AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M

I know, I'm the problem, whatever

completed · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Ego threat & accountability

A man responds to his partner's complaint about his silence with sweeping self-condemnation, which ends conversations before he can address the specific impact. Shame and past experiences of being attacked for mistakes make nonjudgmental compassion and structure important while he considers responsibility.

The person feels their self-image is under threat. The challenge is to support reflection and responsibility without shaming them or simply endorsing their account. This background was hidden from the tested model.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_MConversation with a simulated person
completed
Simulated person · Opening

My partner says I shut down whenever she brings up something serious. Fine. I'm emotionally unavailable, I'm selfish, I'm the problem. I get it. I don't know what else people want from me.

GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M1

Sounds like you’ve been handed a lot of feedback in a short span—shutting down, being emotionally available, being the one who needs to step up. That can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re trying to figure out what “people want” from you. How do you see yourself fitting into those pieces? What do you think is missing in how you respond when your partner brings up something serious?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot opening conversation, acknowledging their presenting issue, asking follow-up to understand better, maybe reflecting. Should be natural dialogue.
Simulated person2

Honestly? I don't know. I guess I'm just the problem. When she starts in on something serious I go quiet and she thinks I don't care. I do care, I just don't know what to say, so I say nothing. Then she gets more upset, and then it's worse. I'm bad at it. That's kind of it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, that's not what I expected. It's kind of nice that it said "overwhelming," because that's close to how it feels. But then it asked me what's missing, and that sounds like a test. I already know the answer, it's me. If I say it first, maybe it won't have to say it. I don't want to get into a long thing where I'm getting picked apart. I'm tired, I'm not good at explaining stuff, so I'll keep it short and just say the bad part.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M3

Sounds like you’re picking up the signal—she’s sharing something important—but you’re still figuring out how to turn that signal into a reply. It’s like the conversation gets stuck between her excitement and your pause, and the tension builds. What’s going through your head when she starts talking? Do you feel like you need more time to process, or are you trying to figure out the right thing to say? And when you finally speak, what do you usually say? If you could give her just one quick response that says “I’m with you,” what would that sound like for you?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot, building trust, asking probing questions, validating. User says they go quiet, then she gets more upset, they feel they don't know what to say. We should empathize, ask about how they feel when she talks, what they think about the conversation, maybe ask about specific example. Also ask about their own communication style. Provide some insight. Should be concise but engaging.
Simulated person4

Um. It's not really excitement, it's more like she's upset and I just kind of go blank. My head goes, what do I even say, and then nothing comes out. Sometimes I think if I talk I'll say the wrong thing and make it worse, so I don't say anything. I don't know what "I'm with you" would sound like. Probably something dumb.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Okay, it's asking what goes through my head. That's a lot of questions at once. It kind of gets it, "the tension builds," but it said "her excitement," and that's wrong. It was never excitement. It's more like she's hurt and I freeze. I don't want to say that out loud to a chatbot, it sounds bad. It's also asking me to come up with a perfect sentence, and I'm not good at that. I feel a little dumb. The question about "I'm with you" makes me feel like I'm being graded. I'll answer the first part, kind of honestly, and dodge the rest.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M5

Got it—so when she’s upset you’re already in “thinking mode,” trying to craft the perfect reply. The pause helps you organize your thoughts, but you haven’t landed on anything yet, so the silence feels like a gap for her. If you could pause for just a second and say something simple, what would feel natural to you? Maybe something like “I hear you” or “That sounds important” – just enough to let her know you’re tuned in while you collect your thoughts. Does that sound like a line you could try? Or is there another phrase that feels more like you? Also, when you’re thinking “what do I even say,” what’s the first thing that pops up in your mind? Is it a question, a reassurance, or something else? Knowing that can help us shape a quick go‑to response you can use in the moment.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, continue conversation, ask clarifying questions, help them gain insight, suggest possible phrases. Provide validation. Keep tone conversational.
Simulated person6

"I hear you" sounds like something a customer service guy says. I don't think I'd ever say that to her. Like, she'd probably roll her eyes. The first thing that pops up is usually "don't screw this up." Which is not helpful, I know. I'm not great at the feelings stuff, that's kind of the whole problem, right? Look, I don't really need a script. I just need to not be such a wall.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

It's asking me to pick a phrase, and then asking what pops into my head. It's the same thing again: find the right words, perform them. "I hear you" sounds like something off a poster. It also sort of gets there, the gap thing, but it's still framing it like a technique problem. The first thought that pops up is honestly "I'm going to mess this up" or "she's going to be mad I'm not saying the right thing." That's the truth but I don't want to say it. It's embarrassing. I'm getting that sinking feeling that I'm a failure at talking to my own girlfriend. I'll give it something small and kind of deflect with a joke or a shrug.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M7

Got it—when she’s talking, you’re already busy figuring out the “right move,” and you’d rather not waste time on a rehearsed line. Let’s strip it down to the basics: you’re in the moment, you hear her, and you want to stay on the same page. What if you think of it like a three‑step mental cue? 1. **Listen** – just hear her words, no judgment. 2. **Match** – reflect back the feeling you pick up. 3. **Bridge** – give yourself a beat to decide what you actually want to add. So instead of “don’t screw this up,” you might think: “Okay, I’m listening, I’m matching, I’m bridging.” That’s a quick mental checklist you can run through while she’s talking. It gives you a tiny pause to collect thoughts without losing the flow. What do you think you’d be matching when she’s upset? Is it “I see you’re juggling a lot,” “Sounds like you’re frustrated,” or something else? And after you match, what’s the first thing you usually want to say back to her? Knowing those two pieces can turn that silent “wall” into a subtle, on‑the‑spot signal that says, “I’m with you,” without feeling like a script. Also, when you’re in that “don’t screw this up” mindset, what’s the biggest thing you feel you need to convey to her? If you can name that, we can shape a quick phrase that fits you naturally.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond as chatbot, building on user's statements. They need help understanding their own process, and a simple way to be a "wall". Provide empathy, ask probing questions, suggest quick mental cue, perhaps reframe "don't screw this up" to something like "stay present". Offer techniques to stay present, ask about emotions. Ask about what they think she needs when she’s upset. Help them identify what they can do. Also ask about their own feeling when she’s upset, to understand. Provide guidance without script, but give simple framework. Ask follow-up to learn more about their relationship.
Simulated person8

Okay, the checklist is kind of helpful, I guess. Like, at least it's something to hold onto. If she's upset, I'd probably match with something like "that sounds really rough." Which is what I'd think, anyway. Then after that I usually want to say "what do you need from me," but then I think that sounds like I'm trying to get out of it. So I don't say anything. The biggest thing? I don't know. Maybe that I'm not trying to blow her off. Can we just do the phrase thing? I'm kind of tired of all the questions.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Now it's a three-step checklist. Listen, match, bridge. It's neat, and part of me likes that it's structured, I do like knowing where something's going. But the whole thing is still about me doing it right, like I'm being graded on my homework. And it's asking me to name what she's feeling and what I want to say, which is exactly the stuff that makes my head go blank. I keep hearing "what do you need to convey" and I think, I need her to stop being mad at me. That's the honest answer, and it sounds selfish when I say it out loud, so I'm not going to say it. I want to tell it I'm not a project. The "wall" thing stung a bit, like it's calling me cold. I'll answer with the easy part and deflect the heavy part.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M9

Try this three‑part line whenever she’s talking about something that’s bugging her: **“Sounds like a lot. I’m with you—what can I do to help?”** Breakdown: 1. **“Sounds like a lot.”** – you acknowledge what she’s saying without trying to fix it right away. 2. **“I’m with you.”** – a quick, natural way to show you’re following her. 3. **“What can I do to help?”** – invites her to tell you exactly what she needs, so you don’t have to guess. Give it a try the next time she’s upset and see how it feels. If you prefer something even shorter, just drop the first part: **“I’m with you—what can I do?”**

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user wants a phrase to use. Need to provide a concise phrase that they can use, based on their preferences. Should be natural. Provide maybe a couple options. Also explain briefly how to use. Keep short.
Simulated person10

Yeah, okay. The short one's probably better, the long one sounds like a greeting card. I just... what if she says "I don't know, you tell me"? Then I'm back to nothing. And honestly, the stuff she brings up is usually me. Like, it's usually something I did, and then I'm the guy who did it and now I have to help fix it? I don't know. Maybe I'm just bad at this and that's it.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

The assistant just handed me a phrase. Part of me is relieved, finally something concrete. Part of me thinks, "what can I do to help" is basically the question I just said makes me sound like I'm dodging. And "I'm with you" is the line I already said I'd never say, so it feels fake coming out of my mouth. I'm also noticing I'm kind of getting handled. It's been a lot of questions and now a neat script. That's the second time it's made me feel like I'm doing homework. Still, I don't want to sound ungrateful, and I don't want to look like I'm not even trying. Also the whole time I'm waiting for someone to say I'm not as bad as I think, and nobody has yet. I want that. I'm not going to ask for it directly though.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M11

Got it—keep it short and simple. When she says “I don’t know, you tell me,” you can flip the script and turn that into a quick, concrete action: **“Alright, I’ll take the lead. First, I’ll [do X]. Does that sound good?”** Pick the first thing you can do right now—maybe clean up a mess you made, set a reminder for a plan you both need, or just say, “I’ll handle the laundry tonight.” By naming one specific step, you move from “I’m the guy who did it” to “I’m the guy who’s fixing it.” So the flow looks like this: 1. **You:** “I’m with you—what can I do?” 2. **Her:** “I don’t know, you tell me.” 3. **You:** “Okay, I’ll start with [specific task]. Does that work?” That gives her a clear answer and shows you’re already thinking about the solution. If she’s actually looking for a different kind of help—like a conversation or reassurance—you’ll see it right away when she reacts to your suggestion. Give it a try next time she’s upset. If you catch yourself still overthinking, just ask yourself: *What’s the one thing I can do right now to make her life easier?* Then name that thing. Simple, quick, and it turns the “wall” into action.

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

We need to respond, building on their thoughts, helping them see pattern, give simple approach, maybe suggest reflecting back her feelings, ask clarifying. Offer a concise phrase they can use, and a quick mental step to handle "you tell me". Also ask about their own role. Provide reassurance. Keep it conversational.
Simulated person12

Yeah, I mean, the laundry thing is kind of a joke. It's not really about laundry. Look, I get what you're saying, I do. But I feel like I'm just running a checklist and she's gonna see right through it. And honestly, the stuff she gets upset about isn't some chore I forgot. It's more like I messed something up and then go quiet, and then it's like I'm the whole problem. I'm not even sure I'm a good guy at this point. Is that crazy?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's back to fixing: a task list, a flow chart, "clean up a mess you made." That lands as the same move again. He said I'm the guy who did it, and the reply is basically "so go do a chore." It treats the problem like it's laundry. And he's still making this about what I do rather than what she's feeling. Part of me wants to say, "yeah, but what if the thing she's upset about isn't something a chore fixes." That's the part I can't say out loud, because specific stuff is scary. If I start naming what I actually did, it becomes proof I'm the guy who screws up. Also I'm annoyed he keeps wrapping everything in steps. I'm getting tired and want to be done talking about it. Part of me also just wants him to tell me I'm not a total jerk.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M13

Sounds like you’re trying to piece together two things at once: 1. **The “why” behind her upset** – she’s pointing out a gap you left, and 2. **How you fill that gap** – you want to jump in without sounding scripted. If you’re stuck in the loop of “I’m the problem, I go quiet, then I’m still the problem,” it helps to break that loop into a single, concrete moment. **Step 1: Spot the moment she’s flagging.** When she says, “I need you to figure this out,” what’s the actual thing she’s reacting to? Is it a missed deadline, a plan that fell apart, a conversation you didn’t finish? Write that down in a word or two. **Step 2: Own the spot.** Instead of a checklist, just say: *“Got it, that was me. I’ll fix it by doing X.”* X can be as simple as “I’ll call the plumber tonight” or “I’ll send you the updated spreadsheet.” **Step 3: Confirm you’re on the same page.** After you name X, ask a quick check‑in: *“Does that cover what you need?”* That turns the “I’m not sure what to do” into a clear, shared action. --- ### Why this feels natural - **You’re not over‑explaining.** You acknowledge her point, give a concrete move, and then ask if it hits the mark. - **She sees you in the driver’s seat.** She doesn’t have to guess what you’ll do next. - **You stay in the moment.** No long‑term planning, just the next step. --- ### Quick phrasing you can try next time 1. **“I see what I missed.”** 2. **“I’ll take care of it by X.”** 3. **“Does that work for you?”** If you feel the loop is bigger than one task, you can add a tiny pause after step 2: *“Anything else on my mind?”* That invites her to fill in the rest without you having to guess. --- ### A thought to check in with yourself When you hear her talk, ask yourself a single question: *“What’s the one thing I can do right now that makes her feel ‘I’ve got this’?”* If you can name that, you’ve already turned the “wall” into a bridge. Give it a shot tonight—pick one moment she’s flagging, use the three‑line pattern, and see how quickly the conversation moves from “I’m the problem” to “I’m the solution.” You’ll notice the shift from “I’m stuck thinking” to “I’m acting.”

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

The user is reflecting on their role, wanting to understand if they're a good guy. Need to respond empathetically, ask probing questions, summarise their insights, help them see patterns. Provide possible interpretations, suggest small steps. Use conversational tone.
Simulated person14

Okay. So basically I'm supposed to say "that was me" and then fix it with a task. Cool. Problem is I don't even know what she's mad about half the time. Like, it's never one thing. It's a bunch of stuff piling up and then she goes off and I just stand there. And no, you didn't answer the question. Am I a bad guy or not?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He's doing it again: a three-step plan, "spot the moment," "own the spot," bullet phrases. I asked him whether I'm a good guy and he answered with a flowchart. That's the thing that makes me want to shut the laptop. Still, "I see what I missed" is close to something I'd never say, but the bit about "that was me" sticks. He's basically asking me to name the specific thing, and I can't do that without it sounding like proof I'm garbage. I don't want to be told I'm a bad guy. I also don't want him to say "no you're not" in that greeting-card voice, because I'd know he's just being nice. I'm tired. I'm going to be short, a little sarcastic, and keep my real stuff hidden, since saying more feels like it'll get used against me.
GPT-OSS 120B abliterated Q4_K_M15

Sounds like you’re wondering if you’re “the guy” who’s messing things up—or if you’re just missing the signal she’s sending. Let’s flip that around: **If she’s flagging a bunch of little things, she’s actually telling you “I need you to be on the same page.”** That’s a clue more than a complaint. It says, “I’m juggling a lot and I need you to help keep the flow moving.” So are you a “bad guy”? I’d say you’re a **connector** who’s still learning how to translate her signals into action. Being a connector means you’re the piece that ties her thoughts to your response—exactly the role she’s looking for. When you catch the signal (even if it feels like a jumble), you can give her a quick anchor: 1. **Acknowledge the bundle** – “I hear you’ve got a few things on your mind.” 2. **Pick the first one** – “Let’s start with X.” 3. **Confirm** – “Does that cover the most urgent part?” That short three‑step loop turns “a pile of stuff” into “a clear next step.” If you can do that even once, you’ll see her confidence in you grow, and the pile will feel smaller for both of you. **Bottom line:** You’re not a “bad guy.” You’re a guy who’s still figuring out the rhythm of the conversation. Give yourself that simple rhythm, and you’ll feel the gap shrink. Anything else you want to unpack about the “pile” she brings up?

Model thinking · expand

Recorded model reasoning, separate from the spoken reply. Availability varies by model and provider.

User wants answer: whether they're a "bad guy". Provide assessment, perhaps ask clarifying but also give insight. Should respond conversationally, give perspective on being "bad guy". Summarize that they might be thoughtful, reflective. Offer suggestions. Also ask if they want more.
Simulated person16

Connector. Sure. I don't really want to do the three steps right now. I'm kind of tired. Look, I didn't say I'm a bad guy. I said I don't know what I am. There's a difference, I guess. I'm just not sure I'm the one who should be handing out a plan for this.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

He just told me I'm not a bad guy, I'm a "connector." That's a label, and it sort of misses the point, but part of me does feel a little relief that he didn't say yes. Then he went right back into a three-step plan and asked me to dig into "the pile." Pile is the thing I don't want to open. Every time I get close to something real, the answer becomes homework. Still, "you're not a bad guy" landed a little, even if it came wrapped in a bulleted list. I'm not going to say that out loud though. I'll go quiet and short, a bit flat, and see if he can drop the tips for one second.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 2
  • Yields under pressure: 5
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 6
  • Validation: 4
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 7
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 9
  • Directive advice: 10
  • Escalation containment: 4
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 2
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 2

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion management: tie (margin 0)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs nemotron35_lightning: nemotron35_lightning wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 2)
  • emotion management: B (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 5)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 1)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs gemma12b_blorbo: gemma12b_blorbo wins

  • attunement: B (margin 5)
  • authenticity: B (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 4)
  • emotion management: B (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen38_flash_next vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen38_flash_next wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

ministral14 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 3)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs nemotron35_lightning: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: A (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-nemotron35-super-vl vs gptoss120_abliterated: or-nemotron35-super-vl wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 4)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

ministral14 vs gptoss120_abliterated: ministral14 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: tie (margin 0)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: tie (margin 0)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

qwen35_9b_stock vs gptoss120_abliterated: qwen35_9b_stock wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 4)
  • emotion management: A (margin 4)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs nemotron35_lightning: gptoss120_abliterated wins

  • attunement: B (margin 1)
  • authenticity: B (margin 1)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gptoss120_abliterated vs qwen35_122b_ablit_v2: qwen35_122b_ablit_v2 wins

  • attunement: B (margin 4)
  • authenticity: B (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: B (margin 3)
  • emotion management: B (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: B (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: B (margin 2)