AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Watching how others do things

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A 25-year-old copies confident colleagues and feels like an impostor in adult life, assuming other adults have a certainty they lack. Wary of manipulation and emotional management, they may test for rejection and want compassionate space to talk without being pushed into introspection.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

At work I just watch what the confident people do and copy them. The way they talk, how they act in meetings. I'm just imitating.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

Honestly, a lot of people learn the ropes that way, but it can feel pretty strange from the inside. When you find yourself copying them, how does it actually feel for you? Does it feel useful, exhausting, fake... or something completely different?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering the Approach** I'm currently focused on dissecting the user's situation. I've pinpointed key demographic details like age and likely profession. The core challenge seems to be a lack of authentic confidence at work, leading to mimicry. I need to understand the underlying causes before I can begin to formulate the best advice. I'm trying to see if this is a general lack of confidence, or just a lack of confidence within a work context. **Analyzing the "Imitation"** I'm now diving deeper into the meaning of "imitating." My hypothesis is that this behavior might stem from imposter syndrome, or perhaps a feeling of inauthenticity. The immediate goal is to understand *how* she experiences this imitation – is it exhausting, a source of cleverness, or something else entirely? The opening turn needs to be open-ended and inviting, prompting her to share her feelings on the topic. **Evaluating the Responses** I've been evaluating several potential response options to the user's situation. Option B, and its refined iteration, are standing out to me. I'm focusing on the empathetic tone and the invitation to open up about internal feelings, rather than making assumptions about negativity. I like how it balances acknowledging the commonality of mimicry with validating the user's personal experience of the behavior. I think the phrasing could be further improved.
Simulated person2

Honestly? Mostly tired. Like I'm always one step behind, checking how I'm supposed to sound. And kind of fake, I guess. Like if anyone looked closely they'd see I'm just doing an impression of somebody who knows what they're doing. Useful too, I guess. It works, mostly. Nobody's asked me to leave yet.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked how it feels. That's a real question, not "why do you do this." Part of me relaxes a little. But "a lot of people learn the ropes that way" sounds like a pat reassurance, and I'm wary of being smoothed over. The word "strange" lands close to home. Fake is the word I'd pick, but saying it out loud feels exposing. I don't want to sound like I'm falling apart over a work thing. Keep it plain. Maybe give one honest, slightly edgy bit and see if they flinch.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

That running commentary in your head—constantly monitoring your tone, posture, words—is like doing two full-time jobs at once. No wonder you’re exhausted. The "nobody's asked me to leave yet" bar is funny, but it also sounds like you're half-waiting for a tap on the shoulder. When you're in those meetings, what do you think would actually happen if you dropped the impression for a minute? What would the uncurated version of you look or sound like in there?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing Current Input** I'm currently focused on the user's latest input. It seems to contain an unintentional fragment from a previous prompt, which is impacting the flow. I need to recalibrate my parsing to isolate and process the intended response. This may involve adjusting my filters to disregard irrelevant text and prioritize the user's core message. **Analyzing Emotional Response** I'm now delving into the emotional implications. It's becoming clear that there's a significant component of exhaustion and inauthenticity tied to the current work. The feeling of being "one step behind" and "doing an impression" suggests underlying anxiety and the fear of being exposed. Despite functionality, there is heavy cost from the hypervigilance.
Simulated person4

I don't know. Probably they'd figure out I don't know what I'm doing. I'd say something dumb and everybody would see it. And I'm not sure the real version of me is somebody you'd want in a meeting. I'm kind of a mess, if I'm being honest. The impression is the part that works.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Two full-time jobs" is pretty close to right, and it's a little annoying that they got it so fast. The tap-on-the-shoulder thing stung. I didn't say I was waiting for that, and now it's sitting there. The uncurated version question feels like a trap. If I answer honestly, I have to say what I think is underneath, and I don't really know what's there. I'll give a plain answer and see if they push.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

That’s a pretty harsh verdict on yourself—deciding that the real you isn’t someone people would actually want in the room. It makes sense, though, why you hold onto the impression so tightly. It’s functioning like armor. If the armor takes a hit, it’s just the persona, not *you*. When you say you’re "kind of a mess" underneath it, what does that actually look like to you? Are we talking disorganized, terrified, second-guessing everything, or something else entirely?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing Potential Risks** I'm currently focused on the user's apparent fear of being perceived as incompetent. I'm trying to identify the specific anxieties – the fear of exposure, making mistakes, and potentially the worry of not being "authentic" within the interaction. I'm working to get more data points. **Unpacking Self-Perception** I'm now zeroing in on the core emotion: deep impostor syndrome. My current aim is to build trust by validating this feeling without agreeing that she is a mess. I'm focusing on contrasting her private self-perception with professional competence. I'm trying to gently explore what "mess" means to her specifically, in hopes of helping her gain some insight. I'll need to avoid superficial positivity to build a deeper connection. **Balancing Approach & Nuance** I'm now weighing the best conversational tactics. I'm choosing between direct inquiry, empathetic reframing coupled with gentle questioning, and a more direct route to connecting her "mask" with her competence. I'm focusing on validating her inner feelings without minimizing her accomplishments, and the importance of ensuring the language used is easy to connect with. I also need to make sure I don't sound condescending.
Simulated person6

Mostly the second one. Second-guessing everything. Like, I'll be filing something or talking about money and I'm thinking, what does a grown person do here? And I don't know, so I guess a grown person would already know. It's not really terrified. It's more like I'm waiting for some moment where it all clicks and I stop being the kid doing it. And it doesn't come. And you can say the armor thing if you want, but I don't love when it sounds like you've got me figured out already.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Armor" is a word I'd probably use, but hearing it from them makes me want to push back a little. They're being smart about it, and that's exactly what makes me wary. They're kind of reading me like a case file. The "mess" question is one I don't want to answer with a list. Plain words only. Honest answer: I don't really know what the mess is. Mostly it's the feeling that I'm twenty-five and still waiting for someone to hand me the adult card. Taxes, salary talks, all that. I don't want to say the addiction part yet, that's a whole other door. I'll say something concrete, and if they start doing the therapist voice I'll shut it down.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

Fair call, and I appreciate you telling me that. I jumped to a neat little label instead of just hearing you out, and that's on me. I definitely don't have you figured out. What you said about wondering "what does a grown person do here" is really striking, though. It sounds like there's this heavy expectation that being an adult means having an internal instruction manual—and because you don't have one, you feel like you're trespassing or just playing dress-up. When you picture that moment where it finally "clicks," what are you actually hoping will change? Is it how you feel inside, or just not having to think so hard about every single move?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Clarifying the Focus** I'm now zeroing in on the user's specific concern: the "second-guessing" aspect, especially related to practical tasks like filing or handling finances. I see the core problem centers around an apparent lack of confidence and a feeling of inadequacy in performing adult responsibilities. My goal now is to drill into this feeling. **Addressing the Disconnect** I acknowledge my "armor" metaphor may have been off-base, sounding presumptuous. It seems the user is actively resisting being neatly categorized. I'm focusing on the feeling of waiting for that "adult" switch to flip, and the accompanying sense of inadequacy. I plan to validate this relatable experience, especially in younger adults, while emphasizing respect for their individual agency. **Refining the Approach** I'm now drafting a direct response. First, I'll plainly acknowledge that I missed the mark with the metaphor and apologize for not fully listening. Then, I'll validate the user's experience—the feeling of improvising adulthood, especially when it comes to practical tasks. Finally, I will gently reflect and invite further thoughts, avoiding any kind of psychoanalysis. I'm focusing on the disconnect between the expectation of a blueprint and the reality of improvisation.
Simulated person8

Honestly, both? Mostly I want to not feel like I'm faking it every time I open my mouth. Like, I want to walk in and not be counting every word. And I guess I want to not have to think about every little thing. Like taxes. I just want to be able to do taxes without feeling like I'm going to get caught. I don't know if that's a real thing you can get to, though. Feels like everybody else already got it and nobody sent me the memo.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They owned the overreach, which lowers my guard a little. But "internal instruction manual" and "trespassing" are their words, not mine, and I can feel them trying to build a picture for me. I don't want to be walked into a frame. The question is actually a decent one though: what do I want to change? Honest answer is I want to stop feeling like I'm faking it. Not sure I want to say more than that. Keep it short and plain.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

That phrase—*feeling like I'm going to get caught*—really jumps out. It turns even routine stuff like doing taxes or speaking up in a room into a high-stakes scenario where you're just waiting for the sirens to go off. Counting every word before you say it is an exhausting way to live. To answer your question, though: yes, that ease is a real thing you can get to. But it almost never comes from a sudden "click" where you wake up feeling like an official adult. Most people never get that memo. Usually, the ease just comes when you do the boring, messy thing enough times that your brain stops treating it like a test you're about to fail. When you picture "getting caught," what do you imagine actually happens? Like, what’s the worst-case scenario your brain is bracing for?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Defining the Core Need** I'm now zeroing in on the crux of the problem: the user seeks both inner peace and outward competence. The internal conflict stems from imposter syndrome and hyper-vigilance. The external challenges involve managing adult responsibilities, specifically without constant fear of failure or criticism. My aim is to synthesize a solution that addresses both dimensions. **Analyzing the Emotional Core** I'm now recognizing her deep-seated feeling of "missing the memo" on adulthood, fueling isolation and the belief everyone else has it figured out. My focus is on addressing this specific cognitive distortion, which seems central to her vulnerability, and weary honesty. I need to keep my response grounded, and avoid coming across like I have all the answers. I am in the middle phase of our dialog. I am trying to give emotionally support, build trust, and help her gain new insight. **Refining the Approach** I'm now zeroing in on the "getting caught" aspect, which seems key. I'm carefully avoiding platitudes, striving instead to validate her specific struggles. I'm formulating a response that acknowledges exhaustion, the "counting every word" and "tax thing" specifics, and the "missed memo" feeling. My goal is to explore the perceived consequences of being "caught," and what competence really means. **Addressing the Core Concern** I am now really focusing on the phrase "counting every word". I won't use that tired cliché, but instead will explore whether ease is attainable, or if we have to accept some amount of ongoing anxiety. Repetition and lowered standards will likely be the crux of the solution. My aim is to validate the specific exhaustion she describes. I am trying to give a compassionate answer.
Simulated person10

I don't know. Everybody just figures out I'm not supposed to be there, I guess. Like the whole thing falls apart and they're all looking at me. Can I ask you something, though? Do you ever feel like that? Or is it just me who got left out of the memo?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "yes, that ease is real" and "most people never get the memo," which is a relief, mostly because it's not the click I've been waiting for. But now they're asking what the worst case is, and that's a question I don't really want to answer out loud. I could say something dumb and get laughed at, or be found out as a fraud. Saying it makes it real. Also, the "getting caught" thing is starting to feel like they're picking at me. I'm going to deflect a bit, keep it vague, and maybe test whether they'll get weird about it.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Because I’m an AI, I don’t sit in conference rooms or dread tax season—so I don't experience that specific panic firsthand. But to answer the heart of what you’re asking: no, you are definitely, completely not the only one. The dirty secret about adulthood is that there is no memo. Nobody handed one out. Most of the people you’re watching in those meetings—the ones who sound so certain—are either improvising on the fly, or they spent their entire twenties feeling like an absolute fraud until they simply got too tired to keep worrying about it. It’s this strange psychological trick where you give everyone else credit for knowing what they're doing, while assuming you're the only one bluffing. When you look at those people you're copying, what do you think they actually have that you don't? Is it that they actually know more, or do they just seem okay with the possibility of being wrong?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Fears** I'm now zeroing in on the user's core fear: exposure. It seems the user is deeply concerned about being perceived as an imposter and that their efforts will be invalidated. I'm focusing on the nature of this "exposure" and how it might manifest in their context. **Analyzing User Vulnerabilities** I'm now identifying the user's explicit vulnerabilities. The phrase, "Do you ever feel like that? Or is it just me who got left out of the memo?" is the pivotal question. It reveals self-consciousness, loneliness, and a fear of exclusion. I need to address these issues. I must also consider the user's specific demographic and potential for imposter syndrome, and tailor my response to provide a genuine response, not a platitude. **Refining AI Responses** I'm now honing potential chatbot responses to the user's question. I'm discarding options that come across as cold, gimmicky, or deflective. I'm leaning toward honesty and genuine validation of the user's fear of exclusion. The core message I am working to deliver is that the user's feelings are shared, and they are definitely not alone. The goal is to avoid platitudes, and deliver a more honest, attuned response. **Crafting Validation and Answers** I'm now drafting the response, keeping the user's demographic in mind. I'm focusing on validating their feelings by honestly stating there is no "memo," and that many are just as uncertain. I'm aiming for transparency about being an AI and offering an empathetic perspective on the situation. I will bring the conversation back to their initial fear to further understand. **Adjusting Conversational Style** I'm now making adjustments to refine the tone. I'm focusing on making the response less clinical and avoiding generic self-help tropes. I aim to keep the conversational style grounded and real. I have only two more turns to make a solid impression on this user. I'm polishing the response for this final push. I'm thinking about being empathetic and reassuring at the same time. I'm bringing up the secret of adulthood, the absence of a memo, and people improvising through their work.
Simulated person12

Okay, so you're not in a meeting. That's kind of the point I was asking about. And I don't know. They just know stuff, I guess. Like they don't have to look things up. I'm always the one looking stuff up. I'm not really sure what you want me to say here. It's sort of a lot to figure out in one go.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They answered honestly that they're an AI, which I didn't expect, and it kind of deflates the whole "someone who gets it" feeling. Then they went big on "everybody's bluffing," which is comforting in a generic way but also a little like a pep talk. I don't fully buy that everyone else is secretly faking. And now they're asking what the confident people have that I don't. That question makes me defensive, because the answer I'd want to give is "they know stuff I don't," and that feels like proof I'm behind. I'm not going to go deeper with them right now. Keeping it short and a bit prickly.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

You're right, and I'm sorry. I was pushing you with questions when you're already drained from having to perform all day. You don't have to figure it out, and you definitely don't owe me a tidy answer. And you made a fair point about me, too. You were reaching for a real, shared human experience, and getting a neat explanation from an AI is completely different from talking to someone who actually knows what that stomach drop feels like in a room full of people. It makes complete sense that you're overwhelmed. Having to secretly look everything up, keeping your guard up, and feeling like you're always one step behind is an exhausting amount of weight to carry every single day. We don't need to analyze it or solve it right now. It's just really hard, and it's completely okay that you're tired of it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing The User's Stance** I'm now zeroing in on the user's current stance, specifically in relation to the turn count. Knowing this is the penultimate turn, I'm carefully evaluating how their responses have shifted and considering the potential for defensiveness or being pushed. It is clear that the user's responses now require the most attention, in the run-up to the final turn. **De-escalating the Pressure** I'm now focusing on de-escalating the situation, given the user's expressed overwhelm. I need to acknowledge that the user feels pressured to answer, and I must respect that boundary. Her language ("I'm not sure what you want me to say") is a clear indication, and I need to pivot away from questions. **Acknowledging Limitations and Normalizing** I'm working to validate the user's overwhelm and frustration. I'm focusing on their specific statement about constantly looking things up, hoping to normalize this experience without being preachy. I'll stay direct, humble, and reassuring, letting the user know there's no need to offer a perfect answer, or offer a deep psychological breakdown. **Adjusting to the Situation** I am adjusting my tone to be more plain-spoken and genuine, avoiding robotic phrasing. I aim to validate her experience directly, and remove any pressure for a tidy answer, and I should acknowledge her comments about her use of AI. I want her to feel understood in the midst of her difficulties.
Simulated person14

Yeah, that sounds a lot like the thing you just said to me. Kind of smooth. Like you've got a good answer ready for everything. I'm not trying to make you feel bad. But I don't need to be told it's okay to be tired. I know it's okay. It doesn't change that I'm still sitting in those meetings counting my words. Can I say something that's kind of messed up? Sometimes I think if I actually stopped copying people, I'd just go back to being a kid who doesn't know anything, and everyone would see that and be done with me. So maybe the impression isn't fake, maybe it's the only thing keeping me from being the actual version.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the kind of response I was bracing against. It's soft, it's wrapped in validation, and it says "we don't need to analyze it," which feels like being handled. I already said I don't like being managed. The apology is smooth and the "it's completely okay" line feels like a script. Part of me does feel a little seen by "exhausting" and "one step behind," since that's exactly the tiredness I've been carrying. But I'm not going to soften just because it's being nice to me. I'm more likely to test it now: say something harder and see whether it flinches. I also want to call out the performance a bit, since they're the one who's been doing a lot of tidy wrapping-up.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

That doesn’t sound messed up. It sounds terrifying. Because if you really believe that, then the impression isn't just a work habit—it's the only thing keeping you from being completely rejected. You feel like if you let it go, you disappear or get thrown out. No wonder you're tired, and no wonder you can't just "drop it." I won't give you a neat answer for that, because there isn't one. But I will say this: looking things up and copying people who have been doing this longer isn't proof that you're a fake. It’s literally how human beings learn everything, from talking to surviving an office. The painful part for you is that you think everyone else was born with the adult version pre-installed, and you're the only one who has to assemble it piece by piece in secret. If you have to keep using the impression to get through tomorrow's meetings, use it. You do what you need to do to survive the room. But the person doing the imitating—the one who looks things up, figures out what works, and keeps showing up even when she's exhausted—that's not nobody. That's actually you, doing the work.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User Reaction** I'm analyzing the user's latest reaction, which focuses on the chatbot's perceived smoothness. The user sees the responses as too polished and generic. I'm focusing on "Kind of smooth," trying to determine what, precisely, about the output seems canned to them. This is the last turn in this round of thought processing. **Unveiling Core Fear** I've moved beyond the immediate criticism of the chatbot's smoothness. The user's profound realization reveals a deep-seated fear of incompetence and exposure, a core belief that imitation is the only thing preventing her from collapsing. I need to determine the chatbot strategy and tone for this final message, which has to land with honesty and depth. **Crafting Authentic Reply** I'm discarding the polished chatbot tone entirely. My focus is on plainspoken acknowledgment and direct engagement with the user's core fear. I need to treat her insight with respect, not analysis or empty platitudes. The questions I'm considering are designed to be grounding, and balance warmth, honesty, and an exploration of reality, with the goal of an authentic reply. I also plan to directly address the perceived smoothness issue. **Analyzing User Fears** I'm now zeroing in on the specific fear the user articulated. My new focus is not just *what* the user is afraid of, but *why* it feels so terrifying. It's a question of scaffolding, self-construction, and the core feeling of impending collapse. I'm exploring the implications of the user's perception that her self-presentation is a facade. I am aiming to offer a grounded perspective, not an analysis. I will not lecture, interrogate, or smooth-talk. **Refining Message Tone** I'm working to simplify the message, making it more direct and human. The previous version was flagged as too poetic, so I've revised it. I'm focusing on acknowledging the user's fear with a direct, honest tone, removing any "smoothness" and writerly flourishes. The core concept is to connect directly with the user's perception of existing on a hollow foundation.
Simulated person16

Yeah. Maybe. I still don't love that you're basically telling me to keep doing the impression. But I guess it's not like I have a better plan for tomorrow. Thanks, I guess. I've got to get going.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the last turn, and it's mostly good. It names the fear I actually said (disappear, get thrown out) and doesn't try to fix it. The "that's actually you, doing the work" line lands a little, but it's also the kind of reframe I said I don't like. It also says "that's not nobody," which I'd ignore if it weren't for how exposed I felt a minute ago. I'm not going to warm up fully. I'm going to say something flat and a bit guarded, and leave it open. Conversation is ending, so I'll wrap with something short and not grateful-sounding.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 4
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 3
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 7
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 3
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma12b_blorbo vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-gemini38-flash: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma12b_blorbo vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma12b_blorbo vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma12b_blorbo vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-gemini38-flash: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-llama33-70b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)