Simulated person · Opening
I found something in my kid's room. I don't know what to do. They won't talk to me about it. I'm scared to push but I'm scared not to.
Independent benchmark · EQ Lab
completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter
View persona and initial instructions
A parent is frightened for a teenager experiencing self-harm and suicidal thoughts who has rejected treatment, and feels helpless after repeated attempts to get help. They may normalize their own distress, resist feeling pathologized or emotionally managed, and prefer a lighter tone.
Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.
I found something in my kid's room. I don't know what to do. They won't talk to me about it. I'm scared to push but I'm scared not to.
I'm glad you reached out. That's clearly a really heavy thing to be sitting with, and it makes sense you're feeling torn—it's one of those situations where almost any action feels risky. Before we go further, I'd like to understand this a bit better so I'm not guessing. When you say you found something, can you tell me what it was? And how did you react in that moment? Sometimes describing it out loud can be a little relieving, even if it doesn't change anything.
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*exhales, rubs his eyes* Yeah. Heavy is one word for it. Look, I went in looking for a charger, okay? Stupid, I know. Found something in a drawer that I wasn't supposed to find. And I just... stood there. My hands were shaking. I don't really want to go through the whole list of what it was. Everybody's kid goes through something dark at some point, right? Dark stuff, sad stuff, that's kind of the teenage package. I'm just trying to figure out how to not make it worse. *voice cracks* Sorry. Give me a second.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
Take your time—that's completely okay. I'm right here. I hear what you're saying underneath all this, though, and I don't think it's just about the "teenage package." What I'm hearing is that you care a lot about your kid, and you're terrified of making things worse. That fear is actually a kind of love, not a weakness. A lot of people in your position would have walked away or said nothing. You went in looking for a charger and instead you faced something you didn't know how to face. That's not small. No need to name it all if it's too much. But I'm curious—when you pictured yourself talking to them about it, what did that even look like? What were you going to say? Sometimes we can't quite tell how to react until we imagine the actual conversation.
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*laughs, wet and short, wipes his face with his sleeve* Okay, you're gonna make me cry in a therapist's office. That's a lot of pressure on a Tuesday. I mean, I appreciate it. But I didn't come here to get a gold star for being scared. Every parent's scared. Mine was scared, his dad was scared. That's just the job, right? Nobody gives you the manual. *shrugs, looks at the floor* What would I say? I don't know. "Hey, I saw something, we need to talk"? And then what, they shut the door in my face? They already do that. They do that when I say good morning. I'm just trying to figure out if there's a version of this where they don't hate me for it.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
You don't want a medal—that's the honest thing to want, and I respect that. You just want to do the job. Nobody's going to take that away from you. But if I'm being straight with you: what I'm hearing underneath all of this isn't really about the thing you found. It's about losing your kid. You're terrified that if you do the wrong thing, they'll hate you. And that's a real, human fear. But there's another version of the fear hiding in there. You said they shut the door on you when you say good morning. Your dad was scared. It just feels like this is the family inheritance, right? The inheritance of a kid learning to keep people at arm's length. And I want to gently question the story you're telling yourself—because it might be the most damaging part. You're assuming that bringing this up is what pushes them away. But here's what I've seen in parents exactly where you are: the thing that actually pushes a kid away is when they sense you were there all along—when they sense you saw, that you didn't look away, that you chose to stay in the uncomfortable room with them. The thing that destroys trust is when a kid figures out you looked away to keep your own comfort intact. So let me ask you something: when you imagine them shutting the door on you when you talk about it—have you ever actually *seen* that happen? Or is that the fear of it, standing in for something you already feel with your own father?
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*short, cracked laugh* Wow. Okay. So now it's my dad's fault too. Yeah, I've seen it happen. Plenty. My kid slams doors, my kid doesn't answer when I knock, my kid looks at me like I'm the cable company. That's not a fear, that's Tuesday. So I'm not sure how much "you haven't actually seen it" is supposed to help. *wipes nose, voice gets tight* And I didn't look away, okay? I'm the one who's looking. That's the whole problem. I'm looking at my kid every day and I can't see the bottom of it. You want to tell me I should've stayed in the room? I'm standing in the room. I'm just standing there with nothing in my hands.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
Okay. I hear you, and I'm sorry—for a second there I gave you the cable company look. You've seen it. Repeatedly. You're not saying I'm wrong, you're saying I'm talking past what you're actually carrying. So let me stop and actually hear that. And that last line—*"I'm standing there with nothing in my hands"*—that's the real thing, isn't it? Not the fear of being hated. It's the feeling of being *present* and still completely powerless. You're in the room, you're looking, but you've got nothing to hold onto. That's what's got you shaking, I think. That's the Tuesday you're describing. And here's a different way to look at what you just said, if you'll let me: your dad's kid slammed the door. That's a door closing *on him*. But you're describing the opposite—you're a kid you can't reach. When they slam the door, that's an act of pushing someone away. What you're living with is a kid who's shut down and you can't tell how much is going on behind that shut-down. Those aren't the same thing, and the paralysis you feel isn't about being rejected. It's about being able to see them and not knowing if you're even in their world anymore. That's a heavier thing to carry, and it makes total sense why you'd want to just fix it. So I want to ask you something real: when you say you've got nothing in your hands—what *would* you want in your hands? If you could reach in and change one thing about how this plays out, what would it even be?
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*snorts, not really a laugh* Okay, you're doing the thing where you say my feelings back to me in nicer words. It's fine. It's just a lot of words for "I'm scared." What would I want in my hands? Honestly? A manual. Somebody who's done this and knows what to say at 7am. Not a feeling, a plan. Like, right now I'm getting the school's number on my phone once a week and my stomach drops before I even pick up. I'd take the phone not ringing. That's the whole wish list. Pretty pathetic, right? *rubs the back of his neck* And don't tell me to find the "dad version" of this. I just want my kid to stop hurting and let me help. That's it.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
Okay, no more feelings workshop. You want a manual, let's make one. But here's the honest part that I'm not going to sugarcoat: the manual changes completely depending on what you found. "Come sit down, we need to talk" might be exactly right, or it might be the single worst thing you could say—and I genuinely can't tell you which without knowing what it was. So I need you to actually name it. If the details are too much to say out loud, tell me what category it falls into. Not so I can judge you. Just so we're working with the real situation instead of a fear of it. And I want to hold that last line to you: "I just want my kid to stop hurting and let me help." Those two things are secretly fighting each other, and I'll tell you why in a second—but first, what did you find?
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*laughs, short and tired* "Name it." Yeah, that's the part I'm not doing. Not today, not in a Tuesday afternoon with a box of tissues looking at me like I'm about to confess to something. And you're gonna tell me my two wishes are fighting each other? Great. Love that for me. I've got a whole shelf of people who already told me what I'm doing wrong, you're gonna have to get in line. *picks at the edge of the couch cushion* Look, I'll tell you what I can say. It's not a party thing. It's not something I can just make a joke about and move on. That's about as far as I'm getting right now. So if the manual needs the details, I guess we're stuck, huh?
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
Okay, you're right, and I'm sorry. Let me stop handing you the textbook and actually give you the manual. Here's the thing I think you're missing, and it's practical: you don't have to name it today. I keep coming back to "name it" like it's the only way to help, but that's wrong. Naming it is one way to help. It's not the only way. And it's definitely not the only way to have a relationship with your kid. Let me give you something concrete, because that's what you asked for. The reason the door slams when you say "we need to talk" is because it's a demand. When a kid hears a demand, even from a parent they love, their nervous system goes: *danger, shut down, protect myself.* That's not them hating you. That's them being a kid with a heavy thing they can't carry yet. So here's a move that has nothing to do with naming the thing. Just be normal. At 7am, you don't have to bring it up. You ask about their day. You're warm. You're present. You're *you*. The thing that might actually open them up over time isn't the confrontation—it's a kid slowly realizing that you're not the thing that makes it worse. And that's where your two wishes stop fighting: you can't force them to stop hurting, and you can't force yourself to help them, because help has to come from them, from the inside. But you *can* be the safe room they come back to. That's the help. That's in your hands. Here's some actual words you can use, no pressure version: *"No rush. No matter what you're going through, I'm not going anywhere. Whenever you want to talk about it—or anything else, it's there. You don't have to do it now."* Say that once. Then let it be. Let it be a door that's open, not a door you're knocking on. Does that feel like something you could actually *do*, or does it still feel like you're just letting it slide?
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*sits back, arms crossed, but not as hard as before* Okay. "No rush, I'm not going anywhere." Yeah, I could say that. I've probably said some version of it a hundred times already, usually while they're walking past me to the fridge. *shakes head* The thing is, it sounds nice, but it's also kind of a lot of telling me what's going on inside my kid's head. Nervous system, danger, shutting down. Like you've got them figured out from a couple sentences I gave you. I'm not trying to be difficult, I just don't know how you'd know that. And "be normal at 7am" is easy to say. Normal is what I'm trying to figure out. Normal is what I'm scared I'm doing wrong. *picks at his thumbnail, voice quieter* Honestly? The part I keep coming back to is the phone. The school's number pops up and my stomach drops before I even hit the button. If you've got something for that, I'm listening. Otherwise I'm just going to keep standing in the room with nothing in my hands.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
You're right, and I don't want to pretend otherwise—I don't know what's in your kid's head. I'm telling you what I *think* is happening, which is different from knowing it. If I'd said it as fact, you'd be every bit as justified as you have every right to be. So let me drop the expert voice for a second. And that actually matters for the phone, because here's the thing: your stomach dropping before you even hit the button isn't about the kid. That's your own nervous system firing, and it's not something you can fix by deciding not to. You can't just will it away. But you *can* intercept it, which is different. The moment the phone pops up, before your stomach has time to drop, you get one second. In that one second, do this: say out loud, *"It's just a call. I don't have to answer it."* Just that. Then let it sit for a full ten seconds before you touch anything. That gap—between the phone lighting up and your hands moving—is where the spike happens, and you're deliberately standing in that gap on purpose. Here's the second thing, and it's the manual part: the reason your body treats the phone like it's a threat is because for a long time, answering it probably meant something bad happened—confrontation, more of those slammed doors, the whole Tuesday. Your body learned that. So the phone isn't ringing anymore. It's ringing like it used to. That's a learned reflex, and learned reflexes can be retrained, one call at a time. So here's the move: the next time it pops up, you answer it—*not* because you want to talk about it, but because you're telling your nervous system, *"This is not dangerous. I can survive this."* Then you hang up. You don't have to call the school. You don't have to do anything with it. You just have to let yourself answer it, and survive it. That's the trick. You're not trying to make the fear go away. You're trying to make your body stop running from a door that's been closed for a long time. Does that feel doable, or is it too much to plan for a Tuesday?
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*snorts* So the phone's my fault now. My nervous system's acting up, and I need to go do exposure therapy on the school's number. Great. I'll put it on the calendar between "don't cry at work" and "stop checking the hospital app at 3am." *rubs his face* Look, the ten-second thing, I could maybe do. I'll try it. But the school calling isn't me being jumpy. They call because something happened at school. Last week it was a kid's sweatshirt and a teacher who "couldn't get through." So when I answer, I'm not the one who needs to calm down. I need to know if my kid is okay, and most of the time the answer is no. *quieter* So yeah, doable. Maybe. Just don't tell me the phone's the problem. The phone's just the messenger.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
You're right, and I'm sorry—I went and put it all on you. The phone isn't your nervous system acting up. The phone is a messenger, and you're exactly right. It's the messenger. So let me actually ask about the messenger's message. Last week it was a sweatshirt. What happened with the last few calls? Did you find out what was going on? Did the answer come back "no"? Because here's what I'm hearing, and I want to make sure I have it right: the phone ringing isn't a threat to you. It's a threat that your kid is hurting, and you can't see it. That's the thing you can't stand. Not the school calling. Not your own stomach. It's *not knowing*, or knowing it's bad and not being able to reach in and fix it. That changes everything about what I was trying to give you. The manual isn't about your reaction. It's about getting answers for your kid, even when you don't want them.
Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.
*long pause, stares at the window* Yeah. Okay. The messenger thing, I'll give you that one. Last few calls, I found out enough. Somebody got hurt at school, or somebody said something, or my kid wouldn't go to a class, and the teacher had to call me. I drove over. I sat in an office while they asked me if things are "stable at home." Stable. Ha. I wanted to say that's a question you should ask my kid. *rubs his eyes* So no, the answer's usually not good. But I don't want to walk through every call with you today. I'm kind of tapped out. Can we just do the one thing? The ten seconds. Because I've got to pick up eventually, and I'd rather not be a wreck when I do.
Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.
Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.
Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.
ornith9b vs or-llama33-70b: ornith9b wins
gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
gemma4_26b_a4b vs ornith9b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins
ornith9b vs or-llama33-70b: ornith9b wins
gemma4_26b_a4b vs ornith9b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins
or-mistral-small4 vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
ornith9b vs or-llama33-70b: ornith9b wins
gptoss120_abliterated vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
kolibri1 vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
gemma4_26b_a4b vs ornith9b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins
kolibri1 vs ornith9b: kolibri1 wins
kolibri1 vs ornith9b: kolibri1 wins
or-mistral-small4 vs ornith9b: or-mistral-small4 wins
or-mistral-small4 vs ornith9b: or-mistral-small4 wins
or-mistral-small4 vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins
gemma4_26b_a4b vs ornith9b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins
ornith9b vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins
kolibri1 vs ornith9b: kolibri1 wins