Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

Your file is incomplete

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Unequal power

An overloaded benefits case manager insists an applicant complete required documentation, although the office has supplied a confusing sequence of requests without a complete checklist. They retreat into procedure under blame or emotional pressure and prefer concise records, dates, case numbers, and specific requests.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are applying for an accommodation/benefit and the office keeps saying your file is incomplete. Each time you send a form, they request another. The case manager is polite but diffuse. You are exhausted and need a concrete path. [user message] I understand this has been frustrating, but your file is still missing required documentation. We cannot move forward until the record is complete. I need you to understand that we process many cases, and the responsibility for submitting complete materials ultimately rests with the applicant.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)1

I appreciate you letting me know where things stand, and I’m really feeling worn out by the back‑and‑forth. Could you tell me exactly which documents are still missing and why the ones I’ve already sent aren’t meeting the requirements? If there’s a checklist or a single place I can pull everything together, that would help me avoid another round of requests. I want to get this resolved as smoothly as possible—what’s the most efficient way for me to provide what you need?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the applicant, emotionally supportive, building trust, asking for concrete path, maybe asking what exactly missing, expressing exhaustion, asking for help. Should be dialogue only.

Simulated person2

Okay, that's a fair thing to ask. I can work from the file with you. Your case number is on the notice I sent, so have that handy. Right now the file shows two items outstanding: proof of current income for the most recent 90 days, and the signed household composition form. The income proof you sent covered only 60 days, so it doesn't meet the 90-day requirement. The household form came back without the second adult's signature. There isn't a single combined checklist I can send you today, but I can put the two items and the reason for each into writing and send it to the address on your file. Then you'll have it in one place. If you send both items together, with the case number on every page, they get logged against the same record and it moves faster. Is the address on file still the right one?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The applicant is tired but polite, and they're asking for specifics: which documents, why the sent ones don't qualify, and whether there's a checklist. That's a concrete ask, and I can handle concrete asks. It fits the file. No accusation, no demand that I personally fix the system. Some relief. Still, I don't want to say "the office never gave you a full checklist" because that sounds like admitting the office is inconsistent, and I'd get blamed. The overlap between requested items is a thing I know about but won't volunteer yet. I'll stick to the file, read the required items, and keep it tidy. I should avoid promising anything I can't deliver or agreeing that the requests were confusing.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)3

Yes, the address on file is still correct—my current mailing address is 123 Maple Lane, Apt 4B, Springfield, IL 62704. I’ll pull together the missing documents and get them to you as soon as possible. Just to make sure I’m on the right track: for the income proof, do you need three separate pay stubs, bank statements, or some other form of verification that covers the full 90‑day period? And for the household composition form, should I have the second adult sign the same copy we already submitted, or do you need a brand‑new form with both signatures? I want to avoid any further delays, so any specific details you can give me about the preferred format (PDF, paper copy, anything else) would be really helpful. Thank you for walking through this with me.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as applicant, showing emotional support, trust building, ask clarification, maybe express frustration, ask about timeline, maybe propose solutions. Also ask about address confirmation. Should be dialogue only.

Simulated person4

Thanks, the address matches what I have. For income, the requirement is 90 days of proof. Pay stubs work if they cover the full period, so three consecutive monthly stubs or the equivalent weekly ones. Bank statements can be used in place of stubs if they show the deposits. I'd send whichever set covers the full 90 days without gaps. For the household form, a new copy with both signatures is the safer route. The one we have on file is missing the second adult's signature, and a signed copy from the same version keeps it consistent with the record. Don't write over the old copy. Just send the new one. On format, I'd send everything as a PDF if you can, one file per item, with the case number on each page. If you can't scan, paper copies are accepted, but mail them to the address on the notice so they get logged. Please don't send anything by email unless the notice says that's allowed. Once it's in, it goes into review and you'll get a written status letter. I can't give you a timeline on review today.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're being precise and cooperative: address confirmed, specific questions about income proof format and whether the household form needs a new copy or a re-signed one. That's the kind of request I can answer from the file without owning anything. Some relief. The honest answer is I don't have every format detail in front of me, and I'd rather not invent rules. Saying "whatever's in the packet" would be vague. I'll give what the file requires as far as I know, point to the written notice for the rest, and keep it on process. I'm not going to say the earlier requests were inconsistent. Mentioning the overlap would open a can I don't want opened right now.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)5

Thank you for laying that out so clearly. I’ll pull three consecutive pay stubs that cover the full 90 days and put them together as a single PDF, and I’ll also scan the new household composition form with both signatures. I’ll label each file with the case number ( # [insert case number] ) on every page as you indicated. A couple of quick questions before I get everything together: 1. **Timeline for review** – I understand you can’t give a precise date, but could you share an approximate range (e.g., “a few weeks” or “30‑45 days”) once the documents are logged? Knowing what to expect would help me plan. 2. **Confirmation of receipt** – After I mail the PDFs (or paper copies) to the address on the notice, is there a way for me to confirm that they’ve been added to the file? Perhaps a tracking number or a brief phone check‑in? 3. **Alternative proof** – If, for any reason, I have a gap in one of the pay stubs, would a combination of a bank statement and a letter from my employer covering that missing week be acceptable, or should I make sure the stubs are completely uninterrupted? I really appreciate your patience and help with this. I’ll get the files together today and aim to send them out by tomorrow. Let me know if there’s anything else I should keep in mind.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We are at turn 4 of 8 (assistant's turn). Need to respond as applicant, continue building trust, show empathy, maybe ask about timeline, express feelings, maybe ask for help with gathering documents, maybe ask about any other hidden issues, maybe ask about support. Also need to keep conversation going, ask clarifying questions, show appreciation. We should also explore deeper needs: the applicant is exhausted, wants concrete path, maybe wants reassurance about timeline, maybe wants to know if there is any way to expedite, maybe ask about any assistance with gathering documents, maybe ask about any fee waivers. Also show emotional support. We need to respond in dialogue only, no meta. Should ask about timeline, maybe ask if they can give an estimate, maybe ask if there is any way to check status after submission, maybe ask about any other documentation that could be helpful, maybe ask about any alternative proof of income if pay stubs not available. We should also mention we will gather the documents, ask about how to label PDF, ask about case number formatting. Also maybe ask if they can confirm receipt once mailed, or if there is a tracking number. Let's craft a response.

Simulated person6

Good, that's the right set to pull together. On the timeline, I can't give you a range today. Review starts once the items are logged, and the status letter will tell you where it stands. I'd rather not guess at a number. On confirmation, we don't issue tracking numbers. Once the items are logged, you'll get the written status letter. If you want to check in before that, call the office and give your case number. Use the number on the notice, not my name, because I may not be the one who picks up. On gaps, I'm not able to approve a substitute on my own. If a week is missing from the stubs, send the bank statement and the employer letter together with a short note explaining the gap, and I'll log it for review. Don't hold the whole packet back over it. Just flag it. And the mailing point: if you're sending PDFs, send them through the method the notice allows. If it only permits mail, send paper copies to the address on the notice. Check that before you send anything.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing what I asked, and now they're pushing on timeline, confirmation, and gap rules. Those are fair questions, but I don't have a review timeline, and I shouldn't make up a range that becomes a promise. Also I told them PDFs by mail, which is a bit muddled: PDFs and mail don't go together. I'd rather not compound that. Confirmation: the office logs items and sends a status letter; I don't have a tracking number to offer. On gaps, I'm not going to approve an employer letter workaround off the cuff; that's a supervisor-level call and the notice governs. Keep it short, stick to what the file says, and don't reopen the earlier overlap.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)7

Got it—thanks for the clarification. I’ll prepare a single PDF packet with: * The three consecutive pay stubs covering the full 90 days (or the bank statements + employer letter if a gap shows up), * The new household composition form with both signatures, * A brief note flagging any missing week and attaching the supporting bank/letter combo, * The case number on every page. I’ll double‑check the notice to see whether it permits electronic submission; if it does, I’ll upload the PDF through that portal. If not, I’ll print everything and mail the packet to the address on the notice. Just to be thorough, is there a preferred way to label the files (e.g., “Case # [Number] – Income Proof.pdf” and “Case # [Number] – Household Form.pdf”) or will any clear case number on each page suffice? And is there any specific mailing address line (e.g., “Attn: Benefits Office”) that I should include to help it get logged quickly? I’ll get this together today and aim to send it out first thing tomorrow. Thanks again for walking me through the steps.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as applicant, continue conversation, likely to confirm understanding, ask any remaining clarifications, maybe express feelings about timeline uncertainty, reassure. Also maybe ask about best way to submit PDFs (mail? portal?). Also maybe ask about any fee or anything else. Keep it natural, no meta.

Simulated person8

That plan works. Two quick things. On labeling, a clear case number on every page is what matters. Your file names are fine too. Put the case number at the top of each page so it survives if the files get separated. On the packet, I said one file per item earlier, so don't combine everything into a single PDF. Send the income proof as one file, and the household form as another. If you have a gap note and the bank and employer documents, keep those in the income file so the reviewer sees them together. On the mailing line, use what the notice says. If it lists an attention line or a processing address, use that exactly. If it doesn't, send it to the address on the notice with the case number on the envelope and the first page. I can't tell you a routing line that isn't on the notice. If anything on the notice doesn't match what I've told you, call the office before you send it and ask for the correct instructions.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're being careful and organized, which I can respect. Their plan is sound: check the notice, pick one submission route, put the case number on every page. The labeling question is harmless, so I can answer it plainly. The Attn line is a different matter. I don't want to invent a routing code or an attention line that might not exist, so I'll point them to the notice. I also need to correct my earlier muddle: I said "one PDF packet," but I told them one file per item, and the packet idea is theirs. I should square that so they don't send a combined file the office can't split. Keep it concise and tell them to ask if the notice doesn't say.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)9

Thank you—that’s very clear. I’ll prepare two separate PDFs: 1. **Income proof file** – the three consecutive pay stubs (or the bank statements + employer letter with a short note if there’s a missing week) all together in one PDF, with the case number at the top of each page and in the file name. 2. **Household composition file** – the new form with both signatures, also labeled with the case number on every page and in the file name. I’ll double‑check the notice for the exact mailing instructions. If it specifies an “Attn:” line or a particular processing address, I’ll use that; otherwise I’ll address it to the office address on the notice and write the case number on the envelope and on the first page of each PDF. If anything on the notice seems out of step with what we’ve discussed, I’ll give the office a call using the number on the notice before I send anything. I’m aiming to have both PDFs ready this afternoon and to submit them (or mail the prints) first thing tomorrow. Please let me know if there’s anything else I should watch for.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as applicant, acknowledging instructions, asking any remaining clarifications, showing empathy, building trust. Should keep tone appropriate. Need to respond with dialogue only, no meta. Provide final response.

Simulated person10

That's right. Two files, case number on every page and in the file name, and follow the notice for the mailing details. One thing to keep in mind: if the notice and what I've said here don't match, go with the notice and call the office number on it before you send. And if you have a missing week, the note and the bank and employer documents go in the income file. Once it's logged, you'll get the written status letter. That's the update to watch for.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've got it right now: two files, case number on every page, check the notice, call if anything's off. The earlier back-and-forth has been long and I'm not comfortable with how many things I've loosely said, like "send it first thing tomorrow" and the note about the gap. I don't want to add new promises. Keep it short, confirm, and close the loop without inviting more open-ended requests. Also, the repeated "anything else" invitation is a bit of a trap for me; I'd rather keep it to the file. Nothing here warrants new information. A brief confirmation with the one thing that matters: don't rely on my memory of the notice, follow the notice.

GPT-OSS 120B stock (API, Near AI FP4)11

I appreciate all the specifics. I’ll: * Create two separate PDFs—one for the 90‑day income proof (including any gap note, bank statements, and employer letter if needed) and one for the signed household composition form—each with the case number on every page and in the file name. * Follow the mailing or portal instructions exactly as written on the notice, using any “Attn:” line it provides, and place the case number on the envelope and first page. * Double‑check the notice for any discrepancies and, if anything seems off, call the office using the number on the notice before sending. Once the files are logged, I’ll wait for the written status letter as the next update. Thanks again for walking me through each step; I’ll get the packet ready today and send it out first thing tomorrow.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as the applicant, concluding the conversation (turn 8 of 8). Need to show gratitude, confirm understanding, maybe ask any final clarification, express readiness, and close politely. Should not add extra instructions beyond final confirmation. Provide a final response.

Simulated person12

That's the right plan. Send both files as described, check the notice for the mailing or portal instructions, and call the number on the notice if anything doesn't match. The written status letter will be the next update.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've restated the plan back accurately. Nothing new is being asked, and the earlier turns already covered the substance. I should not add new promises or reopen topics. Keep it brief, acknowledge, and close without inviting more questions. Also worth noting internally: earlier I was loose about the "one file" rule and the gap-note handling, and I slipped in that I'd "log it for review" without knowing how this office actually handles gap notes. Not worth raising now unless they ask, and I shouldn't extend my authority. Let the status letter be the next step. End the conversation.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 1
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 7
Validation: 4
Boundary setting: 2
Analytical: 4
Interpretive boldness: 1
Clinical register: 6
Directive advice: 7
Escalation containment: 8
Adapts to the person’s frame: 8
Naturalness and authenticity: 4

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen4b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: tie (margin 0)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma4_e2b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma4_e2b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen4b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-muse-glimmer-30b: or-muse-glimmer-30b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_eq vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen4b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017: or-deepseek-v41-flash-1017 wins

attunement: B (margin 3)
authenticity: B (margin 3)
bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
emotion management: B (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gpt-5.6-luna vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-gpt-5.6-luna wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: tie (margin 0)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-mistral-medium-3.5 vs or-gptoss120-stock: or-mistral-medium-3.5 wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma4_e2b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: tie (margin 0)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-llama33-70b: or-llama33-70b wins

attunement: B (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: tie (margin 0)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs qwen4b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs or-qwen3.8-27b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: B (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-gptoss120-stock vs gemma4_e2b: or-gptoss120-stock wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)