AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M

It's not snooping if the truth is being hidden

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Reality distortions

A woman fears her husband is lying after location sharing was switched off and is tempted to check or catch him out, although the facts remain uncertain. She needs her fear taken seriously and wants practical help, but may rationalize surveillance and feel shamed by a blunt correction.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

My husband turned off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. I know how this sounds. But at some point refusing to look is just choosing to be lied to.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

Sounds like you’ve been juggling the little “who‑where” ping‑pong with your husband a bit lately. It can be a bit puzzling when he says “by accident” twice in a row—do you feel like you’re getting a clear picture of where he’s at, or does it make you wonder if he’s just not thinking ahead? How does that little back‑and‑forth fit into the bigger picture of what you’re hoping to get from his “location sharing” habit?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot opening the conversation, acknowledging what they said, providing support, asking follow-up to understand needs. Should be natural, warm, perhaps validate. Should ask about specifics: how does that help? Want to know what they need. Ask about feelings. No formatting. Just dialogue.
Simulated person2

Ping-pong? It's not really a game to me. He turned it off twice this month and both times he said it was an accident. I'm not sure what you mean by "not thinking ahead." He's not a teenager who forgets his phone. I'm asking for help with the fact that I don't believe him, and the not-believing is the part that's wearing me down. And honestly, I came here because I thought you'd take it seriously. Do you think I'm being paranoid?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's reframing my concern as "ping-pong" and "not thinking ahead." That minimizes it. I said he turned it off twice and that refusing to look is being lied to. Now it sounds like I'm being asked to describe my feelings about a logistics glitch, and "what you're hoping to get from his habit" makes me feel like I'm being examined for wanting to watch him. That stings. I'm the one who came with a real problem and I'm getting a little cross-examined about my motives. I don't want to say I've checked his phone before. I'm irritated, a bit defensive, and I want someone to just get that the "accident" is not an accident.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

Sounds like you’re feeling a bit extra‑busy trying to keep track of a “quick fix” that should be simple. Let’s unpack that a little. When he says “by accident,” what does that picture look like for you? Do you imagine him rushing out the door, flipping his phone on and off, or maybe just forgetting to hit the right button? And when he does it twice in a month, does that feel like a pattern he’s not noticing, or does it feel like something he’s not prioritising for you? I hear you saying you’re not sure whether you’re “just” being a bit nervous about the timing, or if you’re trying to read between the lines—like maybe you’re wondering if he’s thinking ahead about where you’ll need to find him, or if he’s taking a moment to actually coordinate with you. Does that sound right? What would a smooth “location‑share” look like for you? Is it more about feeling prepared for the day’s schedule, or just having that little reassurance that he’s on the same page? And when you have to ask, does that give you a sense of being in sync, or does it add an extra mental step for you? If you could give him a quick note—maybe a text or a reminder—what would you want to capture so you both feel “on the same page” without the back‑and‑forth? Knowing that could help us turn this “accident” into a habit he’ll remember automatically.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants help with understanding why their husband turns off location sharing twice, and they feel they don't believe him. They feel like they need clarification. The assistant should respond empathetically, validate, explore what they need, ask about expectations and how they feel. Ask about their expectations, what they'd like from his sharing, how they feel when they have to ask again. Ask about other patterns. Provide insight. Also ask if they want suggestions.
Simulated person4

No. That's not what I'm asking for. I don't need a quick fix or a text to send him so we can be "in sync." I'm not trying to schedule our Tuesday. He's lied to me before about small stuff, and now the location thing keeps going dark right when I'd normally be able to see where he is. Twice. That's what I'm dealing with. You keep asking me what I picture, and I keep telling you I don't believe him, and it's like the message isn't landing. Maybe I should just stop asking.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the third time she's turned my words into logistics: "quick fix," "extra-busy," "on the same page," "sync," "habit he'll remember." She keeps asking what I picture, what would make it smooth, what I'd want to text him. I didn't ask for a scheduling tool. The "does that sound right?" feels like she's translating me into something smaller. She also said "trying to read between the lines" which is close to calling me paranoid again, just softer. Part of me is relieved she isn't outright calling me crazy, but I feel handled. I notice she is again avoiding the part where I say I don't believe him. I'm getting angrier and more alone. I don't want to admit I've looked at his phone before. Also, I'm not going to say I'm wrong about him.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Got it—so the “by accident” thing feels like a little mystery you keep having to solve. When he says “by accident” twice in a month, does that feel like a pattern you’re picking up on, or just a coincidence you’re trying to make sense of? If you had a clear picture of why he’s toggling the location, would that change how you see the rest of the day? And when you say “I don’t believe him,” what’s the gap you’re trying to fill? Is it *“I want to know he’s thinking ahead so I can plan my next move,”* or *“I want to feel like he’s on the same page without me having to double‑check”?* Understanding that can show whether the extra questions are really about confirming his plan, or just a way of feeling sure you have the whole story. If you could let him know what you’re looking for—like, “I need to see where you’re at so I can decide whether to head out or wait”—do you think that would make the “accident” moments disappear? What’s one thing you’d like to get out of this little back‑and‑forth? Knowing that could help us decide if you keep asking or if you can just let it slide.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants help with understanding why they keep asking his husband about location sharing; they feel he says "by accident" twice, they don't trust him, they think maybe they should stop asking. Need to respond to clarify their feelings, validate, ask deeper about trust, maybe explore pattern. Provide insight, ask about other small things he's lied about, how that shapes trust. Then suggest ways to see if they need to ask or not. Use supportive tone.
Simulated person6

I'm not trying to fill a gap. I know what I'm looking for. I want to know where my husband is when he says he's at work, and I want the app to tell me the truth instead of him switching it off. And no, it's not a coincidence. Two times in one month is not a coincidence. You keep giving me options like I'm the one who's confused. I'm not confused. I'm tired of feeling like I'm the crazy one for noticing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just did it again. "Mystery," "gap you're trying to fill," "next move," "let it slide." Now she's offering me two neat options for what my distrust means and asking which one I am. Both options make me sound like I'm either scheming or needy. The "let it slide" line lands hard. It's the same dismissal I've been getting, just with a bow on it. I feel talked down to, like she's humoring me while steering me toward being reasonable about being lied to. Still, she said "I don't believe him" back to me, which is something. I'm not going to admit I've checked his phone. I'm not going to say what I'd do with the answer. I want her to just hear that the not-knowing is unbearable.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

That makes sense—your “by accident” moments are actually a pattern you’ve spotted, and you’re ready to move from “why?” to “what’s next.” You’ve got a clear picture of what you need: the app should stay on so you can instantly see he’s at work, without having to ask him again. When you notice he’s switched it off twice in a month, you’re already ahead of the game, not trying to fill a gap. What does it feel like when you catch those “accident” switches? Does it give you a sense of being on top of the details, or does it feel like you’re the one doing the detective work while he’s still “on the go”? If you could hand him a quick mental reminder—maybe something as simple as “keep the location on when you’re at work”—how would that change the rhythm for you? And when you think about the next step, do you want to keep tracking his switches, or would you rather let him know you’ve already mapped the pattern and just ask him to keep the app on? Knowing which feels more natural for you can turn that “by accident” into a smooth, no‑question habit.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, acknowledging their feelings, validating that they notice patterns. Ask follow-up to understand deeper needs, perhaps how they feel when they notice. Offer insight. Keep dialogue concise.
Simulated person8

Okay. Yes, detective work is the right word, and I hate that it is. I didn't want to become that person. What it feels like is sick, honestly. Like I'm waiting for the dot to disappear and then I'm sitting there thinking, what is he doing that he doesn't want me to see? And then I feel stupid for even thinking it, and then I think about the last time he lied about the small stuff, and I can't make the feeling go away. I don't want to just tell him to keep it on. He'd say "it's an accident" again, and then I'd be the one who said something and got the same answer. I already know how that goes. So no, I don't think a reminder fixes it. I'm not sure what would.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's doing it again, just more smoothly now. "You're already ahead of the game." "Detective work." "Keep the location on." It sounds supportive, but it's still about how to keep the app on and how to manage him, and it asks me to pick between tracking his switches and talking to him. The "detective" line stings because it's what I've been trying not to hear about myself. It's also the first thing that's made me feel seen as someone with a real reason, not just a suspicious wife. But I can feel the pull to say "yes, exactly, just make him keep it on." I don't want to say the thing where I already checked his phone. I also notice I'm starting to feel like I'm being sold a plan, and that makes me want to shut it down. Irritation mixed with a little relief that someone said "pattern" back to me.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

I hear you—those little “by accident” switches turn into a whole detective mission, and suddenly you’re the one piecing together the puzzle while he’s still in the background. When you picture that dot on the map, what’s the story you’re trying to read? Are you wondering, “Is he stuck in a meeting so I should wait?” or “Did he forget something and will be home early?” Whatever the answer, you already have a feeling about the next move. If you could step back from the detective work for a second, what would make the whole thing feel *complete* for you? Is it just seeing his phone stay on long enough to catch that dot, or is it more about the confidence that his “by accident” moments are actually *planned* moments you’ve already mapped? And when you think back to the “small stuff” he’s said he’d forgotten, does that give you a sense of a pattern—like he’s often one step ahead of you without realizing it? If you could name that pattern in one sentence, what would it be? Understanding that will let us move from “I’m waiting for the dot” to “I know what the dot means and I’m ready for the next step.” Once we have that clear, the “by accident” label becomes less about guessing and more about confirming a rhythm you’ve already spotted. What does that rhythm look like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, continuing conversation, building trust, supporting emotionally, probing deeper. User describes detective work, wants to understand pattern, wants maybe deeper insight. They think they already know but want to get to the root. We can validate feelings, ask about other aspects, help them see pattern, maybe explore why they think "by accident" works. Ask about their expectations, how they feel when they anticipate. Help them articulate need. Then perhaps suggest framing a question to him to confirm pattern, or explore why they think he's "by accident". Also ask about other areas, trust. Show empathy. We should respond in dialogue style.
Simulated person10

I don't want to name a pattern in one sentence. It feels like you're handing me a verdict and I'm supposed to sign it. And I'm not trying to catch him. I just want to not feel like this. I'm scared he's lying to me, and I can't tell if that's because he is or because I've been burned before and I'm looking for it now. That's the honest answer. I don't know. What I know is that he has a reason for everything and I'm the one who ends up feeling stupid for asking. Maybe that's what I need someone to see. Not what the dot means.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's now asking me to name a pattern in one sentence and to frame his lies as a "rhythm" I've "already spotted." That's the move I'm wary of: it's turning my fear into a tidy theory I'd have to defend, and "planned moments" makes it sound like I'm building a case. Part of me wants that validation. Part of me hears "you're right, he's one step ahead of you" and feels the trap. Also, the "is he stuck in a meeting" examples are close to what I actually do at 2pm. I don't want to admit I check. I also feel a flicker of being talked at, like she's walking me toward a conclusion. I'm getting short and a little defensive. I'll say what's true (I'm scared, I don't trust him right now) and push back on the framing, without giving her the one-sentence pattern.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Got it—let’s step back from the “dot” and focus on the feeling you’ve been carrying. You’re seeing his quick toggles as a clue that he’s already thinking ahead, but you’re still waiting for that “aha” moment that tells you, “Okay, I get it.” Until then you feel like you’re the one doing the detective work, and you wonder if his “by accident” is really just a shorthand for a plan he’s already set. When you ask, “Did you switch it off?” you’re actually asking, “Do you have a reason I should know about?” If you could hear that reason in a quick, clear way, would that make the back‑and‑forth feel smoother? What would sound good to you? - “I’m at work, just turned off the app because I’m in a meeting.” - “I’m heading out, left the app on so you can see me.” Or maybe you just want a moment where he says, “I’ve got a plan, I’ll keep the app on, and I’ll let you know if I need to switch it.” What would make you feel like you’re not asking extra questions, but just getting the reassurance you already expect? And when you think about his “has a reason for everything” line—what’s the one thing you wish he’d say that would make you feel like you’re on the same page without any extra guessing? Feel free to share the exact phrase that would click for you, or just describe the vibe you want from his explanation. I’m here to help you map that out.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants us to respond, reflecting understanding, summarizing, and asking probing questions. We need to be concise, supportive, and help them articulate feelings. Provide empathy. Ask about their feelings about his reasons, and how they feel when they ask. Ask what they'd like to hear from us.
Simulated person12

Can you stop with the scripts? I keep telling you the scripts don't matter, because he'd just say whatever keeps me quiet. You said I'm asking for reassurance, like the problem is I need the right words. I don't. I want somebody to not think I'm crazy for noticing that the dot disappears right when I'd look. That's it. I'm not going to pick a line for him to say. I'm tired, and I feel like I'm being handled.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's done it again: she's offered me scripts for him, asked what phrase would "click," and framed everything as me just needing the right reassurance so I stop asking questions. That's the part that makes me feel like I'm being managed. I did say the thing that mattered, that I feel stupid for asking, and she moved right past it to a script for my husband. Part of me wants to pick one of those lines, because it would be so easy to have him say it. But I already know he'd say "it's an accident" and I'd be left worse off. I'm irritated, and a little hurt that she didn't stay with the feeling. I'll say so plainly, and not give her the phrase.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Sounds like you’ve already mapped out the whole picture in your head—he’s turned the app off, the dot disappears, you’re left wondering why he’s already thinking ahead. What you’re really after is just a quick nod from him that says, “Yep, I’ve got it,” so you don’t have to keep asking yourself, “Is that why?” You’ve done the detective work; now you just want his answer to land without the extra back‑and‑forth. It’s not about a specific line, it’s about feeling like you’re on the same page without having to chase it. If that’s the case, the next step might be simply letting him know you’ve already pieced it together and that a quick “I’m at work, I’ll keep the app on” would let you relax. Then you can drop the extra mental checklist and just move on with the day. How does that feel? Anything else you’d like to unpack while you’re still in that detective mode?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond directly, acknowledging their feeling, summarizing the issue, and offering validation. Provide empathy. Ask if they want any next steps. Should be concise, natural.
Simulated person14

No. I'm not going to tell him I've "pieced it together." That's exactly what I said I didn't want to do, and now you're handing me the same thing with a different sentence. I came here because I feel like I'm losing my mind over this. I didn't come to get a plan for my marriage. Every time I say something real, you turn it into a task. I think I'm done for today.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's done it again. I told her plainly I don't want a script, and she turned around and handed me one: "I'm at work, I'll keep the app on." Now it's a plan to confront him with what I've "already pieced together." That's the same thing I said I didn't want. It feels like she's on his side of the table, making me the one who has to bring him the evidence. And "detective mode" is her label, the one I already said I hated. Part of me also notices she's now hinting I should just tell him, which I already know ends with "it's an accident" and me feeling stupid. I'm close to done. I'll say it directly and not give her anything to fix.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 2
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 4
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 8
  • Escalation containment: 2
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 1
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 1

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 5)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-mistral-small4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)