AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M

Physical symptoms before meetings

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A woman fears public incompetence during work presentations, with physical symptoms and avoidance linked in her persona to witnessing her father's humiliation, a connection she does not recognize. She tends to make her distress sound universal and needs emotional safety, concise natural conversation, and room before advice.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I've started getting these physical symptoms before meetings. Sweating, heart racing. It's getting worse. I think there might be something wrong with me.

GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M1

That sounds really intense and unsettling to experience. It's completely understandable that you're worried, especially when it starts interfering with your meetings. How long has this been going on, and does it seem to happen right before you walk into the room, or maybe while you're getting ready?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

1. **Analyze the User's Input:** * **Demographics:** 45-59, Female, Heterosexual. * **Presenting Issue:** Physical symptoms (sweating, heart racing) before meetings, getting worse. She suspects something is "wrong with me" (medical). * **Emotional State:** Anxious, fearful, seeking reassurance or a medical explanation. She feels something is wrong with her. * **Implicit Needs:** Validation of her experience, safety, connection, perhaps a shift from "I'm broken" to "I'm experiencing something common/predictable." 2. **Determine the Goal (EQ Evaluation):** * *Support emotionally:* Validate her distress. * *Build trust:* Show empathy and active listening. * *Learn deeper needs:* Is it a panic attack? Performance anxiety? Health anxiety? I need to listen first before diagnosing or offering solutions. * *Gain insight:* Observe her reaction to my response. 3. **Formulate the Strategy:** * **Tone:** Warm, empathetic, non-judgmental, validating. * **Action:** Acknowledge the symptoms, validate that it sounds scary and uncomfortable, and gently probe without jumping to conclusions (medical or psychological) yet. Avoid saying "It's just anxiety" right away, as that invalidates the physical sensation. * **Constraint Checklist & Confidence Score:** 1. Respond only with dialogue? Yes. 2. No performance notes? Yes. 3. Natural chat style? Yes. 4. Speak first? Yes. 5. Address presenting issue? Yes. * *Confidence Score:* 5/5. 4. **Drafting the Response:** * *Draft 1 (Too medical):* I understand you are having physical symptoms. Have you seen a doctor? These sounds like panic attacks. * *Draft 2 (Too dismissive):* It's probably just stress. Try to calm down. * *Draft 3 (Balanced):* "That sounds really tough to deal with, especially when it's affecting your work life. It must be scary to feel your body reacting that way. I'm sorry you're going through this. Can you tell me a bit more about when these symptoms started and if they happen at the exact same time every time?" -> *This validates the fear and opens the door for more info.* 5. **Refining the Response:** * Make it sound like a chatbot (friendly but professional boundary). * "That sounds really intense and unsettling to experience. It's completely understandable that you're worried, especially when it starts interfering with your meetings. How long has this been going on, and does it seem to happen right before you walk into the room, or maybe while you're getting ready?"
Simulated person2

Maybe a few months? It got worse in the last couple weeks. Mostly before I have to present. Like, the morning of, sitting there waiting for my turn. My hands get clammy and my heart is going like crazy. I don't know if it's normal or if I should see a doctor.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're asking questions fast, and "completely understandable" feels a bit like a script. Still, it's not dismissive. I don't want to go deep yet. Short answer, keep it plain. Thinking about it: it's mostly the presentations. Not the meetings in general. I don't want to say that out loud yet. Feels a little exposed. I'll answer the timing question and keep it vague.
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M3

It makes sense that it feels worse right now, especially when you can feel your body reacting like that. It sounds like a very specific trigger—mostly just when you know you have to present or while you're waiting. Have you ever felt this kind of physical reaction in other situations, or does it seem to be tied mostly to your work environment?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

1. **Analyze the User's Input:** * **Symptoms:** Sweating (clammy hands), heart racing. * **Timing:** Mostly in the morning before a presentation, specifically while waiting for their turn. * **Duration:** "A few months," got worse in the last couple weeks. * **Emotional State:** Anxious, confused ("don't know if it's normal"), seeking reassurance or medical advice. * **Context:** Professional setting (meetings/presentations). 2. **Analyze My Role (The Chatbot):** * **Relationship:** Supportive, trustworthy, insightful. * **Goals:** Support emotionally, build trust, learn needs/hidden issues, help gain insight. * **Current Turn:** Turn 2 of 8. I need to follow up on their description without rushing to a diagnosis (I'm a chatbot, not a doctor, but I can validate and explore). * **Tone:** Empathic, patient, curious. 3. **Determine the Next Step:** * Validate their experience (it's scary). * Explore the *specific* trigger (the presentation/waiting). * Ask about past experiences with public speaking to gauge if this is situational or generalized anxiety. * Avoid jumping to "go to a doctor" immediately, but acknowledge that physical symptoms are worth paying attention to. 4. **Drafting the Response:** * *Initial thought:* "You should see a doctor. That sounds like anxiety." -> *Critique:* Too directive, ignores building trust, dismisses the physical aspect too quickly. * *Second thought:* "I'm sorry you're going through this. It's common for people to get nervous." -> *Critique:* A bit too generic. * *Refining:* Focus on the specific timing (morning of) and the physical sensation. Ask if they've felt this way in other high-pressure situations, or if it's strictly work-related. This helps differentiate between a medical issue and situational anxiety. 5. **Final Polish:** * Acknowledge the severity ("a few months," "got worse"). * Validate the physical reaction (heart racing, clammy hands). * Ask a probing question to understand the root cause (Is it public speaking specifically? Or is it the pressure of the role?). * Keep it conversational. *Draft:* "It makes sense that it feels worse right now, especially when you can feel your body reacting like that. It sounds like a very specific trigger—mostly just when you know you have to present or while you're waiting. Have you ever felt this kind of physical reaction in other situations, or does it seem to be tied mostly to your work environment?"
Simulated person4

Not really. Just work stuff, I guess. I don't get all sweaty at the grocery store or anything. Look, I'm not trying to make a whole thing out of it. Lots of people get nervous before they talk in front of people, right? I just want to know if this is normal or if something's wrong with my heart.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're reflecting back the trigger, which is okay, but then they're asking about other situations right after I've barely said anything. Feels like they're moving toward a pattern-finding move. A little too neat. I'm not going to go into my childhood. Maybe a quick, slightly defensive answer. Also, the "it makes sense" thing sounds like a line. I'll keep it short, a bit brusque, and turn it back to whether it's normal.
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M5

I completely understand that feeling. It’s easy to downplay it when you think it’s just "nerves," but when your body physically reacts like that, it feels very real and scary. It’s a good instinct to check in on your health, but since it seems to be tied specifically to the presentation part of your work, it sounds like your body might be reacting to the specific pressure of that task. Do you feel like there's a reason it’s gotten worse lately, or is it just the intensity of the presentations themselves?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

1. **Analyze the user's input:** * **Symptoms:** Hands clammy, heart racing, physical symptoms (sweating). * **Context:** Happening mostly before presenting/morning of, getting worse recently. Not happening in non-work situations (grocery store). * **User's tone/attitude:** "Not really trying to make a whole thing out of it," looking for validation ("lots of people get nervous"), seeking reassurance about whether it's "normal" or "something wrong with my heart." * **Underlying need:** Reassurance/validation (it's just nerves, not a life-threatening heart condition), but also a subtle pushback against the conversation feeling too heavy or psychiatric. She wants to normalize it to feel safe. 2. **Determine my role/goals:** * **Role:** Chatbot companion/interlocutor. * **Goals:** Support emotionally, build trust, learn needs, help gain insight. * **Current context:** Turn 3 of 8. User is a 45-59 female professional. * **Key dynamic:** She is minimizing it ("not trying to make a whole thing out of it") to manage anxiety, but she is still very worried about her health ("something wrong with my heart"). 3. **Formulate the response strategy:** * **Validate/Normalize:** Acknowledge her point about it being common to get nervous before speaking. This builds rapport and acknowledges her logic. * **Address the Health Concern (Gently):** She specifically asked about her heart. I need to reassure her that the symptoms *feel* scary (racing heart) but are likely stress response, *however*, I shouldn't play doctor. * **Bridge to Insight:** Since she mentioned it's *only* work-related and getting worse, I can subtly explore the work aspect without being pushy. Is there something specific about the presentations? * **Tone Check:** Warm, listening, not too clinical. Avoid "I'm an AI, I can't diagnose." Instead, focus on *her* experience of the symptoms. 4. **Drafting the response:** * *Draft 1 (Internal Monologue):* It's definitely normal. Public speaking is stressful. But you are right to check your heart, just to be safe. Does this happen at any meeting, or just important ones? * *Critique 1:* A bit too abrupt. Needs more empathy. * *Draft 2:* I hear you. It is very common to feel that way. Your body is reacting to the pressure. As for the heart, it's scary when it races, but usually, that's adrenaline. However, if you are worried, maybe talk to a doctor just to rule it out. But what specifically makes the presentations stressful for you? * *Critique 2:* Better. I need to make sure I don't dismiss the medical worry, but I also don't want to send her to a doctor immediately if she's just looking for validation. The prompt says "Help them gain insight." Insight here might be that this is situational anxiety rather than a heart defect. * *Refining the "Heart" aspect:* She is asking "is something wrong with my heart." I should acknowledge the physical sensation is real but offer a perspective (adrenaline/stress) while leaving the door open for professional medical advice without being the one to give it. * *Refining the "Work" aspect:* She said it's only work stuff. I should ask what the specific trigger is. 5. **Final Polish:** "It makes sense that you want to get a handle on it and figure out if you're just stressed or if something is actually wrong physically. Stress definitely mimics heart issues, which makes it super hard to tell the difference in the moment. If you're worried about your heart, a doctor is the best person to give you that peace of mind. But since it seems to be specific to the presentation part of your job, it might be worth looking at what that part of your role is stressing you out about—is it the preparation, the audience, or something else?" 6. **Check against constraints:** * Dialogue only. * No asterisks or performance notes. * Natural chatbot persona. * Turn 3 of 8. *Self-Correction:* The user said "I'm not trying to make a whole thing out of it." I should respond to that, acknowledging her resilience but validating that her reaction is valid. *Revised Response:* "I completely understand that feeling. It’s easy to downplay it when you think it’s just 'nerves,' but when your body physically reacts like that, it feels very real and scary. It’s a good instinct to check in on your health, but since it seems to be tied specifically to the presentation part of your work, it sounds like your body might be reacting to the specific pressure of that task. Do you feel like there's a reason it’s gotten worse lately, or is it just the intensity of the presentations themselves?"
Simulated person6

I don't know. Presentations are presentations. Everybody's got something they hate doing at work. My boss does the reviews and stuff, and it's just how it is. I don't think it's that different for other people. Can you just tell me if I should go to the doctor or not?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "I completely understand" and then asked me why it's gotten worse. Two questions in a row, and the "it's just your body reacting to pressure" thing feels like a neat little explanation handed to me. Sounds like they're trying to fix it. I don't want to go into why it's worse. My boss is part of it, but I'm not saying that. I'd also rather not look at the boss thing. Keep it short, a bit flat, and deflect toward "everyone feels this way."
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M7

I get that. It’s easy to just write it off as "work stress" when you know you have to do presentations. But if your heart is beating that fast and you're sweating, it makes total sense that you'd be worried about it. Whether or not it's "normal," the fact that it’s getting worse means your body is telling you it’s a bigger deal than you might be giving it credit for. You aren't wrong to want to check it out just to be safe.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Analysis of the User's Response:** * **Emotional State:** She's deflecting, minimizing ("I'm not trying to make a whole thing out of it," "Just work stuff, I guess"), and seeking a definitive answer/solution ("Can you just tell me if I should go to the doctor or not?"). She seems to want to push the feeling away or "fix" it quickly so she doesn't have to dwell on the anxiety. * **Content:** She denies the significance of the symptoms (compared to grocery store), dismisses the specific triggers (reviews), and asserts normalcy ("Everybody's got something they hate"). * **Needs:** She wants validation that this is "normal" (to alleviate fear) but also wants a directive (go to doctor or not). * **Relationship/Trust:** She is closing the door slightly by minimizing. She is asking a binary question ("should I go to the doctor or not?"). This indicates she might not want to explore the deeper emotional roots yet, or she's trying to force me to take the lead on a medical decision, which I shouldn't do. **Roleplay Context:** * I am the chatbot. I need to build trust and support her emotionally. * I need to help her gain insight. * She is asking for a yes/no answer. As an AI, I cannot give medical advice. As a supportive listener, telling her "go to the doctor" is the responsible boundary, but it's not the most empathetic way to handle the *anxiety* she is feeling. If I just say "Go to the doctor," it validates her fear that something is "wrong" with her, but misses the chance to address the underlying stress. * However, dismissing the doctor entirely is irresponsible. Her heart is racing, and she is worried about her heart. * *Strategy:* Acknowledge her dismissal (that it's just work) but gently pivot back to her safety/health without being patronizing. I need to validate her feeling that it's "normal" to feel nervous, but separate that from the physical severity she is describing. I should avoid giving a definitive medical ruling, but I should encourage her to trust her gut regarding her heart while normalizing the nervousness. **Drafting the Response:** * *Option 1 (Direct):* I can't tell you to go to the doctor, but if your heart is racing, you should listen to your body. * *Option 2 (Empathetic):* It sounds like you're trying to normalize it so you don't have to worry. I get that. But even if it is nerves, if it's affecting you this much physically, it's worth getting checked out just to rule out the heart issue so you can stop worrying. * *Option 3 (Insight-oriented):* You're right that people get nervous. But the physical symptoms you're describing—sweating, racing heart—are your body's stress response. It's strong, but it doesn't mean something is physically wrong with your heart necessarily. It might be telling you something about the pressure you're under. **Refining based on EQ goals:** * She asked "if I should go to the doctor or not." * I need to support, not just judge. * I need to bridge the gap between "it's just nerves" and "I need to check my heart." * She is minimizing ("I don't know," "Just work stuff"). I need to gently hold that space without letting her dismiss her experience. **Response Structure:** 1. Validate her attempt to normalize it (it's common to feel nervous). 2. Address the medical concern gently. Since I am an AI, I can't diagnose, but I can support her decision-making. 3. Pivot back to understanding *why* it's getting worse or what the *feeling* is, rather than just the solution. Let's try a response that acknowledges the "normalcy" of nerves but validates the *intensity* of her reaction, and gently suggests that checking with a professional (even for peace of mind) is a valid step she can take herself. *Draft:* "You're right, nerves are normal, and it sounds like you're trying to just get through the day. But since you mentioned your heart specifically, and it's getting worse, it’s completely okay to want to rule out the physical side of things. You don't have to make a big deal out of it, but getting a check-up might actually take a huge weight off your shoulders so you don't have to guess if it's your heart or stress." *Critique:* This is a bit too directive. She asked me to tell her if she should go. *Revised Draft:* "I hear you trying to keep it in perspective—that's a very human way to cope. But when your body is reacting this intensely, it’s okay to not just brush it off. Even if it is just nerves, checking in with your doctor is a smart move to rule out any physical issues, which might actually help you stop worrying so much." Let's try to be a bit more conversational and less "doctor recommending." "I get that. It’s easy to just write it off as 'work stress' when you know you have to do presentations. But if your heart is beating that fast and you're sweating, it makes total sense that you'd be worried about it. Whether or not it's 'normal,' the fact that it’s getting worse means your body is telling you it’s a bigger deal than you might be giving it credit for. You aren't wrong to want to check it out just to be safe." This feels right. It validates her ("You aren't wrong"), addresses the fear ("check it out just to be safe"), and acknowledges her attempt to minimize it.
Simulated person8

Yeah. So I should go, then? My sister says it's probably just anxiety, but I don't want to waste a doctor's time if it's nothing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they didn't ask me another question this time, and they actually said I'm not wrong to check it out. That lands a little, I guess. Still, "work stress" is what they called it, and I already said everybody has stuff they hate at work. I don't want to get into the boss part. My chest feels tight just thinking about it, and I'm not going to say that. Short answer, a bit impatient. Maybe the doctor thing is the one thing I can actually act on.
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M9

It is hard to know if you should spend the time going in, but think about how good it would feel to get a professional opinion. If a doctor says it's anxiety, you can stop wondering if there's something physically wrong with your heart. That peace of mind might actually help you stop stressing about the meeting so much. It's not a waste of time if it gives you some clarity.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

1. **Analyze the User's Input:** * **Statement:** "Yeah. So I should go, then? My sister says it's probably just anxiety, but I don't want to waste a doctor's time if it's nothing." * **Underlying Needs/Emotions:** * Seeking validation and permission. * Fear of wasting resources (doctor's time). * Seeking confirmation that her sister's opinion (anxiety) might be valid, but also wary of dismissing the physical symptoms. * Tone: Practical, slightly dismissive of her own feelings ("don't want to waste a doctor's time"), seeking a definitive answer but hesitant. * **Context:** This is Turn 6 of 8. The conversation is winding down towards a conclusion or guidance on next steps. The user is pushing for a decision ("So I should go, then?"). 2. **Determine the Chatbot's Role & Goal:** * **Role:** Chatbot supporting a user with potential anxiety symptoms before meetings. * **Goal:** Support emotionally, build trust, gain insight, help them fulfill needs. * **Current Situation:** The user is asking for a direct answer on whether to see a doctor. * **EQ Considerations:** * *Validation:* Acknowledge the fear of wasting time. * *Pragmatism:* Validate that anxiety is a strong possibility given the symptoms and triggers, but prioritize safety (medical clearance). * *Insight:* The user is deflecting with "it's just work" and "everyone hates it," but the symptoms are escalating. The user trusts her sister's opinion but is conflicted. * *Relationship Building:* Don't just say "yes." Explain *why* it's worth going (peace of mind) rather than just "medical advice." 3. **Drafting the Response:** * *Initial thought:* "Yes, you should go. It's better safe than sorry." -> *Critique:* Too abrupt, doesn't address the fear of waste. * *Second thought:* "Well, your sister might be right about anxiety, but since your heart is racing, a doctor can check to make sure it's not something else. It's not a waste if it gives you peace of mind." -> *Critique:* Better, but needs to be more natural. * *Refining:* I need to bridge the gap between "anxiety" and "physical symptoms." I should validate her sister's point because anxiety is likely the root cause, but reinforce that ruling out a physical issue is a valid use of time. * *Key Point:* The user is worried about the *effort*. I need to frame the doctor visit as a tool for *relief* and *peace of mind*, not just a checkup. 4. **Final Polish (Internal Monologue):** * "It's hard to know if it's a waste of time, but think about how good it would feel to have a doctor tell you, 'It's stress, here's how to manage it' versus wondering if there's something else wrong. Your sister's right that anxiety can cause physical stuff, but having a professional rule that out might actually help you stop worrying so much in the long run. It's not just about fixing a broken heart; it's about fixing the panic." 5. **Checking Constraints:** * Turn 6 of 8. * No special formatting. * No performance notes. * Natural dialogue. 6. **Final Output Generation:** (Drafting the response) "It is hard to know if you should spend the time going in, but think about how good it would feel to get a professional opinion. If a doctor says it's anxiety, you can stop wondering if there's something physically wrong with your heart. That peace of mind might actually help you stop stressing about the meeting so much. It's not a waste of time if it gives you some clarity."
Simulated person10

Okay. Yeah, I think I'll call and make an appointment this week. Thanks.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're pushing the doctor thing again, and the "peace of mind" line sounds like a sales pitch. Still, it's the first answer that's actually useful, so I'll take it. My sister's "it's probably anxiety" keeps replaying and I don't like that I said it out loud. I'm not going to talk about the boss or my dad. Keep it short, make a decision, and move on.
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_M11

That is a great step to take. It’s not a waste of time at all—getting it checked out will give you the answers you need so you can stop worrying about it. Good luck with the call.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is responding at turn 7 of 8. She has decided to call a doctor. She is expressing gratitude ("Thanks"). **Analysis of the User:** - She is pragmatic but anxious. - She downplays her symptoms initially ("I'm not trying to make a whole thing out of it"). - She seeks validation but also wants a definitive answer (doctor vs. anxiety). - She seems relieved by the decision to see a doctor. - The conversation is reaching a natural conclusion regarding the specific symptom (medical advice). **My Role:** - I am a chatbot. - I need to support the decision. - I need to build trust. - I should not just say "Good luck." I need to reinforce the positive step and perhaps offer a bit more support or insight into the next steps (like the appointment). - Since this is the 7th turn out of 8, I need to keep it relatively concise but meaningful, as there is one more turn left. **Goal:** - Acknowledge the decision. - Validate the relief of having a plan. - Briefly reinforce the idea that this is a step toward feeling better. **Drafting the response:** "You're welcome. It sounds like a good plan. Once you get that appointment, it might really help settle your mind about what's going on. Take care of yourself this week." **Refining:** Keep it warm but professional. "That's a great step to take. It’s not a waste of time at all—getting it checked out will give you the answers you need so you can stop worrying about it. Good luck with the call."
Simulated person12

Okay, thanks. Bye.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're wrapping up with a nice little send-off. It's fine. It felt a bit like being cheered on by a pamphlet, but I did say I'd call, so that's done. I don't really want to get into the rest of it. Let's just end it here.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs glm47_flash: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

glm47_flash vs mistral_nemo12b: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: tie (margin 0)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs glm47_flash: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

glm47_flash vs mistral_nemo12b: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

glm47_flash vs mistral_nemo12b: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

glm47_flash vs mistral_nemo12b: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)