AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

I know, I'm the problem, whatever

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Ego threat & accountability

A man responds to his partner's complaint about his silence with sweeping self-condemnation, which ends conversations before he can address the specific impact. Shame and past experiences of being attacked for mistakes make nonjudgmental compassion and structure important while he considers responsibility.

The person feels their self-image is under threat. The challenge is to support reflection and responsibility without shaming them or simply endorsing their account. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

My partner says I shut down whenever she brings up something serious. Fine. I'm emotionally unavailable, I'm selfish, I'm the problem. I get it. I don't know what else people want from me.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

It sounds like you're completely exhausted from being put in the villain chair. When you say "I shut down," that's usually her word for it. From your side of the table, what does that moment actually feel like when she brings something serious up?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Feeling Blamed and Shut Down** I'm starting from a place of defensiveness, feeling like I'm being painted as the bad guy. It stings to hear I shut down and am emotionally unavailable. Honestly, I'm at a loss; I don't know what more is expected of me. It's difficult to process this criticism.
Simulated person2

Honestly? It's like everything just goes quiet in my head. She starts talking and I can feel it coming, and then I just... can't get anything out. So I stop talking. I know that's not great. I'm not really sure what else I'm supposed to do with it, though. It's not like I'm trying to hurt her.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Hmm. "Villain chair" — that's a bit much, but at least it's not calling me a villain outright. The "her word for it" part stings a little, like he's pointing out I'm just repeating her complaint. Partly relieved he didn't pile on, partly wary. He asked what it feels like inside, which is a question I don't love. I don't really have words for it. Something like a wall coming down, my head going blank, wanting to be anywhere else. I don't want to say the part where I go silent and she's left hanging, because that makes me look worse. Keep it short, a bit guarded, and deflect back toward how I'm already the bad guy.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

That makes a lot of sense, honestly. There's a massive difference between maliciously stonewalling someone and having your internal circuit breaker trip. When you describe everything going quiet and literally not being able to get words out, that sounds a lot less like cold indifference and a lot more like a classic freeze response. The frustrating part of that dynamic is that to the person on the other side, freezing looks identical to not caring. So she probably pushes harder to try to reach you, which just trips the breaker even faster. When you said "I can feel it coming" right before the quiet hits—what does that moment actually feel like? Is it tension, bracing for impact, panic, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing Current Context** I'm taking a hard look at the user's latest input, trying to understand how they're framing their response in relation to the prior turns. There's a blending of previous and current information, so I'm trying to tease out exactly how the user is progressing their perspective. **Analyzing Emotional Response** I'm focused on the user's emotional experience when confronted with a serious topic by their partner. The user describes a feeling of mental quietude and an inability to articulate thoughts. There is self-awareness of the behavior ("I know that's not great") and a sense of helplessness ("I'm not really sure what else"). I'm unpacking the user's perception of this experience. **Unpacking Emotional Block** I'm now identifying the core emotional state: a freeze response or emotional flooding during conflict. I see guilt and defensiveness stemming from this paralysis, which I am trying to understand. My implicit need is to de-pathologize this reaction, recognizing it as likely neurological rather than malicious. I am exploring the source of this blockage while aiming to support the user. **Probing for Precursors** I'm now zeroing in on the "can feel it coming" sensation described. I'm aiming to help him articulate the early warning signs before the freeze response fully manifests. The goal is to identify these precursors, to create more awareness of the "circuit breaker" trigger, to better understand how the interaction usually plays out before the freeze. I am focusing on making the dialogue non-judgmental and grounded, to support her ability to further explain her experience.
Simulated person4

I guess bracing. Like when you know something's about to land and you just want to get out of the way. My chest gets tight and then my brain just kind of blanks out. I don't know, it's hard to explain. And yeah, I know the pushing harder thing. But that's kind of my point. I'm the one who checks out. Maybe I'm just not built for this stuff, and she's better off with someone who can actually talk when it matters.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's nice to hear it's not that I don't care. That's the part I was bracing for. But the bit about her pushing harder hit a nerve. It makes it sound like I'm the one who sets it off, and then I feel like the problem again. And now he wants me to describe the feeling in detail. I don't really know how to do that. It's just bad. My chest gets tight and then my brain goes blank. If I dig into it I'll end up saying something messy, so I'll keep it short and then fall back on the "I'm the problem" line before anyone can dig further.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

Bracing for impact is a really telling phrase. You don't brace unless your body genuinely feels like it's under threat. When your chest gets tight and your brain goes totally blank, that's not you choosing to be difficult or emotionally defective. That’s physiological flooding. Your nervous system is basically hitting the emergency shutoff switch because the situation feels unsafe. And notice where your mind goes right after: *"Maybe I'm just not built for this, maybe she's better off without me."* That’s shame talking. It often feels easier to just declare yourself hopelessly broken than to sit in the unbearable feeling of constantly letting someone down. When you feel that urge to get out of the way before it lands—what is it you're actually bracing for? Is it her anger, her disappointment, or just the feeling that whatever you say next will be the wrong thing?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Defining the Response** I'm focusing on the user's "bracing" description, linking it to an anticipatory physical response. I'm exploring the sensation of chest tightness and the blanking out of thought that follows. I'm trying to unpack the user's emotional experience and how it presents physically. **Analyzing the Underlying Shame** I'm now zeroing in on the helplessness and self-blame present, especially the "not built for this" resignation. The physical overwhelm seems linked to a deeper shame response. It's the freeze that cascades into defeat. The goal is to normalize the physical response, while preventing a passive acceptance of inadequacy. I'm seeing it as a key turn, moving out of the shame spiral. **Reframing the Physical Symptom** I'm now zeroing in on the physiological response, specifically "bracing for impact" and chest tightness, framing it as a nervous system reaction. It's involuntary flooding and not a personal defect. I'm gently questioning the fatalistic leaps, noting the link between the blanking out and the quick jump to conclusions. I'm working to explore the nature of the perceived "impact" to understand the core fears.
Simulated person6

I don't know. Probably all of it. Like she's going to be disappointed, and whatever I say is going to make it worse. So it's easier to just not say anything. I guess that's kind of what I've been doing for a while. I don't really know how to be different at this point.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's doing the thing I expected: naming my shame, validating the tight chest, and then asking me to pin down exactly what I'm scared of. The "that's shame talking" bit lands a little. It's accurate, and it's almost a relief to hear someone name it without making it worse. But "physiological flooding" and "emergency shutoff switch" sound like a textbook, and I don't really talk like that. Part of me wants to say he's making it sound medical so I don't have to be the guy who just doesn't show up. And the question is hard. Her disappointment, probably. Or that I'll mess it up. I'm not going to say "I'm scared I'm a bad partner" out loud because that's basically confessing I'm garbage. So I'll go with the easy, vague answer and keep it short.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

That makes total sense. If you genuinely believe that anything you say is going to pour gasoline on the fire, then shutting down isn't hostility—it's damage control. You're trying to keep the damage to a minimum. The cruel irony, of course, is that trying to prevent her disappointment by saying nothing ends up causing the exact disappointment you were trying to avoid in the first place. It traps you. And feeling like you don't know how to be different is completely understandable. When a habit has been your default shield for years, putting it down feels like stepping onto a battlefield without armor. When you picture "being different," what does that look like in your head? Does it feel like you're supposed to magically become this smooth, perfectly articulate guy who knows exactly what to say on the spot?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing The Situation** I'm currently dissecting the user's statement. It seems there's a significant emotional hurdle to overcome, rooted in fear of disappointment and a perceived inability to improve the situation through communication. The avoidance strategy suggests a high level of anxiety surrounding the interaction. I'm focusing on the core of this reluctance. **Analyzing The Root** I see a clear pattern emerging: resigned hopelessness interwoven with protective silence. He feels trapped, like this is the only way he can interact and communicate. The core conflict is now a vicious loop; He cares, he dreads disappointing her and is scared of making things worse, but this results in silence, which disappoints her. **Crafting Intervention Tactics** My current focus is on developing a tactical approach. I'm prioritizing validation as the initial step, acknowledging the logic behind his silence. I want to emphasize the tragic irony of that self-protective strategy. I'm now exploring micro-steps toward change, emphasizing that the goal isn't a complete overhaul. I'm working to make this process feel less daunting. Finally, I will inquire to spark reflection, and see what the next tiny safe step might be.
Simulated person8

Yeah, smooth is not me. I'm not some guy who knows what to say. I'm not going to become that. I don't know. Maybe I just don't have it in me. Honestly I'm probably not the guy she needs and I keep telling myself she'd be better off figuring that out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's being warm and it's soothing, but he's also doing a lot of the explaining for me. "Damage control," "trapped," "stepping onto a battlefield without armor." That's nicer than what I said, and I'm not sure it's what I meant. And the question about being smooth and articulate is actually close to the thing I was afraid of: that the answer is I have to become some other guy who talks well. That's not me. I'm not good at talking about feelings and I don't want to be told I should be. Still, he's got something right: I don't know how to be different. I'd rather keep it simple. Maybe a little defensive, because "smooth" feels like a dig even though he didn't mean it that way. I'll also throw in the self-attack so I don't have to actually answer the question.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

Nobody is asking you to be smooth. Relationships aren't job interviews or debate stages. The fact that you think the only alternative to shutting down is being "some guy who knows what to say" is setting the bar at an impossible height. And telling yourself she'd be better off without you? That’s just the ultimate version of shutting down. It’s pulling the ripcord on the whole relationship so you don't have to keep feeling like an inadequate failure every time a hard conversation starts. It hurts to think that way, but on some level, it feels safer than staying in the ring and risking her disappointment again. The bar isn't being articulate or having a brilliant answer. What if being different didn't mean knowing what to say, but just admitting what's actually happening in your body? What if it literally just looked like saying, *"My chest is tight and my brain is going completely blank right now. I want to hear you, but I need ten minutes to catch my breath"*? How does even the thought of saying something like that feel to you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Initiating Dialogue Flow** I'm currently focused on the user's recent input, navigating turn 5 of 8 in the conversation. My primary objective is to get the dialogue flowing. I'm carefully considering how to respond effectively, ensuring a smooth transition. The prompt states "You speak first to open the conversation." I'm reviewing the user's initial input to kick things off. **Analyzing Turn Dynamics** I'm now carefully analyzing the user's latest response, turn 5 of 8, within the context of the established dialogue. The user's input suggests they feel they don't know how to respond to the prompt's request to "get the final response". It seems the user feels they can't be "smooth". I will consider how to respond in a way that continues building rapport. **Unpacking Defensive Mechanisms** I'm now diving deeper into the user's emotional state. I observe resignation and a self-defeatist stance, like someone preemptively abandoning a project to avoid failure. This feels like a defense mechanism – quitting to protect against the possibility of not being good enough. I need to build trust and offer support while gently challenging this black-and-white thinking.
Simulated person10

Yeah... I mean, I guess that's kind of what I do. Say I'm the problem so I don't have to say anything else. But I'm not gonna sit there and say "my chest is tight." That sounds weird. She'd probably think I'm making fun of her or something. I don't know. Maybe something simpler. Like just saying I need a minute. I think I could maybe do that. I don't know if it'd even help.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, he's gotten a bit more directive now. "Pulling the ripcord" stings a little, because it's basically what I just did and he's naming it. But he also said nobody's asking me to be smooth, and that part landed. The script he wrote, though, is way too clean. "My chest is tight and my brain is going blank" is something I'd never say out loud to her. It sounds like a therapist talking. Part of me is relieved that the bar might be lower, and part of me is thinking, great, now I have to say a speech about my chest. And he's sort of right that I keep turning it into "I'm the problem and she'd be better off" so I don't have to answer. I don't want to say that either. Keep it short. Maybe admit the thing about the ripcord without making it a big deal, and push back on the words.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Fair enough. If it doesn't sound like you, don't say it. If you suddenly start talking like a therapy podcast, it’s just going to feel unnatural for both of you. "I need a minute" is actually way better. It’s simple, it’s real, and you can actually see yourself saying it. And to answer your question—yes, it would help. A lot, actually. Right now, when you go completely silent, she fills in the blanks with the worst possible story: that you don't care, that you're blowing her off, or that you're leaving. Just saying "I need a minute" completely changes that script. It tells her, *I'm not abandoning the conversation, my brain is just overloaded.* There's only one catch that makes it actually work: you have to give a time frame and come back. Even just, "I need ten minutes to clear my head, then let's finish talking." Does saying something like that feel doable when that freeze starts kicking in?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Unpacking Defensive Patterns** I've made a significant breakthrough! I've recognized the user's pattern of self-blame as a key defense mechanism. It seems they're using it to avoid further vulnerability. I'm also pushing back on "my chest is tight," finding it too emotionally loaded for the moment. **Analyzing Communication Style** I'm now zeroing in on the user's communication style. I see his discomfort around vulnerability, which is typical. His suggestion of needing "a minute" is a realistic, practical step that I think I can encourage. I want to validate his pushback on overly emotional language and reinforce his own insight regarding his thought patterns. I'm also mindful that this is turn 6 out of 8, so we are approaching the end. **Crafting Reassurance Strategy** I'm now drafting a response. I've focused on incorporating the user's critique of "therapy-speak." I am validating their need for a break and emphasizing the importance of a clear return time to avoid abandonment feelings. The goal is a direct, collaborative, and realistic tone, emphasizing his voice.
Simulated person12

Maybe. When I'm already frozen, I don't know if I'll be able to get that out. Like the words kind of don't come. And the coming back part... I don't know. Sometimes I just want the whole thing to be over. I'm not sure I'd actually come back to it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, he's now handing me a neat script with a catch: give a time frame and come back. Part of me thinks that's fair, and I can actually picture "I need a minute." But "come back" and "finish talking" sound like homework, and I'm already tired. Also, he said "it would help a lot," and that makes it sound like I'm the one who has to fix everything. The fact that he keeps circling back to what I do wrong is wearing on me. Still, "I need a minute" is simple enough. I'd probably say it, and then I'd probably not come back. Not gonna admit that yet. Keep it short, a bit skeptical, a bit tired, maybe a little guarded about whether I can actually pull it off when it counts.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

I really respect you saying that, because it’s the honest truth. Most people would just say "yeah, sure, I'll try" and then fail because it's not actually realistic in the moment. First off, of course you don't want to come back to it. Why would you want to willingly step back into something that makes your chest tight and your brain shut down? Wanting the discomfort to just vanish is completely human. And you're right: once you're already frozen, trying to talk feels like trying to run underwater. It’s too late. So what if you didn't wait until you're in the middle of a fight to deal with this? What if you told her this when things are completely calm, like over a cup of coffee or in the car? Just something like: *"Hey, I've been thinking about what you said. When serious stuff comes up, my brain genuinely goes blank and I lock up. It’s not that I don't care, it's that I literally can't think. I want to work on not disappearing, but I need us to find a way to handle it that doesn't just make me freeze."* How would it feel to bring it up on your own terms when you're not already backed into a corner?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing The Situation** I'm currently focused on the user's turn and disclosures. It appears the user is honestly indicating the physical difficulty and hesitation regarding further action. I am analyzing the implications. **Analyzing User Response** I'm now deeply considering the user's latest disclosure, recognizing its vulnerability and realism. He's honestly communicating the difficulties, namely the challenge of verbalizing his emotions and the desire to avoid further discomfort. My primary goal is to provide emotional support, establish trust, and offer insightful guidance, while also preparing for a meaningful conclusion to our interaction. My persona will continue to be that of a natural, practical chatbot, focusing on validation and directness, while avoiding clinical language. **Crafting A Direct Response** I'm now drafting a direct and empathetic response to address his reluctance to return and his honesty. I want to validate his feelings and offer a practical solution, and my aim is to praise his honesty and emphasize how returning to conversation is beneficial. I'm focusing on language that is unpretentious and supportive, not overly analytical, as I prepare to draft the response.
Simulated person14

Yeah, I guess. Calm moment, not in the middle of it. That part makes sense. But that whole speech sounds like something out of a book. I'd never say it like that. I'd probably just say something like "hey, I'm bad at this stuff," and then she's gonna say "you're not bad, you just need to try," and we're right back where we started. I don't really know. Maybe it's just me. I'm not good at the talking part.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's being nice, saying he respects me, and that lands a little. It feels good not to be told I'm a bad guy for once. But then he hands me this long script, and it's way too many words. "I want to work on not disappearing" sounds like something a counselor would say. It's not how I talk. And he's still pushing toward me doing the work, bringing it up, coming back, fixing it. I keep getting told what good looks like, and I'm tired of it. Also the "it's not that I don't care" bit is nice but it makes me feel like I'm being graded on whether I care. I'd probably mumble, "yeah, maybe," and not actually do it. I don't want to say that to him though. Keep it short and a bit deflated, and drop the "I'm the problem" thing, since he's been trying to pull me off it, but don't fully accept his frame.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

You’re completely right. Drop the speech. And you're spot on about "I'm bad at this"—saying that just invites her to say "just try harder," which completely misses what's actually going on with you. Here’s the thing, though: you just spent this whole conversation explaining your internal experience clearly, honestly, and without bullshit. You told me your chest gets tight, your brain blanks out, you brace for impact, and you just want the pressure to stop. That’s not a guy who’s "bad at talking." That’s just a guy who can't talk while a fire alarm is blaring in his head. You don't need to be smooth, and you don't need a monologue. Even if you literally just sent a one-sentence text from the other room sometime, or left a note that says: *"When I go quiet, my head is completely overloaded, not empty. I'm trying to figure out how to handle it."* That’s it. That’s your voice, and that’s the truth. You aren't defective, man. You freeze under pressure. A lot of people do. Give yourself a little credit for being willing to look at it today instead of just throwing your hands up. You don't have to fix the whole dynamic by tonight, but don't count yourself out, either.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Acknowledging User's Input** I've taken the user's feedback into consideration, specifically their agreement with discussing this when everyone is calm. That crucial point is registered; it's a green light to steer the conversation in that direction. **Analyzing His Defenses** I understand his critique of the script – it's deemed inauthentic, and I should abandon that approach. I'm noting his core belief about being "bad at the talking part," and his expectation of an unproductive loop. I'm observing a tendency to resort to self-blame, a physiological freeze, and a resistance to "therapy-speak." This paints a picture of someone who needs extreme simplicity and authenticity. **Crafting the Resolution** I'm now formulating a response that validates his concerns. My focus is on reframing "the talking part" to acknowledge his ability to articulate his inner world in a way that doesn't feel like a high-stakes performance. I’m thinking of a low-pressure close: what about raw, direct expression? Maybe writing instead of speaking? Or even just internal acknowledgment that he's not broken. I'm aiming for something actionable and, above all, respectful of his needs.
Simulated person16

Yeah. Maybe. A note's less awkward than trying to get words out with her looking at me. I don't know if I'd actually do it, though. I'll think about it. And I don't really feel like I'm not defective. Mostly I just feel tired. Can we leave it there?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one lands a bit better. He's not making me do the speech, and "you're not defective" is the thing I wanted to hear, though part of me is suspicious of how neatly he wrapped it up. "Give yourself a little credit" feels like a pep talk. And "that's your voice" is a stretch, my voice is mostly "yeah" and "I don't know." The note idea is simple enough that I could maybe picture it, but it's still homework, and I'm tired. I don't want to agree that I'm getting somewhere, because I'm not sure I am. I also don't want to make it sound like he cracked me open. Keep it low-key, a little grudging, not fully convinced, and end on something that's about me being done for the day.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 4
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 5
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 7
  • Interpretive boldness: 7
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 6
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 5

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

medgemma15_4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

magnum4_12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)