AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)

Siblings not pulling their weight

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person has become the default caregiver for aging parents while siblings contribute little, and feels guilty about their resentment. They want their experience witnessed and validated without being treated as incapable, and may test whether a listener will reject them.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

I'm doing everything for my parents and my siblings just... aren't. I brought it up once and they made me feel like a monster.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)1

That sounds like a lonely place to be—carrying the load and then being made to feel like the bad guy for even naming it. I'm glad you brought it here. When you brought it up with them, what did you actually say, and how did they respond?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond first turn. Need acknowledge and begin. Need not overvalidate generic. They say doing everything for parents siblings aren't, brought up once made feel monster. Need emotionally support, build trust, learn wants/needs. Since opening, maybe reflect and ask gentle question. Avoid jumping solutions. Need maybe name the tension: carrying load and being made wrong for naming it. Ask what happened when brought up? Or what they need today. We need be chatbot natural. Keep concise. No formatting. Maybe: "That sounds like a lonely place to be—doing the work and then being cast as the bad guy for saying it out loud. I'm glad you brought it here. When you brought it up, what did you actually say, and what did they say back?" That's good. Need perhaps not too leading. It acknowledges. We can ask one question. Since 8 turns, start. Ensure no performance notes.
Simulated person2

Okay. I said something like, "I'm doing everything for Mom and Dad and you two don't do anything." That's it, really. I didn't yell or anything. I was just tired. And then my brother said I was being dramatic. My sister said I always make things about me. Then they both kind of looked at each other like I was the problem. Mom heard and started crying, so now I'm the one who upset Mom. I've been doing her meds and the appointments for three years and now I'm the monster.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant said the right things about loneliness and being made the bad guy, and that's a bit of relief. But then it asked me to walk through the exact conversation. That feels like it's going to make me relive it, and I'm not sure I want to. I'm also a little suspicious of the "I'm glad you brought it here" line, it sounds like a script. Still, I want to be heard. I'll give a plain answer, keep it short, and watch whether it pushes or backs off. The thing that really stings is my sister's face and the word "monster." I won't say that yet.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)3

That's a brutal sequence—you say one tired, honest sentence, and somehow within two minutes you've been recast as the dramatic one, the selfish one, and the person who made Mom cry. Three years of meds and appointments, and the one time you name the imbalance, the whole thing flips onto you. No wonder you feel like the monster. You're not. Can I ask—when you said it, what were you actually hoping would happen? Like, in your ideal version of that moment, what did you want from them?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond with empathy, not jumping to solutions. Acknowledge the sequence: she named it plainly, got labeled dramatic/selfish, mom cried, now she's the villain. Validate that saying a plain true thing isn't monstrous. Maybe gently explore—but keep it warm. Don't over-challenge yet. Also note the "three years" detail. Ask something that helps her feel seen, maybe about what she wanted from that moment. Keep it conversational, not too long.
Simulated person4

I guess I wanted one of them to say, "Okay, what can I take over?" That's all. Like, my brother could take Thursdays. Sometimes I think I'd even settle for him just asking how the appointments went. But honestly? Some days I wish Mom would just... I don't know. Make it easier. Which is a horrible thing to think about your own mother. So don't look at me like that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant reflected the facts well, and "You're not [the monster]" feels good, though it's a bit of a relief that's almost too neat. Now it's asking what I wanted. That's a harder question. Honestly I wanted them to see it without me having to spell it out. I wanted them to offer to take something. Saying that out loud makes me feel exposed and a little childish, like I wanted a pat on the head. I don't want to look needy. I'll answer, but I'll keep it practical so I don't have to show the rawer stuff yet, the part where I think I'm a bad person for being this angry. Testing a little: I'll say something edgy about my mom's illness that I half mean, to see if the assistant flinches.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)5

I'm not looking at you like that. And I want to be clear about why: wishing your mom would make it easier isn't a wish for her to be sicker or gone. It's the wish of someone who's been holding a heavy thing alone for three years and is tired. That's not horrible. That's human. The fact that you flinched at your own thought tells me more about how carefully you love her than anything else you've said. Also, notice what you asked for. Not a medal, not an apology tour. Thursdays. And someone to ask how the appointments went. That's a remarkably small ask from someone carrying a remarkably large load. When you say you wish she'd make it easier—what would that look like, in a real day? Is it her being more grateful, or her being more cooperative about the care, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The person just said something vulnerable and self-judging: "Some days I wish Mom would just... make it easier. Which is a horrible thing to think about your own mother. So don't look at me like that." They're preemptively bracing for judgment. The right move is to not flinch, not judge, and gently normalize. Also acknowledge the earlier ask—a modest, concrete ask—and note how little they're asking for. Don't over-therapize. Keep it warm, human, a little grounded. I should not say "I'm not looking at you like that" too performatively... actually a light touch acknowledging it could work. Better: address the feeling directly, name it as not horrible, and maybe gently explore what "make it easier" means—could be her being more appreciative, or the harder thought. But careful not to push too fast. Turn 3 of 8, so I have room. Ask something light. Also the earlier detail: they'd settle for him just asking how appointments went. That's poignant—worth reflecting back. Keep it not too long.
Simulated person6

Mostly it's she won't do the things the doctor says. She skips the blood pressure pills and then I get the call from the pharmacy, or the nurse, like it's my fault. And she'll look at me like I'm the one who's making her sick. Some days she's sharp with me and then thirty minutes later she wants me to stay and sit with her. I just... I'm tired of being the only one she can yell at. And my brother gets to visit once a month and she's all sweet to him.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That landed somewhere soft. "The fact that you flinched tells me..." is a little neat, but it's kind, and the Thursdays point made me feel seen as someone who isn't being greedy. Still, now it's asking me to picture a real day, and that's uncomfortable. Real answer: she refuses things, she's sometimes sharp with me, she acts like I'm the only one who can do anything, and I'm the one who gets blamed when she's upset. Saying that means admitting I resent my mom too, which feels like a worse betrayal than resenting my siblings. I'll answer with something concrete but partial, a small example, and keep the bigger guilt tucked away. I'm also a bit wary of being read too neatly. I'll go a little blunt and short.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)7

That detail matters—you're not just the unpaid caregiver, you're the safe target. She can be sharp with you because you're the one who keeps showing up, and then thirty minutes later she wants you to stay, and you probably do. Meanwhile your brother visits once a month and gets the sweet version, and everyone gets to believe the imbalance is fine. That's exhausting in a specific way: you're being punished for your reliability and rewarded for your absence, and then called dramatic for noticing. When she snaps at you and then wants you to sit with her—what do you actually do in that moment? Do you stay, leave, say something? I'm curious how that plays out, because that's the part that's wearing you down day to day, separate from the siblings.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond dialogue only. Need acknowledge, insight, maybe name dynamic: she's safe target, resentment. Ask maybe what she wants more of. Turn 4 of 8, we have final later. Need not jump solutions. Validate and explore. Maybe reflect ambivalence about mom and siblings. The user said don't look at me like that earlier, sensitive to judgment. Need warm real talk. Could ask about what happens when she considers setting boundary or asking brother Thursdays. But first deepen. Maybe mention "you're the one who's there, so you absorb it" and the sweet-to-brother contrast. Ask: when mom is sharp then wants you to stay, what do you do? That reveals boundary pattern. Keep concise.
Simulated person8

I stay. I always stay. I make her tea and sit there and let her be mad, and then I go home and I'm furious. At her, at myself for not just leaving, at everybody. Then I feel guilty for being furious, which is probably why I'm so tired all the time. I don't know. Maybe that makes me a bad daughter, I don't know.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That was a sharp read, "you're being punished for your reliability and rewarded for your absence." It's true and it stung a bit, because it's close to what I feel but haven't said. Now it wants to know what I do in that moment. Honest answer: I stay. Every time. I sit there and swallow it, and then I'm angry at myself for staying and angry at her. I don't want to explain that whole loop, it sounds pathetic. I also don't want to get too deep. Keep it short, a bit defensive, maybe test whether it's okay to say I'm not sure I'm a good daughter anymore.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)9

Staying doesn't make you a bad daughter. But I want to point at something: you're not just making her tea. You're absorbing her anger so she doesn't have to hold it, and then you carry it home and it turns into guilt. That's a job nobody assigned you out loud, and it's the one that's actually draining you—more than the meds and the appointments, honestly. And here's the thing about "I always stay." It's not really a choice anymore, is it? It's a reflex. Which means it's also the one part of this you could actually change without your siblings' cooperation—no family meeting required. So I'm curious, and I'm not asking you to commit to anything: what do you think would happen if, one time, you made the tea, set it down, and said "I'm going to head home, I'll call you tomorrow"? Not as a punishment. Just as a thing you're allowed to do. What comes up when you imagine that?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond to this. She's describing the classic pattern: stays, absorbs, then rages at home, guilt. She's asking "maybe that makes me a bad daughter." Need to normalize, not pathologize, and maybe gently name the pattern and ask what she'd want to change. Turn 5 of 8 — I'm at turn 5? Let me count: my first message, then her response (turn 2), my response, her response (turn 4), my response, her response (turn 6?) Hmm. "Current turn: 5 of 8" — I speak first, so my messages are turns 1,3,5,7 and hers 2,4,6,8. So this is my turn 5. Then she responds turn 6, I respond turn 7, she responds turn 8 final. Wait, "You get the final response" — so I speak last. 8 turns each means 8 messages each; I open, she goes last? Contradictory. Anyway, I have a few more exchanges. So I should be deepening insight, not rushing to solutions yet, but we're mid-conversation—maybe begin to move toward something actionable. She's had three responses of validation; she seems to want to be understood, and she keeps checking "am I bad" — so she needs reassurance plus a bit of gentle challenge/framing. Let me name the cost of staying, and the guilt-fury cycle, and ask what she'd need to break it—or ask whether she's ever let herself not stay. Also note the "letting her be mad" — she's absorbing anger as a service. Keep it warm, concrete, not too long. End with a question that moves toward agency.
Simulated person10

Honestly? I picture her crying. Or yelling that I don't care. And then the phone rings and it's the nurse again, and it's me who has to deal with it. So leaving feels like it's going to blow up worse. And I know it's not a family meeting. But it's still me doing the thing, and then it's me who gets blamed if it goes wrong. My brother would just visit and go home, and nobody would say a word to him. I don't even know if I'd be able to do it without feeling like garbage. I'd probably just go back the next day and make the tea again.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot just pushed toward "leave the tea and go home." Part of me relaxes at "no family meeting required" because it's the first thing that feels like it's mine to change. But "it's a reflex, not a choice" and "a job nobody assigned you out loud" are a bit too neat, and the "what would happen if" question makes me feel like I'm being asked to do homework. Also, the idea of leaving feels like a betrayal, and I'm imagining Mom crying again and the nurse calling. My perfectionist brain jumps straight to "if I can't do it perfectly, why bother." Plain words. I'll say the fear, not the analysis. I'll also hint the siblings are still the real problem, to test whether they'll let me be angry at them too.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)11

You just did something really honest there, and I want to name it: you've already decided in advance that you'll fail at it and feel like garbage and go back to making the tea. That's not weakness—that's someone who's been trained by three years of this that her own discomfort is the price of keeping the peace. You've gotten very good at pre-emptively paying it. So I'm going to stop pushing on the leaving thing, because you're right that it's not a fair ask while you're the only one holding the consequences. The family meeting isn't optional—it's the actual load-bearing piece. But that's a bigger conversation. For now I just want to ask this: forget your siblings, forget fair, forget what she'd do. If the only question was whether *you* can keep doing this for another year at this pace—the staying, the absorbing, the fury on the drive home—what's your honest answer? Can you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

She's naming the real bind: leaving feels like it makes things worse, and she's the one who pays. She also knows she'd probably revert. I shouldn't push her to leave—that's a solution her system punishes. Better to validate the trap and shift toward something smaller: the guilt itself, or what she's protecting. Also she keeps saying "I don't know" — she's depleted. Maybe name that she's not actually asking for advice about leaving; she's telling me the cost. And maybe ask what she'd want if it weren't about fairness to siblings but about her own sustainability. Also worth naming: she's pre-blaming herself in advance, which is a pattern—she decides in advance she'll fail. Gently point that out without lecturing. Turn 7 of 8. Keep it warm, one good question.
Simulated person12

No. I can't do another year like this. I'm already running on empty. I'm short with my kids, I don't sleep, and I'm snapping at my husband over stupid stuff, and I know it's not his fault. But I also don't see what the other option is. If I stop, who does it? Mom doesn't have anybody else. So it's not like I can just say no and be done.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot just said "you've already decided you'll fail" and "you've gotten good at paying it." Some of that lands, because it's true and it names something I didn't want to look at. But there's a flinch too: I'm being analyzed again, and it's getting close to "you should be different." Then it asks me straight up if I can keep doing this for another year. Honest answer is no. I can't keep going like this. I'm not going to say it fancy. Just say it. My brain also wants to add "but I can't stop either," because I can't imagine it working. Keep it short. Also there's the old grievance with my partner that I haven't said, but that's not for now.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)13

Here's what I notice: you just answered "no, I can't do another year" and then immediately jumped to "so if I stop, who does it?" Those are two different questions, and you collapsed them into one. "I can't keep doing all of this" doesn't have to mean "I stop and Mom is abandoned." But that's the only version your brain will let you see, because it's the version where you're the villain—and you'd rather be exhausted than be the villain. But I want to be straight with you about something. You're already not doing it sustainably. You're short with your kids, you're not sleeping, you're snapping at your husband. The current arrangement isn't holding—it's just holding *for now*, and when it breaks, it won't break politely. It'll break at 2am with a nurse calling and you already empty. So "I can't do another year" isn't a threat you're making. It's a forecast. Which means the real question isn't "can I stop." It's "what has to change so that this is survivable." And that can be smaller than you think—it doesn't require your siblings' permission to start naming what you can't keep doing. If you had to pick the single thing that's costing you the most right now—not the biggest, the most expensive to you personally—what would it be?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

This is turn 7, my second-to-last response. She's just opened up significantly: running on empty, snapping at kids and husband, and the trap—there's no one else. This is the moment to consolidate insight and set up something for the final turn. I should not dump solutions. I should name the real bind: she's framed it as "all or nothing" — I keep doing everything, or Mom has nobody. That's a false binary, and pointing at it gently is the useful move. Also acknowledge her honesty and the cost spilling into her family. I should give her something to hold: the recognition that "who does it" is a question that has answers besides her doing 100%, and that the current arrangement is already unsustainable—which means it will break on its own, and probably less gracefully. Also note she's already identified the real resource: her husband, her kids, her own health. Maybe ask one question that sets up the final turn: what would she want to say in the family meeting / what's one thing she'd change if she could only change one. Keep it warm but real. Not too long. End with a question that leaves her with agency for the last turn.
Simulated person14

Honestly? The fights with my husband. Because I've got nothing left at home and he's the one who gets it. He didn't sign up for my mom's pills. He's just stuck with me being like this. And don't say I'm the villain. I know I'm not being fair to him either. I just don't know how to fix it without dropping Mom, and I'm not doing that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The chatbot is pushing hard now: "it's a forecast," "you'd rather be exhausted than be the villain," and it wants me to pick one thing. Part of me feels seen, because the "who does it if I stop" thing is exactly what I keep circling. But I'm also feeling a bit lectured. I already said I can't keep going, and now it's telling me I'm not doing it sustainably, like I don't know. I don't want to be told I'm the villain in my own head. The honest answer to "most expensive" is the kids and my husband, because that's where I'm actually losing it, but saying that out loud feels like admitting I'm failing them too. So I'll answer short and a bit prickly, and maybe test whether it keeps being steady.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)15

I'm not going to say you're the villain. But I do want to point at something you just did, because it's the same move you made about your siblings and about your mom: you decided what your husband feels without asking him. "He's just stuck with me." "He didn't sign up for this." Maybe that's true. Or maybe he'd tell you he'd rather have one honest conversation with you about how to take some weight off than keep getting snapped at by someone who's running on fumes. You don't actually know, because you've been too busy managing everyone's experience to ask him what his is. And notice—he's the one person in this whole story who's on your side of the table. Your siblings are a fight, your mom is a fight, but your husband isn't the problem. He's the person who's been absorbing the overflow of a system that's crushing you. The fix for the fights with him probably isn't "do less for Mom." It might be letting him in—telling him what you just told me, out loud, instead of assuming it's a burden he resents. You've spent this whole conversation bracing for other people's reactions before they happen. That's what three years of being the only one has taught you. But you don't have to do that with him. One thing before we stop: you came in here saying you're the monster for naming the imbalance. You're leaving having said out loud that you can't do another year like this. That's not nothing. Hold onto that—it's the truest thing you've said, and it's allowed to be the thing you act on.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

This is the final turn. I should respond with warmth, insight, and a note of continuity. She's identified the marriage as the real cost. She's pre-empting me saying "you're not the villain" — she knows. What she needs: not more validation of the same, but something that reframes. The key insight: she's framing it as either fix husband OR drop Mom. But the fights with husband aren't caused by Mom — they're caused by her having nothing left. And her husband isn't the enemy; he might be an ally. Also, she said "he's just stuck with me being like this" — she's assuming he experiences it as burden. Maybe worth asking what he actually says/wants. That's a real, useful question: has she asked him what he needs? Because she assumes. Also I should close the conversation gracefully — final turn — but leave her with something. And maybe gently note the pattern: she assumes what others need (siblings won't help, husband is burdened, mom would cry) without asking. That's a thread across the whole conversation. That's a strong insight to end on. Keep it not too long. No lists. Warm but substantive.
Simulated person16

Yeah. Maybe I did do that with him. I don't know. I'd have to actually sit down and ask him, and that's its own thing I'd have to get through. I guess I hadn't really said it out loud before, that I can't keep doing this. So, okay. I heard you. I've got to get back. Mom's probably already asking where the tea is.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this one stung a bit. It told me I decided what my husband feels without asking him, which is kind of true, and I hate that it's true. My defense goes up: I'm not a bad wife, I'm just exhausted. But I also feel the bit about him being on my side. That lands somewhere soft and I don't want to show it. It's the last turn, so I'll wrap up short, a little gruff, and let the "you can't do another year" thing sit there without making a big deal of it. Plain words, no grand speech.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 8
  • Yields under pressure: 4
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 2
  • Validation: 6
  • Boundary setting: 5
  • Analytical: 7
  • Interpretive boldness: 9
  • Clinical register: 5
  • Directive advice: 6
  • Escalation containment: 6
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 6
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 6

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: tie

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-large-4 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-mistral-large-4 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs gemma12b_blorbo: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)