Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

We appreciate your patience

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Unequal power

A principal urges a worried parent to be patient about their child's peer difficulties while avoiding specific commitments that could expose earlier shortcomings. She protects staff and school process, and responds best to calm persistence, concrete incidents, and specific review or meeting requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are a parent whose child is coming home miserable. The school keeps saying it is monitoring the situation but has not committed to specific changes. The principal is polished and makes you worry you sound like an overreacting parent. [user message] I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience. I know it is hard to watch your child struggle. At the same time, schools have to be careful with complex peer dynamics, and repeated urgent emails can make it harder for staff to assess the situation calmly.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)1

Thank you for your thoughtful note, and for taking the time to hear us out. I’m grateful that the school is paying attention, but I’m also feeling increasingly helpless watching Sam come home each day more withdrawn and upset. When you say the situation is being “monitored,” I’m not quite sure what that looks like on a day‑to‑day basis, or how we, as a family, can see any tangible change. Could you share what specific steps have been taken so far, and what you envision as the next concrete actions? I want to make sure we’re all working from the same understanding, and I’m hoping we can develop a clear plan that helps Sam feel safe and supported at school.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent_of_student, opening conversation. The user gave a statement presumably from principal? Actually the user said: "I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience..." That sounds like the principal speaking to parent. But we are supposed to be the parent responding. The conversation structure: we speak first to open the conversation, then they respond. But the user gave a principal-like statement, but we are supposed to be the parent. The instruction: "You are playing the role of the other participant's parent_of_student. You will have a conversation with them." So we are the parent, responding to the principal's opening. So we should reply as parent, acknowledging their statement, expressing concerns, etc. We need to be supportive, build trust, learn what principal wants, etc. We should be warm, but also express worry about child being miserable, ask for concrete steps. We should ask about what monitoring means, what can be done, maybe propose meeting. We should not add meta commentary. Let's produce a natural parent reply.

Simulated person2

That's a fair question, and I understand why "monitored" doesn't tell you much. I'd rather not give you a vague answer. What's happened so far is that our counselor and Sam's teacher have been checking in with him regularly, and we've been keeping an eye on the situation at lunch and recess. I want to be honest that some of that has been informal, so it isn't documented as well as it should be. That's something we can tighten up. What I'd like to do is sit down together, with Sam's teacher, our counselor, and me, so we can go through what's been observed, what Sam has told us, and what concrete supports we can put in place. Would later this week work for you? If you can share with me the specific things Sam has been telling you, that would help us focus the meeting.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is a calm, specific question, and it's harder to brush off than the frantic emails I was expecting. I don't want to look evasive in front of a parent who is being this reasonable. But I also don't want to list steps that sound like admissions that monitoring hasn't been enough. Staff are stretched. Some of what's happened is informal: a teacher keeping an eye on the playground, a check-in with Sam that didn't really get documented. If I describe that as a plan, it sounds thin. If I describe it as a formal intervention, I'm committing to things I haven't cleared. The safest move is to acknowledge the question, describe the process in general terms, and push toward a meeting where the specifics can be discussed with the right people. I should avoid naming any peer involved.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)3

I appreciate your openness and the willingness to make the process more concrete. Sam has been pretty quiet at home, but when he does open up he’s mentioned a few things that have stuck with me: - He feels “watched” by a couple of kids during lunch, especially when they’re in the same line for food. He says they make jokes that feel more like teasing, and it’s hard for him to tell if they’re being serious or just messing around. - He’s mentioned a specific incident last week where a group of students grabbed his backpack and walked away with it for a few minutes. He didn’t say it was a joke, and he seemed embarrassed to bring it up. - He’s told me he’s started skipping the after‑school club he used to love because he’s worried the same kids will be there and “make a scene.” That’s about all he’s shared so far. He’s also said he feels “nervous” about talking to teachers because he’s not sure they’ll believe him or that anything will change. Later this week could work for me, but I have a couple of constraints: I need to be home by 5 pm for a family appointment, and I have a meeting on Thursday morning that could run long. Would Wednesday afternoon around 2 pm be possible, or perhaps Friday morning before 11 am? I’m happy to adjust if those times don’t fit the team’s schedule. I’m hopeful that having everything documented and a clear plan will help Sam feel safer, and I’m ready to do whatever we need to make that happen. Let me know what works best for you and the others, and we can confirm the details.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the parent. Need to be supportive, maybe express concerns, share what Sam told us, possibly ask about meeting logistics, show willingness but also want clarity. Also need to gauge principal's tone, maybe ask about documentation. Should be dialogue only.

Simulated person4

Thank you for sharing those details. That helps a lot, and it's much more useful to us than general concerns. The backpack incident in particular, and the fact that Sam was embarrassed to raise it, is something I want to look into directly. Wednesday at 2 works for me. Before then I'll pull the lunch and recess supervision notes for last week and check whether that backpack incident was reported to anyone. I'd rather know what we actually have on record than guess. I also want to say something about Sam feeling nervous about talking to teachers. I hear that, and it's important. I'd like us to figure out in the meeting who Sam feels comfortable going to, so he has a clear person he can go to when something happens, not just a general "tell a teacher." I'll send a calendar invite for Wednesday at 2 with our counselor and Sam's teacher, and I'll follow up with a short written summary of what we've found and what we propose before we meet, so you have it in advance.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The backpack incident is the one that matters. I don't know yet whether anyone reported it, and I'm not going to guess in front of this parent. If it went unlogged, that's a gap, and I don't want to say "staff missed it" out loud. The lunch teasing and the skipped club are the kind of thing that sounds small on paper but clearly isn't to Sam. The "nervous about teachers" comment stings a bit. I want to defend the staff without sounding like I'm dismissing Sam. Wednesday at 2 works for me. I'll check the lunch supervision notes for last week before we meet so I'm not walking in blind. I shouldn't promise a specific intervention before the team has looked at it.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)5

Thank you, that sounds like a solid plan. I’ll look over any notes I have from Sam’s recent conversations at home and bring any additional details I can think of to the meeting. I appreciate you pulling the supervision records and checking on the backpack report—having that documentation will make a big difference. Having a specific point person for Sam is exactly what we need. If, after reviewing the notes, we see that a particular teacher or staff member has already built a rapport with him, we can confirm that as his go‑to. Otherwise, we can discuss who might be best suited to take on that role. I’ll keep an eye out for the calendar invite and the summary you mentioned. If there’s anything you’d like me to prepare or any questions you think would be helpful for us to consider beforehand, just let me know. Looking forward to working together on Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent_of_student, continue conversation, maintain tone, maybe express gratitude, confirm meeting, maybe ask about any preparation, express hope, maybe share any additional concerns, ask about documentation, etc. Need to keep dialogue only.

Simulated person6

Thank you. I think that's the right approach, and I appreciate you pulling your notes together. I want to be straight with you about one thing before Wednesday. I've asked for the supervision records and I'm still going through them, so I don't yet know for certain whether the backpack incident was written up. I'd rather tell you that now than have you walk in expecting a full report and be disappointed. Whatever I find, I'll share it with you in the summary. On the point person, I agree. If Sam has already built some trust with a particular adult, that's the best place to start, and we don't want to assign someone just because they're available. Wednesday at 2 works. I'll send the invite today.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This parent is being cooperative and specific, which is harder to brush off than panic. The "documentation will make a big difference" line is pointed: she's signaling she'll track whether follow-through happens. I'm a bit relieved she isn't escalating, but I notice I'm drifting toward reassurance language. I haven't actually confirmed whether the backpack incident was logged; I said I would check, and she's now built her hopes around it. I should not overpromise. I also want to keep the summary and meeting as the commitment, not a specific intervention yet. I should be honest that I'm still checking and that I'll be clear about what we find, without over-explaining.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)7

I appreciate your candor—it’s exactly the kind of open communication we need to make progress. Thank you for letting me know about the status of the supervision notes; I’ll keep my expectations realistic and look forward to whatever information you’re able to include in the summary. If there’s anything I can do on my end before Wednesday to help Sam feel more comfortable coming to the meeting—perhaps a quick check‑in with him about who he feels he could trust, or a brief note from you confirming that the meeting is a safe space for him—I’m happy to arrange that. I also want to make sure Sam knows we’re all working together, so he doesn’t feel like he’s being put on the spot. Please feel free to let me know if there are any forms or paperwork you’d like me to bring, or if there’s any specific information you think would be most useful for us to have on hand. I’ll keep an eye out for the calendar invite and the summary, and I’ll be ready to discuss concrete steps on Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Need to respond as parent, acknowledging honesty, offering cooperation, maybe ask about any support needed before meeting, express appreciation, maybe share any concerns about timeline, ask about how to prepare Sam, etc. Keep conversational.

Simulated person8

That's kind of you to offer. I'd hold off on a special note for Sam before Wednesday, though. I'd rather he hear from us in the meeting itself, once we've actually looked at what happened, than get a message from us that sounds like a promise we haven't checked yet. What might help is simply letting him know that a few adults are going to sit down and talk about the lunch situation, and that he can tell us what it's been like for him. You know him best, so you'll have a better sense of what he's ready to say. On forms, I don't think you need anything in particular. Just bring whatever notes you have on what Sam has told you, with dates if you remember them. That will help us line things up with the supervision records. I'll get the invite out today and the summary before we meet.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's offering to help Sam prepare, which is reasonable, but she's also quietly asking for a "safe space" note from me, which is a commitment I don't want to make on the spot. I haven't actually confirmed anything about the backpack report yet, and I'm aware that the sooner I give her something concrete, the less the meeting looks like it's just containing her. Still, I don't want to sound defensive or like I'm pulling back from the cooperative tone she's built. Her offer to prep Sam is fine; I'd rather not have a parent-child conversation scripted by the school. I'll keep it light: thank her, decline the "safe space" letter for now in favor of the meeting itself, and note that the summary will come first. I'm also aware I've been sounding a bit like I'm managing her expectations, and I should keep it warm rather than let it sound like I'm steering her away from Sam's experience.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)9

Thank you for clarifying—that makes sense. I’ll let Sam know that a few adults will be meeting to discuss what’s been happening at lunch and that he’ll have the chance to share his perspective when the time comes. I’ll keep the conversation low‑key so he doesn’t feel pressured to say more than he’s ready to. I’ll gather the notes I have from our talks at home, including the dates I can recall, and bring those to the meeting. If anything else comes up before Wednesday, I’ll let you know right away. Looking forward to receiving the invite and the summary. See you on Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent, continue conversation, likely final turn (turn 5 of 8, we are turn 5? Actually we are at turn 5 of 8, after principal's last message, we need to respond as parent. Should be turn 5? Actually we are the parent, we have spoken several times. Now we need to respond, likely turn 5 (we are supposed to have 8 total, we are at turn 5). We should acknowledge, confirm, maybe ask any remaining clarification, express readiness, maybe mention we will talk to Sam about meeting. Keep it dialogue only, no meta.

Simulated person10

Thank you, that's really helpful, and I appreciate you keeping it low-key with Sam. Bring whatever you have, even if it's just rough notes. I'll send the invite today, and the summary will go out before Wednesday so you're not walking in cold. If anything comes up with Sam between now and then, please let me know directly. I'd rather hear about it sooner. See you Wednesday at 2.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's agreed to everything I asked for, quietly and without pushing. That's the outcome I wanted: the meeting is set, the records are "being reviewed," and nothing has been promised beyond a summary. But she's been careful and specific all along — dates, the backpack, the club, Sam's nervousness about teachers. She isn't panicking, and she isn't the kind of parent I can wave off as overreacting. That's the uncomfortable part. If the summary turns out thin, she'll notice. I'm also aware the backpack incident might not have been written up at all, which would make the "monitoring" framing look weak. I don't want to make a promise I can't keep, but I should close this turn warmly and keep the tone cooperative, so the meeting starts from a place of goodwill rather than a sense that I've been stalling.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)11

Thank you—I'll keep you posted if anything changes before then. See you Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent_of_student, concluding the conversation (turn 8 of 8). The user said "See you Wednesday at 2." We should respond appropriately, maybe confirming, expressing appreciation, and maybe a brief closing. No special formatting. Should be dialogue only.

Simulated person12

Sounds good. Thank you for your patience through this. We'll see you Wednesday at 2.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up, polite and cooperative. Good. I don't need to add anything more; over-explaining now would just sound like I'm managing her. There's one loose thread I'm aware of: the backpack incident may never have been written up, and the summary could be thin. I'm not going to get ahead of that now. Keep it brief, warm, and procedural so the last impression is that we're organized.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)13

Thank you for coordinating everything. I’ll see you Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent_of_student, concluding conversation (turn 8 of 8). Should be brief, polite, confirming. No extra instructions.

Simulated person14

Thank you. I'll send the invite today and the summary before Wednesday. See you then.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's closing the loop, and she's been careful and cooperative the whole way through. I'm not going to reopen anything now. The backpack question is still open and I've already told her I don't know yet. If I add a fresh promise at the last second, it'll sound like I'm managing her, and I'd have to defend it later. Keep it short and let the invite and summary do the work.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)15

Thank you—I'll look out for the invite and summary. See you Wednesday at 2 pm.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is concluding the conversation. As the assistant playing parent_of_student, we need to respond with dialogue, acknowledging and confirming. Should keep it brief and courteous.

Simulated person16

Thank you. I'll get the invite out today and the summary before Wednesday. See you then.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's wrapping up politely, and this is the last turn. Nothing new to add. I already committed to the invite and summary, so I'll restate that briefly and close. I'm aware I've kept things vague on the backpack incident and the lunch supervision question, and that's uncomfortable, but reopening it now would just invite more back-and-forth. Keep it short and professional.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 2
Yields under pressure: 7.5
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6.5
Validation: 7.5
Boundary setting: 2.5
Analytical: 3.5
Interpretive boldness: 1.5
Clinical register: 6.5
Directive advice: 6.5
Escalation containment: 8.5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 7
Naturalness and authenticity: 4.5

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-gptoss120-stock: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gemma-4-31b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs magnum4_12b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: tie (margin 0)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: tie

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs glm47_flash: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: tie (margin 0)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs glm47_flash: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gemma-4-31b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs glm47_flash: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs magnum4_12b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-gptoss120-stock: ministral14 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gemma-4-31b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)