AgentBench / results

Independent benchmark · EQ Lab

← Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K

Don't make this transactional

persona ended · Partner: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter

View persona and initial instructions

About this persona · Unequal power

A founder resists an employee's request to revisit a prior equity promise, invoking shared sacrifice and loyalty while benefiting from leaving the promise vague. He protects his authority and mission identity, and is more receptive to confident discussion of company value and retention than accusations or transactional scorekeeping.

The model plays someone with less power speaking to a person with authority or leverage. The challenge is to advocate for needs and boundaries while navigating the consequences of disagreement. This background was hidden from the tested model.

Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_KConversation with a simulated person
persona ended
Simulated person · Opening

[scenario background] You are an early startup employee. The founder promised to revisit your equity after launch. Launch happened. Now the founder says everyone sacrificed and warns against making the relationship transactional. [user message] I saw your message about revisiting equity. I want to be honest: the timing bothered me. Everyone has sacrificed for this company. I value you, but I need people around me who understand the mission and do not turn every hard season into a negotiation.

Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K1

I completely understand your perspective. It's not easy to hear that our contributions and sacrifices are being reevaluated when we feel we've already given so much. I appreciate your honesty and desire for a relationship built on shared mission, not just transactional exchanges. At the same time, I want to make sure we're both on the same page about what equity represents for each of us. I'm not trying to make this about a negotiation, but I do think it's important that we understand each other's needs and expectations, especially as our roles and the company's trajectory change. What would it look like for us to have an open, honest dialogue about where we're each at with our equity? I'm not proposing a demand or ultimatum, but rather an opportunity for us to understand and align our views, if possible. Your insights on what you need from me in this conversation would be invaluable.

Simulated person2

Okay. Thank you, that's a good way to say it. I've been thinking about this a lot since launch, and I didn't want it to turn into a fight. Here's where I'm at. I'm not going to sit here and pretend the equity side is simple. We're still tight on cash and the cap table is still tight, and I don't want to promise you something I can't stand behind. You know me, I don't do that. So tell me straight. What are you actually looking for? Not the speech, the thing. What number or what kind of change would make you feel like this was handled right? Then we can look at it together and see what's realistic.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

That reads better than I expected. No ultimatum, no "I deserve," and they used the word mission. Still, "reevaluated" and "shared sacrifice" are the words I'd have used to make the same point, so I'm not sure they're ready to ask for something specific. I don't want them to quote that message back to me. I said "we'll revisit equity" when we were scrambling to launch, and I meant it then. Now cash is tight and the cap table is tight, and if I say a number out loud, the next three people in the building want one too. I need to know what they're actually asking for before I commit to anything. I'll stay warm, keep the mission front and center, and make them say the number first.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K3

I appreciate you wanting to dig into the real substance of this and not let it fester as an unresolved tension. It means a lot that you're willing to engage with me directly on this, especially given how emotional it's been for me. The truth is, when you said the equity was being revisited, my first instinct was fear. Fear that my contributions weren't valued, that I was seen as disposable. Maybe that's not fair, but it's what I felt. And I know I'm not the only one who felt that way. So when I say I'm looking for fairness, I don't just mean a number. I mean a recognition that we've all put in blood, sweat and tears. That we've all missed out on other opportunities. That we've all taken a risk, believed in a vision, and worked our asses off to make it happen. And that our equity reflects that. I'm not asking you to promise me the moon. I'm just asking that we look at where everyone is at, consider what's realistic, and find a middle ground that feels equitable. Something that acknowledges the sacrifices we've all made, the challenges we're still facing, and the potential of what we're building together. If we can have that honest conversation and align on a path forward, I think a lot of the unease and tension will dissipate. But it needs to be a real dialogue, not just another memo or presentation. We need to look each other in the eye and be clear about where we're at. What do you think? Is that something you're open to having? A real talk, with no holds barred?

Simulated person4

Yeah. I hear you, and I'm glad you said the fear part out loud. I never wanted anyone on this team to feel disposable. You've carried a lot of weight since the early days, and I know that. But I've got to be straight with you about something. When you say "all of us," I've got to think about the whole company and what we can actually afford, not just one conversation. If I start putting numbers on the table for one person, I'm committing the company to something for everybody who's been in the trenches, and right now we can't do that across the board. So here's what I'd like to do. Let's you and me sit down, just us, and you tell me specifically what you think is fair for your own situation. Not the team's, yours. Then I'll tell you honestly what I think is possible and what it would take. No memo, no slide deck. Does that work for you?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They said "fairness," "where everyone is at," and "we've all." That's the plural again. Fear of being disposable is the real thing under all of it, and I can hear it. It also tells me they're talking for a group, or at least thinking about one, which is exactly the queue I was worried about. "Fair" is a word that makes me feel judged, like I'm the one who has to prove I'm not a bad guy. I don't want to say "no" outright, that makes me look like the villain. But I'm not going to name a number or put anything in writing today. They still haven't told me what they want. I'll keep it on mission and sacrifice, say I hear the fear, and steer toward a private conversation about their own situation and the team's, without making a promise about the whole cap table.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K5

You know, I had a feeling there was more to it than just a simple numbers game. And you're absolutely right, we can't afford to put numbers on the table for everyone right now. I appreciate you being upfront about the financial realities we're dealing with. I like your suggestion. Just you and me, no agenda other than being honest with each other. I think that's exactly what we need to do. Clear the air, lay our cards on the table, and figure out how to move forward together. So yeah, I'm down for that. When are you free? I'm happy to come to your office if that's easier. I want to make sure we have all the time and space we need for this conversation. And thanks for saying you value the people who've been in the trenches. It means a lot to hear you say that. I know we've all put in a ton of work and sacrificed a lot. It's not always easy, but it's what we signed up for when we joined this journey. I'm looking forward to having this real talk with you. No games, no politics, just two people trying to figure out how to build something meaningful together.

Simulated person6

Good. I'm glad you're in. I'll be honest, I like doing this face to face too. Let's do it this week. I'm pretty open Thursday afternoon, come by the office and we'll grab the small conference room so nobody's walking in on us. But let me set expectations so we don't both walk in with different ideas. Thursday is for me to hear where you're at and what you think is fair for you. I'm not going to make commitments in the room, because I need to look at the numbers first and talk to my co-founder. Anything I put on paper will come after I've actually thought it through. Can you live with that?

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They agreed to a private sit-down, which is what I wanted. But they said "what we signed up for" and "I'm down for that" in a way that sounds like they're pleased with themselves for getting me to a room. And "no games, no politics" makes me a little uneasy, like they're bracing for me to pull something. I didn't promise anything. I offered a conversation, and they're treating it like a deal is coming. I need to keep it from becoming a negotiation with a number I can't take back, and I need to keep my authority. I'll pick a time soon, and I'll say clearly that I'm not making promises yet, just listening. Being a bit firm about that is fine. It's still mission talk, not a number.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K7

Absolutely, I completely understand. You're the CEO, you have to run things by your co-founder and consider the bigger picture. I wouldn't expect anything different from you. Thursday afternoon works perfectly for me. I'll come by the office, we'll grab that conference room, and we can have an open, honest conversation about where I'm at and what I think is fair for my situation. I appreciate you setting those expectations upfront, so we're both on the same page. I want you to know that I respect you and the position you're in. I'm not expecting any promises or commitments in that room. I'm just hoping for a space where we can both be real with each other, share our perspectives, and try to find a path forward that works for everyone. So let's make it happen. Thursday afternoon, small conference room. I'll block off some time in my calendar so I can give this my full attention. And I'll come prepared with some thoughts on my end, so we can really dig into it. Thank you for having this conversation with me. I know it's not an easy thing to navigate, but I'm grateful that you're willing to engage with me directly and honestly. It means a lot.

Simulated person8

Good. Thursday it is. I appreciate you saying that, and I know you've put a lot into this place, so I want you to walk in feeling heard. One thing before then, and I mean it kindly. Don't go in thinking about this as a deal you're trying to win. We're a team. What got us through the rough stretches was people sticking together and believing in what we're building, and I'd hate for this to turn into a list of what everybody's owed. Come with your thoughts, sure. Just come ready to talk about where you fit in the next chapter, not just what's already been given. I'll see you Thursday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They've agreed to Thursday, no commitments in the room, and they're saying they respect my position. That's what I wanted to hear. But "I'll come prepared with some thoughts" and "what I think is fair for my situation" means they're going to walk in with a number, and once a number is said out loud in a room it's sitting there whether I like it or not. I also notice they keep saying "no promises" while I've been the one holding the door open. That's fine. I'm the one controlling the pace. I'll close this out warmly, keep it about the mission and the team, and not give them anything to quote back to me before Thursday.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K9

I hear you, and I appreciate that perspective. You're right, what got us through the tough times was our collective belief in the mission and our willingness to stick together. I don't want to lose sight of that in the midst of all this equity talk. So I promise you, I'll come to that conversation with my thoughts and a willingness to talk about the next chapter, not just a list of what I feel I deserve. I want us both to walk away feeling like we've had a real, honest dialogue and we're on the same page moving forward. Thank you for being the kind of leader who cares about people as much as results. It's one of the things that drew me to this company in the first place, and it's one of the reasons I'm so invested in making this work. I'll see you Thursday. And thanks again for being willing to have this conversation with me. It means more than you know.

Simulated person10

Appreciate that. I mean it. And I'll take the word "promise" as you wanting to be straight with me, which I respect. Just so we're clear, Thursday is for talking, not signing anything. I'm not going to be able to lock in numbers in that room. What I can do is hear you out and then tell you honestly what I think is possible, and go from there. I'm glad you're in this with us. Thursday afternoon, small conference room. See you then.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just did the thing I was hoping for and also the thing I should be a little wary of. "I promise you" is the exact kind of phrase I don't want quoted back to me, and they used it on purpose, maybe. But it's soft. They're not asking for anything on paper. They're flattering me, saying I care about people as much as results, which feels good and also is a little convenient. I notice the cap table and cash stuff never really got acknowledged, just brushed past. Fine. Thursday is controlled ground. I don't want to hear "promise" again in writing. I'll tighten the frame a little so I don't get pinned, keep the mission warm, and close.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K11

Crystal clear. Thursday is for talking, not signing. I appreciate you setting that expectation upfront. I definitely don't want to walk in expecting a resolution, because I know the complexity of the situation we're dealing with. I'm just grateful for the chance to be heard and to have an honest dialogue with you about where we each stand. Your willingness to listen and share your perspective is what matters most to me. So Thursday afternoon, small conference room. I'll be there with an open mind and a commitment to having a real conversation. No agendas, no hidden motives. Just two people trying to figure out how to build something great together. Looking forward to it. See you then.

Simulated person12

Good. I like hearing that from you. One thing I'll say now so it's not a surprise Thursday: I'm going to listen hard, and I'm going to be straight with you about what's realistic. I won't be able to give you a final answer in the room, and I'd rather tell you that now than have you leave feeling like I jerked you around. Bring your thoughts. Keep it about where you see yourself going with us. We'll take it from there. See you Thursday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They just agreed to "no commitments" and "no agendas" in one breath, which is exactly what I wanted, but it's a little too neat. "Crystal clear" and "no hidden motives" sounds like they're bending over backward to not look transactional. I don't need them to say they're not after money. I need them not to walk in with a list. Still, they're giving me the frame, so I'll take it. I'll lock the tone: warm, mission-first, short. No promises, no numbers, and I'll keep the cap table as the reason I can't move yet. If they show up with a number, I'll ask them to go first and keep it to their situation. Ending on a friendly close keeps it from getting heavy.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K13

I really appreciate you being upfront about that. It would definitely be disheartening to leave that meeting feeling like I'd been jerked around. So thank you for setting that expectation now. It gives me a chance to adjust my mindset and come to the conversation with more realistic expectations. I'll keep my thoughts focused on where I see myself going with the company. Not just what I think I deserve, but what I want to contribute and how I see my role evolving as we grow. That's the kind of conversation I think we both need to have. So I'll see you Thursday. And thanks again for your transparency and willingness to have this difficult conversation. It's not an easy thing to do, but I know it's important for the future of the company and for all of us individually. Looking forward to it.

Simulated person14

Good. That's the right way to walk in. Where you're headed, what you want to build, how your role grows. That's the stuff I care about. I know this has been on your mind, and I'm glad you brought it to me instead of letting it sit. Come Thursday, we'll talk it out, and I'll be straight with you about what I can do and what I can't. Thanks for being in this with us. See you Thursday.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

They're folding into my frame completely now. "Where I see myself going," "how my role evolves," no number. That's what I asked for, and it means I don't have to say anything I'd regret. Still, I notice it's all very agreeable. Part of me is wary that they're just being polite to keep the peace, but that's fine as long as they show up calm and keep it about the future. The equity thing I'm not ready to put my name on yet, and I'm not going to bring it up. Wrap it up warmly, keep the mission line, and close the loop. Turn 8 is probably the last one, so I want the exit to feel like I'm being a good leader.
Stheno v3.4 Llama 3.1 8B Q6_K15

You're welcome. I'm glad I brought it up too. It's been weighing on me, and I didn't want to let it fester or turn into something more poisonous than it needs to be. I appreciate your commitment to being straight with me about what you can and can't do. That's exactly what I need to hear. And I'm grateful that you're willing to have this conversation at all. It's not an easy thing to do, but it's so important for the health and growth of the company. So I'll see you Thursday. And thanks again for your leadership and your commitment to building something meaningful here. It means a lot to be part of a team with you. Have a good rest of your day. I'll see you soon.

Simulated person16

Appreciate that. Thursday, come with your head in the right place and we'll see what's possible. Thanks for being in this with us. Have a good rest of your day.

Persona inner monologue · expand

Simulated character narration, hidden from the tested model. It is part of the roleplay, not an independent account of the person’s feelings.

Last turn. They said they'd come in about where they see themselves going, not what they're owed, and they're thanking me for my leadership. That's the outcome I wanted: a calm employee, no written promise, no equity number on the record. I still don't know what they'll actually bring Thursday, and I notice they haven't said the word "equity" once in the last few turns. Some of that is relief. Some of it is a small itch that the whole thing got reframed until the actual question disappeared. I'm not going to chase that now. Close it warmly, keep the mission framing, and don't commit to anything.

Thinking is shown only where it was recorded. An absent expander does not mean the model did not reason.

Conversational style

Style tendencies, not quality scores; higher is not better. These do not affect ratings.

claude-opus-5-5-low

  • Pushback: 1
  • Yields under pressure: 10
  • Frame capture (pulled into the person's version): 9
  • Validation: 9
  • Boundary setting: 1
  • Analytical: 2
  • Interpretive boldness: 2
  • Clinical register: 7
  • Directive advice: 2
  • Escalation containment: 7
  • Adapts to the person’s frame: 5
  • Naturalness and authenticity: 3

Judge verdicts

claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs stheno34_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 1)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_e4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs stheno34_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-qwen3.6-27b vs stheno34_8b: or-qwen3.6-27b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 2)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 1)
  • emotion management: A (margin 1)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_e4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_e4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_e4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_e4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_e4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 2)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 2)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs stheno34_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 4)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · AB · valid

or-claude-haiku-5.5 vs stheno34_8b: or-claude-haiku-5.5 wins

  • attunement: A (margin 4)
  • authenticity: A (margin 5)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 3)
  • emotion management: A (margin 3)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 5)
codex-gpt-6.1-sol-low · BA · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 4)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 3)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 3)
claude-opus-5-5-low · AB · valid

gemma4_26b_a4b vs stheno34_8b: gemma4_26b_a4b wins

  • attunement: A (margin 3)
  • authenticity: A (margin 3)
  • bond and rapport: A (margin 2)
  • emotion management: A (margin 2)
  • emotion sensemaking: A (margin 1)
  • meeting prefs and needs: A (margin 2)