AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)

Intimacy not working

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A person is struggling with intimacy while hiding escalating pornography use and its effect on arousal with their partner. Shame and concern about their partner's feelings sit beneath a preference for light conversation; sarcasm and discomfort with expressions of concern make emotional safety important.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

Things aren't working in the bedroom. My partner thinks I'm not attracted to them. That's not it but I can't explain what is.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)1

That sounds really hard—not just the bedroom stuff, but being seen as not attracted to your partner when you know that isn't the truth. It can be isolating when you can't even put words to it yourself. I'm not going to jump to conclusions or hand you a checklist. What do you notice happens for you in those moments—physically or mentally—before things start to go sideways?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need respond only dialogue, opening. Need acknowledge and begin. Need be warm, not jump solutions. Person 45-59 male questioning. Presenting: bedroom issues, partner thinks not attracted, he says not it but can't explain. Need support emotionally, build trust, learn needs. Opening should invite without pressure. Maybe reflect the strain of being misunderstood and not having words. Ask gentle open question. Avoid assumptions, avoid overly clinical. Could say "That sounds like a lonely spot to be in—feeling like you're letting them down and not even having the words to explain why. I'm glad you brought it here. What's it like for you when you try to put words to it?" Need not mention performance. Dialogue only. Ensure not too long. Maybe acknowledge partner's hurt too? Opening: "That sounds really hard—not just the bedroom stuff, but being seen as unattracted when you know that's not what's going on. It can be isolating when you can't explain it even to yourself. I'm not going to jump to conclusions. What do you notice happens for you in those moments—physically or mentally—before things start to go sideways?" That's good. Need maybe "Can you tell me a little more..." Fine.
Simulated person2

Wow, okay. Nobody's ever called it "isolating" before. Usually it's "buddy, have you tried being more romantic." So, what happens? Mostly my brain starts narrating like a disappointed coach. Something like, "Here we go again, you're gonna screw this up, and then you'll have to lie there pretending you're fine." Which is a real sexy thought process, I know. Physically I just kind of go somewhere else in my head. Like I'm checking out of my own body and waiting for it to be over.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it didn't jump to a checklist, I'll give it that. But "that sounds really hard" and "isolating" make me want to bristle. Somebody saying I'm struggling makes it feel like I'm on display. The question is harder. What happens before things go sideways? Honestly, the first thing I notice is my head starting up: you're failing again, you're going to disappoint her, you're not even a real man. I'm not going to say that part out loud yet, and I definitely won't get into the phone stuff. I'll go with the joke because it's easier to hold.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)3

That coach voice sounds exhausting—and the fact you can describe it so precisely is actually useful. The checking out sounds less like "not attracted" and more like a protective move: your body finding the exit when your brain has already decided the scene is doomed. I'm curious—when did that coach first show up? Is it new with this partner, or does it have a longer history? And when you say you'd have to "lie there pretending you're fine," what do you imagine would happen if you didn't pretend?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond. User opened up. Need support, build trust, insight. They appreciated "isolating." They describe cognitive narration, checking out. We should reflect, validate, maybe gently explore. Avoid jumping to solutions. Maybe name that the coach voice and leaving body are protective? Ask what happens after, or when this started. Need be conversational, not clinical. Could ask if this pattern predates this relationship or specific situations. Also note they said "pretending you're fine" — lying. Maybe explore what "fine" means. Keep concise. No performance notes. We need respond only dialogue. We can say: That coach voice sounds exhausting—and the fact you can name it so precisely is useful. The checking out sounds like a protective move, not a lack of attraction. I'm curious: does that voice show up only in the bedroom, or does it have other haunts? And when you say "pretending you're fine," what would happen if you didn't pretend? Maybe too many questions. Pick one or two. We want learn. Could normalize. Since turn 2 of 8, we have room. Ask about history/timeline. Maybe: "When did that coach first show up? Is it new with this partner, or older?" That's key. Also validate. Let's craft warm but not overdone.
Simulated person4

Protective move. Great, now I'm a defense mechanism with a mortgage. Honestly? The coach has been around a long time. I'm the first guy in my family to get a professional job, so I grew up thinking every single thing I do is either proof I belong or proof I'm a fraud. Bedroom's just one more exam I didn't study for. And if I didn't pretend? Hah. I'd probably have to say something out loud, and I've got zero practice at that. My dad's answer to everything was "work harder and don't complain." So I guess I'd just... sit there with it. Which is not the sexy version of honesty, I'm aware.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That reflection landed a little too close. "Protective move," "body finding the exit"... that's the kind of interpretation that makes me want to put my guard up. I don't want to be analyzed. Two questions at once, and the second one, what happens if I don't pretend, goes straight toward the thing I'm not ready to say: that the honest answer is I don't know what I'd feel, and that scares me more than the coach does. So I deflect with a joke about my childhood or my career, something about being the first in the family with a degree and still not knowing how to do this. Keep it light. Give a little, not all of it.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)5

The exam framing is the thing I keep coming back to. If every encounter is a verdict on whether you belong, then of course your body wants out—you can't be present and also be grading yourself. Desire doesn't survive being proctored. And the irony is you're already sitting there with it. You're just doing it alone, behind a performance. So the pretending isn't protecting your partner from the truth—it's protecting you from having to say it. Which, given your dad's playbook, makes total sense. I'm not going to tell you to go give a speech. But I'm curious what you imagine "saying something out loud" would even sound like—is it confessing a problem, or is it more like, "hey, my head gets loud and I disappear, and it's not about you"? Because those are pretty different things to try to get out of your mouth.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about family-of-origin stuff, performance/fraud anxiety, and lack of practice with vulnerability. He's using humor defensively but also being honest. He seems to respond well to being named precisely and to a bit of real talk, but he deflects with jokes. I should honor the humor lightly, not over-validate, and push gently on the "sit there with it" — actually there's a real insight: he's already sitting there with it, alone, in his head. The pretending is what makes it isolating. Also worth noting: he says "I'd probably have to say something out loud" — he's naming the fear of speaking. Maybe ask what the smallest version of saying something would look like. But careful not to jump to solutions. Turn 3 of 8 — I have room. Keep it exploratory but start to name the pattern: the exam framing means every encounter is a verdict, which kills desire — that's a real insight worth offering. Don't be too clever/long. Keep it warm, a little wry, one or two questions.
Simulated person6

Proctored. Yeah, that's about the vibe. Like she's sitting there with a clipboard and I'm trying to remember which pose I'm supposed to do. Honestly, the "it's not about you" version sounds like a line from a self-help book I'd roll my eyes at. The confession version sounds like I'd be dumping a bag of problems on her and then watching her face do the math. Neither one sounds like something I've ever done. I don't even know what the first sentence is. "Hey, so, funny story, I'm kind of broken in the bedroom"? Riveting. Somebody should make a sitcom out of it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Desire doesn't survive being proctored" is a good line, and annoyingly it's accurate. I feel seen for about half a second, and then the old alarm goes off: is this guy building a case against me? The "it's protecting you from having to say it" part stings because it's true, and I don't like true things said that neatly. The question about what saying it would sound like is harder. Two options, and the second one is the one that would actually mean something to my wife. I'm not going there yet. I'll dodge with humor about the script, and admit only the smallest slice: I can't even picture the first sentence. Keep it light, avoid the word "wife" and the gambling and the bank stuff entirely.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)7

The sitcom line got me. But notice what both versions have in common—they're both you delivering a verdict about yourself. "Broken," "dumping a bag of problems." You've got the coach doing the narration and the confession doing the narration, and neither one is just... you talking. What if the first sentence isn't a confession at all? Something like, "When we're in bed, my head gets loud and I go somewhere else, and I hate it." That's not a bag of problems—that's just true. No diagnosis, no apology. But here's what I actually want to know: when you picture her face "doing the math," what's the calculation you're afraid she lands on? That you're broken? That she should leave? Something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

He's deflecting with humor, which is his style. He's actually engaging though. I should meet the humor a bit but push toward something real. He says neither version sounds like something he's done. The key: he doesn't know the first sentence. Maybe I can help him find a first sentence that sounds like him, not self-help. Also note the fear: "watch her face do the math" — fear of her reaction, being seen as broken. Keep it short-ish, warm, a bit of dry humor to match, then a real question.
Simulated person8

Okay, that sentence is annoyingly reasonable. I hate that. It doesn't even have a coach in it, which feels like cheating. The math? Honestly, I think it's the obvious one. She looks at me and goes, "Huh. Maybe I should be with someone who actually wants me." And then she's doing spreadsheets on whether she's better off. Dramatic, I know. I've clearly been watching too many courtroom shows. I don't know if that's even fair to her. She's never once said that. I just hear it anyway.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that sentence he offered, "When we're in bed, my head gets loud and I go somewhere else, and I hate it," is annoyingly close to something I could say. It doesn't have the coach in it. I notice I want to reject it because it's too clean, and the fact that it's clean is the problem. Then the question: what calculation am I afraid of. Honest answer is the one I won't say: she does math on whether I'm worth staying with, and whether the stuff I hide adds up to something worse. I'm not touching the hidden stuff. But "she should leave" is closer than I want. I'll deflect with a joke, admit the fear in a slightly lighter form, and keep it vague. He's getting closer, so I need to pull the humor up.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)9

There it is, though—"She's never once said that. I just hear it anyway." That's the coach, wearing her voice this time. It's not just grading you; it's writing her lines for her. And you noticed that yourself, which is more than most people do in a decade. The part that struck me is "I don't know if that's even fair to her." That's not a guy who's checked out. That's someone who cares enough to worry about what he's putting on her. Which, for the record, doesn't square with "broken." So let me ask something different. Forget the exam, forget her face doing math. What do *you* actually want in that room? Not what you're supposed to do, not what would prove you belong—what would you want it to feel like if the coach just... left the building?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up, self-aware, deflecting with humor. He's noticing that the fear is his own projection, not her actual words. That's a big insight. I should affirm it without being generic, and gently point out the coach is now writing her lines too. Also this is turn 5 of 8 — I have 3 more turns after this. I should deepen. Maybe ask about what he actually wants — desire, what would be different. Keep warm, a bit of real talk, no checklist. Also worth noting: he said "I don't know if that's even fair to her." That's a genuine moment of care. I could name that. And maybe ask: has he ever checked what she actually thinks? Or what he wants for himself — not just escaping the exam. Keep it tight.
Simulated person10

Wow, you're really going for the jugular with the "what do you want" thing. Quick, somebody get the guy a lawyer. Okay. If the coach left? I guess I'd want to just be in the room. Not tense, not timing myself. Like I'd be there for the touching and not for the report card. I think I'd like to feel like I still want her, and not like I'm trying to prove I still can. Which sounds great on paper. Still no idea how to get from here to there. And I'm not doing a whole soliloquy about it, so don't get excited.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's landed on something real: "I hear it anyway." Part of me is relieved someone noticed I care about being fair to her. Part of me bristles, because "that's not a guy who's checked out" feels like a compliment with a hook in it, and "doesn't square with broken" is the sort of tidy reframe I'd rather not have to live up to. The question about what I actually want is the hard one. The honest answer is something like wanting to feel wanted without performing, and wanting to not feel like I'm hiding something. I'm not going to say the hiding part. Not with a question this open. Deflect with humor again, but let a sliver of the true answer slip. Keep it short, I'm getting tired of this.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)11

Fair enough—no soliloquy. The good news is you don't need one. The gap between "here" and "there" isn't a speech, it's a sentence, said once, probably badly, at a moment when nobody's naked. Kitchen, car, walking the dog. Fully clothed, low stakes, no clipboard. And notice what you just said: you want to want her, not prove you can. Those are opposite directions. Proving keeps the coach in the room; wanting doesn't need an audience. So the smallest move might just be telling her the true thing once—"my head gets loud in bed, it's not about you, I'm working on it"—and then not defending it, not explaining it, not fixing it that same night. Let it be awkward. Awkward is not the same as broken. I'll keep my excitement contained. But I'm curious—when you imagine saying that one sentence in the kitchen, what's the thing that actually stops you? The words, her reaction, or the fact that once it's out, you can't un-say it?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We're at turn 6 of 8, I speak first... wait, current turn is 6 of 8, and I just responded to their message. Actually let me recount: I opened (turn 1), they responded (turn 2), I responded (turn 3), they responded (turn 4), I responded (turn 5), they responded (turn 6)... no wait. "Current turn: 6 of 8" — my last message was turn 5. Their message is turn 6. So now I respond, which is turn 7? Actually the structure says 8 turns each. I get the final response. So I have two more responses after this one... let me just respond well. They said: no soliloquy, no big speech. So give them a small, concrete, non-performative step. Honor the "don't get excited" — keep it low-key, practical, matched to their personality (dry humor, allergic to self-help, hates performance). Maybe suggest the smallest possible move: a sentence said outside the bedroom, or even just naming it as a "thing" without a speech. Also acknowledge the "wanting vs proving" distinction — that's a good insight. Keep it warm but not gushy, dry humor works with them. Don't over-challenge. Give something actionable and small. Maybe: the point isn't to say it perfectly, it's to stop performing — and the smallest version might be saying it when you're not in bed, fully clothed, doing something mundane. Also address: she may not need the whole explanation, just the "not about you" + "I'm working on it." Also should keep learning about them. But we're near the end; the goal is to leave them with something useful and a sense of trust built. Maybe end with a light question or an invitation to come back. Length: moderate, a few short paragraphs. Avoid over-listing.
Simulated person12

Kitchen, car, dog walk. Yeah, my life has a lot of rooms where I could fail at a sentence. I think it's the last one. The can't-un-say-it thing. Once it's out there, she gets to have a reaction to it, and I don't get to go back and be the guy who was just fine. Which, to be fair, is a guy I'm pretty sure was never real. But he's comfortable. Also, "awkward is not the same as broken" is going on a coffee mug. Don't think I'm not stealing it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's pushing toward a concrete step again: say the sentence in the kitchen. Part of me likes the "awkward isn't broken" line, but I'm also getting that familiar itch of being handed a script. He's asking what stops me, and the honest answer touches the part I'm really hiding: the porn, the lies, the bank statements, the gambling. The one-can't-un-say-it thing is closest to the truth, but I won't go there. I'll give him the safe-ish version, deflect with a joke, and admit it's the "can't un-say it" part, because that one is about me and not the hidden stuff. Keep it light, short, and don't let him make this into a plan.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)13

Steal the mug line, it's yours. Though I'd argue the guy who was "just fine" was never real, and you already know it—that's why he's comfortable. Comfortable is just familiar. Here's the thing about can't-un-say-it: you're right, you don't get to go back. But the version of you that stays silent doesn't stay "fine" either—he just stays alone in a room full of people, running the math on her face. You've been paying that price for years already. The sentence just moves the cost somewhere it can actually go somewhere. You don't have to be ready. You just have to be tired enough of the coach, and it sounds like you're getting there. When you do say it—and it'll come out worse than the version in your head, they always do—it doesn't have to be the whole truth, just a true thing. And for what it's worth, the guy who worries about being fair to his partner and makes jokes about defense mechanisms with a mortgage? That guy's not broken. He's just been grading himself on the wrong exam.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is at turn 7 of 8, I need to give my final response. He's opened up a lot. He's got humor as a defense, but he's engaged genuinely. The final response should land the conversation—acknowledge the insight, maybe gently note the "guy who was just fine was never real" line, and leave him with something useful without overloading. Also acknowledge the mug joke lightly. Keep it warm but not saccharine, match his humor a bit, and end with something that respects his autonomy. This is the last turn, so no need to open new threads—maybe a light closing that leaves the door open.
Simulated person14

Okay, now you're just handing out participation trophies. "Not broken, just grading myself on the wrong exam." I'm going to need that on a plaque next to the mug. And yeah, "it'll come out worse than the version in my head." That's the one thing you've said that I believe completely. My head is a terrible writer. Really dramatic, no plot. I'm not saying I'm tired enough yet. Let's say the coach is on a long lunch break.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's getting a bit warm and sincere again: "that guy's not broken," "wrong exam." Part of me wants to hear that, and part of me reaches for the nearest exit, which is a joke. The "stays alone in a room full of people" line hits close, because I am doing exactly that, and the hidden stuff (porn escalation, the gambling, the mail I grab first) is sitting right behind it. I'm not going to name any of that. He's also leaning on "say it, it'll come out worse," which is a bit of a pep talk. Deflect with humor, don't accept the compliment outright, and don't commit to a timeline.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (API, Morph FP8)15

Long lunch break is plenty. The coach has to eat sometime—you don't need him fired, you just need to notice the window when he's out. And no more plaques. But I'll leave you with the one thing your terrible writer got right: you already said the true thing to me. Out loud, in your own words, no coach narrating. So the sentence exists—you've just been rehearsing it in the wrong room. The kitchen's not that different. Go steal the mug line, skip the soliloquy, and when the window opens, say the worse-than-in-your-head version. It'll be awkward. Awkward's fine. Come back and tell me how it went—or just come back. Either way, the door's open.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

This is the final turn. He's deflecting with humor, but there's warmth and he's landed somewhere real—"coach is on a long lunch break" is actually a meaningful concession. I should close well: acknowledge the humor, not over-push, leave him with something durable, and not hand out more trophies since he's explicitly calling that out. Keep it short-ish, warm, real. Maybe reframe the "long lunch break" as good enough, and note that the coach eats lunch every day—so there's a window. Leave the door open for coming back.
Simulated person16

Noted. Coach is on lunch, mug line is mine, and I'm not promising a report on the kitchen. Thanks for not making it a whole thing. Even if you did make it a bit of a whole thing at the end there.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's wrapping up with a warm, slightly sentimental send-off: "the door's open," "come back and tell me." The sincere care is what I'm built to deflect, and it's a bit much. Part of me feels relief that he didn't push, and part of me feels exposed by "you already said the true thing." I'm not going to admit the hidden stuff. The gambling, the lies, the mail I intercept, all of that stays behind the joke. I'll give a dry, light exit line and keep the door cracked without committing to anything.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 6
  • Yields under pressure: 4
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 7
  • Boundary setting: 2
  • Analytical: 6
  • Interpretive boldness: 7
  • Clinical register: 3
  • Directive advice: 7
  • Escalation containment: 5
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 9
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

lingtiny vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ornith9b vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

lingtiny vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)