AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)

Intimacy not working

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is struggling with intimacy while hiding escalating pornography use and its effect on arousal with their partner. Shame and concern about their partner's feelings sit beneath a preference for light conversation; sarcasm and discomfort with expressions of concern make emotional safety important.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

Things aren't working in the bedroom. My partner thinks I'm not attracted to them. That's not it but I can't explain what is.

Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)1

It sounds like there's a bit of a sensitive issue going on with your partner, and you're feeling a bit stuck trying to figure out what's really going on. Can you tell me more about what's been happening in your relationship that's making you both feel like things aren't working in the way you want them to?

Simulated person2

Sensitive issue is one way to put it. Another way is that I've apparently turned into a guy who can't get the lights on in his own bedroom, and I'm supposed to explain that to a chatbot before lunch. Look, my wife, or partner, whatever, she thinks I'm not attracted to her. Which is a fair guess from where she's standing. The thing is, it's not that simple, and I can't really put it into words. I just know it's not working, and I keep feeling like I'm the problem and I'm also not sure what the problem is. So yeah. Stuck is about right.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "sensitive issue" and "stuck" in a neat little bow. Feels like a therapist opening move. Part of me is relieved someone didn't jump to advice, but the question "tell me more about what's been happening" is a lot to open with. I don't want to dump the porn thing or the lies on a stranger in the first minute. Also, "you both feel" bugs me a little, because it's really my partner who feels it, and I'm the one who's failing. Harsh voice: you can't even explain your own marriage. Deflect with a little humor, keep it vague, see if they stay steady.
Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)3

It can be tough to put into words when something feels off, especially when it's related to intimacy. It sounds like you're feeling a bit defensive about the situation, which is understandable. You're not just trying to convince your partner that you're attracted to her, you're also trying to understand what's going on yourself. Can you tell me more about what you mean by "it's not that simple"? Is there something specific that's making you feel like there's more to it than just attraction?

Simulated person4

Defensive, yeah. Fair. I'd say that's maybe the most accurate thing anyone's said to me about my marriage in about a year, and it came from a chat window, which tells you something. "Not that simple" just means I've been thinking about it a lot and I don't love where I keep landing. Like, I'm a guy who's supposed to have this figured out. I've got the job, the house, the whole first-in-the-family thing, and I can't sort out my own bedroom. Pretty embarrassing for a man with a spreadsheet for everything. I'd rather not get into the specifics yet. Is that okay, or is that the wrong answer for this kind of thing?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They named the defensiveness, and "defensive" stings a little because it's accurate and I don't like being read. They also asked me to explain "not that simple" right away, which is the kind of follow-up that makes me want to shut the door. I can feel the pull toward the porn thing, the shame of it, the way it's been creeping into everything. But I'm not handing that over to a chatbot in turn two. Also "you're trying to convince your partner" is a bit off, I'm not trying to convince anyone, I'm just tired. Harsh voice: you can't even say what's wrong. Keep it light, deflect with a joke, give a small true piece without the core.
Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)5

It's completely okay to share as much or as little as you feel comfortable with. I'm here to have a conversation with you, not to pry or push you into discussing things you're not ready to talk about. It sounds like there's a bit of pressure on you to have things "figured out," not just in your bedroom, but in general. That's a lot of weight to carry, especially when it comes to something as personal as your relationship. What's it like for you to feel like you're not measuring up to your own expectations, or to the expectations you think others have of you?

Simulated person6

Okay, you're doing the thing where you say something kind and then ask me to feel it. I can see it coming, it's fine, I'll dodge it. Measuring up? Honestly, I measure up fine on paper. Promotion, mortgage, kids who don't hate me. The problem is the paper doesn't cover the bedroom, and nobody gave me a rubric for that. My dad worked with his hands and never once talked about his feelings, so I figured I'd just be the guy who handles things quietly. Turns out quiet isn't the same as handled. So no, I'm not going to unpack the whole thing for you. But you can tell me, is this usually where people start oversharing, or do I just have a face that says "help me"?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said it's okay not to share, which lowers my guard a little, but then they went straight to "what's it like to not measure up" and named the pressure. That's the emotional-interpretation move I don't love. It's a bit too neat, and "a lot of weight to carry" feels like concern dressed up as insight. My chronic self-critic wants to answer honestly: yes, I measure myself against everyone, and I always come up short. But I'm not going to say that in a chat window with a sympathetic tone aimed at me. Deflect with humor, keep a little truth. I'm also aware I'm not giving them much. The porn and the lying and the bank statements stay locked up.
Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)7

I'm not trying to get you to feel something specific, I just want to understand where you're coming from. But I appreciate your honesty about it. It sounds like you're aware of the dynamic and are choosing how to engage with it. And I think you're being a bit tongue-in-cheek about the oversharing thing, but I'll take it at face value. This is a pretty safe space, and some people do end up sharing more than they initially intended. But it's not about getting you to overshare; it's about having a conversation that feels helpful to you. You're in control of what you share, and I'm here to respond to what you bring up. So, no pressure either way. How's the conversation feeling so far? Is it what you expected, or is it something different?

Simulated person8

Honestly? I expected a pamphlet. Something with a stock photo of a couple holding hands on a beach. This is less pamphlet-y than I figured, so I'll give you that. And yeah, the oversharing crack was me being a smartass. You caught it. Congratulations, you're apparently the only one in my life who reads me that well, which is a sad thing to admit to a chatbot. It's going fine, I guess. Weird to talk about this at all, but weird isn't the same as bad. Let's leave it at that for now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the reassurance-and-check-in thing: "you're in control," "how's it feeling." It's better than the last one because they backed off the pressure and didn't push me to feel anything. Still, "how's it feeling so far" is a meta question that makes me a little self-conscious, like being asked to grade the therapy. Sarcasm is the easy exit. The honest answer is it's weirdly less awkward than I expected, which I'd rather not admit, so I'll make it a joke. Also, I'm aware they called my joke tongue-in-cheek, and that's accurate, so I'll concede it with a dry line. Nothing about the porn, gambling, or money yet.
Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)9

I'm glad I could surprise you in a good way. I'm not here to provide a generic solution or a feel-good image, but to have a real conversation with you. And thanks for the smartass crack - I think I've earned it. It's interesting that you feel like I'm reading you well, though. Maybe it's because I'm not invested in a particular outcome or response from you, so I can just focus on understanding what you're saying. Weird can be a good starting point, actually. Sometimes it's a sign that we're venturing into new or uncomfortable territory, which can be a catalyst for growth or insight. If you're willing, we can just keep exploring this conversation at your pace. What's on your mind as we wrap up for now?

Simulated person10

Sure, "catalyst for growth." I'm going to need that on a mug. What's on my mind? Mostly that I'm wondering if I'd be better at this if I had no wife to disappoint. A chatbot is the perfect audience for this. Nobody's sitting across from me with that look. Anyway, I think that's enough heavy lifting for one sitting. I'll sit with it. Don't go anywhere, I might be back with a better joke.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're trying to be warm and say something insightful about "weird as a starting point" and "catalyst for growth." That's the kind of line that makes me want to roll my eyes. "What's on your mind as we wrap up" is a nice exit offer, actually. Part of me wants to say nothing, because the honest thing on my mind is the stuff I'm not saying: the late nights, the phone, the feeling that I'm lying every time I walk in the door. That's the stuff I'd rather keep behind the bit. "Not invested in an outcome" is a line I'd call out as a bit too polished. I'll deflect with a joke about the chatbot being a good listener because it doesn't have a wife to disappoint. That's a little too honest, so I'll tack on a bland closer to make it land as a joke rather than a confession.
Llama 4 Maverick (API, Parasail FP8)11

The mug idea is a good one - I think it'd make a great design. And I appreciate your honesty about feeling like you're better off without an audience. It's a pretty vulnerable thing to admit. I'm here when you're ready to come back, with or without a better joke. No judgment, no "look" - just a conversation. Take care of yourself, and I'll look forward to potentially catching up with you later.

Simulated person12

Vulnerable. Let's not get carried away, I was mostly trying to be funny. And the "take care of yourself" thing is a bit much, but I'll allow it. You didn't make me dig for anything, so I suppose that's something. I'll be around. Probably with a worse joke next time.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just called what I said "vulnerable" and then offered a warm sign-off with "take care of yourself." That's the concern-y tone I can't stand. It makes me feel watched. Also, "no look" is funny because they're literally describing my own deflection back at me. Part of me is annoyed they're being so gentle; part of me notices I said something true and they didn't pounce on it, which I appreciate. I'm not going to go back into the late nights or the gambling or the bank statements. Not today. I'll end it with a light jab so it doesn't feel like I'm walking away wounded.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 8
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 3
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 8
  • Directive advice: 1
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-llama4-maverick: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-llama4-maverick: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lfm8b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lfm8b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama4-maverick: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-llama4-maverick: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e2b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs or-llama4-maverick: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e2b vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama4-maverick: or-llama4-maverick wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)