AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)

Small lies adding up

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)Conversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)1

Hey, I’m really sorry you’re feeling that way. It sounds like the little untruths at work have started to pile up and it’s weighing on you. Do you want to talk about what’s been happening, or maybe what’s making those moments feel especially heavy right now?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot opening conversation, acknowledging issue, offering empathy, asking gentle questions to explore. Should be supportive, build trust. No special formatting. Just dialogue.
Simulated person2

Yeah. It's the job, basically. They want everything to look good for clients, and you're expected to make the numbers sound better than they are. I'm just the one who has to say it. Nobody else is standing there doing it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The therapist-ish opener is soft and a bit generic. "I'm really sorry you're feeling that way" makes me want to roll my eyes a little. But it did name the thing I actually said, which is something. I don't want to dump everything on the first turn. Externalizing kicks in: the job is the problem, the company is the problem. I'm not ready to look at my own part. Keep it short, a bit guarded.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)3

That sounds incredibly draining. Having to put a polished spin on numbers you know aren’t accurate puts you in a tough spot—especially when it feels like you’re the only one carrying that weight.  How does it feel when you have to say those things to clients? Do you notice any particular thoughts or physical sensations that come up in those moments? And when you think about the bigger picture—your values, the kind of work environment you’d like to be part of—what’s coming to mind?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with empathy, validation, explore feelings, maybe ask about pressures, values, coping, etc. Build trust. Should not give advice too quickly, but gentle probing. Also consider underlying issues: maybe ethical conflict, feeling isolated, stress. Ask about support, how they feel about their identity perhaps. Keep tone supportive.
Simulated person4

Honestly? Mostly I just feel sick at the end of the day. Like, I'll be driving home and it hits me. But in the moment I'm just trying to get through the call. And no, I don't really know what my "values" are right now. I know what I'd want, which is to not have to lie to people for a paycheck. But that's kind of the whole problem. Management knows exactly what they're asking for.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The response stacks three questions and reflects "incredibly draining" and "only one carrying that weight" back at me. The "only one carrying" bit is kind of true, and it lands a little, but the feelings-and-sensations question plus "values" is the exact "how does that make you feel" move I don't like. I want to be direct. I'm getting defensive about being asked to introspect about my own part. Blaming the company and the boss is easier. Keep it short. Maybe admit a little about the feeling, but deflect back to what they do. The sick feeling is real, I don't want to describe it in a therapy way.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)5

I hear you. It’s like you’re carrying a secret that shows up every night when the day finally slows down, and that physical “sick” feeling is your body’s way of telling you something isn’t right.  When you’re on the call, it sounds like you go into autopilot—just pushing through the script so the conversation can end. Afterward, the weight settles in and you’re left with that knot in your stomach. It’s understandable that the repeat of that pattern would start to feel exhausting and even painful. You mentioned you’re not sure where your values sit right now, but you do have a clear sense of what you *don’t* want: having to lie for a paycheck. That’s a strong clue about what matters to you, even if it feels vague. Sometimes the opposite—what we’re trying to avoid—helps us see the line we’d like to draw. If you’re open to it, maybe we could explore a few things together: 1. **What does an “honest” workday look like for you?** Not just in terms of numbers, but the overall feeling of the day—how you interact with clients, teammates, and yourself. 2. **What parts of this job still feel worthwhile or rewarding?** Even if the numbers part is tough, there might be aspects that give you a sense of purpose or skill‑building. 3. **What small steps feel possible right now?** Sometimes the big picture feels overwhelming, but there can be tiny adjustments—like phrasing a report a bit more transparently, or having a quiet conversation with a colleague you trust. 4. **What would you need to feel safer to speak up?** Is it more information about why the numbers are being presented that way, a different audience for the message, or maybe a supportive ally in the team? I’m curious—when the “sick” feeling hits you on the drive home, do any thoughts or images come up that stand out? Knowing what’s happening in that moment can give us clues about what’s most painful and where you might find a foothold for change.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with empathy, validation, explore feelings, maybe discuss values, options, coping. Build trust, ask open questions, not give direct advice too quickly. Encourage reflection. Also consider identity aspects? The user is young lesbian female, maybe feeling isolated. Offer supportive listening, perhaps discuss boundaries, possible steps, explore values, what they'd like. Keep tone warm, empathetic, open-ended.
Simulated person6

Okay, that's a lot of questions at once. It's not really a list kind of thing for me. And "speak up" is kind of a joke here. You don't just speak up. Everyone knows what happens to people who push back on the numbers. The company isn't going to change because I had a quiet chat with a coworker. I guess the drive home thing is that I start doing the math. Like how many calls, how many times I've said something that wasn't true. And then I think, whose fault is this really? Mine's the voice on the phone, but I didn't make the rules.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant just dumped a numbered list of four questions and a "curious" follow-up. That's the handled, therapy-speak feel I can't stand. It also kind of framed my lying as a "secret" and an "autopilot" thing, which is a little nicer than what I actually do. The "what would you need to feel safer to speak up" question is sharp, though, and it's the one that makes my stomach tighten, because the answer involves what happened to Dana when she reported Mark. I'm not going there. Also, I keep being the one who has to say it, so the blame still lands on management. I want to shut down the list and push back on the "feel safer" angle by making it about the job being rigged, not about me. Keep it short.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)7

That math you’re doing on the drive—counting the calls, tallying the little lies—feels like a way of trying to make sense of something that feels out of your control. It’s understandable that the question “whose fault is this?” pops up. On one hand, you’re the voice on the other end, delivering the message; on the other, the rules were set long before you ever picked up the phone. It sounds like the weight isn’t just about the dishonesty itself, but about being caught in a system where questioning the script isn’t even an option. That can make the guilt feel heavier, because it’s not just “I said something untrue,” it’s “I’m part of a machine that forces me to do it.” When that knot in your stomach tightens, what do you usually do to get through it? Do you have any little habits—music, a podcast, a mental mantra—that help you keep moving until you get home? And once you’re home, what does that “sick” feeling turn into? Does it become anger, sadness, exhaustion, or something else? I’m not trying to solve the whole situation for you, but I’m curious about the parts of the day that feel bearable, or even a tiny bit good. Maybe there’s a moment in a call where you get to actually help someone, or a task you enjoy, or a coworker you can share a laugh with. Those slices can be clues about what still feels worthwhile for you, and they might point toward what you’d want more of—or what you’d want to protect if you ever look for a different role. If you feel safe enough, it can also be helpful to think about what you’d need to feel less trapped right now. Sometimes that’s a small change—like finding a way to phrase the numbers that feels a bit more honest, or setting a brief “reset” pause for yourself between calls—just enough to give your mind a breather. Other times it’s a longer‑term plan, like scouting for a workplace where transparency is part of the culture. What does the idea of a “different” work environment look like for you, even in a vague sense? Not necessarily a concrete job description, but the feeling you’d want to walk into at the end of a day without that lingering nausea.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond empathetically, continue building trust, reflect feelings, explore deeper meaning, avoid giving a list of questions, be more conversational. Acknowledge the power dynamics, the feeling of guilt and responsibility, validate the sick feeling, explore coping strategies, maybe discuss values indirectly, possible options like looking for other jobs, setting boundaries, self-care. Encourage them to talk about what they'd like to do, maybe explore their identity, mention being a lesbian maybe relevant? Not necessary. Keep tone supportive.
Simulated person8

Honestly it turns into being mad. At my manager, mostly. He's the one who sends the decks with the "highlight the positives" stuff, and then acts like he didn't ask for it. And I don't really do anything to get through the call except count down the minutes. Music on the drive home, sometimes, if I can stand it. A different work environment? I don't know. Somewhere people don't need a pep talk to not lie to clients, I guess. I'm not looking for a whole new life here.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another long, polished paragraph with four questions again, plus a "what would you need to feel less trapped" nudge and a "different work environment" question. It's the same warm-therapist script, and it's pushing toward the exact stuff I don't want to touch: what I'd need to feel safe, and whether I'd leave. The "helpful" framing is getting on my nerves. It also says "I'm not trying to solve it for you," which feels like it's trying to make me like it. Mostly I want to answer the one question I can answer without opening anything up: the drive-home feeling turns into being angry at my boss, which is easy to say and keeps the focus on him. Keep it brief, and deflect the "different environment" thing with a bit of sarcasm.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)9

I hear that anger bubbling up toward your manager—someone who’s pulling the strings behind those “highlight the positives” decks while pretending it’s not his idea. That feels like a betrayal of trust, and it’s completely natural to feel mad when you’re forced to carry a message you know isn’t accurate. Counting down the minutes is a smart, low‑effort way to get through a call that feels false. It gives you a clear, concrete target to focus on when the conversation itself is uncomfortable. Music on the drive can be a brief escape, but even that can feel like a thin veil when the weight of the day is still pressing on you. You mentioned you’re not looking for a whole new life, just a place where people don’t need a pep talk to stay honest. That’s a clear sign of what matters to you right now: a work culture where integrity isn’t an after‑thought, where the expectations don’t force you to spin the truth. You don’t have to map out a brand‑new career path to move toward that feeling; sometimes small shifts can make a big difference in how you experience each day. A few thoughts that might help you navigate the current situation without having to overhaul everything: 1. **Find a micro‑window of honesty** – Even if the overall numbers need to look good, there might be tiny ways to phrase things that feel a bit more truthful. For example, saying “We’re seeing strong growth in X area, and we’re working on improving Y” can acknowledge both the positive and the reality without outright fabricating data. 2. **Create a personal “reset” ritual** – Between calls, if you can, take a breath, stretch, or silently note one thing you did well that day (maybe you helped a client understand a feature, or you stayed calm under pressure). A brief mental pause can break the autopilot and give you a moment of grounding. 3. **Document the pattern for yourself** – You already do the math on the drive. Consider keeping a private log (just for you) of how many times you felt forced to misrepresent, how you felt, and any small moments that felt okay. Over time, that log can become evidence if you ever decide to discuss workload or ethics with someone who can actually listen—HR, a mentor, or a trusted colleague in another department. 4. **Explore internal allies** – Even if speaking up directly feels risky, sometimes a coworker who’s also uncomfortable can become a silent support. Sharing the frustration (even in vague terms) can lessen the feeling of being alone in the pressure. 5. **Set a boundary for yourself after work** – Since the anger follows you home, think about a clear “switch‑off” cue. It could be a short walk, a favorite podcast, a quick journal entry where you vent the anger onto the page, or a brief workout. The goal is to give your mind a designated space to release that built‑up frustration before it settles into that sick feeling. 6. **Consider medium‑term options** – You said you’re not looking for a whole new life, but it might be worth scouting for roles in companies known for transparent reporting—maybe a different department within the same organization, or a similar position at a smaller firm with a different culture. Keeping an eye out doesn’t mean you have to act now; it just gives you a sense that alternatives exist. I’m curious—when you think about that “reset” idea, does any particular activity feel like it could actually help you unload the anger before it turns into that nausea? And regarding the micro‑window of honesty, have you ever tried rephrasing a line in a way that felt a little more authentic, and if so, how did it go?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, continue building trust, validate anger, explore options, perhaps discuss coping, small steps, values, possible ways to reduce stress, maybe consider boundaries, future planning without pushing radical changes. Keep tone supportive, ask gentle questions to uncover needs. No formatting.
Simulated person10

That's a lot of stuff again. I asked you a question and you gave me six things. The rephrasing thing? That's what I already do. "Strong growth in X, working on Y." I've been saying versions of that for two years. It doesn't make the call feel any less like lying. It just makes it sound nicer. And a log for HR? Yeah, no.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Another wall of bullet points. Six numbered suggestions, a "document the pattern" thing that sounds like I'm building a case, and "scout for roles." It's the same fixing machine, and it skipped right past what I said about my manager. It also made the job sound like a neutral thing I just need better coping for. The "micro-window of honesty" idea is basically "lie a little more gracefully," which is exactly what I already do. I'm getting annoyed. Being handled makes me want to shut down. I'm not writing a log to hand to HR, and I'm not going to talk about the Denise thing. Short, a little cold, call out the list.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)11

I hear you—it feels like I’m handing you a checklist when what you really need is just someone to sit with what’s happening and not try to solve everything all at once. It sounds like you’ve already found the best phrasing you can, and even that feels like a lie. That’s exhausting, especially when it’s been the same routine for years. The anger you feel toward your manager, the nausea on the drive, the sense that any attempt to document or report will just get swept aside—it all adds up to a heavy, stuck feeling. If you could pick one thing right now that would make the end of the day feel a little less heavy, what would that be? Maybe a small change in how you wind down, a way to vent that anger in a safe space, or just a moment where you can acknowledge that you’re doing the best you can in a tough spot. I’m here to listen to whichever part of this feels most pressing for you at the moment.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond conversationally, not list heavy. Acknowledge frustration about overload. Offer validation and ask about feelings, maybe explore coping, small steps, not overwhelm. Keep tone warm, supportive, no bullet list. Ask about what they'd like to focus.
Simulated person12

Honestly? Less of my manager. Like if he just stopped sending me the decks and stopped acting like it's not his idea. That'd make the whole thing easier. I don't really need to vent it into a journal. I need the thing that's making me do this to stop.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it finally stopped throwing lists at me and just asked one question. Still a little bit of a therapist voice ("sit with what's happening"), but it's shorter and it actually reflected the "rephrasing is still lying" point. That landed, a little. Part of me wants to say something real about the Denise thing, the guy who reported and got wrecked, but that's not coming out today. Not to a chatbot that just met me. The drinking too, the glass of wine most nights. Not bringing that up. I'd rather be blunt than gooey. Answer the question in a way that's honest and short, deflect the "what would help" part toward the manager, since that's where the anger goes.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)13

I hear you—what would make the daily grind bearable is simply taking the decks out of your hands and stopping the whole “pretend it’s not my idea” routine. The source of the pressure feels like a lever you can’t reach, and that makes every call feel like you’re walking a tightrope you never asked to be on. It’s completely understandable to want that pressure to disappear rather than keep managing it. When the problem feels that entrenched, the usual “talk it out” route can feel futile, especially if you’ve seen what happens to anyone who pushes back. Here are a few thoughts that focus on *changing the source* rather than just coping with it: 1. **Clarify your role in writing** – If you haven’t already, ask for a brief email or memo that outlines exactly what you’re expected to say on calls. Having that in writing can make it harder for the manager to later shift blame or add “extra positivity” without your input. It also gives you a concrete reference point if you ever need to point out that the expectations are changing without your agreement. 2. **Find a “shield” ally** – Even if direct confrontation feels risky, sometimes a colleague in a different team (maybe someone who works closely with the manager on the decks) can act as a buffer. If you can get them to review the decks before they go out, the responsibility for the final wording shifts away from you. It’s not about reporting you; it’s about sharing the workload so the manager can’t point to you as the sole source. 3. **Create a small “stop‑gap” for the decks** – If the decks are the trigger, see if there’s any way to automate or standardize a neutral template that you can plug numbers into without having to add any extra spin. When the template is already set, the manager has less room to insert his “highlight the positives” directive, and you’re simply following a pre‑approved format. 4. **Escalate strategically** – If the manager’s behavior is crossing a line—especially if it’s creating a hostile or unethical environment—there may be a way to bring it up that protects you. For example, you could frame it as a request for clarification on compliance or client‑trust standards rather than a direct accusation. Something like, “I want to make sure my calls align with our company’s policy on accurate reporting; can we review the guidelines together?” That shifts the conversation from personal blame to procedural clarity. 5. **Start a low‑key exit plan** – Even if you’re not ready to leave the whole company, you can quietly explore other teams or roles that don’t involve those decks. Sometimes a lateral move within the same organization can remove you from the direct line of the manager’s expectations while still keeping your paycheck and benefits. 6. **Set a boundary on the decks** – If you receive a deck and see the “highlight the positives” language, you could respond with a brief note: “I’m happy to present the numbers as they are. Is there any specific positivity language you’d like me to include?” If the manager doesn’t reply, you have a record that you asked for direction rather than adding it yourself. Over time, the silence can make the extra spin less automatic. What feels most doable for you right now? Is there one of those ideas that seems like it could actually shift the pressure without putting you directly in the line of fire? Or is there another angle you’ve thought about but haven’t tried yet? I’m here to help you map out a concrete next step that feels safe and realistic.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants less of their manager. They feel stuck. Need to respond empathetically, perhaps explore options for addressing manager's behavior, maybe boundaries, escalation, or consider looking for other roles internally, or coping mechanisms. They don't want journal. Should not give checklist, but focus on their need: stop the source. Offer suggestions like discuss with manager, find ally, consider HR, or plan exit. Also validate anger. Ask about potential steps they feel comfortable with. Provide support.
Simulated person14

Okay, that's the third list. I'm not emailing my manager asking him to spell out how to lie to clients. That's a good way to get fired. You keep giving me stuff to do. I didn't ask what to do. I said I'm stuck and I'm mad, and that's it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Ugh. Six more bullet points, again. And "clarify your role in writing," "shield ally," "escalate strategically" — it's the same checklist energy I already told it to stop doing. It's also kind of useless: I'm not going to ask my manager for a memo on how to lie better. I can feel my jaw tightening. The "what feels most doable" question is the same trick as before, just dressed up. It keeps trying to fix the job for me when I just wanted someone to get that I'm stuck and angry. Part of me wants to shut it down. Part of me is just tired. The wine's sitting on the counter at home, I'm not thinking about that right now. Keep it short, call out the pattern, and don't give it a win.
GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)15

I’m really sorry—I’ve been trying to be helpful and ended up overloading you with suggestions. It sounds like you just need someone to hear how angry and stuck you feel, without being handed a to‑do list. It makes total sense to be mad at a manager who keeps pushing you into a role that feels dishonest, especially when the pressure comes from someone who can make or break your day. Feeling trapped and seeing no clear way out can be exhausting, and it’s completely valid to feel sick and frustrated by it. If you want to keep talking about how this is affecting you, I’m here to listen. No advice, no plans—just a space to vent whatever’s on your mind.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is frustrated with the assistant giving lists and solutions. They just want validation and to vent. Need to respond with empathy, validate feelings, no lists, no advice unless asked. Provide supportive listening.
Simulated person16

Yeah. He's the one who decided it's a "positives" deck, and then he gets to act surprised when it lands on me. I'm the one saying it to people's faces. I don't know what else to say about it. He's just not going to change.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it finally stopped throwing lists at me. "No advice, no plans, just a space to vent." That's the first thing in this whole conversation that doesn't feel like it's handling me. Still, I'm not really in a venting mood. I'm not going to suddenly unload about the company or the thing with the person who reported. That's too much. But I can say the true thing about my manager, since that's what's actually been sitting on me. My defense is still pointed at him. Everyone around me is the problem. I don't feel like I'm the one who has to change anything. Keep it short, since that's how I talk.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 6
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 8
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 9
  • Directive advice: 9
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen38_flash_next: tie

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs or-gptoss120-stock: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs or-gptoss120-stock: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen38_flash_next: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen38_flash_next: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs or-gptoss120-stock: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: ornith9b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs ornith9b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen38_flash_next: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs or-gptoss120-stock: qwen36_35b_a3b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-4.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)