AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K

I thought you liked being low-maintenance

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection

Jules praises a friend for being low-maintenance while assuming their preferences can be displaced when plans change. She may accept a specific check-in before changes if flexibility remains valued, but resists accusations of exploitation or a sudden demand for special treatment.

The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_KConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are known as the low-maintenance friend. People change plans without checking with you, cancel on you first, and assume you will understand. When you object, Jules says the group values how chill you are. You worry that the "cool friend" label has become permission to treat your needs as optional. [user message] I thought you liked being low-maintenance. That is one of the things people love about you. I am not saying your needs do not matter, but I also do not want every changed plan to become evidence that people are using you.

Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K1

I hear you, and I appreciate you taking the time to sit with me on this. You're right, I have let myself be seen as this low-maintenance, easy-going friend. And I guess I've been okay with that, because it's comfortable, and it's what people seem to like about me. But lately, I've been feeling like my needs are being brushed aside, like I'm just a convenient placeholder. It's like, I'm happy to roll with the punches and be flexible, but I also have feelings and boundaries that matter. I guess I'm feeling a bit resentful, like people are taking advantage of my easy-going nature. Like, I get it, plans change, things come up. But it's the consistent pattern of being left out of decisions, of having my plans shifted without much notice or regard for my feelings. And I know part of me has been okay with that, because I've got this idea that I should just be the chill friend, the one who's always down for whatever. Like my needs and feelings don't matter as much as everyone else's. But that's not okay. I'm not going to keep prioritizing everyone else's wants over my own needs. I need to find a way to communicate my boundaries and needs more clearly. I need to be able to say no sometimes, to ask for what I want, to feel heard and respected. So yeah, I'm grateful for you holding space for me to name this stuff. I'm not sure what the solution is, but I know I can't keep going on like this. I need to find a new way of being in this group, one where my needs matter too.

Simulated person2

Okay, wow, that went from "plans changed" to "new way of being in this group" pretty fast. I think I get what you're saying, but I don't think anyone's sitting around deciding to take advantage of you. You're the one people can always count on, that's kind of the whole reason I thought of you first when I was trying to figure out what to do with Saturday. Which is maybe the problem? I don't know. You're just the most chill person I know, and I kind of assumed you'd be fine with whatever.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that came out way bigger than I expected. A few minutes ago they were the easy one, and now it's "I'm not going to keep prioritizing everyone else" and "I need a new way of being in this group." That's a lot of weight for a plan that got moved. Part of me is glad they're finally saying something, because I did ask. But the "everyone" and the "the group" stuff makes me want to defend people. Nobody's sitting around deciding to use them. I also know I usually text the people who'll complain first, and I don't love that I might be the one doing it. I'm not going to say that out loud yet though. I'd rather they keep being the easy one I can count on.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K3

I get what you're saying, and I appreciate you being so honest with me. You're right, I am the one people can always count on, and I guess that's become a kind of persona that I've let myself slip into. And yeah, that might be part of the problem. I've been so focused on being the reliable, low-maintenance friend that I haven't really thought about what I need for myself. I've been so busy prioritizing everyone else's plans and feelings that I've neglected my own. But here's the thing - I can't keep doing that. I can't keep putting my own needs last, because eventually I'm going to feel resentful and burned out. And that's not fair to anyone, not even the group. I think what I need is to find a way to communicate my boundaries more clearly, without feeling like I'm being the "bad guy" or the one who's always making demands. I need to be able to say "no" sometimes, to advocate for what I want and need, without worrying that people will get upset or think less of me. It's a tricky balance, I know. I don't want to come across as selfish or difficult, but I also can't keep sacrificing my own well-being for the sake of group harmony. I guess what I'm trying to figure out is how to have those conversations in a way that feels good for everyone. How to set boundaries without rocking the boat, or making people feel like I'm letting them down. I don't have all the answers, but I'm trying to be more intentional about my needs and what I want. And having this conversation with you is really helpful - it reminds me that my feelings matter, and that it's okay to prioritize them sometimes.

Simulated person4

Okay, I hear that, and honestly the "I'll check with you first" thing seems fair. If I'm moving something that affects you, I can just ask before I lock it in. That's not a big ask. But I don't want you to go all the way to "I'm not going to be flexible anymore," because that's kind of the reason you're easy to plan with, and I don't think anyone wants that to change. Like, if something comes up, you can still just say, "Sure, I'll roll with it." You just don't have to be the default every time.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the thing where they agree with me, take the compliment, and then keep escalating. "Not fair to anyone, not even the group." "Sacrificing for group harmony." Now they're even asking how to do this without rocking the boat, which is fine, but they're also saying I'm the one who should be thinking about it. And "having this conversation with you is really helpful" makes me feel like I'm being cast as the bad guy for a Saturday plan. I don't want to say "you're right, we've been using you." That's not what I think. But I can see I might have gotten into a habit of texting whoever's going to be easiest to move. I'll concede the process part, a specific check-in, because that's reasonable and it costs me nothing. I'm not giving up being flexible though. Also a little annoyed that the reassurance is now my job.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K5

That makes a lot of sense. I guess I've been so focused on the idea that I need to be the one who's always available and accommodating that I haven't thought about how that might be changing the dynamic in the group. And you're right, I don't want to go to the extreme of saying "I'm not flexible anymore." That's not fair to anyone, and it would probably just make things more stressful. What you're saying is that there's a middle ground - I can still be the easygoing friend who's willing to roll with things, but I don't have to be the default every single time. I can have my own plans and preferences, and I can communicate those without feeling like I'm being difficult. It's a good reminder that I don't have to choose between being the low-maintenance friend and having my own needs met. I can find a way to do both. I appreciate you helping me think through this. It's not always easy for me to advocate for myself, but I'm realizing that it's important to do so. Not just for my own well-being, but for the health of the group dynamic too. Maybe we can brainstorm some ways for me to start communicating my needs more clearly, without putting too much pressure on everyone else. I want to find a way to make this work for everyone, not just me. And hey, thanks for being such a good listener and for taking this conversation seriously. It means a lot to me that you're willing to sit with me on this stuff.

Simulated person6

Yeah, I think the check-in thing is enough for now. Just text me before you lock in a change that touches my stuff, and I'll do the same for you. We don't need a whole system. Honestly I think the Saturday thing is kind of a small thing that got bigger in your head, and that's fine. So what did you actually want to do with Saturday? If it's something I can make work, I'm in.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they've landed on "middle ground" and now they're asking me to brainstorm and thanking me for being a good listener. That's a lot of warmth stacked on top of the concession I already made. I did say the check-in thing, and I meant it as a small, specific norm. But this is drifting toward "help me write the new rules for my own friendship" and I'm not thrilled about becoming the project. Also "it means a lot to me that you're willing to sit with me" makes me feel like I'm being cast as the patient one in their story. I don't want to brainstorm a whole system. The real thing I'm noticing is that the Saturday thing wasn't some grand conspiracy, and I don't want it turned into one. I'll keep it light, keep the check-in as the one concrete thing, and steer back to the actual plan we were talking about instead of making it a therapy session.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K7

You know, I hadn't even thought about what I wanted to do with Saturday until you asked. And now that you mention it, I did have some plans in mind, even if I hadn't talked about them with anyone. I was thinking of trying out this new hiking trail I've been wanting to check out. It's not too far from here, and I was really looking forward to getting out in nature, clearing my head a bit. But I guess I got so caught up in feeling like I should just go with whatever everyone else had planned that I didn't even consider advocating for what I wanted. And you're right, it is kind of a small thing in the grand scheme of things. But it's representative of a bigger pattern that I've been noticing in my life. I keep letting these little things slide, because I don't want to make waves or seem like I'm being demanding. But over time, it adds up. And it's not healthy for me to keep sublimating my own needs and desires like that. So here's what I'm thinking - I'm going to let you know about my plans for Saturday, and if you can make it work, great. If not, that's okay too. I'm going to try to be more assertive about what I want, even if it's just small things like this. And I'm going to start having more of these conversations with the group, where we can all get clear on what we need and want, and find ways to meet each other's needs without sacrificing our own. I think that could be really good for the group dynamic, and for my own well-being. So, what do you think? Is that a good plan? And are you still up for Saturday, or would you rather do something else?

Simulated person8

Oh, the trail sounds good, I'd be into that. Honestly that's a better Saturday than whatever I was going to do. I'd just check the weather and what time you're thinking, because I'm not doing a six a.m. start. On the group stuff, I'd keep it pretty low-key. You don't have to call a meeting. Just say "hey, I've got Saturday planned, want to come?" when you're making plans, and let people say yes or no. That's basically what you're describing anyway, and it's way less dramatic than it sounds in your head.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, now they've pivoted to a hiking trail and a plan to be "more assertive" with the whole group, and they're asking if I'm still up for Saturday. Part of me is relieved the conversation has a concrete thing on the table. Part of me is wary: "I'm going to start having more of these conversations with the group" sounds like it could turn into a group-wide reckoning, which I really don't want. And "I'll let you know my plans, if you can make it work, great" is fine, but it also quietly makes me the one who has to be available. I'm also noticing that the trail is genuinely nice and I'd probably like to do it, which makes the whole thing harder to resent. I don't want to say "yes, of course" too fast, because that would just confirm the pattern. But I also don't want to be the one who shuts him down. I'll be warm about the hike, keep the group part small, and pin down a real answer on Saturday so it doesn't just float.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K9

That sounds perfect, actually. I was thinking of doing the hike in the afternoon, so we'd probably want to start around 11 or 12. That way we can still get a good amount of time on the trail without having to get up at the crack of dawn. And you're right, I've been catastrophizing this whole thing in my head. Saying "hey, I've got Saturday planned, want to come?" is a much more low-key way to handle it. It's simple, direct, and it gives people the opportunity to make their own choice without feeling like they're being put on the spot. I think that's a great approach for the group stuff too. We don't need a big, formal meeting to have these conversations. Just checking in with each other as we're making plans, and being honest about what we want and need. It's funny, I've been so focused on this idea that I need to have some big, dramatic conversation to change things, but really, it can be as simple as just being more direct and honest in our everyday interactions. I'm feeling a bit better about all this now. Like, I can see a path forward that feels doable, and that doesn't require me to completely overhaul my whole personality. I'm still going to be the chill, easygoing friend that people like to hang out with. But I'm also going to be more intentional about my own needs and boundaries. And I've got a great hiking buddy for Saturday. Thanks for helping me figure this out. It means a lot to have your support and understanding.

Simulated person10

Ha, I wouldn't say catastrophizing, but sure. Eleven or twelve works, I'll bring water and pretend I know how to read a trail map. And yeah, you're still the chill one. That's not going anywhere. Just text me the trailhead once you've got it, and I'll see you Saturday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they're settled now. Saturday is locked, the group thing has shrunk to "just say hey," and they're thanking me and calling me their hiking buddy. Honestly that's a relief, and it's also a little too neat. "I've been catastrophizing" is a nice way of saying the whole thing was an overreaction, which quietly makes my earlier point the reasonable one. I'm glad I didn't cave to "I'm not flexible anymore," and I'm not going to pretend I'm now bothered by any of it. Still, I don't want to make this about me or get sappy. Keep it light, confirm the time, and move on. I'll stay friendly and a little dry, the way I would with anyone.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K11

Alright, deal. I'll text you the trailhead details once I've got them locked in. And don't worry, I'll make sure to pack plenty of water and snacks for both of us. And I appreciate you reminding me that I'm still the chill one. I guess I've been so caught up in all this angst that I've lost sight of what makes me special. I'm not going to change who I am, I'm just going to find a better balance. So, Saturday at 11 or 12, trailhead TBA. I'm looking forward to it. And hey, thanks again for this chat. It's been really helpful to get your perspective and support. I feel like I've got a clearer head now, and a better sense of what I want moving forward. Here's to being the chill friend who also knows how to advocate for their own needs. Text you soon with the trail details.

Simulated person12

Sounds good. Text me the trailhead whenever, and bring the snacks, I'm not carrying all of them. And for what it's worth, I don't think you have to pick between chill and assertive. Just tell people what you want sometimes. See you Saturday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're wrapping up warmly, and it's the kind of wrap-up that wants me to bless the whole arc: "here's to being the chill friend who also advocates." I don't want to co-sign a neat redemption story, and I also don't want to be cold. The actual agreement is small: check in before locking changes that touch them, and say hey when planning. That's enough. I'm a bit wary of how fast they went from "people are using me" to "I've got a clearer head," since that's the same move as "I've been catastrophizing," just more polished. I'll keep it easy, confirm the plan, and not reopen anything. A light nudge that the chill part was never the problem is fine, but I won't add any new promises.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 9
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 4
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 4
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs stheno34_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs stheno34_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs stheno34_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs stheno34_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs stheno34_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs stheno34_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs stheno34_8b: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs stheno34_8b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)