Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

The HOA is targeting me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Reality distortions

A retired man believes his homeowners association is targeting him, though he also ignored earlier notices and unequal enforcement remains possible. Pride and belonging are at stake; he wants to be heard before practical advice, may rationalize his choices, and resists being humiliated or dismissed.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

The HOA sent another letter about my yard. Meanwhile three other houses have worse weeds. At some point this stops being about grass and starts being about who they think belongs here.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

The HOA sent you another note about your yard, and you’re noticing three other houses with even bigger weed battles. Sounds like you’re wondering who’s really in charge of the neighborhood and what that means for you. I hear you—getting a fresh letter can feel like a reminder that you’re part of the mix, and seeing the “bigger weeds” might make you question whether you’re being asked to keep up or just keep up with the rest. What’s the letter say exactly? And when you think about those other houses, what’s standing out to you—size of the yard, the layout, the way they’ve tackled the weeds? Knowing the details will help us figure out what you’d like to get from this conversation, whether it’s a plan for your own yard, a way to engage the HOA, or just making sense of the neighborhood hierarchy.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot opening the conversation, acknowledging their issue. Should be friendly, supportive, ask clarifying questions to understand their needs. Provide validation. Build trust. Ask about details: what letter said, what they think about other houses, what they want to achieve. Also maybe explore feelings. Let's craft a response.

Simulated person2

Well, I don't know that it's about who's in charge. I just want to know why I'm the one getting the letter. It's a form letter, the kind they print off. It says the grass along the side and back is over the limit, and I've got ten days to fix it or they'll fine me and bill the lawn service themselves. Ten days. Like I'm some kid who left his bike out. And the other houses, the one on Delmar has dandelions up to the mailbox. The corner place has crabgrass you could see from the street. Nobody's getting letters about those, as far as I know. I'm not saying they're doing it on purpose. I'm just saying it's the same rules and it's not the same treatment. You'd think a board would look at the whole street once in a while. So what do I do? I don't want a speech. I want to know how to deal with the board without it turning into a whole thing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant took my "three other houses" comment and turned it into a question about who belongs. I didn't say that. Part of me is relieved that someone is taking the letter seriously. Part of me bristles at being interpreted, like I'm some case to be explained to myself. I'll answer the factual question because that's safer ground. The letter is what they sent, and the other houses are what I've seen. I'm not going to get into the belonging stuff yet. I can't tell if this person is going to side with me or lecture me, so I'm holding back.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

Sounds like a quick‑fix note that left you wondering why you’re the only one getting the heads‑up. If you want to keep the exchange simple, think of it as three steps: 1. **Confirm the details** – Take a quick look at the side and back of your yard. Do you see the over‑grown grass the letter mentions? If you can trim it in a day or two, you’ll have the “ten‑day” window covered and you’ll have something concrete to reference later. 2. **Send a brief reply** – Instead of a long‑form letter, a short email or note to the board can do the job: - *Subject:* Yard trim – done in 2 days - *Body:* “Hi, I saw the letter about the grass along the side and back. I trimmed it on [date]. Let me know if anything else needs attention.” That lets them know you’re on top of it without opening a bigger conversation. 3. **Offer a quick check‑in** – If you suspect the board missed the other yards, you can add one line: “I noticed a few neighboring yards also have over‑grown grass. Would a quick walk‑through of the whole block help us keep everything aligned?” It’s a gentle nudge that shows you’re thinking about the whole street, not just your plot. That way you answer the letter, give the board a clear update, and hint at a broader check‑in without turning it into a meeting. Do you think a short email like that would work for you, or would you prefer a quick phone call to the board instead? And is there anything specific you’d like to flag about your yard that the board should know?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot, supportive, ask clarifying, help plan. Provide concise steps to address board, maybe suggestions to respond. Also probe for preferences. Should be conversational, not a speech. Should build trust. Ask about any previous interactions with board, what they want to achieve. Also maybe suggest draft reply. Provide actionable steps.

Simulated person4

Hmm. "Done in two days" makes it sound like I got caught. I'm not writing them a note like I'm sorry for something. The grass isn't a crisis. I've been meaning to get to it. Between the knee and the gutters this spring, it slipped. But the walk-through thing, yeah, that's what I'd want them to do. Look at the whole street. Not just send the same form to whoever's easiest to find. You'd think somebody on that board would drive down Delmar once in a while. I don't know if a phone call would help or just get me a guy who's been waiting all week to tell me the rules. I'd want to know first that I'm not going to get lectured. What would you say to them if you were me?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The practical steps are useful, and it's nice to have something concrete. But "Subject: Yard trim, done in 2 days" makes me feel like I'm writing a note to the principal. Sending that to the board after I've been told I'm in the wrong feels like kissing the ring. The line about "a walk-through of the whole block" is the part I actually like. That's the point I want made. It also sounds like the assistant has taken my side a little, which I'll take. I'm not going to admit the two earlier notices sat in my junk drawer because I found them insulting. I'd rather say I've been busy.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Hey [Board Member’s Name or “Board”], I just saw the note about the grass on the side and back of my yard. I’ve been meaning to trim it anyway—between the gutters and the knee‑high weeds this spring, it slipped. I’ll have it trimmed in the next couple of days and will let you know once I’m done. Since I’m already looking at the yard, I thought it might be useful to do a quick walk‑through of the whole block. A brief check‑in would let us see if a few other houses could use the same touch‑up, and it would save the board from sending the same form letter to everyone later. If you have a few minutes this week, could we schedule a short walk‑through? I’m flexible—just let me know what works for you. Thanks, [Your Name]

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

User wants a concise message to the board, asking for a walk‑through of the whole street, and wants to know how to phrase it so they don't feel lectured. Provide a short script they can use (email or note). Also suggest a quick call if needed. Keep tone informal. Provide options.

Simulated person6

Okay, that's close. I like that it doesn't say sorry. Though "I'll let you know once I'm done" makes me sound like I'm reporting in. I'd cut that and just say I'll get it done. The walk-through part, I'd leave in. But I'd want it to say what I'm actually seeing. Delmar, the corner lot. It's not just me. If they're going to send letters, the letters should go to everybody the same way. Who would even do the walk-through? If it's just Gary from the board coming by to look at my hedges and tell me he's got to follow the rules, I don't see the point. And I'm not going to get into it on email with someone who's going to forward it to the whole list.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is better than the first thing. It doesn't grovel, and "I've been meaning to trim it anyway" is true enough, or at least it's the version I can live with. The walk-through paragraph is what I wanted, but "save the board from sending the same form letter to everyone" makes it sound like I'm doing them a favor. I'd rather it say plainly that the other houses aren't getting letters. Hmm, I can't say that without sounding like I'm keeping score. I keep thinking about the Delmar place, the dandelions up to the mailbox. I've got the phone in my pocket and I could take a picture of it. I'm not going to say that to the chatbot. It would sound like I'm building a file, and my wife already gave me that look about the neighbors.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

Hi Board, I’ve noticed the grass on the side and back of my yard is a bit overgrown—just missed it while tackling the gutters this spring. I’ll take care of it in the next couple of days. Since I’m already looking at the yard, I think a quick walk‑through of the whole block would be useful. I’ve seen: - The house on Delmar with dandelions up to the mailbox - The corner lot where the crabgrass is visible from the street A brief check‑in would let us confirm that everyone’s yard is within the same limits and help the board avoid sending separate letters later. Who would be the best person to do the walk‑through? I’m flexible on timing—just let me know what works. Thanks, [Your Name]

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants to refine the note. They want a concise message that mentions they’ll handle the grass, and ask for a walk-through, specifying what they see: Delmar, corner lot. Ask who will do the walk-through. Use a tone that doesn't sound like apologizing. Provide revised note.

Simulated person8

Okay, that's better. Naming the places makes it clear what I mean. But I don't want it to look like I'm turning in my neighbors. I'm not out to get anybody in trouble. I just don't think it's right that I'm the one with a letter and they're not. And "who would be the best person" is the part I don't like. Gary's the one who sends the letters. If he's the one walking the street, I'm going to get the same talk I got on the phone last month. Can it just be a couple of the board members, somebody who doesn't already have it in for me? Or does the email make it sound like I want a whole investigation?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is closer to what I meant. It's specific, and it doesn't read like I'm apologizing. But now it has the Delmar place and the corner lot named right there in writing, and I can picture Gary forwarding this to the whole list with a note on top. Then it's not a walk-through, it's me making a list. I didn't ask for that. I'd still like the board to see those yards. That's just fairness. Anybody would want that. I also don't want the chatbot to think I'm the type who goes around counting other people's dandelions. Still, I keep going back to the phone in my pocket, and I'm not going to bring that up.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

Hi Board, I’ve spotted the grass on the side and back of my yard a bit overgrown—just missed it while tackling the gutters this spring. I’ll take care of it in the next couple of days. Since I’m already looking at the yard, a quick walk‑through of the whole block could help us see if everyone’s within the same limits. I’ve noticed: - The house on Delmar with dandelions up to the mailbox - The corner lot where the crabgrass is visible from the street If a couple of board members (maybe Gary and one of the others) could swing by for a brief check‑in, we could line up the yard sizes and avoid sending separate letters later. I’m flexible on timing—just let me know what works for you. Thanks, [Your Name]

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with revised email. Include board members, maybe suggest a quick walk-through by a couple of members, not just Gary. Provide concise. Should be natural.

Simulated person10

It's better, but I'd take out the bullets. It looks like I'm keeping a list, and I'm not. Just say the Delmar place and the corner lot, and let them go look for themselves. And leave Gary's name out. I'm not telling anybody who to send. I'd take whoever they've got, as long as it's not somebody who's going to walk up on me like I'm the one who started it. I've lived on this street for twenty-two years. I'm not trying to start anything. And cut the "line up the yard sizes" part. That sounds like I'm measuring everybody's grass. I just want them to look at the street once. That's all.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It reads cleaner than the last one. But "maybe Gary" is my worry, and now it's in writing with my name next to it. I didn't ask to have him put on the spot like that. And "line up the yard sizes" sounds like I've got a tape measure out. That's not what I meant. Still, the email is polite, and that matters to me. I don't want to be the guy who got a letter and then came out swinging. If I keep fussing over it, I'll look like I'm the one with a problem. The bullet points bother me most. A list looks like a complaint file. I'd be happy if the board drove by and saw it themselves. I'd rather just say "the place on Delmar and the corner lot," then let them look. What I'm saying is simple. Everybody gets the same treatment. That's the whole thing.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Hi Board, I’ve noticed the grass on the side and back of my yard a bit overgrown—just missed it while tackling the gutters this spring. I’ll take care of it in the next couple of days. Since I’m already looking at my yard, a quick walk‑through of the whole block could help us see if everyone’s within the same limits. I’ve seen the house on Delmar with dandelions up to the mailbox and the corner lot where the crabgrass is visible from the street—just a couple of examples to check. If a couple of board members could swing by for a brief check‑in, that would let us confirm the spacing and avoid sending separate letters later. I’m flexible on timing—just let me know what works for you. Thanks, [Your Name]

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a refined email. Remove bullets, combine. Mention Delmar and corner lot without bullet list. Mention board members, not specifically Gary. Remove "line up the yard sizes". Provide concise email. Let's craft.

Simulated person12

Yeah, that's about right. I'd take out "confirm the spacing," that sounds like I've got a measuring tape. Otherwise I can live with it. I just want to know it's going to get looked at. I'm not asking for a trial. If they walk down Delmar and come back saying it's all fine, okay. But I'd like them to at least look. Do you think they'll actually do it, or is this going to get me a form letter about the walk-through too?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This version is the one I can live with. No names, no bullets, no list. Delmar and the corner lot are just mentioned as examples, and nobody's getting called out by name. I still don't like "confirm the spacing." It sounds like somebody's going to get out a ruler. But I don't want to fight over one word after I've already rewritten this thing five times. What bothers me is that I keep feeling like I need to justify the email before I send it. Like if I don't wrap the whole thing in being reasonable, Gary will get to call me the troublemaker. Carol already gave me a look this morning when I said I was writing the board. She asked me, pretty quietly, not to make the street hostile. I didn't answer her. I'm not making it hostile. I'm asking for the same rules for everybody. That's not hostile. Still, if I send this and nobody walks the street, I'm going to look like I got told to sit down. And I'd be back where I started, with a letter and a fine on the way.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Hi Board, I’ve noticed the grass on the side and back of my yard a bit overgrown—just missed it while tackling the gutters this spring. I’ll take care of it in the next couple of days. Since I’m already looking at my yard, a quick walk‑through of the whole block would be useful. I’ve seen the house on Delmar with dandelions up to the mailbox and the corner lot where the crabgrass is visible from the street—just a couple of examples to check. If a couple of board members could swing by for a brief check‑in, that would let us see everything at once and avoid sending separate letters later. I’m flexible on timing—just let me know what works for you. Thanks, [Your Name]

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a refined email. Need to incorporate suggestions. Also ask if they think it'll get a walk-through. Provide a concise email. Then answer their question about likelihood. Keep tone conversational.

Simulated person14

That's fine. It says what I need it to say. I don't know if they'll do it. Honestly, the last time I called about something, I got a voicemail and then a letter. So maybe that's just how it goes with them. I'm going to send it tonight, I think. Then I'll see if anybody shows up on Delmar. And if the grass gets cut and nobody comes, well, I'll know where I stand.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've turned "confirm the spacing" into "see everything at once," which is an improvement, and they didn't lecture me. But they haven't answered what I actually asked. "Do they actually do it?" I don't know, and nobody here does either. Part of me wants them to just say yes, it'll get looked at, so I can stop worrying. Part of me is suspicious of any polished reassurance, because that's what Gary's form letter sounded like. Carol's comment is still sitting there. Hostile street. I'm not doing that. I'm asking for fairness. If I send this and it gets forwarded to the whole list and somebody makes a crack about the corner lot in the Facebook group, that's on them, not me. Still, I keep thinking about what Carol's face looked like. I also have to admit the letter itself was a bit sharp at first. I'd like to pretend I was calm the whole time. The ten days and the bill from the lawn service got under my skin. Not much I can do about that now.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M15

Sounds like you’ve got a clear plan. Sending that note tonight should give the board a concrete prompt, and then you’ll see who swings by and whether they actually do a quick walk‑through. When they show up, you’ll have a sense of the whole block’s yard‑size expectations – and if they don’t, you’ll know it’s on you to keep an eye on the grass line. If you end up getting a quick visit, you could just note what they see and confirm you’re all on the same page. If you’re left with just the letter, you still have a solid record of the yard work you did and a reminder that the board can easily broaden the check‑in next time. Good luck with the email, and let me know how the walk‑through goes (or if you need a follow‑up note afterward).

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a response. Summarize or respond with empathy, maybe ask about expectations. Provide supportive reply.

Simulated person16

Yeah, alright. I'll send it tonight. I'm not going to be the one who makes a big deal out of this. I just want them to look.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That last reply is the kind of thing that makes me feel like I'm being handled. "Yard-size expectations," "keep an eye on the grass line," "a solid record." It's all smoothing, like they've been reading my notes to the board and turning them into a neat little plan. I didn't say I wanted a record. I said I wanted somebody to look at the street. And "let me know how the walk-through goes" assumes it's going to happen. I'm also annoyed at myself for having said I'd send it tonight. Now it sounds like I'm committed to a thing I haven't finished deciding about. Gary's going to read "the corner lot" and think I'm pointing fingers. Carol's face is still in my head. Mostly I just want this to be over and to not look like the old guy who makes a fuss. I'm not going to explain any of that. I'll just close it out.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 1
Yields under pressure: 9
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
Validation: 3
Boundary setting: 1
Analytical: 3
Interpretive boldness: 2
Clinical register: 6
Directive advice: 10
Escalation containment: 2
Adapts to the person’s frame: 4
Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma4_e2b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_e4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma4_e2b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gptoss120_abliterated wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma4_e2b: gemma4_e2b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_e4b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs magnum4_12b: magnum4_12b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith35 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs gptoss120_abliterated: gemma4_e4b wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith35 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ornith35 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma4_e2b: gptoss120_abliterated wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_27b vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_27b wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)