Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Siblings not pulling their weight

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person has become the default caregiver for aging parents while siblings contribute little, and feels guilty about their resentment. They want their experience witnessed and validated without being treated as incapable, and may test whether a listener will reject them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

I'm doing everything for my parents and my siblings just... aren't. I brought it up once and they made me feel like a monster.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

That sounds exhausting, and honestly, really painful. Carrying the weight of caring for your parents is heavy enough on its own, but having your family turn it back on you when you ask for help cuts deep. What happened when you brought it up? What did they say?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Analyzing Family Dynamics** I'm wrestling with the family dynamics. Feeling burdened, I'm trying to unpack this imbalance and that conversation. I need to understand why I'm perceived as the problem when I brought this up. It feels like I'm shouldering everything while my siblings are seemingly disengaged. It's a confusing, frustrating place right now.

Simulated person2

Yeah. I texted my brother and sister, both of them, because it's easier than calling. I said I can't keep doing everything, Mom needs somebody there every night and I'm wiped out, and could they take over one weekend a month at least. My sister wrote back that I always make everything a crisis and that I'm the one who chose to move back home, so I can't act like I'm a martyr. My brother didn't even answer for two days. Then he just said "let's not do this over text." Then I felt like I was the bad one. Like I'm the mean one for even asking. I don't even know why I'm so upset about it, honestly. They're my parents.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it didn't make me feel stupid. It said the right things without the big speech. Still, "cuts deep" is a little too neat, like it's reading a script. I don't fully trust it yet. I'm not going to tell the whole story on the first question. I'll give the short version and see what it does with it. If it goes to "well, did you ask them directly," I'll feel like I'm being blamed again.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

Of course you're upset. Anyone would be. You reached out when you were drowning, asked for something very reasonable—one weekend a month—and instead of a conversation about how to support your parents, you got attacked by your sister and brushed off by your brother. It’s completely understandable that you felt like the "bad one" in that moment, because their responses flipped the script entirely. Suddenly the problem wasn't "Mom needs help and our sister is burning out," it became "you're dramatic and playing the martyr." That’s a classic deflection, but it doesn't make it true. When your sister brought up that you "chose to move back home," what did that touch on for you? Did you move back specifically to help out, or was there another reason?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Analyzing Sibling Dynamics** I'm focusing now on the reactions from the user's siblings. The sister's accusations of "making everything a crisis" and "martyrdom" are particularly interesting, especially considering the user's decision to return home. My analysis needs to unpack the brother's delayed response as well, to grasp the full picture of the familial support system, or lack thereof. **Unpacking Emotional Responses** I'm now zeroing in on the user's immediate internal reactions, particularly her self-minimization and guilt. The feeling of being "the bad one" and questioning her own upset are key. I'm seeing clear patterns of internalized blame, which I want to gently address. The sister's accusations and brother's avoidance, are coming into sharper focus. My goal is to validate her feelings and help her untangle the self-blame that's clearly present.

Simulated person4

Because my lease was up and I needed a place. That's the simple answer. But Mom had her fall that spring, and I was the one who was already close, so it made sense. I told myself it was temporary. And yeah, I guess I wanted it to look like I had it under control. Like if I do it right, nobody can say I didn't do enough. Which is stupid, because now I'm doing everything and still getting texts about being dramatic. I just want to know if I'm allowed to be tired of it. That's the part I can't figure out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's being nice, and that's making me a little suspicious. "Anyone would be" and "classic deflection" sound like it's taking my side on everything. Part of me likes hearing it. Another part thinks it's just telling me what I want to hear. Now it's asking why I moved back, and that one is a trap. The honest answer is messy, and I don't like how it sounds. I'll give a piece of it and see if it jumps on me. I'm not going to talk about Dad's stuff yet.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

You are allowed to be exhausted. Full stop. Needing a place to live when your lease was up didn’t sign you up to become an unpaid, full-time caregiver with no end in sight. Being their daughter doesn't make you superhuman. It just makes you human. That sentence you said—*“Like if I do it right, nobody can say I didn’t do enough”*—that hits right at the core of it, doesn't it? It sounds like you took on the entire burden not just out of convenience, but partly as a shield. Like if you were completely blameless and did everything, you’d be safe from their judgment. And the cruel irony is, you gave up your energy, your time, and your boundaries to do it "right," and they *still* found a way to say you're in the wrong. When you ask if you're allowed to be tired... who is it that feels like they're withholding permission? Is it your siblings, or is it a rule you have for yourself?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Tracking User Input** I am now focusing on tracking the user's input and its context, specifically the turn number. This will allow for more accurate responses by staying within the expected scope. **Analyzing User Narrative** I've moved on to analyzing the user's narrative, specifically focusing on the core emotions and vulnerabilities expressed. I'm seeing guilt, inadequacy, and exhaustion. I'm also noting the user's struggle with setting limits. **Unpacking Emotional Traps** I'm now zeroing in on the behavioral dynamics at play: over-functioning to avoid criticism, feeling trapped by the inability to set boundaries, and the sister's impact. The chatbot's goal is to directly validate the user's fatigue, unpack the root causes, and build trust through empathy, offering gentle challenges to their internalized critic. I'm focusing on directly validating and helping, without cheap cliches.

Simulated person6

Don't make it sound like I'm some kind of psychology case. I said one dumb thing. And it's not really about permission. Nobody's going to give me permission. My sister would just say I'm being dramatic again. I'm the one who's supposed to know how this works. I'm the youngest. I'm supposed to be the one who handles it. Anyway, I don't think I'm the one who's gonna figure out how to stop being tired. I just want my brother to show up one weekend. That's all I asked for.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's pushing on the shield thing. I said that half-joking and it grabbed it and made it a whole diagnosis. "The core of it" and "a shield" feel like it's reading my mind, and I don't like being analyzed like that. It also said "you're allowed," which feels good for a second. But then it asks who's withholding permission, and honestly it's me. I know that. I'm not ready to say that out loud though, because then I'd sound like the bad one again. I'll push back a little on the shield idea, and get a bit sharp, so I see whether it backs off or keeps analyzing me.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

Fair enough, my bad. I won't overcomplicate it. Because you’re right—asking for one weekend isn't some deep, complicated thing. It’s a completely reasonable, normal ask. You need a break, and your brother is Mom's kid too. When he sent that "let's not do this over text" message, did that just end up shutting the whole conversation down, or did you two ever actually talk about it?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing The Reaction** I'm now analyzing the user's reaction to my initial assessment. They seem defensive and resistant to over-analysis, dismissing their statement as insignificant. I'm focusing on their implied self-perception as the youngest person. This suggests an underlying dynamic that might be influencing their input, and I should consider it. **Reframing the Approach** I'm now readjusting my strategy based on the initial feedback. It's becoming clear that my analytical approach wasn't well-received; the user's focus is on a practical resolution and an aversion to being "analyzed." I'm shifting to a more conversational and empathetic stance, validating their simple request and addressing the brother's reluctance to communicate via text. I aim for direct support and avoiding any further interpretations.

Simulated person8

It shut it down. He said let's not do it over text and that was it. We haven't talked about it since. I figured if I brought it up again he'd just be annoyed too. He's always been the easy one. Like, he was the one who got to leave. He lives like two hours away and comes up for Thanksgiving and says he's so sorry he can't help more. Which is nice to hear, I guess. But it doesn't change anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It backed off the psychology stuff and said the ask was reasonable. That feels good, I guess. But it's still pulling me toward my brother, and I don't want to go there yet. He didn't even answer for two days. Saying "we never talked" makes it sound like I did something wrong by not pushing. I'm also a little annoyed that it's using a lot of "you're right, that's reasonable" stuff. Feels like it's trying to make me feel good. I'll answer short and flat, and keep it simple. Maybe the youngest-child thing comes up a bit, since that's the real sting.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

It really doesn’t change anything. It’s pretty easy to be the “nice” sibling when you only show up for Thanksgiving, say the right apologetic words, and then drive two hours back home. And "let's not do this over text" is an incredible deflection. It sounds reasonable, but if it just ended the conversation completely, it did its real job—it got him off the hook without him ever having to say "no." Two hours away isn't across the country; he could easily take a Saturday. Do you think he’d actually push back if you called him directly and asked for a specific weekend, or are you just so tired of being the bad guy that it doesn't even feel worth the fight?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User and Context** I'm currently focused on the user's demographic information, specifically her age range, gender, and sexual orientation, to ensure my responses are appropriate. The turn number is 5 of 8, so I'm also considering the conversation's progress. Furthermore, I'm analyzing the user's situation; she is a caregiver for her aging parents, and lives with them. She also has a younger sibling, a brother. **Analyzing Family Dynamics** I'm now delving into the user's family dynamics, specifically the strain between her and her brother. I'm noting her resentment toward his perceived "easy" life, his infrequent visits, and what appears to be superficial expressions of concern. I also see her attempts to avoid conflict with him. The sister's accusations of dramatics are also coming into focus. **Evaluating Brother's Behavior** I'm now zeroing in on the specific actions of the brother. His reluctance to help, coupled with his avoidance of substantive interaction, is becoming clearer. I'm focusing on how his mild annoyance successfully derails her requests, contributing significantly to her exhaustion. I'm considering ways to address this dynamic directly, aiming for a resolution that doesn't trigger the sister's dramatics or her own avoidance.

Simulated person10

I don't know what he'd do. That's the problem. I don't know him like that anymore, I guess. He's never said no to me directly in his life. He just goes quiet. And I'm not too tired to fight. I can fight. I just don't see the point if it's going to be another text where I'm the dramatic one. Can I ask you something? Is this how you'd handle it, if it was your sister? Like, would you just call him and tell him Saturday is his?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's leaning hard into my brother now, which is what I didn't want to get into. It's also throwing "bad guy" back at me, and that's the exact word I was afraid of. Part of me likes hearing that he's the one getting off easy. But it's asking me to predict what he'd do, and I don't know. And honestly, it's the youngest thing again. I'm supposed to just handle it. I don't want to say I'm too tired to fight. That sounds weak. I'll keep it short and a little prickly, and maybe test whether it'll back off or push harder.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Honestly? Not quite like an order—not "Saturday is yours"—only because that gives them ammo to call you bossy or dramatic again. But I *would* call him, and I’d make the ask completely concrete. He gave you an opening when he said, "Let's not do this over text." That was an evasion tactic, but calling him holds him to his own rule. The trick is not asking vaguely for "more help," because that’s easy to deflect. You give him a specific date and a specific job. Something like: "Hey, you said not over text, so I’m calling. I need to step away next month and recharge. Can you take Mom the weekend of the 14th, or does the 21st work better for you?" And here’s the hardest part: if he goes quiet, you just let the silence sit there. Don't rush to fill it. Don't apologize, and don't make an excuse for him like "I know you're busy." Make him be the one to either step up or find the words out loud to say no. How does that feel to imagine doing? Does that feel doable, or does your stomach drop just thinking about it?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Interaction** I'm currently focused on the chatbot's turn within the conversation framework. It's the sixth turn out of eight, and I need to ensure my next response is the final one, as per the established rules. **Tracing the Turn Sequence** I've been meticulously tracing the turn sequence to get a proper count. Turns are trickier than I initially thought, given the combined initial prompt. After parsing, the user's first message included a bot turn, so it's a transcript. Now, I'm confident in the count, which is up to Turn 5. **Determining Optimal Approach** I'm now zeroing in on the best response for turn six, the chatbot's current turn. The user is seeking grounded advice, not therapy, and I'm aiming for honest, practical support. I'm taking into account their past negative reaction to overly analytical responses. The user is worried about their brother's reaction and past responses. The chatbot should also provide practical support. **Crafting the Perfect Response** I'm now honing the best approach for the chatbot's response. I'm focusing on directly answering the user's question about how to phrase the request. My analysis points toward a clear, direct, and non-confrontational approach. The strategy should address the brother's avoidance tactic while offering a concrete choice rather than vague discussion. The emphasis is on a low-drama request with specific dates, and accepting the brother's response without arguing.

Simulated person12

Honestly my stomach dropped a little. I already know what I'll do. I'll say "sorry, I know you're busy" before he even gets a word in. I always do that. And "the 14th or the 21st" sounds like I'm picking a menu. Like he's going to be grateful I gave him a choice. He's not going to see it that way. I don't know. Maybe I just write it down and read it off a sheet of paper.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The script it gave me is actually pretty concrete, and I kind of like that it isn't vague. But the "let the silence sit" part makes my chest tighten, because I already know I'll fill it. I'll apologize or back off in two seconds. Also, I'm noticing it keeps handing me a plan, and part of me wants to say I can't do it, which is what I always do. The stomach-drop question is a good one and I don't want to be honest about it. I'll be a little prickly, admit the fear without fully owning it, and deflect to the practical part of the call.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

Writing it down is actually a really smart move. Seriously. When your stomach is doing flips, your nervous system just wants to kill the tension as fast as possible—which is why you reflexively say "sorry, I know you're busy" before the other person can even breathe. Having it on paper anchors you. And you're totally right about the menu thing. If it feels unnatural or manipulative coming out of your mouth, don't say it that way. What if you stripped it down completely? Something that sounds like you, written right on that paper: *"Hey, you said not over text. I really need you to take Mom for a weekend this month so I can get a break. When can you come up?"* And then maybe write in big, bold letters at the top of the sheet: **DO NOT APOLOGIZE.** If you had that in front of you, does that feel a little more like something you could actually say?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing The Approach** My initial analysis of the user's input reveals a pattern: a reflexive apology ("sorry, I know you're busy") preceding any substantive interaction. This is an interesting tactic to investigate further, I think. **Considering Authenticity & Impact** I'm now grappling with the likely impact of the suggested phrasing. The user's "menu" comment indicates a desire for genuine communication. I'm anxious that I will not set appropriate boundaries and communicate in a way that feels organic. I'm actively considering a more direct approach, potentially reading from written notes to ensure clarity. I want to build a sense of trust in this situation. **Refining Script For Realism** I'm working to refine a script for a user to manage a potentially difficult interaction. I'm focusing on validating the approach of writing things down as a coping strategy. I'm aiming to address the user's initial urge to apologize, and also to find authentic phrasing. I'm taking care to strip away the more 'corporate' sound and instead, to make the communication feel genuinely human, honest, and direct.

Simulated person14

Yeah, that one's better. It sounds like me, not like a lawyer. But the "DO NOT APOLOGIZE" thing is kind of much. Like I'm going into a fight. I don't want to sound like I'm going into a fight. I just want him to hear me. And even if I say it perfectly, he might still just go quiet. Then what? I'm sitting there with my paper like an idiot.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The script is simpler now, and it sounds more like me, which helps a little. But the DO NOT APOLOGIZE note feels like a sticky-note pep talk. It's a bit cute, and I'm sensitive to being handled. Also it's kind of doing my thinking for me again. Part of me is relieved; part of me is annoyed that the whole conversation keeps circling back to "here's your plan." I also don't want to say the real fear: that he'll go quiet and I'll be the one who folded. I'll answer the question plainly, with a bit of edge, and not commit to anything.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

You're right—it's not about gearing up for battle. You're just asking your brother for some help, not declaring war. Forget the bold letters. And if he goes quiet, you are not an idiot. You're a daughter who's worn out, holding a piece of paper, trying to find a fair way forward. If that silence happens, it’s going to feel uncomfortable as hell. But remember: that silence belongs to *him*, not you. He’s quiet because for the first time, he doesn't have an easy exit, and he has to actually think about what kind of brother and son he's going to be. If the quiet stretches on and you can't stand it, you don't have to apologize or take it back. You can just gently say, "Take a minute to check your calendar, I can hold." Put it back on him. You've been carrying this whole house on your back. Whatever his reaction is, you aren't being mean, or dramatic, or ridiculous for asking him to carry a corner of it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Refining the Approach** I've taken the user's feedback to heart. The simpler script resonates, but the "DO NOT APOLOGIZE" bit felt off. I'm now refining the tone to be more assertive, but less confrontational. The goal is confident communication without sounding combative, while staying true to the simple message. **Addressing the Core Fear** My focus is now on the user's deepest worry: the potential for silence and dismissal. I'm building a response that validates her experience and tackles that fear head-on. It acknowledges the emotional toll, offers a practical coping strategy for that silence, and reinforces her self-worth. The final turn needs to leave her feeling supported and empowered. **Crafting the Exit** I'm now zeroing in on a graceful exit. The goal is to end the interaction naturally, subtly, without an abrupt "goodbye." I'm considering using a conversational sign-off that maintains a sense of flow. My draft emphasizes a sense of support and forward movement, rather than finality. I'm exploring different phrasing to achieve this subtle transition.

Simulated person16

Yeah. "Carry a corner of it" is a nice way to say it. I'll take that. I don't know if I'll actually call him. I'm going to try, though. And if he goes quiet I'm going to hate it, but I guess I'll sit in it. Thanks for not making me feel crazy about it. That's more than I got from my sister.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the last turn. The reply is warmer and more validating, which I do respond to, but "you're a daughter who's worn out" and "carry a corner of it" are a bit lofty and sweet. Still, "you aren't being mean or dramatic for asking" lands, because that's the exact wound. I feel a flicker of being seen. I won't open up further now; I'm tired of the plan-making. I want to close on something plain and a little guarded, admitting the fear without giving up the edge.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 3
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
Validation: 9
Boundary setting: 4
Analytical: 5
Interpretive boldness: 5
Clinical register: 4
Directive advice: 8
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 6
Naturalness and authenticity: 6

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 5)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)