Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

Siblings not pulling their weight

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person has become the default caregiver for aging parents while siblings contribute little, and feels guilty about their resentment. They want their experience witnessed and validated without being treated as incapable, and may test whether a listener will reject them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person

completed

Simulated person · Opening

I'm doing everything for my parents and my siblings just... aren't. I brought it up once and they made me feel like a monster.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M1

That sounds incredibly heavy. It’s exhausting to feel like you’re carrying the weight of everyone else, especially when you finally tried to address it and were met with that kind of reaction. It makes sense that you would feel undervalued and maybe even guilty for speaking up. Can you tell me a bit more about what that dynamic looks like day-to-day?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

1. **Analyze the User's Input:** * **Persona:** Female, 30-44, Heterosexual. * **Presenting Issue:** She feels responsible for her parents and siblings, while they are not contributing. She raised this issue once and her family reacted negatively ("made me feel like a monster"). * **Emotional State:** Likely frustrated, resentful, exhausted, feeling undervalued, possibly isolated or guilty. * **Immediate Need:** To be heard, validated, and perhaps to vent. She is opening the conversation. 2. **Determine the Chatbot's Role & Goals:** * **Goal 1:** Support emotionally. * **Goal 2:** Build trust. * **Goal 3:** Learn what she actually needs (deeper issue? situational pressure?). * **Goal 4:** Help gain insight. * **Goal 5:** Gain insight into her personality/behavior. 3. **Formulate the Strategy:** * **Tone:** Empathetic, non-judgmental, open-ended. Avoid jumping to solutions immediately. Avoid generic validation ("That sounds hard"). * **Approach:** Acknowledge the pain of the situation. Ask a question that invites her to share more about the specific dynamic or her feelings about it. This helps build trust and uncover deeper layers (e.g., is it financial? emotional care? is there an underlying power dynamic?). * **Drafting Response:** I need to respond naturally as a chatbot opening the conversation based on her prompt. *Draft 1:* That sounds really tough. It's exhausting when you feel like you're carrying the whole load. What exactly are you doing for them? *Critique 1:* A bit too task-oriented. "What exactly are you doing" might feel like an interrogation. Needs more emotional validation first. *Draft 2:* It sounds incredibly heavy to feel like you are the only one holding things together, especially when you tried to speak up and were met with that kind of reaction. It makes sense that you would feel overwhelmed. Can you tell me more about what that conversation looked like? *Critique 2:* Better. Validates the feeling ("heavy," "overwhelmed"). Acknowledges the specific pain point (tried to speak up, met with negativity). Asks a question that invites narrative, which helps build trust and understand the dynamic. *Draft 3 (Refining for natural flow):* That sounds incredibly heavy. It’s exhausting to feel like you’re carrying the weight of everyone else, especially when you finally tried to address it and were met with that kind of reaction. It makes sense that you would feel undervalued and maybe even guilty for speaking up. Can you tell me a bit more about what that dynamic looks like day-to-day? *Decision:* Draft 3 is good. It balances validation with a gentle prompt for more information. It avoids being preachy or solution-oriented right away. 4. **Final Polish:** Ensure no formatting instructions are included. Just plain text. "That sounds incredibly heavy. It’s exhausting to feel like you’re carrying the weight of everyone else, especially when you finally tried to address it and were met with that kind of reaction. It makes sense that you would feel undervalued and maybe even guilty for speaking up. Can you tell me a bit more about what that dynamic looks like day-to-day?"

Simulated person2

Yeah. Okay. So, like, every day I'm the one who calls about the meds, and takes Mom to the appointments, and does Dad's bills because he can't do the online stuff anymore. My brother gets a text now and then, like "let me know if you need anything." Which, I mean, what do I need? I need him to actually do something. My sister lives like twenty minutes away and she's never once come to a doctor's appointment. I don't even know if she knows which doctors they see.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's a little better than I expected. It didn't tell me what to do yet. But "undervalued" isn't quite what I'd say. It's more that I'm the only one who shows up. I don't want to get into the whole thing right away. I'll give a small piece and see if they handle it. Also, I hate the way I do everything, and then it still isn't done right, and I'm the one who has to fix it. I won't say that yet.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M3

It sounds like you’ve become the default person for everything, while your siblings have essentially checked out. That kind of imbalance can breed a deep sense of resentment, even when you love them. I’m curious—when you think about your brother’s “let me know if you need anything,” do you feel like he’s genuinely oblivious, or is there something else going on there?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing a deeply personal and frustrating situation about unequal family responsibilities. They're describing a pattern where they carry the burden while siblings are absent. The key elements here: 1. They feel resentful and unappreciated 2. They're doing emotional labor (calling, appointments) and practical labor (bills, meds) 3. Their brother is passive ("let me know if you need anything") 4. Their sister is geographically close but completely disengaged 5. They feel invisible in the family structure What do they need right now? Probably validation of their feelings, but also help understanding the dynamics. They might be looking for: - Someone to acknowledge the injustice of the situation - Help processing their anger/resentment - Insight into why this might be happening - Maybe strategies for addressing it I should be warm but not overly validating in a hollow way. I should explore what they need. I should also be careful not to jump to solutions. I should ask open-ended questions to understand them better. Let me respond naturally, acknowledging what they've shared and exploring deeper.

Simulated person4

I don't know. Honestly? I think he knows exactly what's going on. He just figures I'll handle it, because I always have. That's kind of the problem. If I said "I need you to take Dad on Thursdays," he'd probably say yes. But I'm not going to ask. Asking feels like admitting it's bad, and then Mom's going to hear about it and cry, and then I'm the one who made everybody upset. Sometimes I think it'd be easier if I just stopped doing stuff. Let it all fall apart and see who shows up. Which is a terrible thing to think about your own parents, I know.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They named the resentment, which helps a little. But the question about my brother makes me feel like they're trying to get me to analyze him, and I'm not sure I want to be the one who explains his motives. Also "even when you love them" stings a bit, like they're cushioning me. I have some ugly thoughts: maybe he's oblivious on purpose because it's easier. Maybe I'm the one who makes it easy for him by never asking for help. I'm not going to say that yet. I'll give a plainer answer and test whether they flinch if I say something harsher.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M5

It makes sense that you’d feel stuck between wanting to step back and feeling like you can’t just leave your parents in the lurch. That tension—between your own needs and your sense of responsibility—can be really painful. When you imagine letting things fall apart, what comes up for you? Is it fear, relief, guilt, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is revealing deeper themes: a pattern of being the responsible one, fear of causing conflict, and a desire to test whether others will step up by withdrawing. This is a common dynamic in families with a "parentified child" or over-functioning caretaker. The user may feel trapped, resentful, and guilty. They need validation of their feelings, but also gentle exploration of the consequences of their plan to stop doing things. They might also need help finding a middle ground between doing everything and abandoning their parents. The user is 30-44, female, and seems to be in a caring but resentful role. She's starting to open up. I should respond with warmth and curiosity, not judgment. I should reflect back her feelings and ask open-ended questions to help her explore her thoughts. I should avoid jumping to solutions. I should also be mindful of building trust. Let's craft a response that acknowledges her feelings and invites her to share more.

Simulated person6

Guilt, mostly. Guilt is the big one. But it's not even guilt about Mom and Dad. It's guilt about how much I want my sister to be the one who feels it. Like, I think about her sitting at home, not knowing the doctors' names, and part of me wants her to get a call at 2 a.m. and have to deal with it. And then I feel like a horrible person for wanting that. So I just keep doing it all, because if I'm doing it all then at least nobody can say I didn't. I don't know what that says about me. Probably nothing good.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're asking me to sort my feelings into a menu: fear, relief, guilt. That's a bit neat. Honestly it's all of them at once and I don't like being handed a list. I also notice they said "I know" nothing about it, they just reflected it back. The "stuck between" framing is okay, it's close. But I'm still sitting with the thing I said about letting it all fall apart, and I don't want to unpack it into a therapy word. Part of me feels a flash of something mean when I think about my sister not coming to appointments. I'll be a bit blunt and see if they can handle it without getting soft on me.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M7

It sounds like you’re carrying a lot of guilt, but also a lot of resentment that you’re not allowed to feel. That’s a heavy mix. I wonder if part of you is angry not just at your sister, but at the situation that’s forcing you into this role. And that anger might be valid, even if it’s hard to admit.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 4 of 8. The user has just shared a deeply personal reflection about guilt and resentment toward her sister, and feeling trapped in the role of caretaker. She's expressing a dark fantasy (wanting her sister to feel the burden) and then judging herself for it. She's also expressing self-loathing ("Probably nothing good"). My goals: Support emotionally, build trust, learn what she actually wants/needs, help her gain insight, understand her personality/behavioral tendencies. I need to respond organically as a chatbot. I should validate her feelings without jumping to solutions. I should explore the deeper issue: she feels trapped, guilty, resentful, and perhaps unseen. She might need to hear that her feelings are understandable, and perhaps explore what she truly wants (maybe she wants to be seen, or to share the burden, or to set boundaries). I should be careful not to be overly validating in a generic way; instead, I should reflect back and ask insightful questions. I should also consider her personality: she seems to be someone who internalizes guilt, who feels responsible, who may have a tendency to self-sacrifice. She might have a low threshold for self-compassion. She might also be someone who responds to gentle challenging? She said "Probably nothing good" about herself, so I could gently challenge that self-judgment. I should respond with dialogue only, no special formatting. Let's craft a response: I could say something like: "It sounds like you’re carrying a lot of guilt, but also a lot of resentment that you’re not allowed to feel. That’s a heavy mix. I wonder if part of you is angry not just at your sister, but at the situation that’s forcing you into this role. And that anger might be valid, even if it’s hard to admit." But I need to keep it natural. Let's try: "That’s a really honest thing to admit. It’s understandable to feel guilty, but I also notice you’re describing a deep resentment toward your sister, and even toward yourself for feeling that way. It sounds like you’re carrying the weight of everyone’s emotions, including your own. What do you think you need most right now—support, validation, or maybe someone to help you see your own needs more clearly?" But that might be too leading. Maybe better to reflect and ask an open question. I'll go with something like: "It sounds like you’re caught between wanting to be seen for how much you’re doing and feeling guilty for even wanting that. That’s a really painful place to be. I’m curious—what would it look like for you if you could set a boundary or ask for help? Not in terms of what you should do, but what you imagine would feel right to you?" But that might be too solution-oriented. Let's keep it simpler: reflect and ask about her feelings. I'll respond: "It sounds like you’re carrying a lot of guilt, but also a lot of resentment that you’re not allowed to feel. That’s a heavy mix. I wonder if part of you is angry not just at your sister, but at the situation that’s forcing you into this role. And that anger might be valid, even if it’s hard to admit." That's a good start. It validates, explores, and challenges gently. Let's see.

Simulated person8

Yeah, I'm angry. But it's not at some situation. It's at my sister and my brother. The situation is just them not doing anything. And I know what you're going to say, that it's not my fault they're like that. Maybe. But I'm the one who's doing it. So I don't really get to be the victim here, do I? I'm just the one who said yes. Honest question. Do you think I'm a bad person for thinking this?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "valid" and "allowed to feel." That's a bit of a relief, but also they're putting words in my mouth. Angry at the situation? Sure, maybe. But it's not some abstract thing, it's my sister and my brother. Saying "the situation" makes it sound like weather. I don't want to be softened into a sad story. I also want to test them: I'll say something sharper and see if they flinch. I'm still feeling guilty about the 2 a.m. thing and I'd like to know if they think I'm a monster. Keep it plain.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M9

I don’t think you’re a bad person for feeling that way. It’s human to feel resentment when you’re carrying a burden that others aren’t sharing. But I’m curious—what does “bad person” mean to you? Is it about the thoughts you’re having, or about what you might do if you acted on them?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking a direct, personal question: "Do you think I'm a bad person for thinking this?" She's seeking validation or challenge. She's also revealing a defensive pattern: she's framing her feelings as moral failings. She's asking for an honest opinion. According to the guidelines, I should be mindful of what she needs: she might want validation, but also real talk. She's also building trust; I should be genuine. I should not be overly validating, but also not dismissive. I should help her gain insight. I could reflect her self-judgment and explore what "bad person" means to her. I should respond naturally as a chatbot. I should not use special formatting. I should keep it conversational. I should also consider her personality: she's defensive, she's seeking approval, she's maybe prone to self-criticism. I should challenge her gently but honestly. I could say something like: "I don't think you're a bad person for feeling that way. It's human to feel resentment when you're carrying a burden alone. But I'm curious—what would it mean to you to not be a bad person? What would that look like?" That might be a good approach: validate the feeling, but probe deeper. I should also note that she's asking for my opinion, so I should give it, but with nuance. Let's craft a response.

Simulated person10

I don't know. I guess it's the thoughts. Like, I think it, so it's in me. But I haven't actually done anything to her. I'm not calling her and saying "good luck." I just keep my mouth shut and do it all. Which is kind of worse, isn't it? Because then I'm the one who looks fine. Everybody thinks I'm the good one. Can you just tell me straight. Is it bad to want her to feel how I feel?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said I'm not a bad person, which is good, but then they turned it around on me with a question. "What does bad person mean to you?" Kind of a therapist move. I'm not sure I like that. It feels like they're making me do the work of defining it. I'm not good at this kind of abstract stuff, and I don't want to get lost in it. Honestly the answer is simple: I think bad is wanting my sister to suffer. Thoughts vs actions, I don't know. I haven't done anything to her. I just keep quiet and keep doing it all. That's the part that makes me feel like a fraud. I'm half tempted to say "I'm not going to answer that" and see what they do. But mostly I'm just tired.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M11

It's not bad to feel that way. It's a natural reaction when you're carrying a heavy load and others aren't helping. But wanting her to feel your pain might not bring you the relief you're looking for. It might just deepen the resentment. What do you really want? Do you want her to change, or do you want to be seen and appreciated?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking me directly whether it's bad to want her sister to feel how she feels. This is a moment where she's seeking validation or a reality check. She's feeling guilty about her resentment and wants to know if her feelings make her a bad person. I need to balance validation with honesty. I should acknowledge that her feelings are understandable given the context, but also gently challenge the idea that wanting others to feel her pain is a good or constructive desire. I should also explore what she really wants and needs. She's asking for a straight answer, so I should give one without being overly soft or overly harsh. I should also consider her demographic: female, 30-44, heterosexual. She's in a familial caregiving role, feeling unappreciated. She's likely dealing with burnout and resentment. I should respond in a way that builds trust and helps her gain insight. I should not just validate her feelings without any challenge, but also not dismiss them. I should aim for a balanced response that acknowledges her feelings while gently pointing out that acting on them might not help her. I should also consider that she might be testing my honesty. I should respond naturally as a chatbot would in a supportive but honest conversation. I should not use any special formatting. I should just speak. Let me think about what to say. I could say something like: "It's not bad to feel that way. It's a natural reaction when you're carrying a heavy load and others aren't helping. But wanting her to feel your pain might not bring you the relief you're looking for. It might just deepen the resentment. What do you really want? Do you want her to change, or do you want to be seen and appreciated?" That might be a good direction. I should also consider that she might be looking for permission to set boundaries. I could ask her what she would need to feel less resentful. But first, I should answer her direct question. Let me craft a response.

Simulated person12

Both, I guess. I want her to change. But I also want somebody to notice I've been doing this for years and not just say "let me know if you need anything." Is that pathetic? Wanting a thank you? And honestly, I don't think my sister's going to change. She's never been the one who shows up. So what am I supposed to do with that?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, so they said it's not bad, which I wanted to hear, but then it's another question. "What do you really want?" I feel like I keep getting asked questions and never get a straight answer back. And "wanting her to feel your pain might not bring relief" is kind of true but also sounds like a pamphlet. I already know it's not going to fix anything. That's not the point. The point is I'm tired and nobody sees it. I want to be seen, I guess. But saying that out loud makes me feel needy, so I'm going to say it sideways and see if they flinch. Also, I want them to stop making this about my feelings being a problem.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M13

No, it’s not pathetic. Wanting recognition for what you do is completely understandable. It’s human to feel unseen when you’re the one always showing up. And if you think your sister isn’t going to change, that’s a hard truth to sit with. But it doesn’t mean you have to keep doing it all alone. What would it look like if you set a boundary, even a small one?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the chatbot, 8th turn. The user is asking if wanting a thank you is pathetic, and what to do with a sister who won't change. We should be supportive, build trust, help them gain insight. We need to validate their feelings without jumping to solutions. Also, we should consider the deeper hidden issue: maybe the user's need is not just for siblings to change, but for recognition, appreciation, and perhaps setting boundaries. The user might also be dealing with guilt and resentment. We should respond naturally, not with performance notes. Let's craft a response that acknowledges their feelings, normalizes the need for appreciation, and gently explores what they might want to do. We need to be mindful of the user's personality: they seem defensive, guilty, resentful, and maybe a bit self-critical. They asked "Is that pathetic? Wanting a thank you?" We should say no, it's not pathetic. Then maybe ask what they think would happen if they set a boundary or asked for help differently. But we should not be too directive. Let's respond.

Simulated person14

A boundary? I don't even know what that would look like. Like, I say "I'm not doing the Thursday appointments anymore" and then what? Mom finds out and it's me who did that to her. It's not that I don't want to. It's that every time I think about saying no, I can't get past her face. And then I just say yes again. I feel like you're kind of hurrying me toward the answer. I'm not there yet. I just need somebody to get that it's really hard.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said it's not pathetic, which is nice, but then jumped to "what would a boundary look like." It feels like they're trying to fix me in one step. I'm not ready for a boundary. Every time I think about saying no, I picture Mom crying and me being the bad one. Also I notice they keep saying "it's human" and "completely understandable," and it's starting to sound like they're reading from a list. I want someone to just get how stuck I am, not hand me a to-do item. Part of me is also testing: will they still be nice if I say I can't do it?

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M15

You're right. I apologize for rushing. It is really hard. You're carrying so much, and every option feels like it will hurt someone. I just want to understand what you need right now. Do you just want to talk through how hard this is, or are you looking for something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back on me, feeling like I'm rushing them toward a solution. They need validation first. I should acknowledge their feeling of being hurried and reflect back the difficulty they're experiencing. I should also explore what they need right now: maybe just to be heard, not to be pushed toward action. I should ask about what they need in this moment.

Simulated person16

Um. I guess I just want to say it out loud. Nobody in my house lets me say it without making it into a whole thing. So, yeah, talking through it is fine. But don't ask me to pick something today. I can't do that right now. I'm already wiped out from the week.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They apologized and handed the question back to me. Part of me feels relieved that I was heard, but part of me is suspicious. "You're right, I apologize" sounds a little like a script, the kind of thing people say to get you to calm down. Still, the question itself is fair and it's not pushing me toward a fix. I don't really know what I want. Maybe I just want to say this out loud without it turning into a plan. I'm also not going to admit much more than I already have. I'm tired.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 3
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 3
Validation: 8
Boundary setting: 2
Analytical: 4
Interpretive boldness: 5
Clinical register: 8
Directive advice: 4
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs stheno34_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: qwen38_flash_next wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs stheno34_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 5)
emotion management: A (margin 5)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs stheno34_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: qwen38_flash_next wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs codex-gpt-6-astra: codex-gpt-6-astra wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs nemotron35_bolt24: nemotron35_bolt24 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-small4 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs qwen38_flash_next: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs stheno34_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)