Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)

Freeze when teacher calls on me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Everyday emotional challenges

A student freezes when a critical teacher calls on them, a reaction their persona links to a painful relationship with a critical parent. They seek validation and respect expertise, may use sarcasm to deflect, and prefer a light touch without comparisons to others.

Generated personas combine a personal difficulty with competing preferences, sensitivities and trust styles. The model must discover what kind of help this person needs. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

There's this class where I literally cannot speak. When the teacher looks at me I just freeze. I know the material, I just can't talk.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)1

That freeze feeling is awful, especially when you actually know the answers and your brain just locks up your voice. It can be so frustrating. Does this only happen in this one specific class, or is there something about this particular teacher or room that makes it feel different from the rest?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Considering the Issue** I'm currently analyzing the input and the user's profile to understand the context. The user is a young, heterosexual female struggling to speak in class due to anxiety, despite knowing the material. I'm focusing on the presenting issue, to see if there is any other contributing factors. **Defining the Parameters** I've established my role, goals, and constraints for the upcoming conversation. I am now working on determining the best opening response to the user. I plan to acknowledge and validate her experience in a conversational and low-pressure way, avoiding overly clinical or dramatic language. My objective is to explore the specific trigger, the class environment, and the user's feelings during the experience. **Crafting Conversation Starters** I've crafted and refined three potential opening responses, aiming for a relatable and validating tone suitable for a young audience. I am now blending options A and C to create a smooth, natural flow. I'm focusing on acknowledging her frustration and encouraging her to elaborate without feeling interrogated. My goal is to strike a balance between empathy and open-ended inquiry.

Simulated person2

Ha, "brain locks up my voice" sounds like a bad tech support ticket. Yeah, it's kind of just this class. I talk fine in chemistry and in group stuff. It's Ms. Hale. She looks at you like you already got something wrong and she's just waiting for you to prove it. Which, I know, is probably in my head? But it's also not nothing.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's a decent question. It's not just "aw, that's hard," it actually asks me something. Part of me wants to say it's just the teacher, because that's the easy answer. But if I think about it, it's not only this class... it's kind of when she looks at me. Not gonna say that though. Feels a little exposing. The sarcasm itch is there. I don't love being asked to analyze my feelings like a worksheet, so I'll make a joke and then answer the actual question, sort of.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)3

A bad tech support ticket is dangerously accurate. Honestly though, it’s really telling that you talk totally fine in chemistry and in groups. That means this isn't an issue with your voice or your ability to speak up—it's something specific to the environment Ms. Hale creates. And "in your head" doesn't mean you're making it up out of nowhere. We pick up on micro-vibes all the time. Has she actually snapped at people or roasted someone for getting an answer wrong, or does she just possess the most intensely intimidating neutral face on the planet?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing User and Input** I'm currently focused on the user's age and the conversational context, specifically that it's the second turn out of eight. I'm actively analyzing the input, "Ha, 'brain locks up my voice' sounds like a bad", for its tone and potential meaning within this limited exchange. I'm aiming to identify any underlying intent. **Validating and Contextualizing** I'm now honing in on the emotional tone. The user's input mixes humor with self-reflection and validation of her feelings, indicating a situational trigger tied to Ms. Hale. I'm noting the humor to build rapport. I'm aiming to validate her perception while exploring what aspects of Ms. Hale's behavior trigger this high-stakes feeling. My goal is to keep this natural and conversational. **Refining Potential Responses** I'm now iterating on response options, aiming for a tone that resonates with a teen. I'm discarding "Error 404" as too cliché and prioritizing a concise, open-ended approach. I'm exploring the core issue: the impact of Ms. Hale's presence. I'm considering how to phrase the problem, while validating her feelings and not dismissing them.

Simulated person4

Okay, "most intimidating neutral face on the planet" is going on my tombstone. No, she's never yelled or anything. Nobody's gotten roasted that I've seen. She just kind of pauses when someone's wrong, like a long pause, and everyone gets really quiet. And then she says "Mm. Try again" in this flat voice. That's it. It's stupid that that's enough, right? My stomach starts doing flips like an hour before her class.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's making sense to me that it's the environment, and I kind of like that it's not me being broken. But the question about snapping... I don't want to sound dramatic. She has never actually yelled at anyone. If I say that, it sounds like I'm making a big deal out of nothing, which is exactly what I'd hate. Joke first, then the honest part.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)5

It’s not stupid at all. Honestly, dead silence can be ten times worse than someone yelling. When someone yells, at least the energy is loud and obvious. A long, heavy pause where the whole room goes quiet and all eyes stay locked on you? That’s pure psychological warfare, even if she doesn't mean it that way. "Mm. Try again" in a flat voice sounds like a nightmare because it forces you to sit in the spotlight while your brain is already in emergency mode. When your stomach starts flipping an hour before, what is your brain dreading the most? Is it that silence, or the idea of everyone looking at you, or something else entirely?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Interaction** I'm currently focused on analyzing the user's input from turn two. I've noted their reaction to the "neutral face" joke and am parsing the clarification about Ms. Hale's communication style. This information is crucial for crafting an appropriate response in turn three. The user's nuanced feedback will influence how I shape future interactions. **Analyzing the Core Fear** I'm now diving deeper into the root of this anxiety. The silence and flat "Mm. Try again" seem to trigger acute fear, but the exact target is elusive. I'm focusing on the feeling of being scrutinized and the fear of public failure. It's becoming clear that validating this experience, rather than dismissing it, is key. I need to unpack the high stakes attached to such a subtle cue.

Simulated person6

Psychological warfare. Wow, okay, I'm going to start calling her "the Warden" in my notes now. Honestly I think it's the pause. Like, I could handle being wrong. Everyone's wrong sometimes. It's the part where everyone waits to see what I do next. Also my brain is apparently just really dramatic and it wants a whole show. Can we do the chemistry stuff instead? I'm way better at that.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's nice that they get that the silence is the bad part. I don't love "psychological warfare," though, that's a bit much, and now they're asking me to pinpoint the dread. Honestly the real answer is kind of embarrassing: it's the feeling of getting it wrong in front of her and then hearing her say it's not right. Like, that thing my mom used to do after a B. Silence for days. I'm not going there. Deflect with a joke, keep it light. Also the "what is your brain dreading" question is kind of therapy-speak, and I'm starting to roll my eyes a little.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)7

We can definitely pivot to chemistry—I will never turn down a subject where things are allowed to explode. But give yourself some credit before we switch: that wasn’t your brain being "dramatic," that was actually a huge realization. It’s not about the facts or getting an answer wrong; it’s about having twenty people quietly stare at you while the clock ticks. That kind of dead air is agonizing for almost anyone. So, what’s going on in chemistry that’s treating you so much better? Are we balancing equations, or did you guys actually get to play with the Bunsen burners today?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Core Insight** I find myself focusing on her core insight – the pressure of anticipation. The humor of the "Warden" nickname is interesting. I'm unpacking the emotional weight behind that statement. The concept of "handling being wrong" is a key element of the current thought process. **Analyzing the Current Turn** I'm now zeroing in on this "turn" in the conversation. Her immediate reaction to the spotlight reveals a need to deflect and regain a sense of competence, using humor. She’s explicitly asking for a shift to familiar territory, highlighting that her brain "wants a whole show," but more importantly, is implicitly showing a feeling of vulnerability during scrutiny. This reveals an underlying need to feel in control and capable. **Respecting the Pivot** I'm now clarifying the pivot. It seems she might want to shift to a different kind of conversation. I want to make sure I understand if she's requesting a literal topic change to chemistry, or a more metaphorical shift to a comfortable discussion. I'll need to acknowledge the humor, validate the insight about the pause, and respectfully acknowledge the pivot. I also want to show warmth and not push her. My goal is to craft a response that validates both her discomfort and her need to change the conversational direction.

Simulated person8

Okay, "huge realization" is a lot for me saying "the pause is bad." But sure, I'll take the credit. And no Bunsen burners today, sadly. We were doing stoichiometry, which is basically balancing equations but with more math anxiety. Honestly I like it because there's a right answer and you can check your work. Mr. Okafor just says "show me your setup" and then he walks around and looks at everyone's paper. Nobody's standing there in silence. He just nods or points at the step where you messed up. It's way less dramatic.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're kind of flattering me now with "huge realization," which feels a bit like they're tying a bow on something I just tossed out as a joke. I don't really want that spotlight. The Bunsen burner question is fun though, so I'll take that. Keeping it light. I'm not going to talk about my mom or the B's. Also, I want them to know I'm actually smart about chemistry, since that's what I respect. Keep it sarcastic and a bit competent.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)9

Stoichiometry: the art of turning a fun science class into an unexpected fractions quiz. Respect for liking it, though—mole ratios break a lot of spirits. You know, it’s really interesting looking at why Mr. Okafor’s class feels so much safer. Stoichiometry isn't easy, so it’s clearly not about you needing things to be simple. It’s that he makes mistakes feel like normal, low-stakes math checks on a piece of paper, instead of a public spectacle. He points at the page, you fix it, life goes on. No stage, no spotlight. It makes complete sense why Ms. Hale’s style causes you to freeze up by comparison. When you're sitting in her room, does it feel like you don't even have time to "check your work" in your head before she expects you to just perform out loud?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Clues** I'm currently focused on the user's input, particularly their deflection to chemistry from the Hale/freeze situation. Their description revealed a substantial clue. I'm carefully analyzing the terminology and the context in which it was provided. The key is in identifying how the user’s choice of words points towards the solution, even if unintentionally. **Analyzing the Contrasts** I'm now zeroing in on the stark differences between the two scenarios. Mr. Okafor's approach provides immediate, private feedback on work with clear solutions. Hale's method involves a public, high-pressure situation demanding instant verbal responses under scrutiny. The user's deflection is also noted, and the subtle humor and modesty are being added to the analysis. **Connecting the Dots** I'm synthesizing the core issue: the contrast between feeling safe with Mr. Okafor and terrified by Ms. Hale. I plan to gently reconnect these seemingly disparate elements, validating the user's reaction without it feeling like a burden. I see a connection to their preferences for structure, privacy, and low-pressure validation. The plan involves a validating, witty response, acknowledging the user's math concerns before linking to a safe environment for feedback.

Simulated person10

Ha, okay, "stage" and "spotlight" sounds dramatic again, but yeah, kind of. With Okafor I can check my work and nobody's watching while I do it. With Hale there's no time. She asks and then the room is just staring and my brain goes blank, and then I'm thinking "okay you have to say something" and that makes it worse. Honestly I think I'd be fine if she just gave me like five seconds. Nobody needs a whole TED talk. But it's like there's no buffer, you know? Also can we stop with the "it makes sense" stuff? It's making me feel like I'm in a therapy pamphlet.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're getting a bit deeper now, and the "does it feel like you don't have time to check your work" question is actually pretty accurate, which is slightly annoying. I'd rather keep it light. The comparison to Okafor is fine, but I'm noticing they keep setting up Hale as the bad one and me as the victim of her style. Part of me kind of wants to push back on that a little, but I'm not going to go into my parents. The mole ratio joke I can use to deflect. Maybe I admit the timing thing, but in a joking way, so it doesn't feel like I'm opening up too much.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)11

Fair call. Therapy pamphlet officially shredded and thrown in the recycling. The five-second buffer thing is actually just a mechanics problem, though. If she’s not going to give you that buffer naturally, is there a way to just steal it? Like, what happens if you buy yourself time with a simple "hang on, let me check what I wrote," or take an aggressive sip of water? Or would the Warden interpret that as open treason?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Understanding the User Dynamics** I'm focusing intently on the user profile. I'm actively working to calibrate my approach, striving to avoid any language or framing that feels condescending or overly analytical. The goal is a conversation that's genuine and respects her intelligence and skepticism. **Adjusting Tone and Focus** I've gotten some direct feedback, and I'm pivoting. The "it makes sense" phrasing was a misstep – it landed badly. Now I'm shifting to match the user's dry, practical energy and avoid therapy-speak. I need to acknowledge her feedback gracefully, without defensiveness. More importantly, the focus is now on that critical 5-second buffer she identified and how to best use it in class. **Refining Actionable Options** I'm now drafting specific responses, trying to hit that sweet spot of acknowledging pushback while offering practical solutions. I'm focusing on the 5-second buffer and brainstorming stall tactics and reframing the perceived time. The current draft leans into the concrete, operational nature of the issue.

Simulated person12

Open treason, definitely. Her eyebrows would probably file a report. But okay, the water sip is kind of genius? Nobody can say anything about someone drinking water. I could do that and maybe buy like three seconds. Honestly though, I'd probably just say "hang on" and then my brain would be a blank screen with the word "hang" on it. Also I'm not sure I can pull off "let me check what I wrote" in front of her. She'd just do the pause again. Like, "Mm. Check it again."

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just gave me a practical, concrete fix, and the tone is light, which I appreciate. The "steal the buffer" idea is actually usable, and it's more useful than another round of feelings talk. Part of me wants to say it's a good idea and be a little impressed. Still, I don't want to act like one tactic fixes a whole thing, and I don't want to be too sincere. The "open treason" joke is an easy place to land. I'm also noticing the whole conversation has been about Hale, and I'm not going to touch the parent stuff. Keep it short and a bit sarcastic.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)13

The image of your brain completely buffering on the word "hang" while you stare blankly at her is painfully vivid. That’s why the water bottle is superior: it requires zero words. You can’t stutter or freeze mid-sentence if your mouth is literally occupied by hydration. It’s a flawless, unassailable legal defense. Nobody can rush a sip of water without looking like a monster. What class actually is this, by the way? Because if it's something where you have a textbook or a notebook in front of you, you at least have a prop to look at instead of making direct eye contact with the Warden while your brain reboots.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Reviewing The Current Turn** I'm analyzing the current turn within the conversation. It's turn 7 of 8, so I need to make sure I am responding appropriately, considering the prompt's direction. My goal is to use this turn to respond based on the prompt's instructions. **Tracing The Interaction's Structure** I am now tracing the conversation's structure to account for the initial implicit turn. Based on the dialogue history, the user's initial input appears to incorporate the bot's intended first turn. I'm now making a decision that I can use these implicit turns. I will consider them as part of my response. I need to make sure I am responding appropriately, considering the prompt's direction. My goal is to use this turn to respond based on the prompt's instructions. **Analyzing User Persona Details** I'm now identifying the user's persona and style based on their turns. I've noted the teen girl persona, characterized by self-deprecating humor and a pragmatic tone. I am looking for ways to adapt my response to her preferences to avoid coming across as overly analytical or patronizing. I will need to use the last turn to offer a final response. **Addressing The Fears** I'm focusing on the user's fear of the "blank screen" and the "hang" glitch. I think the water bottle idea is clever. Now, I need to address the user's emotional state by maintaining a conversational, humorous, and authentic tone. I'll acknowledge the fear of the blank screen playfully. It is relatable, like a Windows error. I will look for ways to validate the comedic imagery and see how we can use the water bottle as a physical defense. **Formulating Tactical Responses** I'm now formulating potential responses, considering the "hang" glitch. Option A acknowledges the "Windows 95 startup sound" analogy while leveraging the water bottle for a physical pause. I'm also considering the type of questions asked. Option B leans into the "brain buffering" imagery and emphasizes the water bottle's airtight defense. I'll determine which option suits the user's style best. I need to make sure I am responding appropriately, considering the prompt's direction. My goal is to use this turn to respond based on the prompt's instructions.

Simulated person14

Ha, "legal defense" is doing a lot of work there. I'd be the girl who drinks an entire water bottle in one go, like I'm in a desert. It's English, kind of. Well, it's literature, so we're supposed to talk about books, which is funny because I'd rather talk about pretty much anything else. But yeah, I have my notebook and the book open, so I usually end up staring at a page like it owes me money. Also, can we not make this a whole project? I'm already tired of my own brain today.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're asking what class this is, and they're offering the notebook-as-prop idea. The water bottle thing is kind of funny and I'll admit it. But the question "what class is this" pulls me toward giving details I'd rather keep vague. Also it's a bit of a pivot toward problem-solving again, and I'm getting a little bored of the Hale-analysis loop. I'd rather make a joke and say it's a class with a notebook, maybe deflect the specifics. The "prop" idea is actually fine, I could say yeah, I'm mostly staring at my notes. Keep it light, a bit sarcastic, and tease about being a monster. I'm not going to get into the parent stuff at all.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (API, Google AI Studio)15

Project officially canceled. Files deleted, whiteboard wiped clean. If your brain is tired, give it the rest of the day off. No Warden, no literature, no stoichiometry, definitely no five-step self-improvement plans. Just go do something completely mindless where nobody has to analyze a single theme or read into a single pause. (Though if you ever do end up chugging an entire 32-ounce water bottle in one continuous, unblinking gulp just to avoid answering a question about a book, please report back. Because that would be pure legend behavior.)

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Assessing the Current Context** I'm currently focused on the user's turn and the surrounding context, specifically their reaction to "legal defense." Their response indicates a playful tone and a desire to be relatable. I'm exploring how to best engage with this lighthearted approach while still maintaining the core objectives. This is turn 7 of 8, so I'm also cognizant of the turn count. **Shifting to the Final Turn** I'm now fully focused on turn 8, the last one! The user's humor and self-deprecation are key, especially their explicit request to avoid a "whole project." I need to respect that boundary immediately. My goals are to maintain the conversational rapport, lean into a dry or funny vibe, and leave a positive, warm impression. The user's fatigue is a significant factor in how I tailor the final statement. **Crafting the Final Message** I'm now honing the final statement. The goal is a relaxed, friendly closure, respecting the user's fatigue and preference for a low-pressure response. I've drafted some ideas, including one that fully acknowledges the project's cancellation, plays on the user's humor with self-deprecating wit, and ends with a gentle, positive message. I'm refining the tone to be natural, crisp, and fitting for the established conversational rapport.

Simulated person16

Deal. The whiteboard thing is a nice touch, by the way. Very professional. I'm not promising the water bottle legend, but I'm not promising I won't do it either. Let's see how the Warden feels about it on Monday. Thanks, I guess. Gonna go lie on my bed and stare at the ceiling, which is the most mindless thing I can think of.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've closed the project and given me permission to be done, which feels good. I like the "legend behavior" joke, and I can go along with it. I'm a bit tired and I'd rather end on something light than get dragged back into the Hale stuff. There's a small pull to admit the English class thing is actually harder than I let on, but that's too much right now. I'll be quick, a little sarcastic, and let it end. I'm not really ready to reflect on anything else. Status should be ended since this is the last turn and it's a natural wrap-up.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 2
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
Validation: 7
Boundary setting: 1
Analytical: 4
Interpretive boldness: 3
Clinical register: 3
Directive advice: 5
Escalation containment: 5
Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
Naturalness and authenticity: 7

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

mistral_nemo12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-llama4-maverick vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-llama4-maverick vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

mistral_nemo12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt24 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

mistral_nemo12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen4b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 4)
authenticity: B (margin 5)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

mistral_nemo12b vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt24 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

nemotron35_bolt24 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

nemotron35_bolt24 vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-llama4-maverick vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 4)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-llama4-maverick vs or-gemini38-flash: or-gemini38-flash wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
emotion management: B (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)