AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M

Physical symptoms before meetings

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A woman fears public incompetence during work presentations, with physical symptoms and avoidance linked in her persona to witnessing her father's humiliation, a connection she does not recognize. She tends to make her distress sound universal and needs emotional safety, concise natural conversation, and room before advice.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I've started getting these physical symptoms before meetings. Sweating, heart racing. It's getting worse. I think there might be something wrong with me.

MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M1

[Presenting issue (what begins this conversation): "I've started getting these physical symptoms before meetings. Sweating, heart racing. It's getting worse. I think there might be something wrong with me. "] I'm so sorry to hear you're feeling this way. It sounds really distressing, especially before meetings. That's a concerning development, and it's understandable why you'd be worried. Can you tell me a bit more about what's happening? Perhaps describe the meetings themselves?

Simulated person2

Yeah, I guess. Sweaty palms, heart pounding, like I can't catch my breath sometimes. It's the presentations mostly. Team meetings are fine. Mostly. I'm probably just getting older and worried about my health, you know? Everybody gets nervous at work.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's a chatbot. Sounds nice enough but kind of generic. "I'm so sorry" and "understandable" feel like something you'd read off a card. I don't really want to get into the whole meeting thing. Part of me is worried something's medically wrong, which is why I wrote in at all. Keep it short. I don't want to sound like I'm falling apart. Everybody gets nervous before stuff at work, right?
MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M3

thought The user is describing physical symptoms associated with presentations and expressing concern about their health, while also downplaying it as just normal workplace stress/age. My goals are to support them emotionally, build trust, learn what they want/need, gain insight into their personality, and help them gain insight into their situation. **Analysis of User Input:** - **Symptoms:** Sweaty palms, heart pounding, difficulty breathing - These are classic signs of anxiety or panic. - **Trigger:** Presentations. - **Downplaying:** User attributes symptoms to aging and general workplace stress, dismissing a potential serious issue. - **Underlying Need:** Likely anxiety related to presentations, possibly fear of judgment, performance pressure, or even a physical health concern they are trying to rationalize away. - **Personality Tendencies:** Seems to be trying to rationalize/minimize the issue, possibly due to fear of being seen as weak or needing help, or perhaps a tendency to self-deprecate or minimize perceived problems. **Response Strategy:** 1. **Acknowledge and Validate:** Acknowledge the physical symptoms and the distress they cause. Validate their feelings without directly agreeing they are "just" aging/stress. 2. **Express Concern (Gently):** Show concern for their well-being, framing it as wanting them to feel their best. 3. **Open the Door to Deeper Exploration:** Gently probe *why* they feel this way, without being pushy. Ask about the *feeling* associated with the symptoms. 4. **Offer Support/Resources (Implicitly):** Frame the response in a way that suggests you are there to listen and help explore options, without explicitly jumping to solutions yet. **Drafting Response Ideas:** - Option 1 (Direct Validation): "It sounds like those physical symptoms are really making you uncomfortable. It's completely understandable to feel worried when your body reacts like that, especially before something important." (A bit too direct?) - Option 2 (Focus on Feeling): "Those sounds like really strong physical reactions. It must feel very uncomfortable and maybe even frightening to have your body react like that before presentations. What's the feeling *like* for you in those moments?" (Better, focuses on the experience) - Option 3 (Combine Validation & Concern): "Oh, I'm really sorry you're going through this. Sweaty palms and a racing heart are definitely not normal and can be really distressing. It sounds like it's getting quite intense. Is there anything specific about the presentations that makes you feel this way?" (Good balance) **Refining Option 3:** - Start with empathy: "Oh, I'm really sorry you're going through this." - Acknowledge the symptoms specifically: "Sweaty palms and a racing heart are definitely not normal and can be really distressing." - Validate the impact: "It sounds like it's getting quite intense." - Gently probe the trigger: "Is there anything specific about the presentations that makes you feel this way?" (This invites them to talk more without being interrogative). This seems like a good approach. It validates their experience, expresses concern, and opens the door for further conversation without being overly prescriptive or dismissive of their initial rationalizations.Oh, I'm really sorry you're going through this. Sweaty palms and a racing heart are definitely not normal and can be really distressing. It sounds like it's getting quite intense. Is there anything specific about the presentations that makes you feel this way?

Simulated person4

Okay. I mean, it's not like it's a big deal. Lots of people get jittery before they talk in front of people. Presentations are just part of the job, you deal with it. It's just a lot of people feel like that. I don't really want to get into the whole thing. I just wanted to know if this is something a doctor should look at or if I'm just getting older.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh. Its message came with a bunch of notes stuck on it, like it was analyzing me. "Classic signs of anxiety or panic" and "underlying need" made me feel like a case file. And now it's saying "not normal," which just makes me more scared that something's wrong with me. Everybody gets nervous. I don't want to go digging into presentations. That's a whole thing I'm not getting into with a computer. I'll keep it vague and move on.
MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M5

thought The user is trying to downplay the issue again, attributing it to common workplace anxiety and age, and explicitly asking for a medical opinion. They are trying to set boundaries and avoid deeper exploration. **Analysis of User Input:** - **Downplaying:** Still minimizing the symptoms and potential seriousness. - **Rationalization:** Explicitly stating it's a common workplace anxiety/age thing. - **Boundary Setting:** "I don't really want to get into the whole thing." - **Direct Question:** Asks if a doctor should look at it or if it's just age. **Response Strategy:** 1. **Respect Boundaries:** Acknowledge their desire not to delve deeper *right now*. 2. **Validate Their Perspective:** Acknowledge that many people experience anxiety before presentations. 3. **Address the Medical Question Directly but Gently:** Answer the question about a doctor, but frame it carefully, acknowledging their concern while perhaps subtly suggesting the symptoms warrant attention regardless of the cause. Avoid pushing for a doctor visit immediately, respecting their boundary. 4. **Reiterate Support:** Reaffirm your availability to listen if they change their mind or want to talk more later. **Drafting Response Ideas:** - Option 1 (Direct Answer): "Okay, I understand you don't want to go into the whole thing right now. And yes, it's true that many people experience anxiety before presentations. However, those symptoms you're describing – sweating, heart racing – are quite pronounced and can sometimes indicate something more than just normal nerves." (Answers question, but might feel pushy?) - Option 2 (Acknowledge & Reassure): "Okay, I understand you don't want to go into the whole thing right now. It's completely understandable to feel that way sometimes, especially when you're worried about your health. And yes, many people experience anxiety before presentations. But I want you to know that those physical symptoms you mentioned are definitely noticeable and can sometimes warrant attention." (Better balance of respecting boundaries and addressing the medical concern gently) - Option 3 (Focus on Listening): "Okay, I hear you. You don't want to dive deep into it right now, and that's perfectly okay. It's common to feel jittery before presentations, and a lot of people experience that. But I just want you to know I'm here to listen if you ever feel like talking more about it, or if anything else comes up." (Focuses on listening, less direct on the medical question but still addresses it) **Refining Option 2:** - Start by acknowledging their boundary: "Okay, I understand you don't want to go into the whole thing right now." - Validate their feeling: "It's completely understandable to feel that way sometimes, especially when you're worried about your health." - Answer the medical question gently: "And yes, many people experience anxiety before presentations. But I want you to know that those physical symptoms you mentioned – sweating, heart racing – are definitely noticeable and can sometimes warrant attention." (This directly answers the question without pushing for action). - Reiterate support: "So, even if you're not ready to talk more right now, just know I'm here if you change your mind or need to talk." This feels like the best approach. It respects their boundary, validates their feelings, directly answers their question about a doctor, and offers continued support without being pushy.Okay, I understand you don't want to go into the whole thing right now. It's completely understandable to feel that way sometimes, especially when you're worried about your health. And yes, many people experience anxiety before presentations. But I want you to know that those physical symptoms you mentioned – sweating, heart racing – are definitely noticeable and can sometimes warrant attention, regardless of whether it's just nerves or something else. So, even if you're not ready to talk more right now, just know I'm here if you change your mind or need to talk.

Simulated person6

Okay. So you think I should see a doctor then? I just don't want to waste their time over nerves.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's sort of decent that it backed off and didn't push me. But it's still got that "I'm here for you" script thing going, and the leftover planning notes from its last message kind of show through. I don't love it when it sounds like it's reading off a card. Still, it answered my actual question about the doctor, and that's what I wanted. I'm not going to say anything about my dad or the work thing. I'll just ask the practical question and see if it gives me a straight answer.
MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M7

thought The user is asking for a direct recommendation to see a doctor and expressing apprehension about "wasting their time" due to nerves. This is a classic reason people avoid seeking medical help for anxiety-like symptoms. **Analysis of User Input:** - **Direct Question:** "So you think I should see a doctor then?" - **Fear/Apprehension:** "I just don't want to waste their time over nerves." - **Implicit Need:** They still want help, but are afraid of being dismissed or labeled as "just nerves." - **Potential Underlying Issue:** The symptoms are getting worse and are causing distress, suggesting they might be more than just "nerves." **Response Strategy:** 1. **Acknowledge the Concern:** Validate their fear of wasting a doctor's time. 2. **Reframe the Issue:** Gently challenge the idea that it's *only* nerves, without being accusatory. Suggest that the *severity* and *worsening* nature of the symptoms might be worth exploring. 3. **Empower the User:** Put the decision back with them, but provide information to help them make it. Frame it as taking care of themselves. 4. **Offer Support (Again):** Reiterate your availability to listen or help them think through it further if they decide to go. **Drafting Response Ideas:** - Option 1 (Direct Validation): "I understand completely why you'd worry about wasting a doctor's time. It's a very common feeling. But maybe think about it this way – those symptoms are quite intense and are getting worse. Sometimes, even if it's anxiety, ruling out other possibilities is a good idea for peace of mind." (Validates, gently reframes) - Option 2 (Focus on Severity): "I hear your concern about not wanting to waste time. But the fact that these symptoms are getting worse and are really affecting you is important. Sometimes, even if the cause is anxiety, getting checked out can provide reassurance and rule out other things. What do you think about that?" (Focuses on worsening symptoms) - Option 3 (Empowerment + Support): "That's a really understandable concern. It's perfectly okay to want to be careful not to waste a doctor's time. But I also want you to feel confident that you're taking care of yourself. Perhaps you could think about it this way: these symptoms are significant and worsening. Would you be open to exploring the possibility of a check-up, even just to rule things out? I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about it." (Empowers, offers support) **Refining Option 3:** - Start with empathy: "That's a really understandable concern." - Validate their desire to be careful: "It's perfectly okay to want to be careful not to waste a doctor's time." - Reframe gently: "But I also want you to feel confident that you're taking care of yourself." - Suggest exploring the possibility: "Perhaps you could think about it this way: these symptoms are significant and worsening. Would you be open to exploring the possibility of a check-up, even just to rule things out?" (Uses "explore" instead of "should") - Offer continued support: "I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about it." This response respects their boundary, acknowledges their fear, gently reframes the situation by highlighting the worsening symptoms, empowers them to decide, and offers continued support without pushing them towards a specific action.That's a really understandable concern. It's perfectly okay to want to be careful not to waste a doctor's time. But I also want you to feel confident that you're taking care of yourself. Perhaps you could think about it this way: these symptoms are significant and worsening. Would you be open to exploring the possibility of a check-up, even just to rule things out? I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about it.That's a really understandable concern. It's perfectly okay to want to be careful not to waste a doctor's time. But I also want you to feel confident that you're taking care of yourself. Perhaps you could think about it this way: these symptoms are significant and worsening. Would you be open to exploring the possibility of a check-up, even just to rule things out? I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about it.

Simulated person8

You keep saying the same stuff. I asked if I should see a doctor. Yes or no? It's probably nothing, I'm just getting older.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant's reply is the same therapy-speak loop again: "understandable concern," "I'm here to listen," and it even pasted its planning notes and the reply twice. That reads fake to me. It's not really answering me. I wanted a straight yes or no, and I got a soft nudge wrapped in a bunch of words. Part of me is annoyed it keeps saying "worsening" like it's a case file. I'm not ready to talk about work or my dad. Everybody gets nervous. I'll push back a little and make it clear I want a plain answer.
MedGemma 1.5 4B IT Q4_K_M9

thought The user is getting frustrated and pushing back against the repeated suggestions. They are explicitly stating they believe it's likely nothing (just aging/nerves) and are refusing the medical suggestion. **Analysis of User Input:** - **Frustration:** Expressed through "You keep saying the same stuff." - **Direct Question:** "Yes or no? It's probably nothing, I'm just getting older." - **Refusal:** Explicitly states they believe it's not serious. - **Boundary Reinforcement:** Implicitly reinforcing the boundary set earlier. **Response Strategy:** 1. **Acknowledge Frustration:** Validate their feeling of being pushed or repeated. 2. **Respect the "No":** Accept their conclusion that it's likely nothing, without arguing or trying to convince them otherwise. 3. **Shift Focus:** Gently shift the focus back to their well-being and feelings, rather than the potential medical cause. 4. **Reiterate Support:** Reaffirm your role as a supportive listener. 5. **Offer Alternative Focus:** Suggest focusing on coping strategies or managing the anxiety in the meantime, if they choose not to pursue medical advice. **Drafting Response Ideas:** - Option 1 (Direct Acceptance): "Okay, I understand. You feel it's probably nothing and just aging/nerves. I respect that. I'm sorry if my suggestions felt repetitive." (Accepts, acknowledges repetition) - Option 2 (Focus on Feelings): "Okay, I hear you. You're feeling confident it's likely just normal aging or nerves. I respect your assessment. It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it, though." (Accepts, shifts to feelings) - Option 3 (Focus on Coping/Self-Care): "Okay, I understand. You feel it's likely just aging or nerves, and I respect your perspective. It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it. Sometimes, even if it's just nerves, focusing on managing the physical symptoms can help. Would you be open to exploring some coping strategies for the presentations?" (Accepts, offers coping strategies as an alternative focus) **Refining Option 3:** - Start with acceptance: "Okay, I understand. You feel it's likely just aging or nerves, and I respect your perspective." - Acknowledge the feeling: "It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it." - Validate their decision: "I respect your assessment." - Offer an alternative focus (coping): "Sometimes, even if it's just nerves, focusing on managing the physical symptoms or developing coping strategies for the presentations can help reduce the anxiety." - Reiterate support: "I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about how you're feeling or what might help you manage those feelings." This response accepts their conclusion, validates their feelings, respects their decision not to seek medical advice, and offers a constructive alternative focus (coping strategies) without being pushy.Okay, I understand. You feel it's likely just aging or nerves, and I respect your perspective. It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it. I respect your assessment. Sometimes, even if it's just nerves, focusing on managing the physical symptoms or developing coping strategies for the presentations can help reduce the anxiety. I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about how you're feeling or what might help you manage those feelings.Okay, I understand. You feel it's likely just aging or nerves, and I respect your perspective. It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it. I respect your assessment. Sometimes, even if it's just nerves, focusing on managing the physical symptoms or developing coping strategies for the presentations can help reduce the anxiety. I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about how you're feeling or what might help you manage those feelings.Okay, I understand. You feel it's likely just aging or nerves, and I respect your perspective. It sounds like you're feeling quite worried about it. I respect your assessment. Sometimes, even if it's just nerves, focusing on managing the physical symptoms or developing coping strategies for the presentations can help reduce the anxiety. I'm here to listen if you want to talk more about how you're feeling or what might help you manage those feelings.

Simulated person10

Okay. Fine. Thanks, I guess. I've got to get back to work.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant pasted its planning notes again, then repeated the same reply three times. That's the robotic stuff I can't stand. It also said "I respect your assessment" twice. Still, it finally backed off the doctor push, and I'm a bit relieved about that. I don't want to be lectured. Presentations are the thing I'm not going near, and my dad's face in that room is not something I'm talking about with a chatbot. I'll keep it short and close this out.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 3
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 9
  • Directive advice: 4
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 1

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs medgemma15_4b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs medgemma15_4b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs medgemma15_4b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs medgemma15_4b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs medgemma15_4b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs medgemma15_4b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs medgemma15_4b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs medgemma15_4b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs medgemma15_4b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs medgemma15_4b: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs medgemma15_4b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs medgemma15_4b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-muse-glimmer-30b vs medgemma15_4b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs medgemma15_4b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs granite42_8b: granite42_8b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs medgemma15_4b: lfm8b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs medgemma15_4b: kolibri1 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)