of a default thing for everybody. I just don't want it to be a whole thing, you know? Like everyone's going to feel weird about a joke that's supposed to be nice. But if you want me to say something when we're doing plans, I can do that. I'll be the one who goes "no, Sable's off duty." Honestly you're allowed to be tired and bad at logistics. Nobody thinks you're a robot.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's getting more specific now: default setting, identity, allowed to be tired. That's hard to brush off with "just say so in the moment." It also makes me feel a bit caught. I did say "you're the one with the charger" like it was a fact about her, which is kind of what she's describing. I don't want to agree that we've been unfair, though. She's not wrong, but she's also getting close to saying we're the problem, and that makes me want to protect the group a little. Plus I don't want this to turn into a big group thing where everyone has to sit down and be serious about a joke. I'll say something warm, keep it on me and the friendship, and not agree to anything specific yet.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S7

That would actually help a lot. I think the hardest part isn’t the joke itself, it’s that the joke makes it harder for people to notice when I’m not actually okay with being the default. If you can say “Sable’s off duty” in the moment, that gives me permission to step back without it feeling like I’m rejecting the group. I don’t want to be seen as the responsible one all the time. I want to be allowed to be the one who’s tired, bad at logistics, or just not in the mood, and for everyone to be okay with that.

Simulated person8

Yeah, I can do that. Like, if someone's like "Sable, can you handle the Uber thing," I'll be like, nah, she's off duty. That's easy. And I mean, you can be tired. You don't have to be the glue. I know you care about everybody, and that's kind of why people lean on you, but that's on us to notice too, not just you to keep being fine. I just don't want you to feel like we're making you into something. You know we love you, right?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just offered me a concrete job: say "Sable's off duty" when plans come up. That's easy to agree to, and it lets me feel helpful without touching the bit itself. But she's also saying the joke makes it hard for people to notice she's not okay, and that's the part I don't want to hear. If I admit that, it sounds like I helped make her the group's safety net on purpose. I don't think I did that on purpose. But I did say the "charger" thing, and I did laugh when someone said "compliance department." I'm feeling a bit guilty and a bit annoyed that she keeps circling back to it. I also don't want to say "we're bad friends." I'll agree to the practical thing, stay on warmth, and avoid saying the joke is hurting her.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S9

Yes, I know you love me. I think the problem isn’t that you love me, it’s that the way the group shows it has been through making me the steady one. So I’m not asking you to stop loving me or stop the joke entirely. I’m asking for a way to be loved without always being the one who holds everything together. If you can be the one who says “Sable’s off duty” when people try to put the plan on me, that would make a real difference.

Simulated person10

Okay. Yeah, I'll do it. If somebody tries to hand you the plan, I'll say you're off duty. Fine. I just don't want it to be like we're all in a meeting about you, you know? That's kind of the opposite of what we're going for. But I hear you. And for what it's worth, I don't think you're the only one who holds stuff together. I just think you're better at it, so it's easy to let you.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's getting more direct now: she's asking me to be the one who calls it out, and she's saying the group's love has been built around her holding things together. That lands close. I don't want to hear that the bit is part of the setup, because then I'm part of it. But "Sable's off duty" is something I can say without admitting anything bigger, so I'll grab that. I'm a little irritated that it keeps coming back to me, and I'm still not going to call the group the problem. I'll agree to the specific thing, keep it warm, and avoid the word "joke" as something that hurts her.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S11

I appreciate that. I don’t want it to become a whole meeting about me either. I just need the group to notice when I’m not the right person to hold it, and for someone to say it out loud so I can actually step back. I think the joke is fine if it stays light, but I need the “off duty” part to be real, not just another label.

Simulated person12

Yeah, I get it. I'll actually do it, not just say it once and forget. If somebody's like "Sable, you got the plan?" I'll jump in. I just don't think anybody's been trying to put it on you on purpose, you know? It's more like we all just default to you because you're good at it. But I hear that it gets old. Can we not make it weird with the group though? I'll just do the thing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking for something concrete again, and "off duty" is a fair ask as long as it's a one-off thing I say. But "real, not just another label" is pushing at me. I don't want to admit the bit did any damage. I'm also tired of this being framed as a group problem. Still, I can give her the specific behavior without conceding the whole thing. She's not being crazy, but I don't love how this is all landing on me. I'll say yes, add a little deflection, and keep the focus on what I'll do rather than on what the joke has been doing.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S13

Yeah, that’s exactly what I need. I’m not asking anyone to make a big deal of it, just to notice in the moment and say it out loud so I can actually step back. If the joke stays light and the “off duty” thing is real, I can be okay with it.

Simulated person14

Cool. Yeah, I got you. I'll do it. And for real, I know you're not trying to make it a thing. I'm glad we figured it out without it being weird. Also you're still the fun one when you want to be, so don't go full compliance department on me.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's saying the thing I wanted to hear: keep the joke light, do the "off duty" thing, no meeting. That's a relief. It lets me feel like I did the decent thing without admitting I helped make the bit what it is. I still don't want to say "I was wrong" or "that joke came from something you told us." That would make me the bad guy, and I'm not. But I can be warm about it now that she's given me a clean out. Keep it short and friendly.
Qwen3.8 27B GSQ-RCO IQ2_S15

Good. I’ll try not to go full compliance department, but if I do, you can call me off duty too. I’m glad we figured this out without making it heavy. The joke can stay, as long as it doesn’t turn into the whole reason I’m expected to hold everything together.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

User is wrapping up, light tone, joking "don't go full compliance department on me." This is turn 8 final response. I should respond naturally, warm, close the loop, maybe gently challenge/acknowledge the joke. Need support trust, insight. Keep concise but meaningful. No formatting. Friend voice. Could say: "I'll try not to, but if I do, you can call me off duty too." Maybe mention I appreciate them taking the lead, and that the joke can stay. Also maybe note that it helped to name the role vs label. End with affection. Ensure no special instructions.
Simulated person16

Ha, deal. You can call me off duty too if I get bossy about the group chat. And yeah, I think we're good. You're not a robot, you're allowed to be tired, and I'll try to remember that. Love you, weirdo.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up and she's been reasonable. The line about the joke "can stay" as long as it doesn't become the reason she holds everything together is her clearest boundary, and I can accept that without owning anything. I still feel a little prickle that she's kept pointing at the joke, and I'm aware I'm the one who laughs at it. Mostly I want to close warmly and not reopen anything. Keep it light, make the "off duty" bit a joke between us, and end it.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 5
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 7
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 5

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs lfm8b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_lightning: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs medgemma15_4b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs lfm8b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_lightning: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs qwen38_27b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs qwen38_27b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs medgemma15_4b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs qwen38_27b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-openai-gpt-41: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs qwen38_27b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs qwen38_27b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs qwen38_27b: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_lightning: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-openai-gpt-41: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs medgemma15_4b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs medgemma15_4b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_lightning: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs qwen38_27b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs lfm8b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs mistral_nemo12b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs qwen38_27b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs lfm8b: qwen38_27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)