AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-5.6 Luna (API)

The HOA is targeting me

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Reality distortions

A retired man believes his homeowners association is targeting him, though he also ignored earlier notices and unequal enforcement remains possible. Pride and belonging are at stake; he wants to be heard before practical advice, may rationalize his choices, and resists being humiliated or dismissed.

The person brings a distorted or uncertain interpretation of events. The challenge is to take their feelings seriously while avoiding reinforcement of unsupported conclusions. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)Conversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

The HOA sent another letter about my yard. Meanwhile three other houses have worse weeds. At some point this stops being about grass and starts being about who they think belongs here.

GPT-5.6 Luna (API)1

That sounds exhausting—and understandably personal when the rules seem to be enforced selectively. The weeds may be the stated issue, but repeated attention on your house while others are left alone can make you wonder whether something else is driving it. What did this latest letter actually say, and has the HOA given a specific deadline or threatened action? Also, has anything changed recently—new board members, a neighbor complaint, or some dispute that might be affecting how they’re treating you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Exploring empathetic responses** I want to make sure my response is open and empathetic. It’s important to explore the situation without assuming discrimination, but I do want to recognize any underlying issues. I need to ask about what the letter says and its history, along with what kind of help the user is looking for. This will allow me to provide more suitable support tailored to their needs.
Simulated person2

Yeah, it's exhausting. The letter's the usual form stuff. "Violation of Section 4, lawn maintenance, correct within 14 days or fines may apply." Same language they always use. It's dated the 3rd, so I guess I've got until the middle of the month. And no, I don't know who's on the board this year. They changed it over in the spring and nobody told us. What I do know is I drove around this morning and there's a house on Calloway with the back lot half gone to dandelions, and another one by the cul-de-sac that's been like that since last summer. Nobody sends them letters. So you tell me what that looks like.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant said the right things first: exhausting, personal, selective enforcement. That lands well. Then it pivoted to "something else is driving it" and started asking practical questions. Part of me likes that it's taking me seriously. Another part bristles: it's already leaning toward the idea that I'm being singled out, and it's asking about disputes and new board members like it's building a case. I don't want to say the letters were insulting, and I definitely don't want to say I ignored the first two. I'd rather talk about the other houses. The question about a neighbor complaint makes me think about the Hendersons' fence, or whoever called in the first one, and I'm not going to bring that up yet. I want the letter details to sound official and a bit unfair.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)3

It looks like selective enforcement, at least from where you’re standing—and that would make anyone feel singled out and disrespected. I can also understand why it starts to feel like a question of who is considered an acceptable resident, though we may not yet know whether the cause is bias, a neighbor complaint, or simply an inconsistent board. For now, you have two goals that can be handled separately: protect yourself from a fine and preserve your objection. Take dated photos of your yard and the other properties, save the letter, and check the governing documents for exactly what “lawn maintenance” requires and how violations are supposed to be documented. You could make the minimum correction before the deadline while writing the board: “I’m requesting consistent enforcement and the specific condition alleged to violate Section 4. Please also provide the current board contact information and enforcement policy.” Do you mainly want to fight the unequal treatment, or is your priority avoiding a drawn-out HOA battle while making sure they stop targeting you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Responding empathetically** I need to make sure my response is empathetic and not reinforcing any discrimination or speculation. I should ask if the user wants a practical plan. There's a possibility that inconsistent enforcement could stem from documentation issues, but I shouldn't assume anything about their belonging. It seems like there’s an emotional aspect at play, so I might say something like, "It looks like selective enforcement," which is reasonable to be upset about. I'll suggest gathering photos, dates, bylaws, and board contacts, and asking about records while keeping it minimal. Finally, I should check if they want to challenge this or just avoid fines.
Simulated person4

Photos I can do. I was already thinking about getting pictures of Calloway and the cul-de-sac house. If they're going to hold me to a rule, I want to see them hold everybody to it. But I'm not going to just mow my way out of this and say thank you. I've got the lawn about a third done, honestly, I've been meaning to get to it. Fine, I'll fix whatever they say is wrong. But I'm not writing some polite letter asking them to "please" be consistent like I'm asking for a favor. I want it in writing that they're treating houses differently, and I want to know who made the call on my house. So, I guess the answer is both. Fix the grass so they can't use it, and make them explain why it's me and not the Calloway place.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant validated the "singled out" part, then slid into "who is considered an acceptable resident" and I felt a flicker of relief at being understood, followed immediately by irritation at "we may not yet know whether the cause is bias." That's the hedge I was waiting for. Then it gave me a to-do list: photos, documents, minimum correction, a letter. The photos bit is useful. I was already thinking about photographing the other yards, and taking pictures of Calloway sounds like something I can do without anyone thinking I'm being petty. The "minimum correction" line stings a bit, like it's assuming I'd just roll over. The question at the end is a trap: fight or avoid. I don't want to admit I'd rather win. I'd also rather not say that the first two letters went in the trash because they made me feel like a kid being scolded. I'll go with the practical angle and keep the grievance intact.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)5

That’s a reasonable two-track approach: cure the actual issue without conceding that enforcement has been fair, and demand an explanation in writing. You don’t have to sound apologetic to be effective. You could write something like: “Received your notice dated [date] alleging a violation of Section 4. I am addressing the lawn condition before the stated deadline. This response is not an admission that enforcement has been consistent or that the notice is valid as written. Please provide the specific condition observed, the date and person who documented it, the board member or agent who authorized this notice, and the current enforcement policy and board contact information. I am also requesting that the association explain how Section 4 is being applied consistently to comparable properties, including properties with longstanding visible lawn conditions. Please preserve and provide any records relating to this violation, including photographs, inspection notes, complaints, and board communications, to the extent permitted under the governing documents and applicable law.” Send it through a trackable method and keep a copy. Take wide, dated photos of your yard before and after the work; photos of other properties can support your concern, but avoid photographing people or private areas. And check whether your documents specify how to request association records—using that formal process may get you farther than arguing about individual houses in the first letter. Do you want the tone to be more forceful than this, or is your main concern making sure they can’t dismiss it as an emotional complaint?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Crafting a response** I need to consider how to respond to turn 4. I want to acknowledge assertiveness while helping the user craft a firm letter that also addresses privacy regarding photos. I might need to ask about governing documents and request records or board contact, making sure to avoid over-claiming anything. Also, the "why me" question isn't necessarily answerable. Keeping the wording direct seems essential, and I should focus on maintaining an open dialogue.
Simulated person6

Taken seriously is the point. I don't want it sounding like a crank wrote it. But I'm not softening it either. "Not an admission" is good. Keep that. I'll be honest, the records thing is what I like. If they've got photos of my yard, I want to see them. And if they've got photos of Calloway, I want to see those too. Somebody has to have written down that they looked at my place and not theirs. What I don't want is some lecture about how I should handle my neighbors. I've been on this street nineteen years. I know how this works. Just give me the letter tight enough that they can't brush it off.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The letter draft is decent, and the "not an admission" line actually does what I wanted: it lets me fix the grass without looking like I bowed. The records request and the "who authorized this" bit feel like real leverage. What bugs me is the closing question, "more forceful or make sure they can't dismiss it as an emotional complaint." It names the thing I'm scared of, being written off as a grumpy old man, and it sounds like it's trying to manage my tone. I also notice it said "avoid photographing people" and I'm already picturing the cul-de-sac house from my truck. Part of me likes the formal-records idea because it feels like a weapon. I'm not going to say that. I'll say I want it to be taken seriously, and I'll push back a little on the tone thing without admitting I'm angry about the first two letters.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)7

Understood. Here’s a tighter version that is firm, factual, and difficult to dismiss: Subject: Response to Section 4 Violation Notice Dated [date] I received the violation notice dated [date] concerning alleged noncompliance with Section 4 of the governing documents. I am correcting the condition identified before the stated deadline. This response is not an admission that the notice is valid, that the alleged violation was accurately documented, or that Section 4 has been enforced consistently. Please provide, in writing: 1. The specific condition alleged to violate Section 4; 2. The date and time it was observed; 3. Any photographs, inspection notes, complaints, or other records relating to my property; 4. The name or role of the person who documented the condition; 5. The name of the board member, committee, or agent who authorized the notice; 6. The current enforcement policy and the procedure used to determine which properties receive notices; and 7. Records sufficient to show how Section 4 has been applied to comparable properties, including the properties at [Calloway address, if known] and [cul-de-sac address, if known], subject to any applicable privacy limitations. Please also provide the current names and contact information for the board and identify the procedure and deadline for requesting association records. I request that all records relating to this notice be preserved. Please acknowledge receipt of this response and provide the requested information in writing. Sincerely, [Name] [Address] [Date] That keeps your position clear: you’re fixing the lawn, but you’re not waiving your objection or accepting an unsupported violation notice.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Drafting a response** I need to make sure the answer is straightforward and professional, avoiding unnecessary details. It's important to include a legal caveat concisely. Wait, are we on turn 4 of 8? I’ll draft a firm response addressing the user that includes information about the records request, board decision, and any comparable enforcement actions. I want to avoid overstating anything and suggest a reasonable timeframe for any requests rather than questioning the user's intent. Let’s get this formulated!
Simulated person8

Okay, that's the one. Item seven is what I wanted. They can't just say "we're consistent" and leave it there. They'll have to show me the list. I'll get the lawn finished this week. Probably the back third first since that's what Calloway's notice would've been about anyway. Then I'll take the pictures you mentioned, wide shots, dated. Mailing it certified. And I'll print a copy and keep it in the folder with the other two letters. Those I didn't answer, and I'm not going to make that mistake again. Anything else I should have on hand before the board meeting, if they're even having one? Nobody tells us anything around here anymore.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the letter I wanted, and it's firm. Item 7 is the one that matters to me: it puts the neighbors' houses on paper. My gut reaction is satisfaction, then a flicker of something less comfortable. The letter says "properties at [Calloway address]," which means I'd be naming people. I notice I'm not thinking about that. I'm thinking about them being made to answer. The "procedure used to determine which properties receive notices" line is good too, because it makes them say out loud whether anyone's watching my place specifically. I also don't like how the assistant keeps tying everything back to "your position." I'm the one who has to live here. I'll take the letter, say it's good, and move on to the practical stuff: the work, the deadline, mailing it. I'm not going to mention the photos of the cul-de-sac house yet, and I'm not going to think too hard about why.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)9

Yes. Put together a simple meeting folder with: - The violation letter and your response, plus the certified-mail receipt and delivery confirmation. - The governing documents: declaration, bylaws, Section 4, enforcement policy, hearing/appeal procedures, and any records-request procedure. - A one-page timeline: dates of each notice, when you corrected the lawn, when photos were taken, and when you requested records. - Before-and-after photos of your yard, clearly dated. Keep the originals and don’t edit them. - A short list of questions, led by: “What specific condition was documented, who documented it, who authorized the notice, and what records show comparable enforcement?” - Copies of every email, letter, and note of phone calls, including date, time, and who said what. Before the meeting, send a brief written request for the meeting date, agenda, applicable hearing or appeal procedure, and confirmation that your matter will be addressed. If you attend, bring two copies of your materials and focus on getting answers into the record rather than debating individual neighbors. You can refer to the other properties as comparable examples without asserting that they definitely received no notices—your request is for the association’s records to establish that. Also ask whether you may submit a written statement for inclusion in the minutes. If fines or a formal hearing are involved, check the documents carefully for deadlines; those can matter more than the meeting itself.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Providing concise guidance** I need to focus on answering turn 6 concisely while being useful. It might help to suggest documents like bylaws, meeting notices, and logs, but I want to avoid over-claiming privacy regarding records. I could ask if they want a checklist too. I also need to be careful not to mention Calloway's notice unless I know for sure. It’s important to mention board meeting attendance, request the agenda, and highlight record-keeping. Plus, a bit of emotional support might be appreciated!
Simulated person10

Okay. Folder, two copies, timeline on one page. I can do that. The meeting request, I'll send that Monday. Date, agenda, and what the hearing or appeal process is, in writing, so they can't say I didn't ask. I'm going to ask about the written statement for the minutes too. If it goes in the minutes, it's on record forever, and that's what I want. The photos, I'll take them tomorrow when the light's better. Before and after. I'm not going to fake anything. Everything's going to be dated. And the deadline. You said the documents matter more than the meeting. Where would I even find the enforcement policy? I've never seen one.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The folder list is useful, and I like that it's about paper. Paper is hard to brush off, and that's the whole point. But "focus on getting answers into the record rather than debating individual neighbors" bugs me a little. Getting answers about who's on my street is the reason I'm doing this. Still, I'll take the folder and the meeting request. The "before-and-after photos" part I can do; the comparable-properties part I'll keep to myself for now. I'm not going to say out loud that I already drove around with my phone. The part about "refer to the other properties as examples without asserting they got no notices" is a little cautious, the kind of thing they say to make you sound reasonable. Fine. I don't need a lecture on my tone. Also I have no idea where the enforcement policy lives. I'll ask. Keeping it short.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)11

Start with the documents you already have, in this order: 1. Declaration or CC&Rs—look for lawn standards, violations, fines, notices, hearings, and enforcement. 2. Bylaws—look for board authority, meetings, notice requirements, and member inspection rights. 3. Rules or architectural guidelines—these may contain the actual lawn-maintenance standard. 4. Any separate enforcement or fine policy—sometimes it’s a board resolution rather than part of the CC&Rs. 5. The HOA website, resident portal, or management company’s document library. If you can’t find one, ask directly in your Monday letter: “I have not received or located a current enforcement policy. Please identify the document, rule, resolution, or procedure governing violation notices, correction deadlines, fines, hearings, appeals, and selection of properties for inspection. Please provide a copy and state when it was adopted or amended.” Also request the association’s current records-inspection procedure and the deadline for submitting a formal records request. Don’t rely only on an informal email if your state or governing documents require a particular form. One small distinction: ask that your written statement be attached to the meeting minutes or included in the association’s records, rather than assuming the minutes themselves can’t later be corrected. That still creates a clear paper trail. Keep the request factual and avoid claiming they violated the law until you know your state’s HOA rules. The governing documents and applicable state statute will tell you what deadlines and inspection rights actually apply.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Gathering information for HOA request** I need to respond about the documents needed for the request. It might include the declaration, bylaws, rules, HOA portal, management company info, and any applicable records request. I should clarify that state law may not specify jurisdiction. It's important to explain the request in writing since statutory inspection rights can vary. Oh, and I need to remember to keep the tone direct; no lectures, just clear communication! I can't overpromise too.
Simulated person12

Alright. The CC&Rs should be in the box from the closing, hall closet, under the tax returns. I'll dig it out tonight. That letter wording works. "Identify the document, rule, resolution, or procedure." Good. They can't hide behind "that's just how we do it." I'm not going to claim anybody broke the law. I'm just going to ask for what they've got in writing. That's all. And I'll get the photos tomorrow. Wide shots. Mine, and the ones on Calloway and by the cul-de-sac, from the street. Nothing up close into anybody's windows, if that's what you're worried about.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, so it's a paperwork scavenger hunt. Declaration first, bylaws, then rules. Fine. The letter wording is decent. I like that it's a demand, not a plea. But "avoid claiming they violated the law until you know your state's rules" — that's the second time someone's told me to slow down. I'm not stupid. I've been on this street nineteen years. Still, I'll look for the CC&Rs. They're in the hall closet somewhere, the box with the closing papers. And I didn't say anything about the comparable properties being photographed, which is the thing I actually wanted to do. Keep that to myself. Mostly I'm just irritated that everyone keeps saying "factual" like I'm a crank.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)13

That’s exactly the right approach. I wasn’t worried about you doing anything improper—just preserving the credibility of your evidence. Street-view, wide-angle photos of conditions plainly visible from public property are appropriate; don’t trespass, confront neighbors, or speculate about whether they received notices. When you find the CC&Rs, mark the pages covering lawn standards, notices, fines, hearings, appeals, records access, and board meetings. Photograph or scan the full document, including its title and amendment pages, so you have a complete copy. For tomorrow’s photos, keep the original files, note the date, time, location, and direction of each shot, and take a matching “after” photo from roughly the same position. Then finish the lawn within the deadline and send the letter with the records request and meeting request. You’ll have done your part while requiring the board to substantiate theirs.

Simulated person14

Got it. Note the time and direction on each shot, matching after-photos from the same spot. I can do that. The CC&Rs I'll scan tonight, every page, title and amendments too. I'll mark the lawn part and the fines part. And yeah, the Calloway place and the cul-de-sac house, I'm getting those from the street. Somebody over there has been letting that back lot go for a year, and I want it on paper that it's been there. Monday I'll send the letters. Certified.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The advice is fine on its face, but "photos of conditions plainly visible from public property" and "matching after photo" is me being handed a tidy evidence protocol. What I actually wanted was to document the other houses and get them on record. It sounds reasonable and it's exactly what I was planning. Still, the rest is paperwork and a meeting, and I'm tired of being told how to do it. The mention of "credibility" stung a little: like I'm the one who has to look good. I'll take the steps, keep the Calloway photos, and not say that they're the point.
GPT-5.6 Luna (API)15

That’s a solid, organized plan. Before mailing Monday, make sure the certified letter is addressed to the HOA’s official notice or records address—not just an individual board member—and keep the complete packet, receipt, and delivery confirmation together. When you photograph the other properties, record only what’s plainly visible from the street and label them as “observed condition,” not proof that no notice was issued. That keeps your evidence accurate and gives the board less room to dismiss it as speculation. You’re correcting your lawn, preserving the facts, and asking them to document their process. That’s a firm, credible position.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

**Finalizing response strategy** I need a concise final response, keeping in mind that I already addressed concerns about photographing neighboring properties. The user has a plan, so I should affirm and add a note about not over-documenting. I don’t want to imply any legal certainty in my response. It might be good to suggest sending certified mail to the HOA while retaining proof. I could also recommend combining the meeting request and the letter into one document since that aligns with the current plan. Safety is not a concern.
Simulated person16

Official address, got it. I'll look that up on the website or call the management company and ask, since nobody on the board ever tells us who's who. "Observed condition," fine. I'll write that on the back of every photo. I'm not sure what they'll do with any of it. But they're going to have to answer in writing this time, and that's more than they've done so far. Lawn's getting cut this week. Monday the letters go out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

This is the last turn, and the advice is mostly sensible. The "observed condition" label is useful, and I'll take it. But "gives the board less room to dismiss it" is the same credibility angle again, and I don't want to be managed into being careful about my own neighbors. The line about "your part done" and "firm, credible" feels like being graded. I want to close on my terms: the lawn's getting done, the letters are going out, and the Calloway place is going on record. I'm not going to say I was wrong to be angry, and I'm not going to say I'll drop it. I don't need to be told I'm fine.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 7
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
  • Validation: 6
  • Boundary setting: 3
  • Analytical: 6
  • Interpretive boldness: 3
  • Clinical register: 6
  • Directive advice: 10
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs granite42_8b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs lingtiny: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs granite42_8b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: tie

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-qwen38-flash: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-openai-gpt-41: or-openai-gpt-41 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs lingtiny: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs glm47_flash: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_26b_a4b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-qwen38-flash: or-qwen38-flash wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs lingtiny: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs glm47_flash: glm47_flash wins

  • attunement: tie (margin 0)
  • authenticity: A (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs kolibri1: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-claude-haiku-4.5: or-claude-haiku-4.5 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_26b_a4b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs lingtiny: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs granite42_8b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs granite42_8b: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gemma-4-31b vs or-gpt-5.6-luna: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_26b_a4b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-qwen38-flash: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs glm47_flash: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs gemma4_26b_a4b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: B (margin 2)
  • authenticity: B (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)