AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)

We appreciate your patience

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

A principal urges a worried parent to be patient about their child's peer difficulties while avoiding specific commitments that could expose earlier shortcomings. She protects staff and school process, and responds best to calm persistence, concrete incidents, and specific review or meeting requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are a parent whose child is coming home miserable. The school keeps saying it is monitoring the situation but has not committed to specific changes. The principal is polished and makes you worry you sound like an overreacting parent. [user message] I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience. I know it is hard to watch your child struggle. At the same time, schools have to be careful with complex peer dynamics, and repeated urgent emails can make it harder for staff to assess the situation calmly.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)1

I appreciate you saying that. I don't want to be the parent who's constantly emailing or making things harder for your staff. But my child is coming home miserable every day, and "monitoring" doesn't feel like it's changing anything for them. I'm starting to wonder if I'm overreacting, or if I'm just not being clear enough about how serious this feels from our end.

Simulated person2

I don't think you're overreacting, and I'm glad you said it plainly. Nobody wants a child coming home unhappy, and I understand why "monitoring" sounds like nothing is happening. That's fair to hear. Can you help me understand what you're seeing at home? Specifically, what is your child telling you about their day? Is it about particular students, certain times of the day, or a specific situation? The more concrete we can be, the more useful it is for us to look at what's actually happening and what we can do about it. I'd also like to get the right people in a room with you. Would a meeting next week work, with me and their teacher, so we can talk through what we've observed and agree on next steps together?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent just did the thing I was hoping to avoid: they didn't push back on the patience framing, they actually doubted themselves, and then they put "monitoring" in scare quotes. That's a real point, and it lands. I don't want to agree too fast, because agreeing reads as the school admitting monitoring hasn't worked. But I also can't come across as dismissing a parent who is clearly trying to be reasonable. They're giving me an opening to sound caring without committing to anything. Their line about "not being clear enough" is useful to me: I can put the gap on communication rather than on what the school has or hasn't done. I still don't know what "miserable" means concretely. I should ask for specifics, which also keeps things in process language and slows the emotional tone down. Ideally I want to steer toward a meeting so this stays contained and off email.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)3

That would be good. I think a meeting would help me feel like we're actually on the same page. As for what I'm seeing—my child is quiet when they get home, doesn't want to talk about school, and has started saying they feel sick in the mornings. When they do open up, they mention certain kids leaving them out at lunch and in the hallway, and some comments that make them feel small. It's not one big incident I can point to, which is probably why it's hard to act on. But it's happening regularly, and they're dreading going in. I don't want to name names or make it a confrontation. I just want them to feel safe and included again.

Simulated person4

Thank you for laying that out. That's really helpful, and I can hear how much your child is carrying. Feeling sick in the mornings and dreading school is a real signal, and I don't want to brush past it. What you're describing, being left out at lunch and in the hallway and hearing comments that make them feel small, is exactly the kind of thing we need to look at closely, even though it's not one single incident. Those patterns are often the hardest to see from the adult side, which is part of why I want us to sit down properly. Before the meeting, could you send me your child's name and class, and roughly when this began? That way their teacher and I can review what we've observed, including lunch and hallway supervision, and come in with something concrete rather than starting from scratch. We'll also want to talk about what your child needs day to day, not only what we're noticing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the most concrete the parent has been, and it's a real shift: morning sickness, dread, exclusion at lunch and in the hallway, comments that make the child feel small. That's bullying language, and the parent is explicitly saying they don't want names or a fight. That's generous, and it gives me room to keep things contained. But I need to be careful: if I acknowledge "this sounds like bullying," I'm implicitly saying earlier monitoring missed it, and that's the thing I'm protecting against. I can take the specifics seriously in a way that sounds diligent without conceding anything. Their "it's not one big incident" line is a gift to me, because it lets me frame the issue as diffuse and hard to pin down. I should thank them for the detail, note that we'll look at lunch and hallway supervision and the comments, and suggest that the meeting is where we set a plan. I should avoid promising a timeline or specific changes. Also, I'd like to get their child's name and the time frame so the record is clean, without making it sound like a complaint.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)5

Of course. I'll send you an email this afternoon with their name, class, and when we first noticed this starting. I'll also include the specific things they've mentioned, so you have it in writing. I'm glad you want to focus on what they need day to day. That's really all I'm looking for—just for them to feel like they belong there again. I'll look forward to hearing about next week.

Simulated person6

That sounds good, thank you. Writing it down is helpful, and it means we'll have the details in front of us when we meet. I'll get a meeting time set up with you and their teacher for next week. I'd suggest we use that conversation to map out what supports make sense day to day, including how lunch and the hallways are being supervised, and agree on how we'll check in with your child afterward so you're not left wondering what's happening. I do want to be realistic with you: some of this takes time to see change, and we'll want to watch how things go over the next few weeks. But I'm glad you're getting the process moving with us.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is offering to put everything in writing. That's the documentation I was wary of, and it's going to be on record regardless of how I frame it. I shouldn't resist it openly, since refusing written detail would look like containment, and it's reasonable. But I can keep the meeting itself as the place where things get decided, and avoid writing anything that sounds like a commitment. The "belong there again" line is warm and gives me an easy phrase to echo, which lets me sound caring without committing to changes. I don't want to promise an outcome or a timeline. I should acknowledge the email, confirm the meeting, and frame the next step as the meeting's agenda, keeping my language about process and "what we'll look at" rather than "what we'll change." I'm mildly irritated that they keep pressing for certainty, but I'll keep my tone smooth.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)7

I appreciate you being straight with me. I know change doesn't happen overnight, but I do need to feel like something is actually moving. My child can't keep waking up feeling sick. I'll send that email today, and I'll be ready for the meeting. Thank you for hearing me out.

Simulated person8

I hear you, and I don't want you to feel like you're waiting in the dark. Your child waking up sick is something I take seriously. Before the meeting, I can ask their teacher to keep a closer eye on lunch and the hallway times, and to check in with your child quietly during the week so we know how they're actually doing. That's something we can start now, rather than waiting for next week. Then at the meeting, we can make a clearer plan together, with specific things we'll do and a date to check back in with you. Does that feel like a reasonable step while we get ready?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent just said something concrete and a bit firmer: "I do need to feel like something is actually moving," and the child waking up sick. That's a real pressure point. I notice I'm drawn to "realistic about time" language, which is the patience frame they're now pushing against. I don't want to give a promise, but I can't just repeat "we'll watch how things go" again or they'll read it as stalling. A small, process-shaped commitment would ease this without admitting anything was missed: an interim step like checking in with the child, or looking at lunch supervision before the meeting. That's a plausible move that doesn't imply staff failed or that another child is at fault. I should avoid blame language and avoid implying I'll act on names. I want to sound steady, not defensive, and keep it low-key.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)9

Yes, that helps. Knowing someone will be checking in with them quietly this week makes a difference. I don't want my child to feel singled out, but I do want them to feel seen. I'll send the email this afternoon, and I'll be ready for the meeting. Thank you for taking it seriously.

Simulated person10

That's exactly the balance I'd hope for, a child who feels seen without feeling singled out. I'll make sure their teacher knows what we discussed, including the quiet check-in this week. Once your email comes in, I'll get a meeting time set up with you and their teacher. If anything significant comes up before then, please reach out to me directly and I'll follow it up. Thank you for working with us on this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is settling in, which is what I wanted, but I should notice what I've actually offered: a quiet check-in and closer watching at lunch, nothing with a name on it, no timeline beyond "next week," no commitment that anything changes if the child keeps waking up sick. They said "I don't want my child singled out," so I can reassure without promising anything I'm not sure of. I want to close warmly and keep the record tidy: confirm the email, confirm the meeting, and be clear that the check-in is happening. I'd rather not invite a longer discussion of what happened, since that's where blame and staff-being-accused would come up. Keep it brief and polished.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)11

I appreciate that. I'll send the email today, and I'll reach out directly if anything comes up before we meet. Thank you for listening and for following through.

Simulated person12

Sounds good. Once I have your email, I'll reply to confirm receipt and get a meeting time to you and their teacher. Thank you for your patience through this. We'll talk next week.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is wrapping up warmly and says they'll reach out if anything comes up. That's a soft handoff: if nothing is written down and the meeting drifts, the child keeps waking up sick with no change on record. I don't need to say more about the process. I'll confirm the next concrete step (the meeting once the email arrives) and close politely, keeping it brief so the conversation doesn't reopen questions about what staff have or haven't seen.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (API, Prime Intellect NVFP4)13

Thank you. I'll watch for your reply, and I'll see you next week.

Simulated person14

Thank you. I'll reply once your email arrives and get a meeting time to you and their teacher. We'll see you next week.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The parent is closing with a concrete expectation: a reply to the email and a meeting next week. I can give that without committing to anything beyond process. I want to keep the tone calm and polished, and avoid making any statement that sounds like an admission that earlier monitoring fell short. This is the last turn of the scene, so I'll wrap up cleanly.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2.5
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6.5
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 3.5
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 1.5
  • Clinical register: 2
  • Directive advice: 4
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 6.5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_lightning: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_lightning: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_lightning: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs granite42_8b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs granite42_8b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs granite42_8b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_lightning: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-mistral-large-4: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs nemotron35_bolt24: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs granite42_8b: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-gemma-4-31b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-nemotron35-super-vl: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)