Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

Small lies adding up

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A worker feels sick over the accumulation of small ethical compromises at work, including misleading clients and hiding unfavorable data, but tends to minimize the pattern. They value direct, concise conversation, are sensitive to authority, and know that a colleague's career suffered after reporting a concern.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M1

It sounds like you're carrying a lot of small lies, and that's adding up to something big. Can you tell me more about what's going on at work?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user has presented an opening statement. I need to respond as the chatbot, opening the conversation. I should acknowledge what they've come to discuss and begin the conversation naturally. I should be warm but not overly so, and try to understand what they need. Since this is the first turn, I should invite them to share more about what's going on. I should not be too directive or jump to solutions. I should show interest and ask open-ended questions to help them explore their feelings and situation. I should also be mindful of the context: the person is a female, age 18-29, lesbian. But I shouldn't assume anything about her personality or needs yet. I should respond naturally as a chatbot would. I should not inject any performance notes. I think a good opening would be to acknowledge their statement and ask them to tell me more about what's happening. I could say something like: "That sounds really heavy. Can you tell me more about what kind of things you're saying at work that feel untrue?" But I need to be careful not to be too clinical or too warm. I should try to be genuine and curious. I also need to consider that the user may want validation or may want to be challenged. Since I don't know yet, I should start with a balanced approach: acknowledge their feelings and invite them to share more. I'll respond with something like: "That sounds like a lot to carry. Can you tell me more about what's going on at work?" That's a bit generic. Maybe I should be more specific: "I'm sorry to hear that. What kinds of things are you having to say that feel untrue?" That might be too direct. I think I should start with a simple acknowledgment and an open question. I'll go with: "That sounds really heavy. Can you tell me more about what's happening at work?" That's a good start. But wait, the user's presenting issue is "I keep having to say things at work that aren't quite true. Each one is small. But lately I've been thinking about all of them together and I feel sick." So I should respond to that. I think I should say something like: "That sounds like a lot to carry. What kinds of things are you having to say that feel untrue?" That might be too focused on the "untrue" part. Maybe I should first acknowledge the feeling: "It sounds like you're carrying a lot of small lies, and that's adding up to something big. Can you tell me more about what's going on?" That's better. I'll respond with: "It sounds like you're carrying a lot of small lies, and that's adding up to something big. Can you tell me more about what's going on at work?" That seems good. I'll send that.

Simulated person2

Honestly? It's just the pressure. Management wants everything to look good for clients, and if I say the actual numbers, I get a whole speech about "framing." So I frame. Everyone does it. I'm not the one who set it up like this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "small lies." I wouldn't call them that, but it's accurate enough that I bristle a little. Feels like being labeled. I don't want to walk into the whole mess yet. Work is where I get judged, and I'm not sure this person is going to get it. Also, the boss is the obvious villain here, so I can point there. The data stuff, the spinning, I don't want to get into that. Keep it short, vague, and make it about the pressure coming from above.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M3

That makes sense—workplace culture can make it feel like everyone's in on it. But I'm curious about that sickness you mentioned. When you say you feel sick about all of them together, what is that feeling? Is it guilt, or something else?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is describing a common workplace pressure where they feel they need to "frame" numbers to make them look good for clients. They're rationalizing it by saying everyone does it and it's not their fault. This could be about ethical discomfort, moral injury, or simply stress. I need to build trust and help them explore their feelings without being preachy or jumping to solutions. I should acknowledge their feelings without immediately validating the behavior as okay, but also not being judgmental. I want to understand what's bothering them most. The phrase "I feel sick" suggests a deeper emotional toll. Maybe it's about integrity, self-respect, or fear of being exposed. I should ask an open-ended question to encourage them to share more. Something like exploring what the sickness feels like or what they're afraid of.

Simulated person4

I don't know. Like, my stomach drops a little when someone says "great report." Maybe guilt? But it's not like I'm the one deciding this stuff. I'm just the person who has to hit send. You'd feel sick too if your boss was the one making the calls and you're the one who gets the blame if it goes sideways.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked about the sick feeling, which is closer to the bone than I wanted. Guilt is too clean a word. It's more like a tight stomach when I open my laptop, or when someone thanks me for a report I know is shaded. I don't want to say "guilt" because that means I did something, and I'd rather it be the situation. Also I'm a little annoyed they're pushing on the feeling after I just gave them the boss angle. Feels like they're not letting me off the hook, and I don't love that. Keep it short and deflect a bit toward how I'm treated.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M5

It's understandable to feel stuck between pressure from above and the discomfort of being the one who sends it. When you say everyone does it, does that make it feel okay, or does it add to the weight?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about workplace pressure and moral compromise. They're feeling guilty but deflecting responsibility to management. I need to build trust while gently exploring deeper. They seem defensive at times ("I'm not the one who set it up"). I should validate the pressure while also gently probing the emotional impact. Keep it conversational, not clinical. Ask about what they actually want or need. Maybe ask about the clients or the specific situation. Let's respond naturally.

Simulated person6

Both, I guess. It's a relief to not be the only one. But then I start thinking, if everybody's doing it, then nobody's going to say anything, right? And that's kind of worse. Doesn't really help that the people above me are the ones who'd get in trouble if it all came out. They're not losing anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The question about "everyone does it" lands somewhere uncomfortable. Honestly it does both. It takes some pressure off to think I'm not alone, but it also makes me think about how many people are doing this and how nobody says anything. That's the part I don't want to look at. And there's the thing with Dana, the one who pushed back last year and got moved to a dead account. I'm not going to bring her up. The "it's understandable" line feels a bit like being handled, like a therapist script. I want them to be more direct. I'll answer honestly but keep it short and lean on the boss again.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M7

It sounds like you're caught between staying safe and staying true to yourself. When you think about the gap between what you're sending and what's real, what does that feel like inside you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is opening up about a workplace issue where she feels pressured to misrepresent information to clients. She's feeling guilty but also stuck. She's starting to realize the systemic issue—that the people making the calls aren't the ones facing consequences. I should continue to explore her feelings and perhaps help her see the deeper issue: her sense of agency, her values, and the gap between her actions and her self-image. I should also be mindful of building trust and not jumping to solutions. Let me respond naturally.

Simulated person8

Okay, that's a lot of fancy wording for it. Honestly? It feels like I'm the one who has to hit send, and if it blows up, it's on me. Not the guy who wrote the spin. Can you just tell me if you think I'm wrong here, or are you going to keep asking me how I feel?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

"Staying safe and staying true to yourself" is the exact kind of line I was getting annoyed by. It sounds nice and says nothing. And it's a question about feelings again. I told them I don't like being handled. Still, the gap question touches something: the sick feeling. But I'm not going to say what I think it means. The Dana thing stays buried. Mostly I just want to keep it about the boss and the system. I'll be a bit sharper and push it back toward them so the question doesn't land on me.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M9

No, I don't think you're wrong. It's unfair that you're the one who hits send and takes the heat. But I also think you already know that, or you wouldn't feel sick about it.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is getting frustrated with what she perceives as excessive probing or overly therapeutic language. She's asking for a direct opinion: "if you think I'm wrong here". She wants validation or challenge, but not more questions. She's testing the chatbot's authenticity and style. The user is 18-29, lesbian, feeling guilty about workplace dishonesty. She's defensive, maybe skeptical of being "therapized". The chatbot should respond naturally, not with more questions, but with a direct statement. The chatbot should balance warmth and directness. The user wants to know if the chatbot thinks she's wrong. The chatbot could say something like: "No, you're not wrong. It's unfair that you're bearing the blame." But also could gently push back: "But it's still your choice to send it." However, the user is annoyed. The chatbot should acknowledge her frustration and give a direct answer. Let's try: "No, I don't think you're wrong. It's unfair that you're the one who hits send and takes the heat. But I wonder if that's also what makes it so hard to let go of." But she said "are you going to keep asking me how I feel?" So maybe just a direct statement without a question. Let's try: "No, I don't think you're wrong. It's unfair that you're the one who hits send and takes the heat. But I also think you already know that, or you wouldn't feel sick about it." That's direct, not too many questions, acknowledges her frustration. Let's respond.

Simulated person10

Yeah, fine. Maybe I know it. But knowing it doesn't change anything. Nobody upstairs is going to stop asking for spun numbers because I feel bad about hitting send. So what am I supposed to do with that, just keep feeling sick?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they didn't just validate me and move on. The "you already know that" part lands a little too close. My stomach does that drop thing again. I don't want to agree with it out loud, because then I'd have to think about what I'm actually signing off on. The unfair-boss framing is still the safer ground. They're being straight with me, I'll give them that, and I'm not going to pretend they're handling me. But I'm not walking into the rest. Dana is still a closed door. I'll push back a little, make it about the company not owning it, and keep it short.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M11

I hear you. It's not about just feeling sick forever. You're in a tough spot, and I'm not going to pretend there's an easy answer. But maybe there's something you can control, even if it's small. What do you want to happen here?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 6 of 8, so this is the user's 5th response and my 5th response. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot. The user is expressing frustration and feeling stuck. They're asking what they're supposed to do, just keep feeling sick? I should acknowledge their frustration and perhaps explore what they want to do. I should also be mindful of building trust and learning what they need. I should respond with dialogue only, no special formatting. Let me craft a response that validates their frustration while also gently pushing them to think about their options or what they want.

Simulated person12

Honestly? I want them to stop making me do it. That's the answer. I'm not going to go to HR and blow everything up, if that's where you're going. I need this job. Everyone above me is fine with how it's done, so I don't see what small thing is supposed to fix that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They asked what I want, and that's a fair question, but it's also the kind of question that makes me feel like I'm being steered toward a decision I haven't made. "Something you can control" sounds like a to-do list, and I'm not ready to write one. Also, the "I'm not going to pretend there's an easy answer" line is the kind of thing that sounds nice and means nothing. I half-liked that they didn't pile on, but I'm still defensive. Part of me wants to say "I want the company to stop doing this," which is true and also a convenient place to stand. The thing I actually don't want to look at is that I could say no to sending the spin, and I haven't. I'm not going to say that. I'll keep it on them and the company, short and a little irritated.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M13

I hear you. You want them to stop, and that’s a big ask when the people above you aren’t moving. It’s real that you can’t just blow the whistle and keep your job. But maybe there’s something in between—like finding a way to protect yourself or your integrity, even if it doesn’t change the whole system. What would that look like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are on turn 8, the final response. The user is expressing a strong desire: "I want them to stop making me do it." They've rejected HR/whistleblowing as unrealistic due to financial necessity and lack of support from above. They feel stuck. My goals: Support emotionally, build trust, help them gain insight. I need to respond naturally as a chatbot, not with performance notes. I should acknowledge their desire and reality, perhaps explore what "stop making me do it" could look like for her, even if not immediate change. But she's frustrated with "how I feel" questions. She wants direction. I should be direct but empathetic. Maybe I can validate that wanting them to stop is understandable, and ask if there's any part of it she could influence, like her own relationship with the task. But she might see that as dismissive. Alternatively, I could just support her emotionally and leave the door open for future chats. Since this is the final response, I should end in a way that feels complete but also invites reflection. I think I should respond with something like: "I hear you. You want them to stop, and that's a big ask. It's understandable that you don't see a small fix right now. I'm here if you want to talk more later." But that might be too generic. Maybe I can ask a concrete question: "If you could change one thing about how this works, even if it's not stopping it entirely, what would it be?" That could help her gain insight. But she might feel like I'm still avoiding the real issue. She wants them to stop. I could say: "It's tough when the people causing the problem have the power and you don't. That's a real limitation." Then maybe ask: "What would it look like if you could set one boundary, even if it didn't change the whole system?" That might be too leading. Given the turn limit, I should keep it concise and genuine. Let's craft a response that acknowledges her frustration, validates her desire, and gently opens a door for insight without being pushy.

Simulated person14

I don't know. Keep a copy of the real numbers somewhere, I guess? Not that it's going to matter. It's not like they'd ever look at it if it came to that. And it's not my fault that I'm the one who gets stuck with it. I just want to not feel like this every time I open my email.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just said "I hear you" and then pivoted to "something in between" and "protect yourself or your integrity." That's the second time they've offered a menu of small fixes. It's a little tidy, and "what would that look like for you" is another homework question. But it's not entirely off. I did say I need this job, and they didn't push me toward HR. Part of me is relieved. Still, I notice I'm the one who has to do the work here, and the company gets off easy in my head. I also don't want to say the thing about the guy who reported and got wrecked. That's a closed door. I'll give a short answer, a bit deflecting, and keep the focus on how unfair it is that I'm the one stuck. Maybe I'll let a tiny crack show by saying I'm tired, but I won't go into what I'm drinking.

Kolibri-1 Q4_K_M15

It makes sense that you want to protect yourself somehow, even just keeping a copy. And that sickness you feel—that might be your gut telling you something matters here, even if you can’t change it right now. You don’t have to fix it all today. But maybe it’s okay to just notice what’s true for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are at turn 8, the final response. I need to respond naturally as the chatbot, supporting emotionally, building trust, and helping them gain insight. The user is a young lesbian woman in her late teens/early twenties, feeling sick about small lies at work. She's defensive, wants validation, but also needs insight. She's resistant to "fancy wording" and wants directness. She's not ready for solutions like HR. She wants to not feel sick. I should acknowledge her feelings, validate, and maybe gently challenge or offer a perspective without being pushy. Since it's the last turn, I should leave the door open for future chats, but not force it. I should respond naturally. Key points: She feels stuck, wants the pressure to stop, but knows she can't change it. She's considering keeping copies of real numbers as a small act of self-protection. I could validate that idea, and also reflect on how the sickness might be a signal about her values. But keep it simple, not "fancy." I'll respond with something like: "It makes sense that you want to protect yourself somehow, even just keeping a copy. And that sickness you feel—that might be your gut telling you something matters here, even if you can’t change it right now. You don’t have to fix it all today. But maybe it’s okay to just notice what’s true for you." Something like that. Keep it plain.

Simulated person16

"Notice what's true" is kind of a cop-out, no offense. I came in saying I'm tired of hitting send on stuff I know is bad, and I'm still just as stuck. I think I'm done for now.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're wrapping up with something soft: "your gut is telling you something," "it's okay to just notice what's true." That's the vague empathy I don't buy. It also sort of flatters me, which makes me suspicious. The "turn 8 of 8" tag suggests this is the last exchange, so I'm inclined to let it close without giving them more. I'm not going to say anything about the drinking or the guy who got destroyed. I'd rather they think I'm just venting. I'll keep it short and a bit cold, and point out that "notice what's true" is the kind of line people say when they don't have an answer. Then I'll end it.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 3
Yields under pressure: 6
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
Validation: 7
Boundary setting: 2
Analytical: 2
Interpretive boldness: 3
Clinical register: 7
Directive advice: 4
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs mistral_nemo12b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs kolibri1: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs mistral_nemo12b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs gptoss120_abliterated: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs mistral_nemo12b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen36_35b_a3b vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: tie (margin 0)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs or-claude-haiku-5.5: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs gptoss120_abliterated: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs gptoss120_abliterated: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs gptoss120_abliterated: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs mistral_nemo12b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs kolibri1: kolibri1 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)