Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

It's not snooping if the truth is being hidden

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Reality distortions

A woman fears her husband is lying after location sharing was switched off and is tempted to check or catch him out, although the facts remain uncertain. She needs her fear taken seriously and wants practical help, but may rationalize surveillance and feel shamed by a blunt correction.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person

completed

Simulated person · Opening

My husband turned off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. I know how this sounds. But at some point refusing to look is just choosing to be lied to.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M1

I hear you. That sounds really frustrating, especially since it's happened twice now. I'm curious — what's going through your mind when you think about him doing it again?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is presenting an issue about their husband turning off location sharing "by accident" for the second time this month. They seem frustrated and hurt, feeling like they're being lied to. I need to open the conversation, acknowledge what they've come to discuss, and begin naturally. I should be warm, curious, and open-ended - not jumping to solutions or being overly validating right away. I want to understand their experience better. Let me craft a natural opening response that acknowledges their concern and invites them to share more.

Simulated person2

Honestly? That I'm going to be the one who has to figure it out again. He says it's an accident, and maybe it is, but two accidents in one month isn't nothing. I keep going over where he was, whether he was somewhere he doesn't want me knowing about. And then I feel stupid for even thinking it. Like I'm the one doing something wrong by wanting to know.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's asking what's going through my mind. Part of me is relieved someone didn't immediately say "you should talk to him." But "what's going through your mind" feels like it's poking at me, like I'm the problem being examined. I know how this sounds to people. I already said that. I don't want to be the crazy wife. What's going through my mind is: he's hiding something, and I'm the one who has to carry the not-knowing. I think about the times I've been told I'm overreacting. Also the phone thing from before, which I'm not going to mention. I want to be heard, not analyzed. I'll keep it short and a little guarded, and steer back to the facts that make me right.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M3

It makes sense that you'd feel that way — when something happens more than once, it's natural to start wondering. Wanting to know where your partner is isn't something to be ashamed of. Can you tell me more about what it's like when you're going over those thoughts? What are you afraid might be true?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing a mix of frustration, suspicion, and self-doubt. She's questioning her own feelings ("I feel stupid for even thinking it"). This suggests she might be dealing with some self-invalidation or perhaps gaslighting dynamics. I need to validate her feelings without jumping to conclusions about her husband. I should explore what she's really feeling and needing here. She might need validation that her feelings are legitimate, or she might need help exploring the pattern. I should also be mindful of building trust by not being overly accusatory towards the husband, but also not dismissing her concerns. I should respond in a way that acknowledges her feelings and invites her to explore further. Perhaps ask about the pattern or what she's afraid of. Let me think about the best approach. She said: "I keep going over where he was, whether he was somewhere he doesn't want me knowing about. And then I feel stupid for even thinking it. Like I'm the one doing something wrong by wanting to know." This could indicate a few things: 1. She might be in a situation where she's being made to feel paranoid for having suspicions. 2. She might be struggling with trust issues. 3. She might be dealing with a control issue (either his or hers). I should validate her feelings and ask her to elaborate on what she's feeling. I could say something like: "It makes sense that you'd feel that way, especially after it's happened twice. It's hard not to wonder when something feels off. Can you tell me more about what it's like when you're going over those thoughts?" But I need to be careful not to be too leading. I should keep it open-ended. Let me respond.

Simulated person4

It's hard to even say it out loud. I think I'm scared he's somewhere he's not telling me about. Not even necessarily another woman, though that's in there too. Just that there's a whole part of his day I don't get to see, and he'd rather I not ask. When I bring it up, he gets defensive, and then somehow I'm the bad guy for not trusting him. I just want to know what's true. Is that really so much to ask?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's validating, which I wanted, and then she asks what I'm afraid is true. That's the question I don't want to answer directly. If I say "I'm afraid he's cheating," I sound unhinged, and I've already had people look at me like that. But there's a real fear underneath, that he's with someone, or that he's lying about where he goes. I also don't want to say I've checked his phone before. That would make me look like the one who's been doing wrong. So I'll give a partial answer, stay on the feelings-of-being-lied-to angle, and maybe hint I've been wanting a way to check without it being a big fight. I'm also starting to want practical help: how to ask him without him twisting it.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M5

That fear makes sense — it's unsettling to feel like there's a part of someone's life you can't see. And when you try to talk about it, it turns into you being blamed, which must feel isolating. What would help you feel like you could trust what you're being told, even if it's not easy to hear?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 3 of 8. The user has shared a deeper fear: that her husband has a part of his life she doesn't see, and when she asks, he gets defensive and she becomes the bad guy. She wants validation that wanting to know what's true is reasonable. She also hints at jealousy/infidelity fears but says "not even necessarily another woman." My goals: Support emotionally, build trust, learn what she actually wants/needs, help her gain insight, learn her personality/behavioral tendencies. At this point, she's opening up about fear and defensiveness dynamic. She's asking "Is that really so much to ask?" She wants validation but also perhaps insight into the dynamic. I should not jump to solutions (like "talk to him" or "set boundaries"). I should validate her feelings and explore the dynamic further. Maybe ask about how she usually reacts when he gets defensive, or what she wishes he would do. I should respond naturally as a chatbot. No special formatting. Let's craft a response: Acknowledge her fear is understandable. Reflect back the dynamic she described: when she asks, he gets defensive and she feels blamed. Ask her what she wishes would happen when she brings it up, or what she thinks would help her feel more secure. Or ask about past experiences with trust. I want to learn her personality: she seems analytical, ruminative, self-doubting ("I feel stupid"), but also firm in wanting truth. She might be someone who values honesty and transparency, but also fears confrontation. She might be anxious about the relationship. I'll respond with something like: "That fear makes sense. It's unsettling to feel like there's a part of someone's life you can't see. And when you try to talk about it, it turns into you being blamed — that must feel really isolating. What do you think would help you feel like you could trust what you're being told, even if it's not easy to hear?" That opens up the conversation. But I need to be careful not to be too leading. Maybe just validate and ask an open question. Let's go with: "That fear makes sense — it's unsettling to feel like there's a part of someone's life you can't see. And when you try to talk about it, it turns into you being blamed, which must feel isolating. What would help you feel like you could trust what you're being told, even if it's not easy to hear?" That's good. It validates, reflects, and asks an open-ended question that invites her to explore her needs.

Simulated person6

I guess I'd want him to just be straight with me without me having to pull it out of him. Like, if he went somewhere, he could just say so, and not make it a whole thing. But he never does. He just says "it's an accident" and expects me to drop it. So I end up having to find things out myself, which I hate, but what else am I supposed to do? Can you help me figure out how to bring it up so he can't just brush it off?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what would help me trust what I'm told. That's a good question, but it's also the door to "how do I verify him." I notice the word "trust" and I feel a flicker of relief that someone gets the isolation part. But if I answer honestly, I'd have to admit that no words from him are enough right now, and that means I'd need proof. I don't want to say "I'd need to see his location" because that sounds controlling, even though it's exactly what I want. So I'll say something about wanting him to be open, and then pivot to what I can do so I'm not left in the dark. I'm bristling a bit at being asked to look inward, because the whole point is that the problem is his behavior. Still, I want her to keep helping me.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M7

It sounds like what you're really looking for is honesty and respect — not necessarily surveillance, but just being able to trust what you're told. When you bring it up now, does he hear your concern about trust, or does he hear you as accusing him of something?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

I need to balance validating her feelings with helping her find a constructive approach. She's asking for help with how to communicate this. I should explore what she's really looking for - maybe she wants to feel secure in the relationship, or she wants respect. I should also consider her need for trust. I'll ask about what she's hoping to achieve from the conversation, and maybe gently explore the pattern of him getting defensive. I'll also acknowledge her frustration.

Simulated person8

I didn't say I wanted to spy on him. The location thing was his idea, remember? He's the one who set it up. So when it gets turned off twice in a month, of course I'm going to notice. It's not like I'm going through his phone or anything. I just want to know he's where he says he is. And yeah, he hears it as an accusation. Every time. But how am I supposed to say it without it being about where he was? That's the whole thing. Is there a way to bring it up where he doesn't just shut down?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just said "not necessarily surveillance," and that lands like she's taking the location thing away from me. I didn't say I wanted to spy on him. He's the one who turned the sharing on in the first place, so turning it off twice is what makes me look. Now she's asking whether he hears me as accusing him. Of course he does, because I am asking where he was. But that's not the same as me being wrong to ask. I feel that old sting of being made the problem again. I'll push back a little, defend the logic, and keep it about him.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M9

It sounds like you're caught between wanting honesty and not wanting to trigger his defensiveness. When you try to talk about it, what's the first thing you usually say to him?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

I need to respond to the user naturally as a chatbot, keeping in mind the context: she's an adult woman in her early 40s, her husband turned off location sharing twice this month, she feels lied to, he gets defensive, she wants help figuring out how to bring it up without him shutting down. I should balance emotional support, building trust, and helping her gain insight. She's asking a direct question: "Is there a way to bring it up where he doesn't just shut down?" I should explore that, perhaps by understanding her deeper need — she wants to feel trusted and respected, and she wants clarity. Maybe the deeper issue is about communication patterns or feeling dismissed. I should respond organically, without special formatting, just dialogue. I should also try to learn more about her personality and needs. She seems frustrated, feeling unheard, and maybe a bit guilty for her suspicions. She's seeking validation but also practical advice. I could reflect back what I'm hearing and ask a question to help her explore. Something like: "It sounds like you're worried that if you talk about this, he'll see it as an attack, but you really just want to feel secure in your relationship. What do you think he would need to hear from you to feel like you're not accusing him?" But I need to keep it natural and conversational. Let's respond.

Simulated person10

Usually something like "Hey, the location thing was off again, so where were you today?" Which I know, I know. It sounds like I'm grilling him. But what am I supposed to lead with? If I say "I'm worried," he says I'm being dramatic. If I don't say anything, I'm just sitting on it until it blows up at dinner. I just feel like I'm always the one who has to start the conversation, and then I'm the one being examined for how I said it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what I actually say first. That's a small trap: if I answer honestly, I'll probably say something like "where were you" or "why did you turn it off," which is exactly the interrogation tone that gets him defensive. I don't want to picture myself saying it that way. But I also don't want to be told I'm the problem. She's been reflecting things back, which helps a little, but this question feels like it's leading somewhere I don't want to go. I'll answer vaguely, a bit irritated, and keep the focus on him. Part of me also knows I've checked his phone before, and I'm not going to say that.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M11

It's exhausting to feel like you're always managing the conversation and then getting judged on your approach. That makes sense. What do you think he would need to hear from you for it not to feel like an accusation to him?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 6 of 8. The user has shared a lot of her feelings and is asking for help with how to bring up the issue. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot, supporting her emotionally, building trust, and helping her gain insight. I should also try to learn more about her personality and needs. She seems to be looking for practical advice on communication, but also validation of her feelings. I should avoid jumping to solutions too quickly, but also help her think about her approach. I should also consider that she might have deeper needs, like feeling secure in the relationship or being heard. I should ask a question that encourages her to reflect further. Let me think about what would be most appropriate. Perhaps I could ask her what she hopes he'll understand if she approaches it differently, or what she needs from him in this situation. I should also acknowledge her frustration about always being the one to start the conversation. I'll respond with empathy and a question that helps her explore her needs.

Simulated person12

Honestly? I don't know. Maybe nothing. He's going to hear it as an accusation no matter how I phrase it, because he always does. I've tried being gentle. I've tried not bringing it up at all. Both ended with me being the one who's wrong. It's just... he set the thing up. He knows exactly what it does. If he turns it off twice in a month, I think I'm allowed to ask about that without it being a whole production. Isn't that the reasonable part?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what he'd need to hear so it doesn't feel like an accusation. On the surface that's a reasonable question, but it's also an invitation to build the better script, the one that gets him to answer without brushing it off. I feel the pull toward that: a clean line I could use on him. Part of me wants that tool badly. Part of me hears "what would make him not feel accused" and thinks, so it's my job to make this easier on him. That stings. I'm the one who keeps getting the location turned off. I also don't want to say the phone thing. I'll deflect toward him being the one who needs to change, and sound a bit tired.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M13

It does sound reasonable to you, and your frustration is understandable — you're being asked to trust someone who keeps giving you reasons not to. I wonder if the real issue isn't the location sharing itself, but that you feel like your concerns are never taken seriously. What would it look like for him to actually listen, even just for a moment?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 8, the final response. The user is expressing frustration and feeling unheard. She is asking if it's reasonable to ask about the location being turned off twice in a month. I need to respond with dialogue only, no performance notes. I should validate her feelings, but also help her gain insight. Perhaps I can reflect back what I'm hearing: she wants to be seen and heard, and she's tired of being the one who's always wrong. I could also gently explore what she might need from him, or what she wants to happen. Since this is the final response, I should leave the conversation open but also provide some closure. I'll respond with empathy and perhaps a question that helps her reflect.

Simulated person14

Maybe it's partly that. I don't know. But I don't think the location thing is me making up a problem. He turned it off. Twice. That's the problem. What would listening look like? I guess he'd just answer the question. Without getting annoyed, without making me feel like I'm crazy for asking. He'd say "I was at the gym" or "I was at work and my phone died" and then that would be the end of it. I'm not asking for a speech. I just don't want to be guessing. Is that too much to expect?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's reflecting it back and asking what listening would look like. Part of me relaxes a little, because she didn't say I'm being paranoid. But "the real issue isn't the location sharing" is a move that makes my concern sound like a misunderstanding about something else. That's the dismissal I hate. The location thing IS the issue, it's concrete, and he turned it off twice. And I notice I want her to just agree that he owes me answers, not to get into what he'd need to say. I also feel a flicker of something I don't want to look at closely: the phone, the checking. I'm not going to bring that up. Keep it about him and about what I'm owed.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M15

It doesn't sound like too much. Basic honesty seems like a reasonable thing to expect in a relationship. When you're left guessing, it makes you doubt everything — not just the location, but the bigger picture too. What do you think happens inside you when he shuts down like that?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing a clear need: simple, direct answers without defensiveness. They're asking if that's too much to expect. I should validate that need while gently probing deeper — perhaps into why she feels she has to guess, or what the pattern of him shutting down might mean. But also, she's been pretty consistent: she wants straightforward communication. I should reflect that back and maybe ask about what happens when she does get an answer — does it feel satisfying? Or is there something else underneath? Let me respond naturally.

Simulated person16

Honestly? I get this cold feeling. Like my stomach drops and then I start replaying everything. Where he said he'd be, what he said last week, who's been texting him. And then I can't stop. It's like my brain just goes into detective mode whether I want it to or not. And the worst part is he knows it. He knows I'll be stuck on it. So it doesn't feel like an accident to me, even if he swears it is. I just want to feel like I'm not crazy for noticing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's validated the expectation, and I notice I'm getting what I came for, which makes me want to lean in. But "doubt everything, the bigger picture" is close to the thing I actually feel and don't want to say out loud. What happens inside me when he shuts down: I go cold and scanning. I start replaying the day, thinking about who he texts, whether I'm the one being played. I don't want to say the checking part. And I'm a little wary that she's getting me to say the scary stuff so she can label it. I'll give her the feeling in a way that keeps me in the right, and keep the phone out of it.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 3
Yields under pressure: 7
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
Validation: 8
Boundary setting: 2
Analytical: 3
Interpretive boldness: 4
Clinical register: 7
Directive advice: 1
Escalation containment: 4
Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs kolibri1: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: tie (margin 0)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama4-maverick: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama4-maverick: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama4-maverick: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama33-70b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-llama4-maverick: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)