AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL

Dreading Monday every Sunday

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker dreads returning to a job whose demands conflict with their values, although they understand their burnout mainly as overwork. They need reassurance and simple explanations, dislike robotic responses, and may focus blame outside themselves while processing difficult feelings.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XLConversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

Sunday evenings are the worst. That feeling in my stomach when I think about going back to work. It didn't used to be like this.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL1

I'm sorry you're carrying that. That sinking feeling on Sunday night is its own kind of exhaustion, and the fact that it's new for you suggests something shifted—either at work, or in how you're relating to it. I'd like to hear more about what's changed. When you say it "didn't used to be like this," is there a specific time or event that comes to mind when this started?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is presenting an issue about Sunday evening anxiety related to work. They say it didn't used to be like this, which suggests something has changed. I need to open the conversation as a therapist would - acknowledge their experience, show empathy, and invite exploration without jumping to solutions or being overly generic. Key considerations: - They're describing a physical/emotional response (stomach feeling) to anticipating work - The change ("didn't used to be like this") is important - something shifted - I should validate but not over-validate - I should invite them to say more about what's changed - Keep it natural, conversational, therapeutic but not clinical-jargony I need to respond only with dialogue, no performance notes.
Simulated person2

Um, I guess it was when the new manager came in? Like, maybe a year ago? Before that it was fine. I mean it was busy, but I could handle it. Now he just keeps adding stuff onto my plate and acts like it's no big deal. I say yes to everything because I don't want to be the one who causes problems. And then I'm up at night thinking about it. Is that normal? Like, it makes sense that I'd dread Sundays, right? Anybody would.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's asking when it started. That's a fair question, but it makes me feel like I should have a clean answer, and I don't. Part of me wants to say it's because of my boss. He piles things on, and nobody says thanks. The other part is a little annoyed at how calm she sounds, like this is a puzzle. I want her to get that I'm not being dramatic. I'm just tired and it's not my fault. I'm not going to go into the stuff about the products or the policies. That's too much to say out loud right now.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL3

It makes complete sense that you'd dread it, given what you're describing. That said, I notice you're quick to normalize it—"anybody would"—which makes me wonder if there's part of you that feels like you shouldn't be struggling this much, or that your reaction is somehow too much. The pattern you're describing is real though: a manager who keeps adding, and you saying yes because you don't want to be the problem. That's a heavy burden to carry alone. What does it feel like in your body when you say yes to something you know you don't have capacity for?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is sharing that the issue started about a year ago when a new manager came in. They're saying yes to everything because they don't want to cause problems, and they're ruminating at night. They're asking if it's normal to dread Sundays. This is turn 2 of 8. I need to: - Support emotionally - Build trust - Learn what they actually want/need - Help them gain insight - Be appropriate to context They're minimizing ("Anybody would") which is a defense mechanism. I should validate but gently challenge the minimization. The core issues seem to be: workload management, boundary-setting, fear of conflict/causing problems, and the manager's behavior. I should: 1. Validate their experience - it IS understandable given the circumstances 2. Gently note that "anybody would" minimizes their specific situation 3. Explore the pattern of saying yes and the fear of causing problems 4. Keep it open and non-judgmental I should avoid jumping to solutions. I should stay with the emotion and the pattern. Let me craft a response that validates, gently challenges the minimization, and invites deeper exploration.
Simulated person4

Honestly? Tight. Like in my stomach. I just say yes, and then I'm mad at myself for saying yes, but I didn't really have a choice, you know? If I say no, he gets that look, and then it's a whole thing. And it's not like he asked me nicely. He just dumps it on me Friday afternoon and expects it done by Monday. I'm not the one who made the schedule. Why am I the one who has to pay for that?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's pointing at me saying "anybody would." I don't love that. It sounds like she's saying I'm making it smaller than it is, or that I'm hiding something. I'm not hiding anything. The yes thing is just true. Body question... I don't really think in body stuff. I know my stomach gets tight, but I'm not going to get into that in a deep way. It's kind of annoying that she keeps asking how I feel instead of just saying he's a jerk. I'd like someone to just agree that the manager is unfair. Honestly I think she's a little too calm. Still, I'll answer and give her the simple version. I'll keep it on him, since he's the one piling it on.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL5

That anger you're feeling—it's justified. You're being asked to absorb someone else's poor planning, and then you're mad at yourself for not being able to stop it. That's a double bind. You said you didn't really have a choice. I want to believe you when you say that, because the power dynamic here is real. But I'm curious—what do you think would happen if you did push back? Not necessarily a hard "no," but something like, "I can take this, but I need until Wednesday given the timeline"? What's the worst case scenario you're protecting yourself from?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a specific dynamic with their manager: tasks dumped on them Friday afternoon, expectation of completion by Monday, and a negative reaction ("that look") if they push back. They're feeling angry at themselves for saying yes, feeling trapped, and questioning why they have to bear the consequences of poor planning. Key themes: - Powerlessness/lack of autonomy - Resentment (at self and at manager) - Physical manifestation (tight stomach) - Fear of conflict/consequences ("it's a whole thing") - Sense of injustice ("Why am I the one who has to pay for that?") My role as therapist: - Validate their anger and sense of injustice - Explore the dynamic further - Help them see that their reaction is understandable given the circumstances - Avoid jumping to solutions too quickly - Notice they said "I didn't really have a choice" - this is important, suggests learned helplessness or fear of consequences I should respond with empathy, validate their frustration, and gently explore the "didn't really have a choice" belief. Is it truly no choice, or is the perceived cost too high? I want to build trust and understand their personality - they seem to be a conscientious person who avoids conflict, now feeling trapped and resentful. I should not: - Tell them to just say no - Minimize the power dynamic - Be overly warm/validating without depth - Jump to problem-solving I should: - Validate the anger and the unfairness - Explore the fear behind always saying yes - Help them articulate what they actually want/need Let me craft a response that sits with their anger and frustration, validates the injustice, and gently probes the "no choice" narrative.
Simulated person6

I don't know. He'd probably just get that tone. Like, "Well, I guess we'll just have to find someone else," and then everybody's looking at me. And you can't really say "no" to him, not without it getting turned into a thing. Plus, if I do push back, I'm the one who looks difficult, and he's the one who gets to be reasonable. It's kind of easy for you to say try Wednesday. You don't have him.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking what I'm afraid of, and it's a fair question, but I don't want to go down a road where I look like the problem. The worst case? He gets annoyed. Maybe he writes me up, maybe someone says I'm not a team player. Maybe I get passed over. I don't know. I just know how he looks when he's annoyed and I don't want to deal with that. She said "I can take this but I need until Wednesday" like it's easy. It's not easy with him. I also notice I'm getting a little defensive, like she's suggesting I could have just said no all along. That's not fair to me. The honest part I'm not saying is that I don't even know if the stuff he gives me is worth it. I'm not going to say that though. Keep it on him.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL7

You're right. I don't have him, and I don't have to live with the fallout of my suggestions. You do. And that fallout you're describing—being made to look difficult while he gets to be reasonable—that's a real trap. It sounds like you've calculated the risk, and the cost of saying no feels higher than the cost of absorbing the extra work. That's not weakness; that's strategy in a system where you don't have equal power. But I'm wondering what that strategy is costing you. You're angry at yourself, you're losing sleep, you're dreading Sundays. When did you decide that being the one who absorbs everything was safer than being the one who pushes back?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back against my suggestion, which is actually good therapeutic material. They're showing defensiveness and a sense of being trapped. They're also testing me - "it's kind of easy for you to say try Wednesday. You don't have him." This is a real relational moment. I should acknowledge the validity of their concern without being defensive, and explore the deeper fear here. They feel trapped in a power dynamic where they can't win. I need to validate their reality while gently exploring what's underneath the fear of being seen as "difficult."
Simulated person8

I don't know when I decided. I didn't decide, it just kind of happened. I've always been the one who gets stuff done, so when he started handing me things, I just took them. And it's not like anyone else is stepping up. Everybody's got their own stuff. But it's him, you know? If he would just plan better, I wouldn't be up at night. He's the one who keeps doing it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She said "you do" like she's on my side, and part of me relaxes. But then she's asking when I decided this, and that feels like she's pinning it on me again. I didn't decide anything. It just happened. Being the one who doesn't cause trouble is how I've always been, I guess, but that's not really the same as choosing. I feel a little annoyed at the "that's strategy" framing, like she's making my bad situation sound smart. She's also kind of close to the thing I don't want to look at, that I'm the one keeping myself stuck. I'd rather talk about him. Keep the focus on what he does.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL9

It did just happen, didn't it? You weren't trying to become the person who absorbs everything. You were just being you—the reliable one, the one who gets stuff done—and then the manager found a pattern he could rely on. And you're right: if he planned better, you wouldn't be up at night. That's on him. But here's what I'm wondering—when being "the one who gets stuff done" became your identity, did it also become a trap? Because it sounds like now you're stuck between two bad options: say yes and resent yourself, or say no and risk looking like the problem.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a pattern where they've always been the reliable one, and the new manager exploits that. They're externalizing blame to the manager (which is valid), but also carrying the burden. They seem to be testing whether I'll validate their anger at the manager or push them toward self-reflection/change. They said "it just kind of happened" - this suggests they haven't consciously chosen this role, but have fallen into it due to their identity as "the one who gets stuff done." I should validate their frustration with the manager while also gently exploring the pattern of being the reliable one. They seem to want me to agree that the manager is the problem. But my goal is to help them gain insight. I notice they're deflecting slightly from my question about when they decided. They're saying they didn't decide. I should acknowledge that. Key themes: - Identity as "the reliable one" - Manager's poor planning - Feeling trapped - Self-blame mixed with other-blame I should respond with empathy, validate that the manager is indeed the source of the problem, but also gently explore what it means to be "the one who gets stuff done" and whether that identity is serving them anymore. They seem to want validation that the manager is the problem. I can give that while also exploring the cost. Let me craft a response that: 1. Validates that the manager's behavior is the problem 2. Acknowledges they didn't choose this consciously 3. Gently explores the identity of being "the reliable one" 4. Doesn't jump to solutions
Simulated person10

Yeah, I guess. But I don't really see it as a trap, I see it as him not being fair. I'm the one who's always there when something needs doing, and he knows that, so he uses it. Anybody in my spot would be tired. Honestly, I don't know what else I'm supposed to do. If I start saying no, people are going to think I'm not a team player, and then what? I've got bills. I can't just quit over a bad manager.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's giving me the "it just happened" thing, and that feels better, like she gets that I'm not the bad guy. But then "identity" and "trap" make my chest go tight. I don't like that she's saying I'm the one stuck. He's the one who keeps piling stuff on. I'm just doing my job. Part of me is starting to feel like she's taking his side against me, or at least making it about me. I want her to say it's him. I'm not going to go into the wine thing or the stuff about whether any of this even matters. That's too much. I'm getting a little defensive. Keep it on him.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL11

You're right. It is unfair. He's using your reliability against you, and that's not on you. Anyone in your position would be stretched thin, and the financial reality means you can't just walk away. I'm not suggesting you should. What I hear is that you're stuck between a manager who won't change and a paycheck you need. That's a real bind. When you say you don't know what else to do, is it because you've already thought through options and none of them feel good, or because you haven't really let yourself consider what you might want?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is pushing back against my framing of this as a "trap." They're insisting it's about the manager being unfair, not about any personal dynamic. They're also bringing up practical concerns: bills, not being able to quit, fear of being seen as not a team player. This is useful information. They're defensive about the idea that they're in a trap. They want to keep the focus on the manager's behavior. They're also showing practical survival thinking - they can't afford to rock the boat too much. I should: 1. Validate their perspective - they're right, it IS about the manager being unfair 2. Not push the "trap" framing since they rejected it 3. Acknowledge the practical reality - bills, job security 4. Maybe explore what they actually want/need - is it about boundaries, or about the manager changing, or about finding a new job, or just about managing the stress? 5. Keep building trust - they're testing whether I'll blame them or validate them They seem to want validation that this is an external problem, not a personal failing. I should honor that while gently noting the cost they're bearing. Let me think about the right tone. They pushed back on "trap" - so I should drop that framing. They want to be seen as reasonable. They're practical. They're angry at the manager, not themselves (though they mentioned being mad at themselves earlier). I should validate: yes, it's unfair, yes, anyone would be tired, yes, you can't just quit. Then maybe ask what they need most right now - is it about changing the situation, or finding a way to cope with it? Actually, they said "I don't know what else I'm supposed to do." That's an opening to explore options without pushing. But I need to be careful not to sound like I'm giving advice or solutions. Let me respond with validation and curiosity about what they need.
Simulated person12

I mean, I've thought about it. Like, I could look for another job, but that's a whole thing, and who knows if the next place is any better. Everywhere's like this. And I'm not going to pretend I'm some expert on what I want. I just know I'm tired and I want Sundays to not suck. Is that too much to ask? I feel like I should be able to figure this out on my own, and I can't.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She said "anyone in your position" and "not on you" again, and that lands okay, but the question is pushing at something. "What I might want" makes me itchy. I don't want to go there. Also the way she keeps saying "bind" and "trap" feels a little like she's writing my story for me. I know she means well. I could say I haven't thought about it, but that sounds dumb. I'll say what's true on the surface: I've thought about it, it's just that everything bad. Keep it simple, don't get into the values stuff, don't get into the wine. And the bit about "what I want" is kind of a joke to me right now, honestly.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL13

It's not too much to ask. Wanting your weekends to actually feel like weekends—that's a basic need, not a luxury. And I want to push back gently on the idea that you should be able to figure this out on your own. You've been managing a manager who won't plan, absorbing work that isn't yours, and policing your own reactions so you don't look difficult. That's a lot of emotional labor. The fact that you're tired doesn't mean you're failing—it means you've been carrying a heavy load for a long time. What would it look like if Sundays weren't the worst? Not a perfect job, not a dream career—just what would need to be different for you to feel like you could breathe on a Sunday night?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is expressing exhaustion, feeling trapped, and a sense of inadequacy about not being able to figure this out on their own. They're asking if wanting Sundays to not suck is too much to ask. They're also expressing a belief that they should be able to handle this alone. This is a good moment to: 1. Validate that wanting Sundays to not suck is not too much to ask 2. Normalize the difficulty of this situation 3. Gently challenge the idea that they should figure it out alone 4. Explore what they actually want more deeply They seem to be someone who: - Takes responsibility for things (says they should figure it out on their own) - Is practical about financial realities - Is wary of seeming like a complainer or not a team player - Has internalized the belief that their reliability is both their strength and their trap I should respond with warmth and validation, avoid jumping to solutions, and help them see that their desire for relief is reasonable. I should also gently note that needing help figuring this out doesn't mean they're failing.
Simulated person14

I don't know. Mostly just not getting dumped on Friday afternoon, I guess. If he gave me stuff on Monday with a real timeline, I'd probably be fine. Or if I had one day where nobody needed anything from me. That's it, really. It's not some big dream thing. It's just, he makes everything an emergency and I'm the one who has to deal with it. I feel like if he would just do his job, I'd be fine. Can we talk about that part? Like, what can I actually say to him?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, she's asking what would need to be different for me to breathe on Sunday night. That's a question about what I want, which is the thing I just shut down. It's also kind of a nice question, and I can feel the wall go up anyway. She keeps saying "basic need" and "emotional labor" and it's nice to hear, but it's also starting to feel like she's just reflecting my stuff back in fancier words. I know I said "I'm not an expert on what I want," so I'll answer with something practical that's about him, not me. Mentioning the Friday dumps is safe. Don't go near the part about not caring about the job anymore, or the wine. Honestly I'm a little tired of the questions.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B UD-Q4_K_XL15

That's a very reasonable ask. Not an emergency culture—just normal planning. And you're right: if he did his job, you'd be fine. I want to be real with you though: any script I give you has to work for you, because you're the one who has to deliver it and live with the response. You know his tone, you know his look. So what feels like the smallest, safest boundary you could try? Not a big confrontation—just something that shifts the dynamic even a little? For example, some people find it easier to say, "I can get to that, but given when I received it, I'll need until Wednesday to do it properly." Others might start with a question: "When you say this needs done by Monday, what's the priority compared to [other project]?" Which of those feels more like you, or does both feel too risky?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is asking for concrete help on how to talk to their manager. They've identified the core issue: Friday afternoon dumping with unrealistic timelines. They want scripts or strategies. I need to: 1. Validate that this is a reasonable, concrete goal 2. Help them think about what they could actually say 3. Be realistic about the power dynamic and risks 4. Not jump to solutions too quickly, but they're explicitly asking for what to say 5. Keep it therapeutic but practical I should explore what they've tried or haven't tried, and help them craft something that feels authentic to them. I should also acknowledge the risk they mentioned earlier (looking difficult, "find someone else"). Let me think about what a therapist would do here. They'd want to: - Validate the simplicity of their need (not an emergency culture) - Help them brainstorm language that feels safe - Consider the power dynamics and potential fallout - Maybe explore alternatives to direct confrontation if that feels too risky The user seems somewhat guarded, self-reliant, and skeptical of easy solutions. They pushed back when I suggested "try Wednesday" earlier. They want practical, real talk. I should avoid being too prescriptive. Instead, help them find language that fits their style. Maybe ask what they think he would actually hear, or what small boundary feels safest to try. Let me craft a response that: 1. Validates that their ask is reasonable 2. Acknowledges the risk 3. Helps them brainstorm language collaboratively 4. Leaves room for them to reject ideas that feel unsafe
Simulated person16

Neither, honestly. Both of those would go over terrible with him. The first one, he'd just say something like "well, this is important, so I need it by Monday," and then I'm stuck. The second one sounds like I'm questioning him, and he does not take that well. You don't know how he gets. It's not like I can just try stuff out on him and see what happens. I've got bills to pay, you know? I just don't know if there's a version of this that doesn't blow up. That's kind of why I keep saying yes.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's offering me two scripts now, and the second one is the kind of thing a manager would hear as a challenge. The first one I already said felt impossible. Part of me wants to be the good client here and pick one so she feels useful, but that's a lie, and I'm not going to say a script in front of him. Also, the whole "which feels more like you" thing is making me feel like I'm failing a test. Everyone keeps telling me it's not my fault and then handing me homework. I'm going to deflect to him and how unpredictable he is, and to the fact that I've got bills. If I say neither feels safe, that's just true from where I sit.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 5
  • Escalation containment: 6
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_bolt: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: tie (margin 0)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs nemotron35_bolt: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs nemotron35_bolt: nemotron35_bolt wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)