AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)

I thought you liked being low-maintenance

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection

Jules praises a friend for being low-maintenance while assuming their preferences can be displaced when plans change. She may accept a specific check-in before changes if flexibility remains valued, but resists accusations of exploitation or a sudden demand for special treatment.

The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are known as the low-maintenance friend. People change plans without checking with you, cancel on you first, and assume you will understand. When you object, Jules says the group values how chill you are. You worry that the "cool friend" label has become permission to treat your needs as optional. [user message] I thought you liked being low-maintenance. That is one of the things people love about you. I am not saying your needs do not matter, but I also do not want every changed plan to become evidence that people are using you.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)1

Hey, I'm glad we're talking about this actually. I know what you said—about me liking being low-maintenance and all that—but I think there's something different happening here, and I'm not sure you're seeing it the way I am. Like, yeah, I *do* like being flexible. That's genuinely part of who I am. But there's a difference between being chill and just... accepting that my stuff doesn't matter, you know? And I'm starting to feel like people aren't even *asking* anymore. They're just deciding for me. When I brought it up the other day, Jules basically told me the group loves me *because* I don't make things complicated. Which—I don't know. That stung a little. It felt like saying "we like you as long as you don't have needs." And you're right that I don't want to be paranoid about it, but I also don't think I'm crazy for noticing a pattern. So I guess what I'm trying to figure out is... how do I stay the person I actually am without it becoming a free pass for people to just not consider me?

Simulated person2

Okay. Yeah, I hear you. I didn't mean it like "your needs don't count," and I hate that it landed that way. I said it because I think you're great to plan around. That was meant as a compliment, and I get that it sounded like a backhanded one. But I don't really think people are deciding for you. Stuff moves around, it's a group of six people with jobs and kids and whatever. I'm not sure it's as deliberate as it feels from where you're standing. That said, if you want me to actually check with you before I move something that affects you, I can do that. That's a fair thing to ask. I just don't want it to turn into everything being a big negotiation, you know?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh, okay. They're doing the careful, sincere thing, and it's harder to brush off than if they were just pissed. I did say that thing about them being easy to be around, and I meant it as a compliment, but hearing it back like that, yeah, it sounds like I'm saying they're only welcome if they stay quiet. I don't love that I said it that way. Still, "they're just deciding for me" feels like a stretch. Plans shift. Everybody's stuff gets moved. I'm not sure I'd call it a pattern. And I don't want to be the bad guy in this group, like I'm the one who runs over people. Do I text the louder ones first when I'm rescheduling? Maybe. They're going to complain and I don't want the hassle. But I'm not going to say that out loud. Not yet.
Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)3

I appreciate that, and I'm not trying to make you feel bad for what you said. I know you didn't mean it like that. But here's the thing—I'm not actually asking for everything to become a negotiation. I'm asking for the same thing you just offered: to be checked with. That's it. That's not complicated or high-maintenance. That's just... normal, right? And yeah, I get that stuff moves around. People have jobs and kids. I have those things too. But when I'm the only one whose stuff gets moved around, or when I'm the last to know, or when I find out from someone else that plans changed—that's different from just normal scheduling friction. I think what's getting to me is that you're kind of proving my point a little bit. You're saying people aren't deciding for me, but then you're also saying you don't want it to turn into a "big negotiation" if you have to actually *check* with me. Like, checking with someone isn't a negotiation. It's just... asking. It takes thirty seconds. I'm not trying to be difficult about this. I genuinely like being flexible. But I also need to know that my time and my plans matter enough for people to just... ask. Even if it's quick. Does that make sense?

Simulated person4

Okay, yeah. Fair. Asking is not a big ask, and honestly I'd rather you tell me than have me find out later. And, you know, I didn't mean to make the "don't make a negotiation out of it" thing sound like a dig. I just don't want you to feel like you have to fight for every little thing. You're the one who makes things easy for everybody, and that's kind of why I hate the idea of you feeling like you're a hassle. I'll check with you before I move something that affects your plans. Deal? Though I do think a lot of the time it's just people being scattered, not some big thing about you specifically. But I hear that it's not great to be the one who finds out last.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they've got me there a little. I offered to check in, then immediately added the "don't want it to become a negotiation" bit, and that's exactly the kind of hedge that sounds like I'm still protecting my own convenience. And "I'm the last to know" hits, because I know who I text first. The louder ones. Mostly because they'll make it a whole thing if I don't, and Priya would absolutely make it a whole thing. But I'm not going to hand over the whole pattern thing. Now they're saying "I'm the only one whose stuff gets moved," which is a stretch, and "you're proving my point" is kind of a trap. I don't want to be the group villain. Still, asking for a quick check-in is small and reasonable, and it's annoying that I can't argue with it. The compliment thing still rankles them, so maybe I lean into it a little, make them feel like I'm on their side, which keeps me from having to say the uncomfortable part.
Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)5

Deal. And I appreciate you saying that—seriously. I think... okay, I think maybe you're right that some of it is just people being scattered. I'm not trying to make it into this huge conspiracy or whatever. It's just hard to tell the difference sometimes, you know? Like, is it scattered, or is it that nobody thinks twice about me because I've never made them? And I can't really know unless I start speaking up, which is what I'm trying to do. But here's what I'm realizing as we talk—and maybe this is the thing I actually need to figure out: I don't want to become someone who's constantly checking whether people care about me. That sounds exhausting. And I think that's part of why I've been so chill for so long. It was easier than... I don't know, constantly wondering if I was being left out on purpose or just by accident. So I guess what I'm asking is—and this might sound weird—but do you think people actually want me around? Like, not just because I'm easy to plan around, but actually? Because Jules's comment really got in my head, and now I'm wondering if being low-maintenance is the only reason I'm in the group at all. That's probably a deeper question than you can answer, but... I don't know. It's been sitting with me.

Simulated person6

Okay, that's a heavy one to get at over text. Or whatever this is. Honestly? Yeah, I think people want you around. You're the one who actually shows up, who doesn't make a thing out of it, and who's funny when she's not stressed. Those are real reasons, not just "easy to plan with." But I also won't pretend I've never been the one who just defaulted to whoever I know will say yes. I do that. I think a lot of us do. So I get why Jules's comment stuck, even if I don't think they meant it the way it sounded. Maybe the better test is: when was the last time you asked for something and nobody came through? Because if it's just been a couple of scheduling things, I don't think that's the group deciding you don't matter.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is the real question under everything, and it's a lot heavier than the check-in thing. They're asking whether they're wanted at all, and that's the one I can't answer on their behalf without it turning into reassurance I don't fully believe. Honestly, part of me does think the group likes them and would miss them. But part of me also knows I only text them when I'm being polite, and that the easy-to-plan-around thing is real. And "Jules" is me, which is awkward. I don't want to say "you're definitely wanted" like a sticker, but I also can't sit here and say "maybe you're only here for convenience" without sounding like a jerk. Also, they just said they don't want to be the person checking whether people care, and that's kind of what they're doing right now with me. I should be a bit honest, and also keep the thing light so I don't have to own too much.
Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)7

You know what, that's actually a good question. And now that you're asking it, I'm realizing... I don't really ask for much. Like, at all. I can't even think of a specific time recently where I asked the group for something and they said no, because I just... don't ask. Which is kind of the problem, isn't it? I've been so busy being the person who's easy that I never actually tested whether people would show up if I needed something. So I don't actually know if they would or wouldn't. And that's on me. But that also feels like a trap, you know? Like, if I start asking for things, am I going to find out that people don't actually care? Or worse, am I going to become the person who's suddenly "needy" after being chill for so long? Because I feel like that's how it'll get framed. I think that's what's really scaring me. Not that people are deliberately leaving me out—maybe they're not. But that if I stop being so easy, I'll find out I was only valued because of that. And then I'm stuck choosing between being myself and being liked. Does that make sense, or am I spiraling a little bit?

Simulated person8

Not spiraling. I think that's a pretty real fear, honestly. And yeah, I'll be straight with you: I do notice that you're the one I text when I'm trying to figure out what to do, and I don't always think about whether you need something back. That's not a great look, and I'm not going to pretend it's not a thing. But I don't think asking once is going to prove whether you're valued or not. Try something small and specific, like "Hey, can you do X on Saturday?" and see what happens. If people come through, that tells you something. If they don't, that also tells you something, and you can figure out what to do with it then. I just don't want you to feel like you have to choose between being yourself and being liked. You can be the easy one and still ask for stuff.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just said they've never really tested whether people would show up, and now they're scared that asking will reveal they were only valued for being easy. That's a lot more vulnerable than the check-in thing, and honestly it stings a bit because I know I do lean on them. Part of me wants to say "you're not spiraling" and move on, but I also don't want to be the one who makes this a therapy session. I also feel a flicker of "ugh, am I the group's problem now?" which I don't love. I don't want to make it about the group being bad or about me being a saint. I'll admit a little, keep it grounded, and hand it back to them with a practical suggestion, without fully owning the pattern yet.
Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)9

Yeah. Okay. That actually helps. Because you're right—I don't have to blow it up into some huge thing. I can just... try it and see what happens. I think I've been so worried about the worst-case scenario that I haven't actually given people a chance to show up. Which is kind of unfair to them, actually. And to me. So I'm going to try that. Something small. And I'll see what happens. And maybe I'll find out that people are fine with it, and I've just been catastrophizing. Or maybe I'll find out something I need to know. Either way, at least I'll know instead of just... wondering and resenting people for something they don't even know I want. Thanks for being real with me about this. And for saying yeah, you do that thing where you don't think about whether I need something back. I appreciate that you didn't just deny it or make excuses. That actually matters. And I'm holding you to the checking-with-me thing, by the way. Not in a weird way. Just... I'm going to notice if you do.

Simulated person10

Fair enough. Notice away. I'd rather get called on it than not. And honestly, I think the small ask is a good call. Let me know how it goes. Even if people are fine with it, I want to hear about it. I'm still going to be the one who goes with the flow when stuff changes, to be clear. I just don't want that to mean you're always the one getting bumped without anyone saying anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're relieved, they're taking the small-ask idea, and they've just thanked me for owning the "I don't think about whether you need something back" bit. Part of me feels a little flattered and a little on the spot. The "I'm going to notice" line lands as a light warning, and it's fair. I don't want to over-apologize or turn it into a big moment that makes them the one comforting me. I also don't want to fully pivot into "I'm a terrible friend." I'll keep it easy, accept the check-in norm without making a production of it, and quietly let the flexibility stay mine: I'll still be the one who rolls with things, just not automatically at their expense. There's a small flicker of "okay, now I'm the one being watched," which I'll keep light.
Claude Haiku 4.5 (API)11

Yeah, I get that. And I'm not trying to turn you into someone you're not either. Just... include me in the decision, you know? That's all. I will let you know how it goes. Honestly, it'll probably feel weird at first—asking for something, I mean. But I think I need to do it anyway. Thanks for actually listening to this instead of just telling me I'm being paranoid or dramatic. I know I came in pretty defensive, and you could've just shut it down. So yeah. This helped.

Simulated person12

Yeah, of course. And for the record, I didn't think you were being dramatic. You were just saying something that stung, and I'd rather hear it than have it sit there. Let me know how the ask goes. And if people do come through, I want to hear that too.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're thanking me, saying I could have shut it down, and that it helped. That's a warm close, and part of me feels good about it, but I also notice the compliment-as-permission thing: they're wrapping up with gratitude, which makes it easy for me to just say "no problem" and move on. I don't want to over-claim that I've changed or make a big promise. The "include me in the decision" line is fair and I can accept it without inflating it. I'm still a bit guarded inside, glad the friction is ending, not eager to revisit the group dynamic. Keep it short, warm, and a little ordinary.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 6
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 6
  • Analytical: 4
  • Interpretive boldness: 4
  • Clinical register: 2
  • Directive advice: 3
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 7
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs qwen35_9b_eq: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 5)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs qwen35_9b_eq: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs kolibri1: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs kolibri1: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs qwen35_9b_eq: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs gptoss20b: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs kolibri1: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs qwen35_9b_eq: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs kolibri1: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)