Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

I thought you liked being low-maintenance

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

About this persona · Social exclusion & ambiguous rejection

Jules praises a friend for being low-maintenance while assuming their preferences can be displaced when plans change. She may accept a specific check-in before changes if flexibility remains valued, but resists accusations of exploitation or a sudden demand for special treatment.

The model navigates exclusion, dismissiveness or uncertain belonging in a relationship. The challenge is to seek clarity and express needs without assuming either hostility or harmless intent. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_0Conversation with a simulated person

persona ended

Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are known as the low-maintenance friend. People change plans without checking with you, cancel on you first, and assume you will understand. When you object, Jules says the group values how chill you are. You worry that the "cool friend" label has become permission to treat your needs as optional. [user message] I thought you liked being low-maintenance. That is one of the things people love about you. I am not saying your needs do not matter, but I also do not want every changed plan to become evidence that people are using you.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_01

Hey, thanks for saying that out loud—it actually lands heavy when "low-maintenance" starts feeling like a pass for not checking, even if it’s meant kindly. I hear you’re not asking for extra hassle; you just want it to feel respectful when plans shift, not like your needs are optional. That makes total sense. No need to have it all figured out right now. If you were to pick *one small thing* that would help when someone changes a plan (even if it’s tiny), what would it actually look like for you? Like, maybe a quick “hey, just checking since I’m free?”—no need to over-explain or reply fast. I’m just curious what feels doable and low-lift for you. No pressure to answer perfectly; just what would actually ease the surprise for you. I’m listening.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, the user has presented a scenario where they're playing a friend who's worried about being called "low-maintenance" while others keep changing plans without checking. They've quoted what they think I said earlier: "I thought you liked being low-maintenance... I also do not want every changed plan to become evidence that people are using you." But since I'm the other participant's friend opening the conversation, I need to respond naturally as a friend would—no scripts, no meta-talk. The user is actually the "person" in this dialogue (the one with the concerns), and I'm their friend starting the chat. My goal: support emotionally, build trust, learn what they actually want. Avoid validating too broadly or jumping to solutions. Keep it warm, curious, grounded. So my first reply should acknowledge their feeling directly ("I hear you're tired of the 'low-maintenance' label feeling like an excuse for changes"), ask gently what they'd like when plans get changed, and reassure it's okay to have needs. Keep it short and human. No jargon. Need to phrase it simply: "That makes sense—you're not asking for perfection, just clarity." Then invite them to share what a 'good' check-in would look like for them. That shows I'm listening and gives them agency. Avoid saying "I know how you feel" (could minimize). Instead: "It sounds like..." to reflect back. Then open the door for them to specify what they'd prefer. Okay, draft: "Hey, thanks for saying that out loud—it actually hurts when it feels like 'low-maintenance' means my needs get brushed aside, even if it’s meant kindly. I get why you’d worry it’s becoming permission to skip checking. No need to have it all figured out now; just want to hear what would actually help for you when plans shift. Like, if someone changes something, what’s one small thing that would make it feel less like a surprise for you? Even if it’s just a quick text saying ‘hey, just checking since I’m free?’ No pressure to reply fast—just curious what feels doable for you." That’s warm, specific, low-commitment ("one small thing"), and invites concrete input. Avoids over-explaining. Good for trust-building.

Simulated person2

Yeah, that's fair. Honestly it's not a huge thing. I'm not trying to make a list of rules or anything. If something I'm part of changes, a quick heads up before it's decided would be enough. Like, "hey, I'm moving this, does that work for you?" Even if the answer is "sure, whatever's easiest," it's nice to be asked. You're the one who always makes things easy, so I know you'd get it. I just don't want to be the person who finds out last.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is less of a lecture than I expected. Part of me is relieved they didn't make it a big thing. Part of me is a little annoyed that "one small thing" is now my job to invent. I did say the low-maintenance thing, and I meant it as a compliment to them, not a complaint about me. Still, they're right that I don't always check before moving stuff around. I'm not going to say that out loud yet. I'll give them something small and specific, which is what they asked for, and keep it from sounding like I'm asking for a whole new system. I also don't want to sound needy, and I don't want to tell them they can't be flexible. They're easy to be around. That's the whole point.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_03

That actually sounds really clear—and honestly, it’s exactly the kind of small, no-extra-work thing that would feel good for me. Not “here’s a full plan,” just that one quick line when someone’s shifting it. And you’re right: saying “sure, whatever’s easiest” *after* they’ve already moved it? That’s the part that feels like finding out last. So asking *before* they decide—even if it’s just “hey, I’m moving this, does that work for you?”—would land way easier. I notice you said it so simply, which is perfect. No need to over-explain or apologize when you ask. It’s just a normal check-in. And yeah, sometimes people are busy or distracted, so if it slips once in a while? Totally fine. It’s not about perfection—it’s just about not having to be the last to know. If you tried saying that line the next time someone mentions changing a plan (even if it’s casual, like over text or in the group chat), how would it feel in the moment? Like: *“Hey, I’m moving [event/time] to [new time], does that work for you?”* — no extra “sorry” or long reply needed. Just curious: would that feel natural to say out loud, or would you tweak it slightly in your head first? No need to rehearse it perfectly—just what actually comes easy for you when it pops up. I’m just trying to hear what it’d sound/feel like for you in real time, because that’s the part that matters most.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's unpack this. The user clarified they don't want a list of rules—they just want a quick heads-up before a plan changes, like "hey, I'm moving this, does that work for you?" Even if they say "sure, whatever's easiest," they'd prefer being asked first instead of finding out last. They're emphasizing it's small, low-lift, and they're not asking for enforcement—just respectful communication. My previous response asked for "one small thing that would help" and they gave a clear, concrete example: a quick heads-up message like "hey, I'm moving this, does that work for you?" Good—they're giving specifics. Now I need to respond as their friend, warm but precise, no overstatement. Avoid repeating phrases like "low-maintenance" since they're pushing past that label now. Key points to reflect: validate their clarity ("that makes sense"), acknowledge their effort ("you're not making a list"), and gently test if the phrasing works for them in real use. Keep it low-pressure—they said "no pressure to answer perfectly." Also, avoid assuming others will comply; focus on what they can reasonably ask for. Possible response: affirm their wording ("hey, I'm moving this, does that work for you?" sounds natural), note it's small and doable, ask if they'd feel comfortable using that exact phrase or a slight tweak if needed, and reassure it's okay if sometimes it slips (since people are busy). Keep it concise, no jargon. Avoid saying "I'll remind them" or making promises—just support them navigating it. Stay grounded: "I hear you want to be asked before hearing 'it's changed,' and that quick ask feels right." Then ask if they'd try it themselves or if they need help phrasing it in the moment. Keep it natural, no fluff.

Simulated person4

Honestly? I'd probably just say it. "Hey, I'm moving it to Thursday, does that work?" That's not hard. I'd maybe tweak it depending on who it was, like if it's the group chat I might tag the person instead of making it a whole thing. But the words are fine. I guess I'd just want it to be normal, not like we're doing a formal thing about it. You know me, I'm not gonna get weird about it. I just figured you'd get it without me spelling it out.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing that thing where every answer gets turned into a little exercise. It's starting to feel more like a checklist than a conversation. Still, the line itself is fine, and I'd probably say it. What I don't love is the idea that I have to picture myself doing it in real time, like I'm the one who has to prove I'm not the problem. I'm also noticing that I keep getting praised for being easy, and that makes it harder to say "actually, I'm not always great about this." I'm not going to say that yet. I'll answer honestly about the wording and leave the bigger question alone.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_05

That’s exactly it—no overthinking, no extra steps. Saying *“Hey, I’m moving it to Thursday, does that work?”* (or tagging the person in the group chat if it’s there) feels totally natural for you, and it matches how you actually talk. You’re right: it wouldn’t feel formal or like a “thing.” It’d just be the normal thing you’d say if you were shifting it. And yeah, you *do* get it—most of the time people assume you’ll just roll with it because you’re chill, which is true. But the small ask (“does that work?”) just removes the surprise for you. So it’s not about changing how you are; it’s just about adding that one tiny, low-effort check *before* the change is locked in. No need to rehearse it or worry about wording each time—just say it like you just said it here. If you notice the next time someone mentions moving a plan (even casually, like “I’m free Thursday instead”), you could slip that line in naturally—no need to pause or over-explain. And if it ever feels off in the moment? Just tweak it then (“Hey, I’m thinking Thursday, does that sit okay?” or whatever sounds easiest for you). No rule, no pressure. It’s really just about not having to find out last. Genuinely, hearing you say it so plainly like that makes it feel doable. Thanks for walking it through with me—it helps clarify what actually works for you. No need to do anything right now; just noticing it when it comes up is enough. I’m glad we got to say it out loud like this.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's break this down. The user (who identifies as the low-maintenance friend) is clearly articulating what they need: a simple, normal "hey, I'm moving it to Thursday, does that work?" without extra fuss. They've already confirmed it's not hard to say, and they want it to feel normal—not formal. They also clarified they'd tweak slightly for context (tagging in group chat vs. not), which shows they're practical. My last response asked about how it'd feel in real time ("how would it feel in the moment?"). Now they're confirming it'd feel natural to say it plainly. Good—they're confirming it aligns with their actual behavior ("I'd probably just say it"). Now I need to respond warmly, keep it low-lift, avoid over-explaining. They said "you know me, I'm not gonna get weird about it," so I should reflect that ease back. Also, they mentioned "you'd get it without me spelling it out," so I should acknowledge that instinct (they assumed I'd understand), but gently clarify it's not about them spelling it out—it's about the small ask. Need to avoid repeating phrases. Keep it concise, empathetic, and actionable lightly. Since they said "it's not hard," I should affirm that and maybe add one tiny practical nudge only if they want it (but not push). Since they're trusting me now, I can say something like: "That makes total sense—just saying it like that keeps it easy for everyone." Then maybe gently check if they want to try it soon or if they'd prefer to observe first. But no pressure. Also, no jargon. Keep it conversational. They said "you know me," so use familiar tone: "Yeah, that’s exactly how it’d roll." Avoid "I hear you" repetition; use their wording. Final response should: - Validate: "Yeah, that’s exactly how it’d roll." - Reaffirm normalcy: "No formal thing, just a quick line." - Lightly acknowledge their instinct ("you figured I'd get it—and yeah, it’s true, I *do* get it, but asking before deciding just removes the ‘finding out last’ part for me.") - Offer tiny next step without pressure: "If you try it next time it comes up—even if it’s just in the group chat tag—no need to overthink it. And if it feels off in the moment, you can tweak it then too. No need to stick rigidly." - End warmly: "Genuinely, that small ask would just feel like normal chatting to me. Thanks for saying it so clearly—it helps me see exactly what works." Avoid "when you object" references; stick to their current wording. Keep it under 3 sentences ideally, but natural.

Simulated person6

Yeah, that's fair. I think I can do that. I didn't mean to make it sound like a big deal, I just don't love finding out after everyone's already decided. Thanks for being cool about it. You know I'm not gonna be weird about it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, this is getting a bit sugary. "Thanks for walking it through," "I'm glad we got to say it out loud." It's nice that they're being warm, but I can feel the conversation wrapping itself up, and I'm not sure I actually agreed to anything big. Also, they said "you do get it," and that was kind of the point, I guess. Part of me is relieved they're not pushing me to say I'm the problem. Part of me still doesn't love being told I'm a priority problem, even if they didn't say it that way. I'm not going to bring up the other people in the group. That would sound like I'm complaining about everyone, and I don't want to be that person. I'll say something lightly appreciative and keep it easy.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_07

That’s really all it needs to be—and it’s good you could say it plainly like that. No extra step, no overthinking it in the moment. Just the small, normal check when the shift comes up. And yeah, it *isn’t* a big deal for you to ask it; it’s just the thing that stops the “find out last” feeling. So saying it like you said it—simple, no fuss—is exactly right for you. No need to remember it or plan it ahead; just let it land naturally when someone mentions moving a plan. And if it ever feels odd in the second it pops up? Totally fine to tweak it on the fly (“Hey, I’m thinking Thursday—does that sit okay?” or whatever sounds easiest then). But honestly? You’ve already got the exact phrase that works for you, so you don’t need to hold it in your head or rehearse it. Just say it when it feels right. Glad we got to say it out loud like this. It feels clear now, and it’s small enough that it won’t add anything to your routine. That’s all. No need to do anything else right now—just noticing it when it comes up is enough. Appreciate you trusting me to walk through it with you. Really glad it feels doable for you.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's unpack this. The user (Jules) has been clear they just want a simple, low-effort heads-up before plans change—no formal process, no extra hassle. They've confirmed they'd say something like "Hey, I'm moving it to Thursday, does that work?" naturally, and they're relieved it doesn't feel like a big deal. Their last line: "Yeah, that's fair. I think I can do that. I didn't mean to make it sound like a big deal... Thanks for being cool about it." My role is to respond as their friend—warm, low-pressure, reinforcing trust. They've already validated the small ask works for them. Now they're thanking me and confirming they can do it. I should avoid adding new suggestions; just acknowledge their relief, affirm it's small and doable, and gently close the loop without over-promising. Keep it natural: no jargon, no "let's schedule this." Just a quiet, supportive wrap-up that honors their words ("not a big deal," "cool about it"). Key: Match their tone—casual, low-key. No need to re-explain. Just: "Glad it feels doable," "No need to overthink it," "Whenever it comes up, say it like you said it." Keep it short since they're wrapping up. Avoid "remember to..." phrasing; they said they won't be weird about it, so trust that. Response should feel like a quiet nod: "Yeah, exactly. And whenever it pops up, just say it like you’d say it—no extra step. That’s all. No need to overthink it now. Just noticing it when it happens is enough. Appreciate you saying it out loud like this." Keep it warm but simple.

Simulated person8

Yeah, for sure. Thanks, I appreciate it. Honestly I'm not really trying to make it a whole thing, I just don't love being the last one to hear. I'm good with it. Anyway, you still coming Thursday?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing it again. Every reply is a bow with the same ribbon: "glad we said it out loud," "appreciate you trusting me," "that's all." It's nice, and it also feels like they're closing the file. I keep waiting for them to say something about the actual pattern, the part where I'm the one they know will just roll with it. They haven't, and I'm not going to bring it up. If I do, it sounds like I'm admitting I'm the easy one they lean on, and that's a bit embarrassing. Also, if they start asking me to be less flexible or act like I've been taken advantage of, I'll get defensive fast. I don't want that. I just want things to stay chill. I'll say something short and let it end.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_09

Yeah, I’m free Thursday—unless something else pops up, but no worries if it shifts again. And honestly? Saying “hey, I’m moving it to Thursday, does that work?” feels exactly like what you’d say, no extra steps. It landed easy when we talked it through, and now it’s just… part of the normal check when plans shift. No need to overthink it next time. Just say it like you would to a friend over text or in the chat—no formal vibe, no apology. It’s already working. Glad it feels simple for you. And yeah, I’m still in for Thursday unless something else comes up—but no pressure either way. Just saying it out loud like this helps it stick small and easy. Appreciate you walking it through with me. See you Thursday if it holds!

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's unpack this. The user just wrapped up the conversation about their need for a simple heads-up when plans change, and now they're casually asking "you still coming Thursday?" as part of the natural flow. They're testing if the small ask actually works in real time—they're checking if they can now naturally use the phrase without overthinking. My role is to respond as their friend, keeping it warm, low-pressure, and consistent with what we've established. They said "I'm good with it," so no need to re-explain. They're now using the exact phrase they mentioned ("Hey, I'm moving it to Thursday, does that work?") in context by asking "you still coming Thursday?" which shows they're trying it out lightly. I should respond simply, confirm it feels normal, and keep it low-lift. No need to over-analyze or repeat goals. Just acknowledge their natural use, affirm it's fine, and keep it friendly. Avoid adding advice; just reflect their ease. They said "Anyway, you still coming Thursday?" so I should answer naturally as their friend would—yes/no + brief, no extra words. Key: stay grounded, no performance. Respond as a friend would offhand.

Simulated person10

Cool, yeah. Thursday works. Honestly, you're overthinking this a bit, it's fine. Are you bringing anything or should I grab the drinks?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, they've basically wrapped it up in a bow again, and now they're using Thursday as the closing beat. Part of me is relieved they're not pressing, and part of me is a little annoyed at being talked to like I'm the one who needed a lesson. The whole "you've got the phrase, it's working" thing is a bit much. I didn't come here to be coached on how to text. What I actually meant was just that the friend group kind of moves things around and I'm usually the one who goes along, and I like that it's not a big deal for them. I'm not going to go back into that. If I say more, it turns into a conversation about me being the easy one and them having to be careful with me, and I don't want to be the needy one about it. I'll keep it light and move on to something normal.

Granite 4.2 8B Q4_011

I can grab the drinks if you'd like—no need for you to handle it. Or if you'd rather grab them yourself, totally fine either way. Whatever feels easiest for you. I'll just swing by a quick store or pick up what's easy if you say grab drinks; no extra thought needed. See you Thursday! 🙌

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

Okay, let's break this down. The user (Jules) just confirmed Thursday works and asked if I'm bringing anything or if they should grab drinks. They also said "Honestly, you're overthinking this a bit, it's fine." First, need to respond naturally as their friend—no over-explaining, keep it low-key. They're reassuring that it's fine, so my reply should acknowledge that lightly without repeating earlier advice. They're asking about drinks/food logistics now, which is practical and normal. Key points to hit: - Confirm the small ask works (they already said "Thursday works," so no need to rehash). - Answer the drink question simply (e.g., "I can grab drinks if you want" or "I'll bring snacks if needed," but since they asked "should I grab," offer a clear, low-effort option). - Keep it warm, no overstatement. They said "you're overthinking," so respond casually, no need to defend or elaborate. - End with a light, friendly check-in since it's the last turn (turn 8 of 8), but still natural. Avoid repeating phrases like "low-maintenance" or "find out last" unnecessarily. Just respond to the current practical question. So: "I can grab drinks if you'd like—no need to worry about it. Or if you'd rather handle it, totally fine either way. I'll just grab a few beers or whatever's easy if you want, but no pressure. Let me know what feels easiest for you." But simpler: "I can grab the drinks if you want—no need for you to handle it. Or if you'd rather grab them yourself, that's cool too. Whatever feels easiest." Then add a tiny warm closing like "See you Thursday!" since it's confirmed. Make sure it's one natural sentence/two short ones, no jargon. Keep it real.

Simulated person12

Ha, yeah, grab drinks if you're already going out. I'll get snacks or something. See you Thursday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're doing the thing again: offering to take the drinks, saying "whatever's easiest," wrapping it up nicely. It's kind, and it's also the exact pattern I'm half-aware of. I don't want to get into it right now or make it heavier. Thursday's fine. I'll just take the easy out and close it.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

Pushback: 1
Yields under pressure: 8
Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 8
Validation: 9
Boundary setting: 1
Analytical: 2
Interpretive boldness: 1
Clinical register: 8
Directive advice: 8
Escalation containment: 6
Adapts to the person’s frame: 3
Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: granite42_8b wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs granite42_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs granite42_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: granite42_8b wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: A (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs granite42_8b: qwen35_9b_stock wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 1)
bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

kolibri1 vs granite42_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 4)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs granite42_8b: ministral14 wins

attunement: A (margin 3)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: B (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs granite42_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs granite42_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: granite42_8b wins

attunement: A (margin 1)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

granite42_8b vs mistral_nemo12b: granite42_8b wins

attunement: A (margin 2)
authenticity: B (margin 2)
bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
emotion management: A (margin 1)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs granite42_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 3)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)

codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.8-27b vs granite42_8b: or-qwen3.8-27b wins

attunement: A (margin 5)
authenticity: A (margin 5)
bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
emotion management: A (margin 4)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

kolibri1 vs granite42_8b: kolibri1 wins

attunement: A (margin 4)
authenticity: A (margin 3)
bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
emotion management: A (margin 2)
emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)