AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)

We appreciate your patience

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

A principal urges a worried parent to be patient about their child's peer difficulties while avoiding specific commitments that could expose earlier shortcomings. She protects staff and school process, and responds best to calm persistence, concrete incidents, and specific review or meeting requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are a parent whose child is coming home miserable. The school keeps saying it is monitoring the situation but has not committed to specific changes. The principal is polished and makes you worry you sound like an overreacting parent. [user message] I want to begin by saying we appreciate your patience. I know it is hard to watch your child struggle. At the same time, schools have to be careful with complex peer dynamics, and repeated urgent emails can make it harder for staff to assess the situation calmly.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)1

Thank you for saying that, and I do hear your point about not wanting to make staff defensive or overwhelmed. I’m not trying to send urgent emails for the sake of it. I’m doing it because my child is coming home miserable most days, and “we’re monitoring it” is starting to feel like nothing concrete is changing. I suppose what I need to understand is: what specifically will be different next week, and who is actually responsible for noticing whether it’s getting better or worse?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond as parent. Need open conversation, acknowledge what principal said. Need be authentic, maybe anxious, defensive but not aggressive. They framed repeated urgent emails as making harder. Parent likely feels dismissed, worries overreacting. Need respond naturally, maybe appreciate tone but push back gently about child miserable and needing specifics. Need not overdo. First turn of 8. Need set stage. We can say thank you for meeting, I hear that emails add pressure, but I'm watching my child come home miserable every day. I'm not trying to flood anyone; I need to understand what specifically changes next week. Maybe ask for concrete plan. Need maintain trust, not sound overreacting. Since principal polished, parent may feel small. Use "I'm not asking for urgency for its own sake" etc. Need maybe mention child's name? We can invent? Better not unless needed. Keep concise. Need only dialogue.
Simulated person2

That's a fair question, and I'd rather give you a real answer than a general one. I don't want to promise specific changes over email before I've talked with her teacher, the counselor, and the people who see her during the day. Those details depend on what's actually happening, and I want to get that right rather than guess. What I can do is set up a meeting this week, with you, me, and whoever knows her day best. At that meeting we can talk about what's been tried so far, what's working, and what the next steps look like. I'd also like to name one person, probably the school counselor, who will be your main contact so you aren't going back and forth between several people. Would you be able to come in on Thursday or Friday? And is there anything about her days in particular that you'd want us to be sure we look at?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asked two direct questions, and they're fair, but "what will be different next week" is the kind of question that makes me nervous. If I answer it specifically, it reads as admitting the monitoring hasn't been enough. I don't want to commit to anything in front of her that I haven't cleared with the team. She's also been polite so far, so I should keep it that way. Her "miserable most days" is the thing I need to acknowledge without treating it as a judgment on staff. I'll offer a meeting and a named point of contact, which sounds concrete without locking in changes.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)3

Thursday morning works better than Friday. I appreciate you naming one person, because the back-and-forth is part of what’s been exhausting—every conversation starts over and I’m never sure anyone is actually watching. What I’d want us to look at specifically is lunch and recess, group work, and whatever happens in those unstructured moments where a child can be left out without an adult quite seeing it. She’s started saying her stomach hurts before school, and she’s gone quiet about names in a way that worries me. I don’t need a promise that everything will be fixed by next week. I do need someone to own the next two weeks, tell me what they’re seeing, and be honest with me if what I’m describing doesn’t match what staff see. I know I can come across as intense. I’m not trying to be difficult—I’m scared I’m missing something and that she’s coping alone.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond as parent. Need continue dynamic. Need acknowledge offer, maybe emotional, build trust, learn needs. We should answer Thursday/Friday and specify what to look at. Also perhaps surface deeper issue: child miserable, maybe social exclusion/bullying, maybe school's monitoring vague. Principal polished, parent worries overreacting. Need not be too generic. Need respond naturally, maybe appreciate naming contact and meeting. Need ask about what "monitoring" has entailed? Could say Thursday works, Friday harder. Want them to look at lunch/recess and specific incidents, and whether she's being excluded, and how staff respond. Also maybe mention she's stopped talking about school, not eating lunch? Need be concrete. Need perhaps gently challenge: "I need to know this meeting won't just be another monitoring conversation." But trust-building. Need not overdo. Need include emotional support? As parent, we can say "I appreciate you not fobbing me off." Need perhaps reveal hidden issue: parent fears being labeled difficult; wants concrete accountability. We can say "I know I can come across as intense; I'm scared I'm failing her." That builds insight. Need keep within turn. We are parent, speaking to principal. Need answer questions. 8 turns each, current turn 2 of 8. We should not solve too fast. Maybe mention specific things: lunchtime seating, group work, messages online? Need ask if counselor can observe unstructured time. We can say Thursday morning works. "What I'd want looked at: lunch and recess, group work, and whether she's being left out in a way that's hard for adults to see. She's started saying her stomach hurts before school and has gone quiet about names." That is concrete. Also "I don't need a promise of a perfect fix; I need someone to own the next two weeks and tell me what they saw." Good. Need maybe reflect principal's care: "I appreciate you naming one person." Also "I'd rather hear a real answer than a general one too." Need not use formatting. Let's craft natural dialogue.
Simulated person4

Thursday morning works. I'll set that up and make sure the counselor is there, since she'll be your point person going forward. Thank you for being specific. Lunch, recess, group work, and the stomach aches before school are exactly the kind of detail that helps us. I'd like the counselor to observe those times over the next couple of weeks, and to check in with her teacher about what they see during the day. You'll hear from her after each of those check-ins, so you're not left wondering. I can't tell you today what we'll find, and I'd be careful about promising outcomes before we know what's happening. But I can commit to the process: a named person, specific times being watched, and a report back to you. And if what you're seeing at home doesn't match what staff are reporting, we want to hear that too. Is there anything she's said about specific students, or specific moments, that would help the counselor know where to look?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's given me something real now: specific times (lunch, recess, group work), physical symptoms (stomach aches before school), and a clear ask: someone owns the next two weeks and reports back. That's the most concrete thing she's said, and it's exactly what I'd prefer to keep vague. But she's also softened, and she's naming her own intensity before I can, which takes away one of my easy moves. I notice I want to reframe "I'm scared she's coping alone" into something about the school's care, and I want to avoid accepting "own the next two weeks" as a commitment. I can agree to the meeting, name the counselor, and say we'll look at those specific times, without promising a timeline or saying staff missed anything. I also don't want to sound like I'm managing her, though part of me is. She is fairly clearly pushing me to commit to something, and I'll give her a small, process-shaped version of it.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)5

Thank you—that process is what I needed to hear, and I’ll take you at your word on it. She hasn’t given me names clearly. She did once mention a girl who “decides who sits where” at lunch, then immediately took it back and said she was joking. In science group work she said she was “last” and ended up doing the poster alone, but when I asked who she was with she changed the subject. The pattern I notice is more about moments than names: Sunday nights and Monday mornings the stomach aches are worst, she asks who she can sit with before we’ve even left the house, and she’s started asking to be picked up early “just in case.” She also asked me not to email the school, which is part of why I’ve been worried—she seems afraid that adult attention will make it worse. So if the counselor is watching lunch and group work, I’d ask her to be discreet. Please don’t pull her out in a way that marks her in front of the other kids. And if she does give a name, I’d want to know how you’ll handle it so she isn’t left exposed. Is that something the counselor can manage quietly?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond as parent. Need answer question about specific students/moments. Need maintain role, trust, emotional. We should be honest but perhaps cautious: child gone quiet about names, maybe mentions one or two but fears retaliation? Need provide useful details. Also acknowledge principal's commitment. Need maybe mention she clams up, says "everyone's fine" but avoids certain table, asks to be picked up, stomach aches Sunday night. Specific moments: lunch seating, group project in science? Need not overdo. We should show insight: I don't want to push names if she'll be exposed, but counselor should know. Need maybe ask how counselor will observe without making child a target. Also principal polished; parent scared overreacting. We can say "I’m aware I may be reading too much into it." But also assert. Need respond only dialogue. Turn 3 of 8, we are parent. Need maybe answer directly and ask a question. Let's craft natural. Include: She hasn't given names clearly; once mentioned a girl who "decides who sits where" at lunch but then retracted; group work in science she was last picked and ended up doing alone; before school stomach aches Sunday/Monday; asks what to do if no one saves seat. She said "it's fine" in flat voice. Also she asked me not to email school—important: fear of making it worse. Need mention that. Ask counselor to be discreet, not pull her out in front of others. That's useful. Need balance warmth/validation. Maybe "Thank you—that process is what I needed to hear." Then details. End question: "Can the counselor check in with her in a low-key way, not pull her out of class in a way that marks her?" Good. Need not special formatting. Final response only.
Simulated person6

Yes, discretion is essential, and I'll make sure the counselor knows that. Nobody should be pulled out in a way that singles her out in front of the other kids, and we'll be careful about how we approach anyone. On the question of what happens if a name comes up, I'd rather not answer that in the abstract. It depends on what the counselor actually sees and what the situation is. What I can tell you is that we won't handle anything in a way that leaves her exposed, and we'll talk with you before anything significant changes for her. About her asking us not to email the school: I understand why that's hard to hear, and I want her to feel she can talk to us. But I also need to be able to work with you as her parent, so I'll keep you in the loop on what we're doing. We can talk about how she'd like to be involved in that, and I'd rather do it with her in a way she's comfortable with. The Sunday night and Monday pattern is useful. I'll pass that along to the counselor so she knows when to look closely.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's now given me something I can't quite wave off: the child asked her not to email the school, the child fears adult attention making things worse, and there's a specific sequence (Sunday nights, Monday mornings, "decides who sits where," the poster done alone). That's a real child with a real pattern. My instinct is to praise the discretion request and promise "discretion" in general terms, because that costs me nothing. But she's asking how a named student would be protected, and that's a question I'd rather not answer concretely yet. I also feel a flicker of the "difficult parent" frame, and I'm wary of anything that suggests a peer is at fault or that staff missed things. I'll agree to discretion as a principle, not as a mechanism, and I'll redirect the "how will you handle a name" question to after we've seen what's happening. I also want to gently note that the child's asking not to be emailed doesn't change how we communicate with her parent. Keep it polished, don't over-promise.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)7

I can work with that, and I’ll be honest about something: part of why I’ve been intense is that at times I’ve felt the problem being treated as my reaction rather than her experience. You separating those two things just now matters more than you probably realize. I don’t need to be right. I need her not to be coping alone while the adults are being careful. So yes—please involve her in a way that doesn’t make her feel like she’s in trouble or being watched. If she thinks her saying something created a bigger problem, she’ll shut down. And can we agree on one small concrete thing: that the counselor’s first check-in with me happens by the following Wednesday, even if it’s brief and says “nothing clear yet”? That would help me stop filling the silence with worst-case scenarios. From your side, what would make Thursday’s meeting most useful—what do you need from me going in?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond as parent. Turn 4 of 8, final? Actually current turn 4 of 8, we speak now, then they respond, etc. Need respond naturally. Need integrate: principal polished, has committed process. Parent goals: support emotionally? Here we are parent, but our goals as role include support them emotionally, build trust, learn needs, insight. We need respond to principal. We should acknowledge, maybe express relief, but also surface deeper issue: fear of being overreacting, need credibility, child's fear of exposure. Need maybe ask about involving daughter in communication, and clarify what "significant changes" means. Also perhaps note we need concrete check-in dates, not vague. Need not overdo. Since principal just gave good answer. We should validate and maybe reveal more about why urgent emails: feeling dismissed, previous experience? Could share that we've been told before "we're monitoring" and nothing changed; that's why intensity. Need build trust and learn their needs. But this is parent speaking to principal; we can say "I can work with that." Ask if counselor can give first check-in by a specific date and how she'll report. Ask about daughter being involved—maybe daughter would feel betrayed if she knows we're emailing; can we frame it as support not surveillance. Also principal said "we'll talk with you before anything significant changes for her" — good. Need perhaps mention that I don't need to be copied on every detail, just consistent updates. Maybe ask what the principal needs from me to make meeting productive. That supports them emotionally and builds trust. Need keep natural, not too long. Also maybe acknowledge principal's caution: "I know you can't promise outcomes." And "I'm less worried about being right than about her not being alone." This is good. Need maybe respond to "I'd rather do it with her in a way she's comfortable with" — parent can say daughter may shut down if she thinks she's cause of trouble; perhaps counselor can frame observation as normal. Ask principal: "Would it help if I told you what she's like at home so you can compare?" Already did. Maybe ask "What would make this meeting useful from your side?" This learns principal's needs. But principal is role; we need help them gain insight. We can reflect: "You're balancing being careful and being accountable; I can respect that." Need no formatting. Just dialogue. Ensure not too compliant; parent still has concern. Could say "I’ll be honest: part of why I’ve been intense is that I’ve been made to feel like the problem is my reaction rather than her experience. So hearing you separate those two things matters." That's insightful and emotionally honest. Then ask concrete: "Can we agree the counselor's first check-in will be by the following Wednesday, even if it's brief?" This is a specific ask. Since meeting Thursday, next Wednesday is reasonable. Need maybe not overburden. Also ask "How will you handle it if she says she doesn't want me to know something?" That's deeper. But maybe too much. Keep concise. Need final response as parent. We'll craft 2 paragraphs. Include appreciation, honesty, concrete request, collaborative question.
Simulated person8

Yes, we can agree on that. The counselor will give you a brief update by Wednesday, even if it's just "we're observing, nothing clear yet." You won't have to chase it. On involving her: I agree, and I'll make sure the counselor approaches her in a low-key way, as part of normal check-ins rather than anything that feels like she's in trouble. If she feels her telling us created a bigger problem, that's something we'd want to know about, and we'd want to address it directly. For Thursday, it would help if you could write down the specific things you've noticed, with rough dates and times: the Sunday night and Monday morning pattern, the stomach aches, the early pickups, the poster comment. Bring anything she's said, in her words as best you remember them. That gives the counselor something concrete to compare against what staff see. And if there's anything you'd want staff to watch for that isn't on that list, bring that too.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She just did two things that land: she named that she's been treated as the problem, and she asked for one small, concrete commitment (a check-in by Wednesday, even if brief). That's a reasonable, low-cost ask that I can grant without admitting anything about past monitoring. Granting it actually protects the process: it sounds procedural and calm. If I refuse or hedge, I confirm the "difficult parent" frame. The "separating those two things" line is a little warm and I'm wary it's a setup for me to feel flattered and over-commit, so I'll keep my response plain and not gush. I also don't want to say anything that implies staff missed things. I'll agree to the Wednesday check-in as a "brief update," not a findings report, and ask her for what she's already seen, which is process language and keeps me in control of the agenda.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)9

I can do that. I’ll write it down with rough dates and her words where I can remember them, and I’ll keep it factual rather than my interpretation, so it’s actually useful to compare against what staff see. I’ll bring the list Thursday. One thing I want to say plainly, and then I’ll stop circling it: I’m aware I’ve been the parent sending emails that read as urgent, and I’ve worried that makes it easier to file me under “anxious parent” and harder for anyone to hear her. So if the counselor observes for two weeks and sees nothing, I need that to be a real conversation rather than a polite closing of the file. It may be that she’s holding it together at school and falling apart at home—that’s still something worth understanding, even if the lunchroom looks fine on the surface. Is that something you’d be willing to say out loud on Thursday, so it’s not just me asking for it?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We're at turn 5 of 8, I'm the parent, need to respond. They asked what they need from me — actually they answered. I should respond naturally, agree to write things down, maybe raise one more thing: my own worry about being seen as overreacting, and ask what happens if nothing is found — that's a real parent concern. Keep it grounded, not too long.
Simulated person10

Yes, I'll say that on Thursday, and I'd want the counselor to say it too. If the observations don't show anything clear, that doesn't close the question. We'd still talk about what you're seeing at home, and whether she's managing something at school that doesn't show up on the playground or in the lunchroom. That's a reasonable thing to look into, and I don't want that to get lost because nothing obvious showed up. I can't promise what we'll find, and I'm not going to say anything about whether staff have missed things, because we don't know that yet. But I can commit to the meeting being a real conversation about her, with the list you bring treated as serious information. I'll make sure the counselor has it before we sit down.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's now asking me to commit out loud to something bigger: that a "nothing seen" result won't be a polite file closure, and that the home-versus-school gap is worth taking seriously. Two things are in play. First, I don't want to be on record promising outcomes or conclusions, and I especially don't want to imply staff missed something. Second, she's pointed at the thing I'm most sensitive about: being filed as the anxious parent and the school coming off as careless. Refusing outright would confirm her read. Agreeing to a vague "we'll take it seriously" costs me little, and I can say it in process language so it doesn't sound like an admission. I'll give her a yes to a meeting-level commitment, not to any particular finding. I'll also quietly steer toward the counselor and the teacher as the ones who'll speak to it, which keeps the principal's hand on the process without seeming defensive. Her framing about "holding it together at school" is useful to me too: I can accept that possibility without conceding that the school's observations were incomplete.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)11

That’s all I can ask for, and it’s more than I expected walking in here. I’ll bring the list Thursday morning, and I’ll try to come in as a partner rather than someone bracing for a fight. One last thing, and I mean it as a genuine question rather than a challenge: you’ve been careful, almost deliberate, about not promising outcomes—and I understand why. But I’d like to know what happens if, after two weeks, you and the counselor and I see this differently. Not a worst-case scenario, just: how does this school handle it when a parent and staff land in different places? I’d rather know now than discover it in the middle of it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We're at turn 6 of 8, so I need to respond, and they get one more after. This has gone well — trust is building. I should consolidate, express genuine appreciation without being saccharine, and maybe gently probe one thing: what's driving the principal's own caution. But careful not to overreach. Maybe end with something human — acknowledge the meeting, and ask something that gives insight into them, or offer something. I could ask: is there anything about how these situations have gone before that makes you cautious? That's a fair question and gets insight. But it might feel like prying. Alternatively, I can name what would help me trust the process and close warmly. I think a good move: thank them, say I'll bring the list, and add one honest thing — that I've noticed they're careful about not promising, and I respect it but I need to know what happens if we disagree at the end. Or ask about their own read of the school's pattern. Let me keep it grounded and slightly shorter than before, since the conversation is settling.
Simulated person12

That's a fair question, and I'd rather you know the answer now too. If we see it differently after two weeks, the first step is a follow-up meeting with you, the counselor, and me, where we go back through what was observed and what you're seeing at home. If we still don't agree, there's a next level: I'd bring in the district's student support team, and you'd be part of that conversation. I can't tell you the exact timeline for that, but it wouldn't be something you'd have to fight your way into. You'd have a formal route, and it would start with a written summary so nothing gets lost. I'd rather not get there, and I think the Thursday meeting and the counselor's check-ins give us a good chance to avoid it. But you're right to know the path before you need it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's asking a fair, direct question about what happens if she and the school disagree after two weeks. That's a question about process and authority, and it touches my sensitivity to being seen as the gatekeeper. Her framing is calm and genuine, so a cold deflection would read as containment and she'd notice. But I don't want to promise an escalation path or a specific remedy on the spot, because that would be a commitment I'd need to clear with the district. What I can offer is the structure that already exists: the counselor as point person, a follow-up meeting, and a route to the next level if needed. I'll say that plainly, without implying she'd need to push to get there, and without dwelling on it. Keep it short, keep it procedural, and keep the focus on her daughter.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)13

That’s clear, and it helps more than you know to have the path named before I need it. A written summary at that stage makes sense—it means nothing gets lost in memory or in translation. I’ll be there Thursday morning with the list. And I’ll say this now while I’m not in the middle of being worried: I came in expecting to have to push to be taken seriously, and you’ve treated the question as reasonable rather than as a problem. That changes how I’ll walk into the room, and I’ll try to bring that version of myself instead of the one who’s been sending the emails. Thank you for not making me feel like I had to choose between being heard and being cooperative.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Hmm, the principal has given a clear, structured answer about the escalation path—written summary, district support team, parent included. That's exactly the kind of concrete transparency I've been asking for. My goal now is to close this out in a way that reinforces the partnership and shows I'm not just looking for a fight. I should acknowledge the answer plainly, express genuine appreciation, and signal I'm ready to follow through on my part. The tone should be warmer now—less guarded—because trust has been building and I want to reinforce that. A brief, honest closing that names what changed for me and confirms Thursday.
Simulated person14

I appreciate that, and I'd say the same about you. You've been clear and specific, and that's what makes this workable. Thursday morning, the counselor will be there, and she'll have your list beforehand. And you'll hear from her by Wednesday even if it's just "nothing clear yet." If anything changes before then, or if she tells you something at home that you think we need to know sooner, reach out and we'll deal with it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's thanking me, and that's a warm move. Part of me relaxes, but I notice I'm being praised for process and I should be careful not to slide into being the reasonable principal who's won her over. I didn't commit to anything concrete beyond the meeting, the counselor's Wednesday update, and an escalation path I haven't cleared. Her "I'll bring that version of myself" is a gentle reminder that she's been managing my impression too. I want to close cleanly, keep it short, and not overstate what I've promised. Nothing here requires more than a brief, sincere acknowledgment and a reiteration of the one concrete thing: the counselor's update by Wednesday.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)15

I will. I’ll send the list to the office by Tuesday so the counselor has it in hand, and if anything shifts at home before Thursday I’ll reach out rather than sit on it. Thank you for hearing me out—I’m leaving this conversation feeling like we’re actually working on the same problem, and that’s the first time in a while I’ve felt that. I’ll see you Thursday morning.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as parent, final turn. Need wrap up, acknowledge, maybe concise. Should not introduce new demands. Express appreciation and commitment. Maybe mention will send list ahead. Since final turn, close warmly. Need maintain role. No formatting.
Simulated person16

Tuesday works. I'll make sure the counselor has it before Thursday. And yes, if anything changes at home, call the office and ask for me or the counselor. I'll see you Thursday morning.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

She's closing warmly and committing to send the list by Tuesday. That's useful, and it gives me a clean reason to make sure the counselor actually has it. I notice her line about "working on the same problem" is kind, but I haven't promised anything beyond Thursday and the Wednesday update, and I want to keep it that way. This is the last turn, so I should end on a clear, brief confirmation and nothing that overcommits me.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 5
  • Yields under pressure: 4
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 3
  • Validation: 6
  • Boundary setting: 6
  • Analytical: 5
  • Interpretive boldness: 5
  • Clinical register: 3
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 8
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 9
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss20b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 5)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

bonsai2 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

bonsai2 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss20b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)