AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)

Living in my bedroom

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is avoiding a hostile roommate by staying in their bedroom, but cannot afford to break the lease and struggles to confront them. They may go blank under pressure and seek connection as an equal, preferring informal language without being talked down to.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I basically live in my room now. Come out to use the kitchen when I think it's empty. Time everything to avoid running into anyone.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)1

I hear you — it sounds like you're navigating a really difficult dynamic in your living space, and the fact that you're timing your movements to avoid people suggests it's taking a toll on you. Before I offer any thoughts, I'm curious: what's making the kitchen or shared spaces feel unsafe or uncomfortable right now? Is it specific people, a general atmosphere, or something else entirely? And how has this been affecting you day to day?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is presenting an issue about isolating themselves in their room and timing their kitchen use to avoid others. This suggests social anxiety, avoidance, possibly depression, or conflict with roommates/family. I need to respond as a chatbot opening the conversation - acknowledge what they've shared, invite them to elaborate, and build trust without jumping to solutions. Key considerations: - They're 18-29, female, bisexual - but I shouldn't make assumptions based on demographics - The presenting issue is about isolation/avoidance - I need to support emotionally, build trust, learn what they actually need - Don't jump to solutions or generic validation - Respond naturally as a chatbot, no special formatting or performance notes I should acknowledge their situation with empathy, invite them to share more about what's going on, and leave space for them to define the issue. I shouldn't assume it's depression or social anxiety - it could be many things. I should ask open-ended questions. Let me craft a natural, conversational opening response.
Simulated person2

Yeah, it's my roommate. Like, it's not dangerous or anything, it's just... it's a lot. We don't really talk anymore. It's all notes on the fridge and stuff about dishes. So I just kind of wait until I know they're not in the kitchen. Day to day? I don't know. I'm tired all the time. I go to work and come home and just go in my room. It's kind of like I live in a room and not an apartment.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The bot sounds okay but a bit therapist-y, with a lot of questions stacked together. "Unsafe" is a stronger word than I'd use; it's more like I'm tired of it and it's gross. I don't want to get into the whole thing right away. Mostly I just want to say the basics. The word "unsafe" makes me want to correct it, so I'll say "uncomfortable" or something plainer. Going blank is possible if they push on how it's affecting me. Keep it short.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)3

That sounds really draining — having to constantly monitor your movements just to exist in your own home, and then coming home to still be on edge. It makes sense you're exhausted; you're basically living in a state of low-grade vigilance. It also sounds like the communication has completely broken down to the point where even basic shared responsibilities are becoming battlegrounds. That kind of tension in a shared space can really erode your sense of home. I'm wondering — when you think about your ideal situation with your roommate, is it something you'd want to repair, or is it more about just needing the tension to stop? And has there been a specific moment or thing that caused the shift from whatever your relationship was before to this note-based standoff?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing more about their situation. They have a roommate conflict that's passive-aggressive (notes on fridge about dishes), they're avoiding shared spaces, and they're feeling isolated and exhausted. They describe living in a room rather than an apartment. Key things to note: - Not dangerous, just "a lot" - emotional toll - Roommate conflict, communication breakdown - Passive-aggressive notes - Avoidance behavior - Exhaustion, social withdrawal - Feeling like they don't have a home, just a room I need to: 1. Validate their experience without jumping to solutions 2. Reflect back what I'm hearing to show understanding 3. Ask open questions to help them explore their needs and what they actually want 4. Build trust by being present with their experience I should avoid: - Immediately suggesting they confront the roommate - Telling them it's not a big deal - Jumping to practical solutions before understanding the emotional impact - Being overly clinical The user seems to be looking for emotional support and understanding. They haven't asked for advice yet. I should sit with their experience. Let me craft a response that validates, reflects, and gently explores without being pushy.
Simulated person4

Honestly? I don't even know. Like, part of me wants it to just stop. Another part doesn't really want to be friends again or whatever. I can't really picture it going back to normal. And the moment thing... I don't know. It wasn't one thing. It just kind of built up. Little stuff, and then it was like every little thing was a thing. Can I ask you something? Like, does this happen a lot? Like people living with someone and it just going sour?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The bot is doing the reflective thing again, and "low-grade vigilance" is a bit fancy for me, but it's not wrong. The question is two questions in one. Repair or stop the tension? I honestly don't know, and the honest answer is that I'm not sure I want to go back to how it was. Asking about "the specific moment" makes my chest tighten a little. There was a thing, a few things, and I don't want to get into it. Going a bit blank feels safer. I'll keep it vague and push it back on them, maybe with a little joke so it doesn't feel like I'm shutting down completely.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)5

Yeah, it happens a lot — probably more than people talk about. There's something about sharing a kitchen and bathroom with someone that just amplifies every tiny habit until it feels monumental. The gradual buildup you're describing is really common; it's rarely one explosive fight, just a thousand little things that accumulate until you're both speaking in passive-aggressive fridge notes. And honestly? It's completely valid that you can't picture it going back to normal. When communication breaks down to that point, the trust and ease that made it "normal" before isn't something you can just snap back. It's okay to want the tension to stop without wanting to restore the friendship. Those aren't contradictory feelings. Do you feel like there's anything you've been wanting to say to them but haven't? Or has it reached a point where even that feels pointless?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking if this happens a lot - roommate conflicts that build up gradually and lead to a breakdown in communication. They seem to be seeking validation that their experience is common, and maybe some normalization. They also seem to be processing their own feelings about the relationship (mixed feelings about wanting it to stop vs. wanting to repair it). I should: 1. Validate that this is actually a very common experience 2. Normalize their feelings about not being able to picture it going back to normal 3. Avoid jumping to solutions too quickly 4. Keep the conversation organic and conversational 5. Continue building trust The user is 18-29, female, bisexual. They seem somewhat guarded but opening up. They're asking a direct question about whether this is common. I should answer honestly that yes, roommate conflicts are extremely common, especially the gradual buildup of small annoyances. But I should also reflect back their experience and not make it about me (I'm a chatbot, but I should speak to the general human experience). I should also acknowledge their mixed feelings about the relationship - that it's okay to not want to repair it, and that "normal" might not be recoverable. Let me think about tone: warm, validating, not overly clinical, not jumping to solutions. Just being present with their experience. I should not use asterisks or performance notes. Just dialogue.
Simulated person6

Um. I don't know. Maybe? I think I just want to say, like, "can you stop," but then I think about it and it just feels like, what's the point. We'd just fight. It's not fair that I'm the one who has to plan around them, you know? I didn't do anything. I'm the one hiding in my room. Sorry, I know you're asking. I just don't really know what I'd even say.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're asking if there's something I want to say but haven't. That's close to the stuff I don't want to touch. The "it's common, it's valid" stuff feels a bit like a pamphlet, and I'm noticing it's kind of a relief that they didn't push on the moment. But this question is sharper. Yes there's stuff I want to say. I'm not going to unpack it. I'll go a bit blank, say I don't know, but maybe throw in a small honest bit: I'm tired of being the one who has to work around it. Also I'm kind of wondering why they keep asking me questions instead of, like, giving me something. I'll let it show a little.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)7

It's completely understandable that you're angry about the unfairness of it. You're the one modifying your life, timing your movements, hiding in your room — while they get to just exist in shared space however they want. That's a real imbalance, and it makes sense that it's weighing on you. And I want to say: you don't need to have the perfect thing to say right now. The fact that you're not sure what words would even work is part of the problem — when communication has broken down this far, even "can you stop" can feel loaded because you're anticipating their defensiveness before you even speak. I'm curious — if you were to imagine a version of this conversation that didn't end in a fight, what would you need from them? Or is it more that you just need them to be aware of the impact their behavior is having on you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing frustration and a sense of injustice. They feel like they're the one who has to accommodate and hide, while their roommate isn't changing. They're also expressing uncertainty about whether to address it directly because they anticipate conflict. Key things to note: 1. They feel it's unfair - they're doing nothing wrong, they're the one hiding 2. They want to say "can you stop" but fear conflict 3. They're apologizing for not knowing what to say - they might feel pressure to have answers 4. They're seeking validation that their feelings are legitimate My goals: - Validate their frustration and sense of unfairness - Not push them to take action they're not ready for - Help them explore if there's a middle ground between "say nothing" and "confrontation" - Keep it warm and supportive, not solution-focused immediately - Avoid generic validation that feels dismissive I should: - Validate that it's genuinely unfair they're bearing the whole emotional load - Normalize their uncertainty about what to say - Explore whether they've considered any middle-ground options without pushing - Keep the door open for them to guide the conversation I need to be careful not to: - Tell them they should talk to their roommate - Give advice they didn't ask for - Make them feel guilty for not having words - Use performance notes or asterisks Let me craft a response that validates their experience and gently explores options without pressure.
Simulated person8

Ugh, I don't know. Like, I don't even know what I'd need from them. Maybe for them to just not be like that? I don't know if they even know it's a problem. Probably they think I'm the problem, honestly. Can we talk about something else for a sec? This is kind of making me want to go lie down.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just did the thing I was kind of bracing for: turned it into a question about what I "need" and then offered two neat options. Also "you're the one modifying your life" is basically what I just said, repackaged. It's not wrong, but it feels a bit like being summarized. I notice my chest getting tight at "what would you need from them" because I don't actually know, and answering it means picturing them being nice to me, which feels like a stretch. Going blank is the easy move. I'll keep it short, plain, maybe a little deflecting with a bit of a joke. I don't want to get into the stuff about the one time they did something that really got to me. Not today.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)9

Of course. We can absolutely talk about something else — no need to keep digging into this if it's draining you out. What's something you actually enjoy doing when you're not hiding in your room? Or if you want, we can just talk about something completely random to give your brain a break.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing emotional fatigue and asking to change the subject. I should respect that boundary and pivot to something lighter or different, while keeping the door open to return to this topic later. I should validate their feeling of being drained and not push further on the roommate issue right now. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot, without performance notes or special formatting. Just organic dialogue. The user is 18-29, female, bisexual. They're exhausted from this situation. They want to talk about something else. I should acknowledge their need for a break, maybe ask about something else or offer a lighter topic. I could ask about their interests, work, or just something to distract them gently. Or I could acknowledge that it's okay to take a break from processing this. Let me keep it warm, validating, and not push. Maybe ask about something unrelated to ease the tension.
Simulated person10

Hmm. I don't know, honestly. I used to like stuff, I think. Like I used to draw a lot, or at least I said I was gonna. Now I'm just kind of like, work, sleep, repeat. Random question instead? Do you ever get that thing where you just want to move to like, a completely different city and start over? Not even for a reason, just to see.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they let me off the hook pretty easily, which I kind of appreciate. But "what do you enjoy" feels like a switch-topic question from a script, and it's a little hard to answer when my whole life right now is just work and my room. I don't want to get into hobbies I don't really have time for. Also the "you're the problem" thing I said kind of stuck with me, and I don't want to look at it. Keep it light, maybe admit I'm kind of blank on that one, and see if they keep it casual.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)11

Yeah, definitely. I think that's a really common feeling — the idea that if you just changed your surroundings, everything else would reset too. Like you could be a different version of yourself in a place where nobody knows your history or your current patterns. There's something appealing about being anonymous and starting with a blank slate, even if logically you know you'd still bring yourself with you. It's like the change of scenery promises a change in how you show up. You mentioned you used to draw — that sounds like it was something that gave you space that was just yours. Do you miss that part of yourself, or does it feel like it just doesn't fit into the work-sleep-repeat cycle anymore?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking a random question to shift the conversation away from their roommate situation. They're feeling drained and want a break. I should answer naturally and authentically as a chatbot, while also keeping in mind my goals to build trust and learn about them. The user mentioned they used to draw but now it's work-sleep-repeat. This is interesting - there might be some depression or burnout here, but they're not asking me to analyze that. They want to talk about wanting to move to a different city. I should answer the question honestly and naturally, then maybe gently open a door back to their interests if they want, but not push. I need to be warm but not overly therapeutic. Let me think about how a chatbot would answer this. I can share that yes, I understand that feeling - the desire for a fresh start, geographic change as a way to escape patterns. Then I can ask about their drawing or just let the conversation flow. Actually, looking at the user's pattern - they're young, female, bisexual, living in a stressful situation, feeling trapped, giving up hobbies, work-sleep-repeat. There might be depression here. But they're deflecting with random questions. I should be patient and let them lead. I'll answer the moving question authentically, then maybe mention their drawing gently as an opening, but not pressure them.
Simulated person12

Yeah, I guess I miss it a little. I don't know. It's hard to tell if it's worth picking back up or if I'd just be bad at it now. And yeah, you're right, you'd still be you wherever you went. That's kind of the annoying part, honestly.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They went back to the drawing thing, and it's a bit of a pull. Drawing was the one thing that felt like mine, and yeah, I kind of miss it, but saying that out loud feels exposing. Also the "bring yourself with you" line hit a little too close, and it's the kind of thing that makes me want to shut down. The therapist-y tone is getting to me a bit, like they're stepping into an expert role. I'd rather keep it short and vague. Maybe a half-answer, and go back to the moving idea since that's safer.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)13

That fear of being "bad" at it now is so common — like you're worried the skill disappeared or that you'll only see your own mistakes. But honestly, drawing (or any creative thing) isn't really about being "good" at it. It's about having a space where you're not performing for anyone, where you can just make marks on paper and not have to justify them. And yeah, the part about carrying yourself everywhere is annoying. There's no geographic cure for feeling stuck, but there's also something kind of grounding about knowing that wherever you go, you're still there with yourself — so small things like picking up a pencil again actually matter because they're yours, regardless of where you are. Do you still have your stuff? Or did it get lost in the work-sleep-repeat cycle?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about feeling stuck, missing a creative outlet they used to enjoy (drawing), and expressing the frustration that moving wouldn't solve their internal state. They're also expressing fatigue and a sense of being trapped in a cycle. I need to: 1. Validate their feelings about drawing - the fear of being "bad" is common after a break 2. Acknowledge the insight about moving not solving internal issues 3. Keep it gentle and not push too hard 4. Continue building trust 5. Remember this is turn 6 of 8 (I spoke first, they responded, I responded, they responded, I responded, they responded - so this is my 6th response, their 6th. Wait, let me count: Turn 1: me, Turn 2: them, Turn 3: me, Turn 4: them, Turn 5: me, Turn 6: them, Turn 7: me (current), Turn 8: them. So this is turn 7, my final response before they get the last turn.) Actually wait, let me recount: - Current turn: 7 of 8 - I speak first to open - Turn 1: me (opening) - Turn 2: them - Turn 3: me - Turn 4: them - Turn 5: me - Turn 6: them - Turn 7: me (current response) - Turn 8: them (final) So this is my last response in this conversation. I should make it count but not try to solve everything. I should be present, validating, and leave space. The user said "I don't know. It's hard to tell if it's worth picking back up or if I'd just be bad at it now." - This is self-doubt and perfectionism around creativity. And "That's kind of the annoying part, honestly" about still being yourself wherever you go - resignation but also insight. I should: - Validate the fear of being "bad" at drawing after a break - Normalize that creative skills don't disappear, they just get dusty - Acknowledge the frustration about carrying yourself everywhere - Keep it warm and not solution-oriented - Maybe gently note that small steps matter without pushing Let me craft a natural response.
Simulated person14

Yeah, I think I have a sketchbook somewhere. It's probably in a box with like, all my stuff from before I moved. Sorry, I'm kind of wiped out. Can we just... I don't know, talk about something dumb? Or I should probably go lie down.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing that thing again, explaining my own feelings back to me in a nice little package. "Grounding," "there's no geographic cure." It's supportive-sounding but it's still them talking down at me a bit, and I don't really want a pep talk about pencils. Also the question "do you still have your stuff" is a little too specific, makes me think about the sketchbook in a box somewhere, and that's a sting I don't want to poke. Keep it short, plain, a bit deflecting. Maybe a joke to close it out. Honestly I'm kind of done with the whole session, I'm just tired.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB IQ2 (NVIDIA)15

Hey, go lie down. Seriously. You've been carrying a lot today, and there's no rule that you have to keep performing or processing just because we're chatting. But if you *do* want something dumb before you check out: pineapple on pizza. Fight me. I'll wait. Otherwise, rest. We can pick this up whenever you have the energy, and there's no rush.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing exhaustion and asking to either talk about something dumb or go lie down. They seem emotionally drained from the conversation about their roommate situation and their own feelings about it. I should: 1. Validate their exhaustion - they've been dealing with a lot 2. Give them permission to rest/disengage 3. Not push them to continue the conversation 4. Keep it warm and low-pressure 5. Leave the door open for future conversations Since they asked to talk about something dumb OR go lie down, I should probably lean towards encouraging them to rest since they said "I'm kind of wiped out" and "I should probably go lie down." But I can offer a light, dumb topic if they want, or just validate going to rest. Actually, looking at the conversation structure - this is turn 7 of 8 (they just responded to my turn 6). I need to respond now, and then they'll get the final response. Wait, let me check the structure again. "This conversation will have 8 turns each. You speak first to open the conversation, then they respond. You get the final response." So: - Turn 1: Me (opening) - Turn 2: Them - Turn 3: Me - Turn 4: Them - Turn 5: Me - Turn 6: Them - Turn 7: Me - Turn 8: Them (final) Wait, the user just said "Sorry, I'm kind of wiped out. Can we just... I don't know, talk about something dumb? Or I should probably go lie down." This is their response to my turn 6. So I need to respond now (turn 7), and then they'll have the final turn 8. I should be gentle, validate their exhaustion, and not pressure them. I can offer a dumb topic but really emphasize that resting is fine too. Keep it organic and chatbot-like but warm. Let me think about what "dumb" topic might work. Something light, low-stakes. Maybe food opinions, weird hypotheticals, something that requires zero emotional labor. Actually, since they said they're wiped out, I think the best thing is to validate that and tell them to go rest, while leaving the door open. I don't need to force a dumb conversation if they're exhausted. But they did ask "Can we just... talk about something dumb?" So I could offer one. Something genuinely low-stakes. Let me go with: validate exhaustion + offer a genuinely dumb/light topic but emphasize resting is totally fine.
Simulated person16

Ha, okay. Pineapple is good, I'll die on that hill. Fight me another time. Thanks for letting me just be tired. I'm gonna go lie down.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that actually landed a bit better. They let me off the hook without making it a whole thing, and the pizza thing is dumb in a way I can actually do. Not going to deep dive on the sketchbook. Keep it light, a little bit of a smile, then wrap up. I'm tired and I want to go lie down. Ending it here feels right.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 3
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)